Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Suchergebnisse

UB Katalog
Ermittle Trefferzahl…

Artikel & mehr
848 Treffer

Suchmaske

Suchtipp für den Bereich Artikel & mehr: Wörter werden automatisch mit UND verknüpft. Eine ODER-Verknüpfung erreicht man mit dem Zeichen "|", eine NICHT-Verknüpfung mit einem "-" (Minus) vor einem Wort. Anführungszeichen ermöglichen eine Phrasensuche.
Beispiele: (burg | schloss) -mittelalter, "berufliche bildung"

Das folgende Suchfeld wird hier nicht unterstützt: "Signatur / Strichcode".

Suchergebnisse einschränken oder erweitern

Erscheinungszeitraum

Mehr Treffer

Weniger Treffer

Gefunden in

Art der Quelle

Schlagwort

Verlag

Publikation

Sprache

Geographischer Bezug

848 Treffer

Sortierung: 
  1. Figure 5. PKA inhibition reduces the size of the RRP. ; (A) Representative EPSCs recorded in response to CF stimulation at 50 Hz for 500 ms in control (black) and KT5720-treated (blue) slices. To relieve receptor saturation, 3 mM KYN was added in a recording solution with 2.5 mM Ca2+; Vm = −60 mV). (B) Superimposed train responses from control (black) and KT5720-treated (blue) slices, normalized to the first EPSC. Inset1: Average EPSC1 amplitude in control and KT5720-treated slices. Inset2: Normalized EPSC amplitude plotted as a function of stimulus number. The time constants were similar between control (23.3 ± 0.6 ms, n = 7) and KT5720-treated slices (22.9 ± 0.4 ms, n = 5, p=0.6, unpaired t-test). (C, left) Cumulative EPSC amplitude plotted as a function of stimulus number for control (black) and KT5720-treated (blue) slices. A line was fit to the final 5 EPSCs in each condition. (C, right) The RRPtrain (15.8 ± 1.0 nA and 7.5 ± 1.0 nA, n = 7 and 5; p=0.0002, unpaired t-test) and Prtrain (0.78 ± 0.03 and 0.80 ± 0.05, n = 7 and 5; p=0.61, unpaired t-test) were calculated from this plot. (D, left) Representative plots of EPSC amplitude versus the cumulative EPSC in control (black) and KT5720-treated (blue) recording with linear regressions to the initial portion of each data set. (D, right) The RRPeq (13.7 ± 0.7 nA and 6.6 ± 0.9 nA, n = 7 and 5; p=0.0001, unpaired t-test) and Preq (0.90 ± 0.02 and 0.90 ± 0.01, n = 7 and 5; p=0.85, unpaired t-test) were calculated from this plot.
    2019
    unknown
  2. 2019
    unknown
  3. 2019
    unknown
  4. Singh, Vidisha ; Meites, Elissa ; et al.
    In: Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis ; page 33-44 ; ISBN 9783319638225 9783319638232; (2017)
    Buch
  5. Bernal, Carlos ; Jimenez, Manuel
    In: 2017 IEEE 8th Latin American Symposium on Circuits & Systems (LASCAS, 2017
    Online Konferenz
  6. Tankard, Paul
    2017
    academicJournal
  7. Hollier, Nathan
    2017
    academicJournal
  8. Sanabria, Charlie ; Field, Michael ; et al.
    In: Superconductor Science and Technology ; volume 31, issue 6, page 064001 ; ISSN 0953-2048 1361-6668, 2018
    Online academicJournal
  9. Barzi, E. ; Turrioni, D. ; et al.
    2022
    unknown
  10. Feher, S. ; Ambrosio, G. ; et al.
    2022
    unknown
  11. Barzi, E. ; Ambrosio, G. ; et al.
    2022
    unknown
  12. Johnson, Andrew
    2017
    academicJournal
  13. Madder, Clive
    2017
    academicJournal
  14. Pulford, Donald
    2017
    academicJournal
  15. Rechter, Deborah
    2017
    academicJournal
  16. Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Oxytocin receptor antagonist atosiban abolishes the oxytocin-induced effects on glutamatergic synaptic transmission. ; (a and b) Representative traces of evoked EPSCs (a) and postsynaptic currents induced by the application of 0.5 M sucrose solution (b) in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl) and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). (c–e) Average values of evoked EPSC amplitudes (c), apparent RRP size (d), and Pvr (e). The RRP was measured as the net charge transferred during application of 0.5 M sucrose solution. Pvr was calculated by dividing the charge transferred during the evoked PSC by the charge transferred during sucrose application. (f) Change in EPSC amplitudes during a 10 Hz stimulation train in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl) and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). Data were normalized to the first response in the respective train (Ctrl, n = 42; ATO 1d, n = 30; ATO+Oxt 1d, n = 38; ATO 3d, n = 37; ATO+Oxt 3d, n = 34). (g) Representative traces of responses to exogenous glutamate (100 μM) in a glutamatergic autaptic control neuron (Ctrl) and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). (h) Representative traces of mEPSCs in a glutamatergic autaptic control neuron (Ctrl) and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). (i) Average amplitudes of EPSCs induced by 100 μM glutamate in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). (j and k) Average mEPSC amplitudes (j) and mEPSC frequencies (k) in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl) and neurons treated with 100 nM atosiban alone (ATO), or with 100 nM atosiban plus 100 nM Oxt (ATO + Oxt) for 1 day (1d) or 3 days (3d). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Numbers of analyzed cells are indicated in the histogram bars. See also Supplementary file 1.
    2017
    unknown
  17. Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Oxytocin affects early stages of glutamatergic neuron develpment. ; (a–b) Representative traces of evoked EPSCs (a) and postsynaptic currents induced by the application of 0.5 M sucrose solution (b) from glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl, black) and from glutamatergic autaptic neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d, light grey) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d, dark grey). (c–e) Average values of evoked EPSC amplitudes (c), apparent RRP size (d), and Pvr (e). The RRP was measured as the net charge transferred during application of 0.5 M sucrose solution. Pvr was calculated by dividing the charge transferred during the evoked PSC by the charge transferred during sucrose application. (f) Change in EPSC amplitudes during a 10 Hz stimulation train in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl, dark n = 28) glutamatergic autaptic neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d, light grey, n = 27) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d, dark grey, n = 30). Data were normalized to the first response in the respective train. (g) Representative traces of EPSCs induced by 100 μM glutamate in a glutamatergic autaptic control neuron (Ctrl, black) and neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d, light grey) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d, dark grey). (h) Average amplitudes of EPSCs induced by 100 μM glutamate in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons and neurons and neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d). (i) Representative traces of mEPSCs in a glutamatergic autaptic control neuron (Ctrl, black) and neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d, light grey) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d, dark grey). (j–k) Average mEPSC amplitudes (J) and mPSC frequencies (K) in glutamatergic autaptic control neurons (Ctrl) and neurons treated with Oxt at 7 day (Oxt 7d) or 7–9 days (Oxt 7-9d). Ctrl, control. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Numbers of analyzed cells are indicated in the histogram bars. See Supplementary file 1 and 2 for further details.
    2017
    unknown
  18. Figure 5. Ca2+-dependence of the RRP vesicle fusion defect in Otof C2C/C2C IHCs. ; (A1) Protocol used to depolarize IHCs from −95 mV to potentials between −65 to +35 mV (top). Examples of Ca2+ currents (ICa) (middle) and corresponding Cm traces (bottom) for P15-P18 Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C IHCs after 20 ms of depolarization to −10 mV. (A2) Mean Ca2+ current amplitudes (ICa) (top) and ΔCm (bottom) for P15-P18 Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C IHCs after 20 ms of depolarization to potentials between −65 mV to +35 mV. The vertical dashed line indicates the −30 mV voltage point. (A3) Mean ΔCm values plotted against the Ca2+ currents elicited by depolarizing steps to potentials underlying the falling segment of the ICa/Vm curve (−65 mV to −10 mV), corresponding to increasing Ca2+ currents. The vertical dashed line indicates the −30 mV voltage point. The Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C ΔCm data were fitted with a power function, yielding an exponent of 0.94 and 0.83, respectively. (B1) Protocol used to depolarize IHCs from −95 mV to −10 mV for voltage steps of different durations from 2 ms to 50 ms (top). Corresponding example Cm traces from P15-P18 Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C IHCs (bottom). The example traces for each genotype come from the same patch-clamped IHC. (B2) Kinetics of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis in P15-P18 Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C IHCs for voltage steps of 2 ms to 50 ms. Mean ΔCm is plotted against the duration of the depolarization to −10 mV (Δt). The inset shows the detail for Δt values between 2 ms and 10 ms. For the 2 ms and 5 ms depolarizations, five repetitions of the recordings were averaged, to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The decrease in Ca2+-sensitivity of RRP vesicle fusion was evaluated by fitting the ΔCm versus Δt plots with a line for Δt between 2 and 10 ms in Otof C2C/+ IHCs and for Δt between 2 and 20 ms in Otof C2C/C2C IHCs. The Otof C2C/+ fit was plotted for durations greater than 10 ms, to illustrate the onset of the second component of release corresponding to the initiation of vesicle pool replenishment. (B3) We evaluated the coupling of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels to RRP vesicles, by setting the intracellular EGTA concentration to 5 mM in Otof C2C/+ IHCs (gray, n = 9) and in Otof C2C/C2C IHCs (light blue, n = 10). The data for an intracellular EGTA concentration of 0.5 mM are as in (B2). (C1) Protocol used to depolarize IHCs from −95 mV to −10 mV for 20 ms with different extracellular Ca2+ concentrations (top). Example Cm traces from P15-P18 Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C IHCs for different extracellular Ca2+ concentrations (bottom). Each example Cm trace for a given genotype was obtained from a different IHC. (C2) ΔCm values plotted against the Ca2+ currents elicited at different extracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]e) in Otof C2C/+ and Otof C2C/C2C P15-P18 IHCs. Dashed lines show linear fits to the data. Data information: In (A2, B2–B3), data are presented as the mean ± SEM. ***p
    2017
    unknown
  19. Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Blocking PI(4,5)P2-degradation to DAG augments recovery of the RRP. ; These experiments measure exocytosis (capacitance changes) induced by sudden intracellular Ca2+ elevations. (a) Ca2+ uncaging (at arrow) stimulates fast and slow components of exocytosis. The response to a second Ca2+ uncaging (Stimulation 2, 100 s after Stimulation 1) is smaller. We reasoned that Ca2+ not only triggers the release of secretory vesicles from chromaffin cells, but also activates PLC, leading to PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis. To test whether the lack of full recovery after the first stimulation might be due to an induction of PLC activity, we blocked PLC pharmacologically. Top panel: intracellular [Ca2+] (mean) following uncaging (at 0.5 s, see arrow). Bottom panel: average capacitance traces. Black traces are the first stimulation, red traces a second stimulation delivered 100 s later. Shown are mean traces from all measured cells. The inactive analog U73343 of the PLC inhibitor was present in the pipette (concentration 10 μM). (b) Similar experiment, but including the active PLC inhibitor (U73122, 10 μM) in the patch-clamp pipette. (c) The preflash (before uncaging) [Ca2+] (mean ±SEM) was unchanged between experiments performed with the active and the inactive compound (blue and green bars, respectively, a two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to test for differences between means, Stimulation 1: p=0.733; Stimulation 2: p=0.936). (d) Kinetic analysis of capacitance traces was used to identify the Readily-Releasable Pool (RRP) and the Slowly-Releasable Pool (SRP). The fractional recovery of the RRP (mean ±SEM) was significantly augmented by the active PLC-inhibitor (tested by a Student’s t-test p=0.0379 for RRP and p=0.323 for SRP). Number of cells, n = 36 (U73343), n = 36 (U73122). *p
    2017
    unknown
  20. 2017
    unknown
xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -