Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Impact of radiologic variables on item responses of ODI, SRS22 and SF-36. in adult spinal deformity patients: differential item functioning (DIF) analysis results from a multi-center database.

Kieser, DC ; Yuksel, S ; et al.
In: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, Jg. 31 (2022-05-01), Heft 5, S. 1166-1173
Online academicJournal

Titel:
Impact of radiologic variables on item responses of ODI, SRS22 and SF-36. in adult spinal deformity patients: differential item functioning (DIF) analysis results from a multi-center database.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Kieser, DC ; Yuksel, S ; Boissiere, L ; Yilgor, C ; Cawley, DT ; Hayashi, K ; Alanay, A ; Kleinstueck, FS ; Pellise, F ; Perez-Grueso, FJS ; Jean-Marc, V ; Bourghli, A ; Acaroglu, ER ; Obeid, I
Link:
Zeitschrift: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, Jg. 31 (2022-05-01), Heft 5, S. 1166-1173
Veröffentlichung: Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany : Springer-Verlag, c1992-, 2022
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 1432-0932 (electronic)
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07088-5
Schlagwort:
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Databases, Factual
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Quality of Life
  • Scoliosis diagnostic imaging
  • Scoliosis surgery
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Corporate Authors: European Spine Study Group
  • Publication Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study
  • Language: English
  • [Eur Spine J] 2022 May; Vol. 31 (5), pp. 1166-1173. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Jan 21.
  • MeSH Terms: Quality of Life* ; Scoliosis* / diagnostic imaging ; Scoliosis* / surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome
  • References: Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029. ; Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(17):E599-606. ; Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):E803–E812. ; Good CR, Auerbach JD, O’Leary PT, Schuler TC (2011) Adult spine deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4(4):159–167. (PMID: 220210173261243) ; McCarthy I, O’Brien M, Ames C, Robinson C, Errico T et al (2014) Incremental cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery: observed quality-adjusted life years with surgery compared with predicted quality-adjusted life years without surgery. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E3. (PMID: 24785485) ; Kieser DC, Silman A, Rothenfluh DA (2019) The growing demand for adult spinal deformity surgery in England: a national health data review. JSNS 8:5. ; Pichelmann MA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Good CR, O’Leary PT, Sides BA (2010) Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(2):219–226. ; Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS, Hu SS, Deviren V et al (2009) Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):832–839. ; Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Hart RA et al (2013) Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(4):464–470. (PMID: 23971763) ; Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ et al (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(10):817–824. ; Liu S, Schwab F, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Ames CP et al (2014) Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment. Ochsner J 14(1):67–77. (PMID: 246883363963055) ; Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Berven S, Edwards C, Glassman S et al (2010) Changes in radiographic and clinical outcomes with primary treatment adult spinal deformity surgeries from two years to three- to five-years follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(20):1849–1854. ; Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Fu KM, Scheer JK, Bess S et al (2013) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the adult spinal deformity patient. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24(2):143–156. (PMID: 23561553) ; Boissière L, Takemoto M, Bourghli A, Vital JM, Pellisé F et al (2017) Global tilt and lumbar lordosis index: two parameters correlating with health-related quality of life scores-but how do they truly impact disability? Spine 17(4):480–488. ; Fujishiro T, Boissière L, Cawley DT, Larrieu D, Gille O et al (2019) Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score: Part 1: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients below 40 years with adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 28(7):1652–1660. (PMID: 30847705) ; Fujishiro T, Boissière L, Cawley DT, Larrieu D, Gille O et al (2020) Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 29(1):45–53. (PMID: 31317308) ; Rost J (1990) Rasch models in latent classes: an integration of two approaches to item analysis. Appl Psychol Meas 14(3):271–282. ; Strobl C, Kopf J, Zeileis A (2015) Rasch trees: a new method for detecting differential item functioning in the Rasch model. Psychometrika 80:289–316. (PMID: 24352514) ; Kopf J (2013) Model-based recursive partitioning meets item response theory: New statistical methods for the detection of differential item functioning and appropriate anchor selection. PhD dissertation, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-University Department of Statistics. ; Go Y, Boissiere L, Larrieu D, Bourghli A, Vital JM, Gille O et al (2017) Advantages and disadvantages of adult spinal deformity surgery and its impact on health-related quality of life. Spine Deformity 42:411–419. ; Kieser D, Boissière L, Ghailane S, Larrieu D, Bourghli A et al (2018) Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery: understanding the true impact on specific activities of daily living. Leban Med J 66(4):193–196. ; Hayashi K, Boissière L, Guevara-Villazón F, Larrieu D, Núñez-Pereira S et al (2019) Factors influencing patient satisfaction after adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 31(3):408–417. (PMID: 31075761) ; Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I et al (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. JBJS [Am] 99(19):1661–1672. ; Andrich D, Hagquist C (2012) Real and artificial differential item functioning. J Educ Behav Stat 37(3):387–416. ; Yüksel S, Demir P, Alkan A (2019) Factors causing occurrence of artificial dif: a simulation study for dichotomous data. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 48(7):2004–2011.
  • Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Cobb; Deformity; Scoliosis; Spine; Surgery
  • Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20220121 Date Completed: 20220520 Latest Revision: 20220913
  • Update Code: 20231215

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -