Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Kyphoplasty versus Fluoroscopy-Assisted Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Jin, M ; Ge, M ; et al.

In: World neurosurgery, Jg. 158 (2022-02-01), S. e1-e9

academicJournal

Background: Making surgery as less aggressive as possible is best for elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Recently, we attempted a more precise, minimally invasive, and robot-assisted kyphoplasty in our clinical setting.

Objective: We sought to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (rPKP) with those of fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (fPKP) in treating OVCFs.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of patients with single-segment OVCF who received either rPKP or fPKP between January 2020 and December 2020 at our institution. The operation time, injected volume of cement, length of hospital stays, visual analog scale for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, local kyphosis angle (LKA), height of fractured vertebra (HFV), and perioperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: A total of 212 cases were included in this study, among whom 81 cases received rPKP and 131 cases received fPKP. Both techniques exhibited satisfying improvement in pain relief and radiologic outcomes. Specifically, the rPKP costed less operation time and achieved better correction and maintenance regarding LKA, HFV, and instant pain relief (P < 0.05). The length of hospital stays, incidence of cement leakage, visual analog scale for back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index at final follow-up were comparable between 2 groups.

Conclusions: rPKP provides a precise puncture and exhibits superiority in the correction and maintenance of LKA and HFV when compared with traditional fPKP. The cost-effectiveness and specific application scenarios of this technique shall be confirmed via further extensive studies.

Titel:	Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Kyphoplasty versus Fluoroscopy-Assisted Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Jin, M ; Ge, M ; Lei, L ; Li, F ; Wu, M ; Zhang, G ; Pei, S ; Zheng, B
Zeitschrift:	World neurosurgery, Jg. 158 (2022-02-01), S. e1-e9
Veröffentlichung:	New York : Elsevier, 2022
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1878-8769 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.066
Schlagwort:	Aged Back Pain drug therapy Bone Cements therapeutic use Fluoroscopy Humans Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Fractures, Compression diagnostic imaging Fractures, Compression surgery Kyphoplasty methods Kyphosis surgery Osteoporotic Fractures diagnostic imaging Osteoporotic Fractures surgery Robotics Spinal Fractures diagnostic imaging Spinal Fractures drug therapy Spinal Fractures surgery
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article Language: English [World Neurosurg] 2022 Feb; Vol. 158, pp. e1-e9. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2021 Oct 09. MeSH Terms: Fractures, Compression* / diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Compression* / surgery ; Kyphoplasty* / methods ; Kyphosis* / surgery ; Osteoporotic Fractures* / diagnostic imaging ; Osteoporotic Fractures* / surgery ; Robotics* ; Spinal Fractures* / diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Fractures* / drug therapy ; Spinal Fractures* / surgery ; Aged ; Back Pain / drug therapy ; Bone Cements / therapeutic use ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome Contributed Indexing: Keywords: CT-guided; Navigation; Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; Percutaneous kyphoplasty; Robot Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Bone Cements) Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20211012 Date Completed: 20220805 Latest Revision: 20220822 Update Code: 20240513

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.