SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
In: Gaming Law Review, Jg. 9 (2005-06-01), Heft 3, S. 284-287
Online
academicJournal
Zugriff:
The article focuses on a court case related to the gambling industry. The case involves Nevada Gold & Casinos Inc., American Heritage Inc., and Route 66 Casinos LLC. Appellant Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc., develops gaming properties and has real estate interests in several states. Respondent American Heritage, Inc., has business arrangements with Native American tribes to open and operate casinos on tribal land. American Heritage's principal is respondent Fred Gillmann. Nevada Gold and American Heritage own, respectively, 51% and 49% of appellant Route 66 Casinos, LLC, a limited liability company that was organized to operate a casino on tribal land in New Mexico. In this appeal from a district court order denying appellants' motion to compel arbitration, it is considered whether appellants have waived any right to demand arbitration by vigorously litigating the dispute in a Texas court. The operating agreement contains a dispute resolution provision, which provides for mediation of any disputes under the agreement. If mediation is unsuccessful, then the agreement calls for binding arbitration.
Titel: |
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
|
---|---|
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Gaming Law Review, Jg. 9 (2005-06-01), Heft 3, S. 284-287 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2005 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 1092-1885 (print) |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|