Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dental models prototyped via entry-level liquid crystal display (LCD) 3D printers.

Materials and Methods: Identical prototyped models were generated from a master digital file testing two entry-level LCD-based 3D printers and using one professional-grade 3D printer as gold standard (GS), with 50-µm and 100-µm layer thickness. Each 3D-printed model was scanned, and a specific 3D technology was used to perform surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis to evaluate trueness and precision. The distances between surface points of two superimposed models were converted to root mean square (RMS) and statistically analyzed.

Results: The RMS values detected were significantly higher in dental models prototyped with entry-level compared to the SLA printer (p < 0.001), in terms of trueness (50 µm: GS 0.075 mm, LCD1 0.192 mm, LCD2 0.179 mm; 100 µm: GS 0.066 mm, LCD1 0.209 mm, LCD2 0.199 mm) and precision (50 µm: GS 0.028 mm, LCD1 0.075 mm, LCD2 0.085 mm; 100 µm: GS 0.039 mm, LCD1 0.096 mm, LCD2 0.101 mm). No significant differences were found between the values of RMS of both entry-level 3D printers (p > 0.05). Layer thickness did not affect either the trueness or precision of the 3D-printed models (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Entry-level LCD-based 3D printers are not as accurate as professional-grade 3D printer, but still close to orthodontics clinical threshold values.

Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should evaluate the intended application of 3D-printed orthodontic models before using entry-level 3D printers.

Titel:	Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Lo Giudice, A ; Ronsivalle, V ; Rustico, L ; Aboulazm, K ; Isola, G ; Palazzo, G
Link:	View record at Springer (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	Clinical oral investigations, Jg. 26 (2022), Heft 1, S. 303-312
Veröffentlichung:	Berlin : Springer-Verlag ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Berlin : Springer, c1997-, 2022
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1436-3771 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1007/s00784-021-03999-1
Schlagwort:	Computer-Aided Design Models, Dental Printing, Three-Dimensional Liquid Crystals Orthodontics
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article Language: English [Clin Oral Investig] 2022 Jan; Vol. 26 (1), pp. 303-312. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2021 Jun 07. MeSH Terms: Liquid Crystals* ; Orthodontics* ; Computer-Aided Design ; Models, Dental ; Printing, Three-Dimensional References: Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, Bumann A (2017) Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: a comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int 48(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a37130. (PMID: 10.3290/j.qi.a3713027834416) ; Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ (2016) 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 32(1):54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.01826494268) ; Moser N, Santander P, Quast A (2018) From 3D imaging to 3D printing in dentistry - a practical guide. Int J Comput Dent 21(4):345–356. (PMID: 30539177) ; Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, Ausiello P (2013) A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 29(2):e1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.01123140842) ; Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena FL, Bajaj D, Breedon P (2019) Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 156(5):694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.01231677678) ; Marcel R, Reinhard H, Andreas K (2020) Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing. Clin Oral Investig 24(12):4607–4615. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-020-03329-x) ; Caminiti M, Lou T (2019) Clear aligner orthognathic splints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(5):e1071–e1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.012) ; Ciuffolo F, Epifania E, Duranti G, De Luca V, Raviglia D, Rezza S, Festa F (2006) Rapid prototyping: a new method of preparing trays for indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(1):75–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.00516443482) ; Cassetta M, Altieri F, Di Giorgio R, Barbato E (2018) Palatal orthodontic miniscrew insertion using a CAD-CAM surgical guide: description of a technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(9):1195–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.01829653870) ; Favero CS, English JD, Cozad BE, Wirthlin JO, Short MM, Kasper FK (2017) Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 152(4):557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.01228962741) ; Zhang ZC, Li PL, Chu FT, Shen G (2019) Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop 80(4):194–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y31172199) ; Kim SY, Shin YS, Jung HD, Hwang CJ, Baik HS, Cha JY (2018) Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 153(1):144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.02529287640) ; Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2014) Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145(1):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.01124373661) ; Ledingham AD, English JD, Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, Ontiveros JC, Kasper FK (2016) Accuracy and mechanical properties of orthodontic models printed 3-dimensionally from calcium sulfate before and after various postprinting treatments. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150(6):1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.027. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.02727894527) ; Sette A, Adorini L, Mancini C, Doria G (1989) An Apple IIE microcomputer program for multiple non-independent comparisons by the Scheffe’s test. Comput Biol Med 19(6):403–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(89)90075-9. (PMID: 10.1016/0010-4825(89)90075-92625038) ; G D (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. George Allen and Unwin, London, UK:122–132. ; Lo Giudice A, Leonardi R, Ronsivalle V, Allegrini S, Lagravère M, Marzo G, Isola G (2020) Evaluation of pulp cavity/chamber changes after tooth-borne and bone-borne rapid maxillary expansions: a CBCT study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03539-3. ; Leonardi RM, Aboulazm K, Giudice AL, Ronsivalle V, D’Antò V, Lagravère M, Isola G (2020) Evaluation of mandibular changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a CBCT study in youngsters with unilateral posterior crossbite using a surface-to-surface matching technique. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03480-5. ; Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos VO, Breuning H (2017) Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151(6):1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.01228554463) ; Vasilakos G, Schilling R, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N (2017) Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures. Sci Rep 7(1):5838. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-017-06013-5) ; Lo Giudice A, Ortensi L, Farronato M, Lucchese A, Lo Castro E, Isola G (2020) The step further smile virtual planning: milled versus prototyped mock-ups for the evaluation of the designed smile characteristics. BMC Oral Health 20(1):165. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-020-01145-z) ; Joós-Kovács G, Vecsei B, Körmendi S, Gyarmathy VA, Borbély J, Hermann P (2019) Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 19(1):280. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-019-0976-1) ; Park JM (2016) Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form. J Adv Prosthodont 8(5):354–362. (PMID: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.354) ; Nestler N, Wesemann C, Spies BC, Beuer F, Bumann A (2020) Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.01132063385) ; Choi JW, Ahn JJ, Son K, Huh JB (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation on accuracy of conventional and milled gypsum models and 3D printed photopolymer models. Materials (Basel) 12(21):3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213499. ; Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (2015) Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 85(5):881–889. https://doi.org/10.2319/061614-436.1. (PMID: 10.2319/061614-436.125412265) ; Henninger E, Vasilakos G, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N (2019) The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models. Sci Rep 9(1):10501. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-019-46887-1) ; Vasilakos G, Koniaris A, Wolf M, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N (2018) Early anterior crossbite correction through posterior bite opening: a 3D superimposition prospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod 40(4):364–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx074. (PMID: 10.1093/ejo/cjx07429059287) ; Lippold C, Kirschneck C, Schreiber K, Abukiress S, Tahvildari A, Moiseenko T, Danesh G (2015) Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - a retrospective clinical study. Comput Biol Med 62:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.01225917690) ; Koretsi V, Kirschbauer C, Proff P, Kirschneck C (2019) Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models. Clin Oral Investig 23(8):3387–3396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2772-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-018-2772-830539294) ; Koretsi V, Tingelhoff L, Proff P, Kirschneck C (2018) Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis. Eur J Orthod 40(1):52–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx040. (PMID: 10.1093/ejo/cjx04028531341) Contributed Indexing: Keywords: 3D printing; CAD-CAM; Digital dentistry; Digital orthodontics; Prototyping Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20210608 Date Completed: 20220128 Latest Revision: 20220128 Update Code: 20240513

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis.