Context: Euphorbia pekinensis Rupr. (Euphorbiaceae) has long been used in the Orient, while its clinical use was limited due to its nephrotoxic effect. Objective: The possible mechanism of nephrotoxicity of Euphorbia pekinensis (EPR) and its related constituents were investigated. Materials and methods: Petroleum ether (PE), acetic ether (AE) and n-butanol (BUT) extracted sections of EPR were separately given to Wistar rats by gavage at the dose of 3 g/kg/day for 10 weeks to determine the nephrotoxic section of EPR. Then, renal metabolic profiling of EPR after oral administration of nephrotoxic section was investigated and its related constituents were identified by LC/Q-TOF-MS method. Results: The average values of creatinine (CREA) in PE, AE, BUT and control groups were 76.54 ± 9.52, 54.12 ± 10.34, 51.33 ± 5.19 and 48.23 ± 6.67 μmol/L. The average values of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in PE, AE, BUT and control groups were 15.25 ± 3.37, 8.32 ± 0.89, 9.22 ± 1.78 and 8.47 ± 1.33 mmol/L, respectively. Only kidney section of rats in PE group showed that glomeruli had cellular or fibrocellular crescents. Renal metabolic profiling showed disturbed metabolic pathways of purine, amino acid, phospholipids and sphingolipids in EPR nephrotoxicity. A total of 25 compounds [(-)-(1S)-15-hydroxy-18-carboxycembrene is a new compound] in PE section and 10 compounds in rat serum after administration of PE section were identified. Conclusions: This is the first time that the toxic compounds of PER and action mechanism of EPR nephrotoxicity were explored to provide a new reference for studying the toxic components of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM).
Keywords: Metabolomics; serum biochemical parameters; histopathology; LC/Q-TOF-MS; nephrotoxicity-related constituents
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has a unique theoretical and practical approach to treat various kinds of diseases with a long history over thousands of years. In the past 20 years, the usage of TCM has become increasingly popular all over the world (Liu et al. 2009), while the spectrum of adverse reactions and side effects also occurred with TCM (Kassler et al. 1991; Steenkamp et al. 2000; Chitturi and Farrell 2008). Therefore, comprehensive characterization of the chemical ingredients in herbal medicines is very important for quality control and understanding the mechanism of action of toxic effects. However, it is not practical to isolate every toxic ingredient from herbs, and also difficult to detect and identify every toxic chemical ingredient in TCMs for further toxicological investigations.
Euphorbia pekinensis Rupr. (Euphorbiaceae) (EPR) is a herbal medicine widely used not only in the treatment of oedema, antivirus, scrofula and anti-inflammatory activity, but also in fluid-purging exercise, dispersing phlegm and alleviating oppilation by purgation (Mucsi et al. 2001; Corea et al. 2004). EPR has been demonstrated to have cytotoxic activity against human cells in vitro (Kong et al. 2002; Liang et al. 2009). In addition, EPR exhibited HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibiting effect, strong histamine-release inhibitory function and strong nitric oxide production inhibitory activities (Ahn et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2006). Previous chemical researche on EPR indicated that diterpenoids, triterpenoids, flavonoids and ellagitannins are the main constituents (Singla and Pathak 1990; Jassbi 2006; Shao et al. 2011), some of which showed tumour promoting, skin-irritant and proinflammatory properties (Sosath et al. 1988; Mucsi et al. 2001; Corea et al. 2004). Moreover, our previous toxicology research indicated that EPR-induced visible hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity resulted from an excessive dose (Hou et al. 2013).
Metabolomics, one of the '-omics' technologies involving modern chemical instrumentation (NMR, GC/MS, LC/MS) and chemometrics analysis, is commonly used to identify the biochemical pattern of endogenous metabolic constituents in biological samples and provides important information for testing a physiopathological response to a toxin-, disease- or drug-induced disturbance in an endogenous metabolic network. Thus, it has been successfully applied to evaluate drug toxicity, to make disease diagnoses and to provide diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers specific for early stages of tissue damage (Brindle et al. 2002; Mortishire-Smith et al. 2004; Waters et al. 2006; Beger et al. 2010).
The development of reliable, high-resolution mass spectrometry analytical methods and technologies, such as quadruple time of flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOF MS), distinguishes isobaric ions and enhances authenticity in the identification of the targeted analytes by providing the elemental composition (Calbiani et al. 2004). Furthermore, accurate mass measurements of product ions in MS/MS mode are helpful for the analysis and elucidation of known and unknown constituents. Therefore, Q-TOF MS has become a valuable analytical technique in TCM research.
It is widely known that the toxicity of one herb mainly existed in its toxic section. Thus, the aim of this study was to (
EPR was purchased from Anguo Chinese Chemicals Herbal Medicine Factory (Anguo, China) and authenticated by Professor Jincai Lu (School of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China); hypoxanthine, niacinamide, phenylalanine, betaine and N,N-dimethylglycine were supplied by Sigma Corporation (St. Louis, MO); corilagin, brevifolin carboxylic acid, brevifolin, ellagic acid, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-d-xylopyranoside, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid, quercetin, yuexiandajisu C, helioscopinolide E and (-)-(1S)-15-hydroxy-18-carboxycembrene were isolated from EPR and fully characterized based on chemical and spectroscopic analysis (UV, IR, NMR and MS) in our laboratory. The purity of each compound isolated was more than 98% determined by HPLC analysis. Methanol and acetonitrile of HPLC grade were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA), and formic acid of HPLC grade was obtained from Concord Tech. Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Distilled water was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA).
The dried and pulverized plant of EPR was processed as follows: 0.5 kg EPR was extracted three times by refluxing with 5 L 95% ethanol for 2 h each time and the solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure. Then, the residue was partitioned respectively by petroleum ether (PE), acetic ether (AE) and n-butanol (BUT) and water. The PE, AE and BUT sections were concentrated under reduced pressure. Furthermore, PE, AE and BUT extracts were redissolved with water and diluted to a volume equivalent of 0.375 g EPR per millilitre.
Thirty-two male pathogen-free Wistar rats (200-220 g) were provided by Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Animal care was carried out in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (Shenyang, China) and the protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Institution. They were fed with a certified standard diet and tap water ad libitum. All rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8/group) as follows:
- Petroleum ether group (PEG), rats were orally treated with PE section of EPR at a dose of 3 g/kg/day;
- Acetic ether group (AEG), rats were orally treated with AE section of EPR at a dose of 3 g/kg/day;
- n-Butanol group (BUTG), rats were orally treated with BUT section of EPR at a dose of 3 g/kg/day;
- Healthy control group (HCG), rats were orally treated with the approximately same volume water.
Blood and kidney samples of rats in the four groups were collected after continuous oral administration of different EPR sections and water for 10 weeks. Blood samples were used in the serum biochemical parameters test and the nephrotoxic constituents' investigation. Kidney samples (left) were used in the histopathology experiment and kidney samples (right) were used in the metabolomics study.
Serum nephrotoxicity biochemical parameters were tested by using standard clinical laboratory methods and a clinical chemistry analyzer (P800, Roche, Berlin, Germany). Creatinine (CREA) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were determined for the evaluation of nephrotoxicity disorders.
The kidney samples (left) were fixed in 10% formalin solution for at least 24 h, then dehydrated with ethanol solution, paraffin-embedded and stained with haematoxylin-eosin for light microscope examination.
CREA and BUN levels of PEG samples were higher than that of other groups and only the kidney samples of PEG displayed obvious renal injury. Based on the results of serum biochemical parameters and histopathology experiments, PE section was screened as the nephrotoxic section of EPR. Thus, the samples of PEG were used in the following experiments.
Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, and then serum was transferred to a 1.5 mL glass vial. A 1 mL serum sample was extracted with protein precipitation with 2 mL acetonitrile. After centrifugation (
Kidney tissues (250 mg) were homogenized in 2 mL acetonitrile in an ice water bath. The homogenates were centrifuged (
UHPLC analysis was performed by ACQUITY
Micromass Quattro micro
The collision induced dissociation (CID) experiment was carried out to get fragmentation patterns of those potential biomarkers. Mass spectra were interpreted with available biochemical databases, such as METLIN (
HPLC/Q-TOF-MS analytical procedures were performed on an Agilent 1200 system (Billerica, MA) coupled with a Bruker Daltonics microTOF-Q mass spectrometer. The HPLC separation was achieved on a Venusil ASB C
The Q-TOF MS was operated in both positive and negative ion modes with an ESI source. The optimized ionization conditions were as follows: capillary voltage was 4.5 kV (ESI
In our previous study, rats were found to have renal injury after oral administration of EPR (Hou et al. 2013), but the section contributing mostly to the toxic effect was still remained unknown. Based on the results of our previous study, we tried to screen the exact nephrotoxicity section of EPR by serum biochemical parameters and histopathology experiments.
The average values of CREA in PE, AE, BUT and control groups were 76.54 ± 9.52, 54.12 ± 10.34, 51.33 ± 5.19 and 48.23 ± 6.67 μmol/L, respectively. The average values of BUN in PE, AE, BUT and control groups were 15.25 ± 3.37, 8.32 ± 0.89, 9.22 ± 1.78 and 8.47 ± 1.33 mmol/L, respectively. All the results are presented in Figure 1. CREA is widely interpreted as a measure of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and is used as an index of renal function in clinical practice as well as BUN. The average values of CREA and BUN in PEG increased significantly (p < 0.01) in comparison with HCG, indicating that renal damage might happen. In the contrast, the values in other groups did not show difference from that of HCG.
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 1. Clinical chemistry: the value of creatinine (CREA) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (n = 8). #Compared with HCG (p < 0.01).
Histopathological findings after administration of different section extracts of EPR are summarized in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2(A,C,D), the kidney section of the HCG, AEG and BUTG showed apparently normal structure in renal cortex and medulla, while the kidney section from PEG (Figure 2(B)) showed that glomeruli had cellular or fibrocellular crescents. Histopathological results confirmed the presence of substantial kidney damage after the administration of PE section of EPR in line with serum biochemical parameters, indicating that PE section should be responsible for the renal toxicity. To investigate the mechanism of renal damage and the constituents in PE section, metabolomics and identification study were carried out in the following experiments.
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 2. Histopathological photomicrographs of rat kidney sections (40×).
When renal injury happened, some metabolic pathways were disordered, leading to level changes of biological metabolites in the kidney. After PE section was screened as the nephrotoxicity section of EPR, the kidney samples of PEG were applied in the metabolomics study to find out the possible nephrotoxicity mechanism of EPR.
Principal component analysis (PCA), a chemometric model which reduces matrix of data to lowest dimension of the most significant factors, was used to gain a comprehensive view of the metabolome for analysing the chromatographic data. The obtained PCA score plot from the processing of data is shown in Figure 3(A), which could be readily divided into two clusters: HCG and PEG. The samples of HCG tend to cluster in the left, while the PEG was located in the right. The clearly separation in Figure 3(A) indicated the physiological status of the rats in these two groups were quite different. Based on the phenomenon showed by the PCA score plot coupled with the serum biochemistry and histopathology results, the presence of substantial kidney injury after administration of PE section of EPR was confirmed.
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 3. PCA score plot (A) and corresponding loading plot (B) of kidney samples in the time-point of 10th week post-dose for rats administrated with PE section of EPR. (□) HCG and (△) PEG.
In order to gain insight into the metabolic changes of the kidney injury induced by the PE section of EPR, the loading profile (Figure 3(B)) that visualizes the influences of variables was used for the selection of biomarkers. These metabolites were correlated to the distinction between normal and abnormal conditions. Judged by the distance from the origin, a series of ions which were found predominantly in the loading plot were chosen as biomarkers (Table 1). Moreover, the full scan intensity of potential biomarkers in HCG and PEG was also taken into consideration (Figure 4). In our study, the identifications of the biomarkers were done using the commercial available standards by comparing their MS/MS spectra and retention time.
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 4. The comparison of biomarker intensity between HCG and PEG. (A) Hypoxanthine, (B) LPC C 20:4, (C) niacinamide, (D) phenylalanine, (E) C16 dihydrosphingosine, (F) C18 phytosphingosine, (G) N,N-dimethylglycine, (H) unknown, (I) unknown and (J) unknown. #Compared with HCG (p < 0.05) and *compared with HCG (p < 0.01).
Potential kidney biomarkers of nephrotoxicity induced by EPR.
Retention time (min) Scan mode Quasi-molecular ion Metabolite Deviation ofnormal plasma 0.67 137 + [M + H]+ Hypoxanthine ↓ 6.61 544 + [M + H]+ LPC C 20:4 ↓ 0.67 123 + [M + H]+ Niacinamide ↓ 0.54 120 + [M + H-HCOOH]+ Phenylalanine ↑ 0.67 274 + [M + H]+ C16 dihydrosphingosine ↑ 0.67 318 + [M + H]+ C18 phytosphingosine ↑ 0.55 104 + [M + H]+ ↑ 0.63 118 + Unknown Unknown ↑ 5.01 366 + Unknown Unknown ↓ 5.46 368 + Unknown Unknown ↓
During the study period, the main biomarkers displayed in Table 1 were hypoxanthine, LPC, niacinamide, phenylalanine, N,N-dimethylglycine (DMG), C
The kidney metabolite profile results indicated that the hypoxanthine level was significantly decreased in the PE-treated rats compared with the HCG rats. Hypoxanthine is a spontaneous deamination product of adenine, and the relationship between hypoxanthine and renal damage is due to the proteolytic conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase (Zhao et al. 2013). What is more, the end product of hypoxanthine catabolism is uric acid which could deposit in renal tissue and form renal calculi. As hypoxanthine was decreased in this study, uric acid was likely to accumulate in kidney and produce renal damage.
LPC, a major component of oxidized-low density lipoproteins, modulated various pathobiological processes involved in vascular and glomerular diseases. Previous research reported that oxidative stress is related to renal damage (Rahman et al. 2003). LPC as an endogenous metabolite which possesses surface activity can ruin pericellular membrane of different tissues including kidney and liver, and further lead to intensity hepatic and kidney injury (Sekas et al. 1985; Joles et al. 1994). The change in LPC content may be a probable result of PE-induced kidney injury.
Niacinamide is a component of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), playing a very important role in the energy metabolism. The research had reported that niacinamide probably causes thrombocytopenia in renal dialysis patients (He et al. 2014). The relationship between niacinamide and renal failure might be both the disturbance of energy metabolic pathway and the change of thrombocyte levels.
Amino acids play important roles in our daily life. Phenylalanine and DMG are two essential amino acids in human body. Phenylalanine is mainly hydroxylated by phenylalanine hydroxylase to tyrosine. In our study, phenylalanine was markedly increased in the PE-treated group compared with the HCG group, indicating renal damage induced by PE section. DMG is a metabolite of homocysteine. Some studies have shown plasma DMG might accumulate in chronic renal failure and contribute to hyperhomocysteinaemia by inhibiting betaine homocysteine methyltransferase activity (McGregor et al. 2001). The disturbance of amino acids metabolism might be one of the nephrotoxicity mechanisms of EPR.
Sphingolipids are essential components of cell membranes, including dihydrosphingosine and phytosphingosine. Dihydrosphingosine can be transformed to phytosphingosine in vivo by C4-hydroxylase, which plays an important role in the anabolic metabolism and catabolism of sphingolipids (Riezman 2006). Some important metabolites occurring in sphingolipid metabolism, such as ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate, are produced by the action of different enzymes. In the present study, there was an obvious increase in dihydrosphingosine and phytosphingosine in the model group compared with the control group, which will result in a high level of ceramides being produced. It has been reported that, as an important intracellular secondary messenger, ceramide has a major effect on cell apoptosis, which may bring growth cytotoxic and inhibitory activities for kidney cell systems (Hannun et al. 1991).
The changes of selected and identified potential biomarkers suggested the involvement of some specific metabolic pathways, such as purine metabolism, phospholipids metabolism, energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism and sphingolipids metabolism. It may be of great importance for getting an insight into development of renal damage and revealing the metabolism of renal damage induced by PE section.
In order to confirm the toxicity material basis, a further study was performed to systematically characterize for multiple absorbed constituents in rat serum after oral administration of PE section of EPR by HPLC/Q-TOF-MS method.
Base peak and extracted ion chromatograms of the PE section of EPR are shown in Figure 5(A,B). The constituents in the PE section of EPR were well separated by the HPLC/Q-TOF MS method and 25 compounds were identified, which were identified by comparison with the reference standards, utilizing Elemental Composition software to carefully investigate their MS spectra and comparing with the literature data. By comparing with the authentic compound, peak 12 was unambiguously identified as (-)-(1S)-15-hydroxy-18-carboxycembrene, taken as an example to illustrate the identification process. In the first-order mass spectra, peak 12 showed [M-H]
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 5. A set of chromatograms of (A) petroleum ether extract of EPR in positive ion mode, (B) petroleum ether extract of EPR in negative ion mode, (C) blank rat serum in positive ion mode, (D) blank rat serum in negative ion mode, (E) 1 h rat serum sample after oral administration of petroleum ether extract of EPR in positive ion mode and (F) 1 h rat serum sample after oral administration of petroleum ether section of EPR in negative ion mode.
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 6. Product ion scan spectra in negative ion mode under different collision energies (
PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 7. Chemical structures of compounds identified from PE section.
MS data (m/z) of the compounds of PE section of EPR and in rat serum after oral administration of PE section of EPR.
Peak no. Quasi-molecularion Formula Measuredmass ( Calculatedmass ( mDa Compound 1 10.8 [M + Na]+ C27H22Na1O18 657.0709 657.0698 -1.04 Corilagin 2 11.3 [M + H]+ C13H9O8 293.0292 293.0292 -0.01 Brevifolin carboxylic acid [M-H]- C13H7O8 291.0204 291.0146 -5.74 3 14.1 [M + H]+ C12H9O6 249.0393 249.0394 0.07 Brevifolin [M-H]- C12H7O6 247.0273 247.0248 -2.52 4a 15.2 [M + H]+ C14H7O8 303.0162 303.0135 -2.68 Ellagic acid [M-H]- C14H5O8 301.0008 300.9990 -1.81 5a 15.5 [M + H]+ C22H21O13 493.0920 493.0977 5.66 3,3′-Di- [M-H]- C22H19O13 491.0861 491.0831 -2.99 6a 18.1 [M + H]+ C21H19O12 463.0903 463.0871 -3.16 3,3′-Di- [M-H]- C21H17O12 461.0730 461.0725 -0.47 7 19.8 [M + H]+ C16H23O4 279.1581 279.1591 0.95 Dibutyl phthalate 8a 22.9 [M + H]+ C15H11O7 303.0500 303.0499 -0.10 Quercetin [M-H]- C15H9O7 301.0340 301.0354 1.39 9a 23.4 [M + H]+ C16H11O8 331.0448 331.0448 0.04 3,3′-Di- [M-H]- C16H9O8 329.0304 329.0303 -0.08 10 27.7 [M + H]+ C20H29O3 317.2091 317.2111 2.02 ent-(5 11 27.9 [M + H]+ C20H27O3 315.1936 315.1955 1.86 Helioscopinolide E 12a 28.0 [M-H]- C20H29O3 317.2124 317.2122 -0.16 (-)-(1 13a 28.5 [M + H]+ C20H29O3 317.2078 317.2111 3.33 Yuexiandajisu C 14 29.2 [M-H]- C20H25O4 329.1784 329.1758 -2.59 Helioscopinolide C 15 29.7 [M + Na]+ C20H30Na1O2 325.2127 325.2138 1.13 Pekinenal 16 29.7 [M + H]+ C20H29O3 317.2069 317.2111 4.22 Helioscopinolide B 17 29.8 [M + H]+ C20H29O3 317.2063 317.2111 4.83 Helioscopinolide 18a 30.2 [M + Na]+ C20H30Na1O2 325.2120 325.2138 1.84 Pekinenins A 19a 31.7 [M + H]+ C20H31O2 303.2274 303.2319 4.47 Euphorpekone A 20a 31.7 [M + H]+ C20H31O2 303.2274 303.2319 4.47 Euphorpekone B 21 34.5 [M + H]+ C30H49O2 441.3643 441.3727 8.44 27-Hydroxy-3-oxolup-12-ene 22 34.7 [M + H]+ C30H49O2 441.3642 441.3727 8.55 28-Hydrozylup-20(29)-en-3-one 23 35.9 [M + H-H2O]+ C30H49O 425.3657 425.3778 12.05 3 24 36.3 [M + H-H2O]+ C30H49O 425.3659 425.3778 11.91 (24S)-9,19-Cycloart-25-ene-3 25 36.3 [M + H-H2O]+ C30H49O 425.3659 425.3778 11.91 (24R)-9,19-Cycloart-25-ene-3
1 Compounds in rat serum after oral administration of PE section of EPR.
To clarify the venenosus constituents responsible for the nephrotoxicity, it is necessary to know the chemical constituent profile in vivo. Therefore, rat serum sample after oral administration of PE section of EPR was analysed by the same HPLC/Q-TOF method. Base peak and extracted ion chromatograms of blank serum sample and rat serum sample after administration PE section of EPR are shown in Figure 5(C-F). The MS data of the ESI (±)-MS spectra are listed in Table 2 and their chemical structures are shown in Figure 7. There were 10 peaks displayed in the profiles of PE section of EPR, whereas there were no equivalent peaks in the profile of the blank serum or blank solvent. Thus, these compounds were defined as prototype components, and identified as diterpenes and ellagitannins.
According to the retention times and mass spectra with those of authentic compounds, peaks 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12 and 13 were designated as ellagic acid, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4'-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid-4′-O-β-d-xylopyrano-side, quercetin, 3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid, (-)-(1S)-15-hydroxy-18-carboxy-cembrene, yuexiandajisu C, respectively.
As is well known, only compounds absorbed into the blood have the probability to be toxic constituents; therefore, the 10 compounds identified in rat serum might be the potentially nephrotoxicity ingredients of EPR to induce nephrotoxicity. It is necessary to research the toxicological activities of these 10 compounds by other in vitro or in vivo experiments in the future work.
The nephrotoxicity of PE, AE and BUT section of EPR ethanol extract was investigated to find out the nephrotoxic section of EPR with the combination of serum biochemical parameters and histopathology results. According to the results, PE section was thought to be the nephrotoxic section of EPR and used for the further study. A good separation was seen between rats treated with PE and healthy rats in the PCA score plot of kidney metabolites by the first two components, and 10 potential biomarkers were screened out and identified by using metabonomic method combined with multivariate data analysis. These results showed abnormal metabolism of purine, phospholipids, energy, amino acid and sphingolipids in rats treated with PE section. Then, an HPLC/Q-TOF method was developed and used to search for the toxic ingredient in PE section and in rat serum after oral administration of PE section. As a result, 25 compounds in PE section and 10 prototype components in serum were successfully separated and identified by comparing retention times and MS spectra with those of authentic compounds and literature data. This identification and structural elucidation of these constituents would be also helpful to reveal the toxicodynamic profile of EPR, which will facilitate its clinical usage. The strategy to find out potential nephrotoxicity ingredients will give a better and further understanding of toxic effects and mechanism research of TCM in the future.
The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
By Zhenzhen Liu; Yan Zeng and Pengyi Hou