OSCE as a tool for evaluation of practical semiology in comparison to MCQ & oral examination.

Dadgar, SR ; Saleh, A ; et al.

In: JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, Jg. 58 (2008-09-01), Heft 9, S. 506-7

Online academicJournal

Zugriff:

Full Text Finder (Volltext)

Objective: To compare medical students' perceptions regarding Objectively Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) and Oral exam in their semiology course.

Methods: We used a questionnaire with 10 questions regarding the quality of exam (Likert scale) and 3 questions regarding the difficulty, being educative and with descriptive scales. The study carried out in the Centre for Clinical skills located at Firozgar Teaching Hospital affiliated to Iran University of Medical Science.

Results: Seventy-three students (65% female) completed the questionnaire. The results of the study showed that exam was very stressful for 63% of participants. Seventy percent believed that OSCE was easier in comparison to MCQ and Oral. About fifty percent (50%) stated that the time was enough. Majority of students expressed that performing the skills at each station was interesting and educative. OSCE, MCQ and ORAL examination were perceived easy by 52.5, 57.9 and 21.1% students respectively. OSCE, MCQ and oral examination were considered educative by 73%, 20% and 56.9% respectively, and fair by 68.9%, 41.4% and 40.7% respectively.

Conclusion: The findings of this study support OSCE as an acceptable method to assess essentials of practical clinical skills of medical students.

Titel:	OSCE as a tool for evaluation of practical semiology in comparison to MCQ & oral examination.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Dadgar, SR ; Saleh, A ; Bahador, H ; Baradaran, HR
Link:	Full Text Finder (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, Jg. 58 (2008-09-01), Heft 9, S. 506-7
Veröffentlichung:	Karachi : Pakistan Medical Association ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Karachi., 2008
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	0030-9982 (print)
Schlagwort:	Data Collection Humans Iran Surveys and Questionnaires Clinical Competence Diagnosis, Oral Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Measurement methods Students, Medical Teaching
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article Language: English [J Pak Med Assoc] 2008 Sep; Vol. 58 (9), pp. 506-7. MeSH Terms: Clinical Competence* ; Diagnosis, Oral* ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate* ; Students, Medical* ; Teaching* ; Educational Measurement / *methods ; Data Collection ; Humans ; Iran ; Surveys and Questionnaires Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20081014 Date Completed: 20081118 Latest Revision: 20151119 Update Code: 20231215

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.