Association between chlorination of drinking water and adverse pregnancy outcome in Taiwan.

Chlorination has been the major means of disinfecting drinking water in Taiwan. The use of chlorinated water has been hypothesized to lead to several adverse birth outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm delivery. We performed a study to examine the relationship between the use of chlorinated water and adverse birth outcomes in Taiwan. The study areas included 14 chlorinating municipalities (CHMs), which were defined as municipalities in which greater than 90% of the municipal population was served by chlorinated water, and 14 matched nonchlorinating municipalities (NCHMs), defined as municipalities in which less than 5% of the municipal population is served by chlorinated water. The CHMs and NCHMs were similar to one another in terms of level of urbanization and sociodemographic characteristics. The study population comprised 18,025 women residing in the 28 municipalities who had a first parity singleton birth between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1996 and for which complete information on maternal age, education, gestational age, birth weight, and sex of the baby were available. The results of our study suggest that there was no association between consumption of chlorinated drinking water and the risk of low birth weight. Key words: chlorination, disinfection by-products, drinking water, infants, low birth weight. Environ Health Perspect 108:765-768 (2000). [Online 30 June 2000] http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/108p 765-768yang/abstract.html

The economy and effectiveness of chlorine in killing waterborne organisms has made water chlorination a tremendous public health success worldwide. However, chlorination of water can produce trace amounts of by-products such as trihalomethanes (THMs), which are carcinogenic organic halogenated contaminants of water chlorination (1-3). A number of epidemiologic studies have focused on the possible associations between the consumption of chlorinated drinking water and cancer mortality or incidence (4-15). Most studies have shown positive associations between the use of chlorinated drinking water and colorectal and bladder cancer risk.

Recently, several epidemiologic studies have examined the associations between the consumption of chlorinated water and adverse pregnancy outcomes (16-24). These studies found associations between chlorination and risk of spontaneous abortion, infants being small for gestational age, having low birth weight, or displaying specific birth defects. These studies considered a wide range of populations and regions but have been mainly carried out in the United States. The present study was carried out because few epidemiologic studies have been conducted outside the United States (21,23). There was a need for additional studies using new independent data from other populations, so we undertook the present study in Taiwan to explore further the association between adverse birth outcomes and the use of chlorinated water. This paper is one in a series of studies to assess the hazard potential posed by exposure to chlorinated drinking water.

Selection of study municipalities. Taiwan is divided into 361 administrative districts, which are referred to here as municipalities. We excluded from the analysis 30 aboriginal townships and 9 islets that encompassed different lifestyles and living environments; we also excluded the 12 municipalities of the city of Taipei because of Taipei's distinctly more urban character and larger population than other municipalities in Taiwan. This elimination left 310 municipalities.

Chlorination has been the major means of disinfecting drinking water in Taiwan. Chlorine is currently added to approximately 75.8% of the nation's drinking water. The current Taiwan water system is rather simple. Residents obtain their drinking water either from the public drinking water supply systems served by the Taiwan Water Supply Corporation or from nonmunicipal sources. The major sources of municipal water supplies are almost all surface waters and are treated with chlorine. The nonmunicipal sources are mainly privately owned wells (groundwater) and are unchlorinated.

In this study, we classified an individual municipality as a chlorinating municipality (CHM) if greater than 90% of the municipal population was served by chlorinated water. In all, 156 of the 310 municipalities satisfied this criterion. A nonchlorinating municipality (NCHM) was defined as one in which less than 5% of the municipality population was served by chlorinated water (i.e., greater than 95% of the residents obtained their drinking water from unchlorinated water sources). In all, 15 municipalities satisfied this criterion. These 15 NCHMs provided a unique opportunity to investigate the issue of chlorination. To take into account the possible confounding effect resulting from differing levels of urbanization, the urbanization level of the nonchlorinating municipalities should be the same as that of the chlorinating municipalities. The assignment of urbanization levels was based on the urban-rural classification of Tzeng and Wu (25). This urbanization index has been applied in our previous studies (26-29). Each municipality in Taiwan (n = 361) was assigned to an urbanization category from 1 to 8. Municipalities with the highest urbanization score, such as the Taipei metropolitan area, were classified in category 1, whereas mountainous areas with the lowest score were assigned to category 8.

Each NCHM was matched with a CHM with the same urbanization level. Among the 15 NCHMs, one was excluded because there was no appropriate municipality for matching. If an NCHM had more than one appropriate matching CHM, we used a random sampling method to select the CHM. Details of the procedure were described by Yang et al. (15). The sociodemographic characteristics of the CHMs and NCHMs were generally similar except for a higher population and a higher percentage of population using the chlorinated water among the CHMs (96.1 vs. 1.5%) (Table 1).

Data collection. Data on pregnancy outcomes were taken from the routine registration of births. Registration of births is required by law in Taiwan. It is the responsibility of the parents or the family to register infant births at a local household registration office within 15 days. Computerized data on live births were collected from the Household Registration System, which is managed by the Department of Interior in Taipei. The registration form, which asks for information on maternal age, education, parity, gestational age, date of delivery, infant sex, and birth weight, is completed by the physician attending the delivery. Because most deliveries in Taiwan take place in either a hospital or clinic (30) and the birth certificates are completed by physicians attending the delivery, and because it is mandatory to register all live births at local household registration offices, the birth registration data are considered complete and accurate. We did not include twins or multiple pregnancies in the analysis. Gestational ages for live births that were outside the range of 20-50 weeks were considered invalid (31).

There were 43,807 singleton deliveries in the study municipalities between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1996. Of the 43,782 births with information on parity, first-parity births accounted for 43.76%. Of 19,159 first-parity singleton live births, we excluded 163 subjects who had invalid or missing information on gestational age. Among the remaining 18,996 subjects, 656 were missing birth weight data or maternal age data. Of the 18,340 first-parity births with complete information on these variables, we excluded 315 births because data were missing on at least one of three variables: maternal educational, maternal marital status, or infant birth place. These exclusions left 18,025 births for the final analysis.

Statistics. The outcomes of interest in this study included term low birth weight (LBW) (is greater than or equal to 37 gestational weeks and less than 2,500 g) and preterm delivery (less than 37 gestational weeks). We used an unconditional logistic regression model to estimate the effects of chlorination practice on the risk of term LBW and preterm delivery. All odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for maternal age (less than 25 or is greater than or equal to 25 years), marital status (married or unmarried), maternal education (less than 12 or is greater than or equal to 12 years), and sex of baby. The analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Values of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Altogether, 18,025 (10,007 CHMs and 8,018 NCHMs) first-parity singleton live births with complete information were included in the analysis. Table 2 shows the distribution of birth outcomes and maternal characteristics by chlorination practice. The mean birth weights in the CHMs and NCHMs were 3,181.8 and 3,170.6 g, respectively. The prevalences of preterm delivery in the CHMs and NCHMs were 4.48 and 3.38%, respectively. The CHMs had a significantly higher rate of preterm delivery than the CHMs.

The CHMs had a lower rate of term LBW than the CHMs (2.49 vs. 2.81%) but the difference was not statistically significant. Table 3 shows the ORs for term LBW and preterm delivery based on comparisons between CHMs and NCHMs using logistic regression. After controlling for possible confounders (including maternal age, marital status, maternal education, and sex of the infant), the adjusted ORs were 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.56)] for preterm delivery and 0.90 (CI, 0.75-1.09) for term LBW, respectively, when comparing CHMs with NCHMs. Analysis using term birth weight as a continuous variable did not indicate an association between birth weight and the use of chlorinated water (data not shown).

The results of this study suggest that there is no association between the use of chlorinated drinking water and the risk of term low birth weight.

A few previous studies have looked at the relation between birth weight and preterm delivery and water chlorination (17,19-22). Kramer et al. (17) carried out a population-based case-control study in Iowa. Chloroform concentrations greater than 10 ppb in drinking water were associated with a small increase in risk of LBW (OR, 1.3; CI, 0.8-2.2) and preterm delivery (OR, 1.1; CI, 0.7-1.6). Bove et al. (19) carried out a large retrospective cohort study in New Jersey. Elevated ORs were found for term LBW at THM concentrations greater than 100 ppb (OR, 1.42; CI, 1.22-1.65) when compared with the reference level of less than or equal to 20 ppb. No association was found between concentrations of THMs and preterm birth (OR not shown). Savitz et al. (20) conducted a population-based case-control study in North Carolina. THM concentrations (82.2-168.8 vs. 40.8-63.3 ppb) were not associated with preterm delivery (OR, 0.9; CI, 0.6-1.5) and LBW (OR, 1.3; CI, 0.8-2.1). Dodds et al. (21) conducted a large retrospective cohort study in Canada. The authors did not find excess risk for LBW (OR, 1.04; CI, 0.92-1.18) or preterm delivery (OR, 0.97; CI, 0.87-1.09) for women whose water contained is greater than or equal to 100 ppb THM. Gallagher et al. (22) carried out a retrospective cohort study in Colorado. The authors found an excess risk for LBW (OR, 2.1; CI, 1.0-4.8) and term LBW (OR, 5.9; CI, 2.0-17.0) for those exposed to is greater than or equal to 60 ppb THM compared with those in the low-exposure group (less than or equal to 20 ppb), but no association between preterm delivery (OR, 1.0; CI, 0.3-2.8) and THM concentrations. Various epidemiologic studies point toward an association between THMs and term LBW (greater than 37 gestational weeks and less than 2,500 g) (19,22) but not LBW (less than or equal to 2,500 g) (17,20,21). The absence of an association with term LBW in our study is not consistent with the association found in New Jersey (19) and Colorado (22). Furthermore, our finding appears to be the first investigation to report a significant association between the use of chlorinated drinking water and preterm delivery. Because there is no evidence to date for an association between THMs and preterm delivery (17,19-22), the possibility that this is a chance finding should be considered.

The major difficulty in studying health effects associated with chlorination lies in assessing exposure (32). In our study, we investigated the effects of drinking water chlorination on adverse birth outcomes using an extreme points contrast to maximize the inherent power of the design (33,34). We used this method in our previous studies (15,28). The percentage of the population served by chlorinated water in the CHMs and NCHMs was 96.1 and 1.5%, respectively. Also, the municipalities selected for this study were rural municipalities, and it is unlikely that the residents would be able to afford bottled water, thus reducing the likelihood that water came from a source other than the home. In line with this assumption, we expect that women living in the CHMs drink water from the public supply and that women living in NCHMs drink water from the private wells (nonchlorinated water).

THMs are common contaminants of chlorinated drinking water and are the most consistently measured contaminants in treated water. Previous studies attempted to quantify the concentration of THMs and assign exposure values to women (17,19-22). In our study we made no attempt to quantify exposure to THMs in chlorinated water. However, we assumed that women living in CHMs, on average, experience a higher exposure to THMs than women living in NCHMs (nonchlorinated water) (23). Fear of delivering an LBW baby should not have deterred women from drinking chlorinated water because the possible role of THMs in drinking water as a risk factor for LBW has not received public attention in Taiwan.

Recently, Gallagher et al. (22) reported an association between LBW, in particular term LBW (OR, 5.9; CI, 2.0-17.0) and exposure to THMs. The authors have taken an important step in reducing misclassification of exposure by using the hydraulic model to identify census blocks for which individual THM exposure levels were all well represented by one or more sampling point measurement. Their ability to reduce misclassification may account for the stronger effect estimate, despite the relatively low levels of THMs observed in their study.

A number of factors are known or suspected to affect birth weight, including maternal nutrition and prepregnancy weight and weight gain (35), cigarette smoking (36), and occupational exposures (37-41). Unfortunately, there is no information available on these variables for individual study subjects and they could not be adjusted for directly in the analysis. However, none of these variables are likely to be associated with chlorination practice, and therefore the estimated effects of chlorination are likely to be free of confounding by these factors.

We used the extreme point contrast method to assess exposure. Nonetheless, the potential misclassification of exposure remains. Mobility between CHMs and NCHMs during pregnancy is likely to be a problem in this study. Two U.S. studies reported that approximately 25% (42) and 37% (43) of women changed residency during pregnancy. No data were available about women who moved between the CHMs and NCHMs during pregnancy. Because misclassification of exposure is likely to be nondifferential with respect to outcome and effect estimates are likely to be biased toward the null (34), whatever the level of such misclassification, its effect would likely bias the effect estimates reported here toward the null.

In summary, the present study provides no evidence of an increased risk of term LBW related to the consumption of chlorinated water. More accurate means of exposure assessment, including quantifying individual exposure to THMs or other disinfection by-products from tap water at home, work, and elsewhere, and other water uses or use of more sophisticated modeling techniques, may help clarify the effect of water chlorination on reproduction (24).

Address correspondence to: C-Y. Yang, College of Health Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st RD, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 80708. Telephone: 886 7 3121101 ext 2141. Fax: 886 7 3110811. E-mail: chunyuh@cc.kmu.edu.tw

This study was partially supported by a grant from the National Science Council, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (NSC-89-2320-B-037-023).

Received 1 February 2000; accepted 11 April 2000.

Table 1. Some characteristics of two groups of Taiwan municipalities, grouped according to chlorination practice.

a Professional, technical, administrative, superintendents, clerical, sales, and service workers as a percentage of the total employed (is greater than or equal to 15 years of age) population.

b Producers, transportation operators, and laborers as a percentage of the total employed population. c Farmers, loggers, grazers, fisherman, hunters, and related workers as a percentage of the total employed population.

Table 2. Maternal characteristics, mean birth weight, and prevalences of term LBW and preterm delivery in first-parity singleton live births in CHMs and NCHMs.

Table 3. Adjusted ORs for term LBW and preterm delivery in first-parity singleton live births by logistic regression.

a Logistic models include all five variables in the model. b The reference group was NCHMs. c The reference groups was is greater than or equal to 25 years of age. d The reference group was married women. e The reference group was is greater than or equal to 12 years of education. f The reference group was male.

1. Reuber MD. Carcinogenicity of chloroform. Environ Health Perspect 31:171-182 (1979).

• 2. Dunnick JK, Melnick RL. Assessment of the carcinogenic potential of chlorinated water: experimental studies of chlorine, chloramine, and trihalomethanes. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:817-822 (1993).
• 3. IARC. Chlorinated Drinking-Water; Chlorination By-Products: Some Other Halogenated Compounds; Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum 52 (1991).
• 4. Cantor KP, Hoover R, Hartge P. Bladder cancer, drinking water sources, and tap water consumption: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:1269-1279 (1987).
• 5. Bean JA, Isacson P, Hausler WJ. Drinking water and cancer incidence in Iowa. I: Trends and incidence by source of drinking water and size of municipality. Am J Epidemiol 116:912-923 (1982).
• 6. Gottlieb MS, Carr JK, Clarkson JR. Drinking water and cancer in Louisiana: a retrospective mortality study. Am J Epidemiol 116:652-667 (1982).
• 7. Carpenter LM, Beresford SAA. Cancer mortality and type of water source: findings from a study in the UK. Int J Epidemiol 15:312-319 (1986).
• 8. Cech I, Holguin AH, Littell AS, Henry JP, O'Connell J. Health significance of chlorination byproducts in drinking water: the Houston experience. Int J Epidemiol 16:198-207 (1987).
• 9. Lawrence CE, Taylor PR, Trock BJ, Reilly AA. Trihalomethanes in drinking water and human colorectol cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 72:563-568 (1984).
• 10. Flaten TP. Chlorination of drinking water and cancer incidence in Norway. Int J Epidemiol 21:6-15 (1992).
• 11. McGeehin MA, Reif JS, Becher JC, Mangione EJ. Case-control study of bladder cancer and water disinfection methods in Colorado. Am J Epidemiol 138:492-501 (1993).
• 12. Morris RD, Audet AM, Angelillo IF, Chalmers TC, Mosteller F. Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 82:955-963 (1992).
• 13. Young TB, Wolf DA, Kanarek MS. Case-control study of colon cancer and drinking water trihalomethanes in Wisconsin. Int J Epidemiol 16:190-197 (1987).
• 14. Zieder S, Fiengold L, Danley RA, Craun G. Bladder cancer in Massachusetts related to chlorinated and chloraminated drinking water: a case-control study. Arch Environ Health 43: 195-200 (1988).
• 15. Yang CY, Chiu HF, Cheng MF, Tsai SS. Chlorination of drinking water and cancer mortality in Taiwan. Environ Res 78:1-6 (1998).
• 16. Shaw GM, Malcoe LH, Milea A, Swan SH. Chlorinated water exposures and congenital cardiac anomalies. Epidemiology 2:459-460 (1991).
• 17. Kramer MD, Lunch CF, Isacson P, Hanson JW. The association of waterborne chloroform with intrauterine growth retardation. Epidemiology 3:407-413 (1992).
• 18. Aschengrau A, Zierler S, Cohen A. Quality of community drinking water and the occurrence of late adverse pregnancy outcomes. Arch Environ Health 48:105-113 (1993).
• 19. Bove FJ, Fulcomer MC, Klotz JB, Esmart J, Dufficy EM, Savrin JE. Public drinking water contamination and birth outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 141:850-862 (1995).
• 20. Savitz DA, Andrews KW, Pastore LM. Drinking water and pregnancy outcome in central North Carolina: source, amount, and trihalomethane levels. Environ Health Perspect 103:592-596 (1995).
• 21. Dodds L, King W, Woolcott C, Pole J. Trihalomethanes in public water supplies and adverse birth outcomes. Epidemiology 10:233-237 (1999).
• 22. Gallagher MD, Nuckols JR, Stallones L, Savitz DA. Exposure to trihalomethanes and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology 9:484-489 (1998).
• 23. Magnus P, Jaakkola JJK, Skrondal A, Alexander J, Becher G, Krogh T, Dybing E. Water chlorination and birth defects. Epidemiology 10:513-517 (1999).
• 24. Waller K, Swan SH, DeLorenze G, Hopkins B. Trihalomethanes in drinking water and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology 9:134-140 (1998).
• 25. Tzeng GH, Wu TY. Characteristics of urbanization levels in Taiwan districts. Geograph Res 12:287-323 (1986).
• 26. Yang CY, Chin JF, Chiu HF, Wang TN, Lee CH, Ko YC. Relationship between water hardness and coronary mortality in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health 49:1-9 (1996).
• 27. Yang CY, Chiu JF, Lin MC, Cheng MF. Geographic variations in mortality from motor vehicle crashes in Taiwan. J Trauma 43:74-77 (1997).
• 28. Yang CY, Chiu HF, Chiu JF, Kao WY, Tsai SS, Lan SJ. Cancer mortality and residence near petrochemical industries in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health 50:265-273 (1997).
• 29. Yang CY, Cheng MF, Tsai SS, Hung CF. Fluoride in drinking water and cancer mortality in Taiwan. Environ Res 82:189-193 (2000).
• 30. Wu SC, Young CL. Study of the birth reporting system. J Natl Public Health Assoc 6:15-27 (1986).
• 31. Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Cornely DA. Gestational age reporting and preterm delivery. Public Health Rep 105:267-275 (1990).
• 32. Swan SH, Waller K. Disinfection by-products and adverse pregnancy outcomes: what is the agent and how it should be measured [Editorial]. Epidemiology 9:479-481 (1998).
• 33. Miettinen OS. Theoretical Epidemiology. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
• 34. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998.
• 35. Paige D, Davis LR. Fetal growth, maternal nutrition, and dietary supplementation. Clin Nutr 5:191-199 (1986).
• 36. Sexton M, Hebel JR. A clinical trial of change in maternal smoking and its effect on birth weight. JAMA 251:911-915 (1984).
• 37. Taylor PR, Stelma JM, Lawrence CE. The relation of polychlorinated biphenyls to birth weight and gestational age in the offspring of occupationally exposed mothers. Am J Epidemiol 129:395-406 (1989).
• 38. Teitelman AM, Welch LS, Hellenbrand KG, Bracken MB. Effect of maternal work activity on preterm birth and low birthweight. Am J Epidemiol 131:104-113 (1990).
• 39. Axelsson G, Rylander R, Molin I. Outcome of pregnancy in relation to irregular and inconvenient work schedules. Br J Ind Med 46:393-398 (1989).
• 40. Xu X, Ding M, Li B, Christiani DC. Association of rotating shiftwork with preterm births and low birthweight among never smoking women textile workers in China. Occup Environ Med 51:470-474 (1994).
• 41. Nurminen T, Kurpaa K. Occupational noise exposure and course of pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ Health 15:117-124 (1989).
• 42. Shaw GM, Malcoe LH. Residential mobility during pregnancy for mothers of infants with or without congenital cardiac anomalies: a reprint. Arch Environ Health 47:236-238 (1992).
• 43. Khoury M, Stewart W, Weinstein A, Panny S, Lindsay P, Eisenberg M. Residential mobility during pregnancy: implications for environmental teratogenesis. J Clin Epidemiol 41:15-20 (1988).