Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Reversal of diabetic-induced myopathy by swimming exercise in pregnant rats: a translational intervention study.

Catinelli, BB ; Rossignoli, PS ; et al.
In: Scientific reports, Jg. 12 (2022-05-05), Heft 1, S. 7375
Online academicJournal

Reversal of diabetic-induced myopathy by swimming exercise in pregnant rats: a translational intervention study 

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) plus rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) myopathy predicts long-term urinary incontinence (UI). Atrophic and stiff RAM are characteristics of diabetes-induced myopathy (DiM) in pregnant rats. This study aimed to determine whether swimming exercise (SE) has a therapeutic effect in mild hyperglycemic pregnant rats model. We hypothesized that SE training might help to reverse RAM DiM. Mild hyperglycemic pregnant rats model was obtained by a unique subcutaneous injection of 100 mg/kg streptozotocin (diabetic group) or citrate buffer (non-diabetic group) on the first day of life in Wistar female newborns. At 90 days of life, the rats are mated and randomly allocated to remain sedentary or subjected to a SE protocol. The SE protocol started at gestational day 0 and consisted of 60 min/day for 6 days/week in a period of 20 days in a swim tunnel. On day 21, rats were sacrificed, and RAM was collected and studied by picrosirius red, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. The SE protocol increased the fiber area and diameter, and the slow-twitch and fast-twitch fiber area and diameter in the diabetic exercised group, a finding was also seen in control sedentary animals. There was a decreased type I collagen but not type III collagen area and showed a similar type I/type III ratio compared with the control sedentary group. In conclusion, SE during pregnancy reversed the RAM DiM in pregnant rats. These findings may be a potential protocol to consider in patients with RAM damage caused by GDM.

These authors contributed equally: Bruna B. Catinelli and Patrícia S. Rossignoli.

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known as a serious global health problem[1]. GDM can cause damage to the skeletal muscle and extracellular matrix (ECM) health and function, i.e. maternal hyperglycemic myopathy[2]–[4]. Maternal GDM leads to long-term pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction and urinary incontinence (UI)[5]–[7], having pregnancy specific-urinary incontinence as a risk factor[5]. It is unknown how this link occurs[4] and how swimming exercise (SE) may alleviate this damage in mild hyperglycemic pregnancy (MHP).

Rat models of MHP also revealed myopathy of the PFM and rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) induced by diabetes (DiM). DiM characterized by muscle atrophy, a shift in the maternal fiber type composition, increased collagen deposition, and higher collagen type I/III ratio [8]–[11]. The latter characteristics mimic those found in human hyperglycemic-associated PFM and RAM myopathy and are considered a profile of skeletal muscle injury caused by GDM during pregnancy in humans [11]–[13]. Despite these observations, the link between GDM and maternal hyperglycemic myopathy remains largely unexplored and without an effective treatment [14].

Exercise has beneficial impacts on maternal glycaemia control and several lifestyle interventions have clarified mechanisms underlying GDM for preventing or minimizing this disease's associated complications [8],[9],[14]–[18]. However, different exercise patterns improve maternal glucose control in some but not all pregnant women with GDM [19]–[21]. Thus, lifestyle interventions during pregnancy alone may not be sufficient to decrease the risk of developing GDM-associated alterations in maternal health [22]–[27].

Considering that pregnant women should avoid high-impact exercises with the risk of falling and with the risk of abdominal trauma, SE is considered ideal for pregnant women. Also, SE in a low-moderate intensity is effective in promoting glycemic control and preventing GDM [21],[24],[27]. In addition, SE and resistance training influence the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles myopathy in rat models of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)[28],[29]. However, there is limited evidence describing the effect of SE on diabetic myopathy in GDM [22],[30]. There are no studies revealing whether the exercise intervention during pregnancy recovers the muscle damage associated with GDM, even considering the regenerative skeletal muscle fibers potential [31].

The aim of this study was to determine whether SE has a therapeutic effect in MHP rats model resulting in attenuation of RAM DiM. We hypothesized that SE training would mitigate RAM DiM, thus reversing the RAM injury. A potential reversal of RAM DiM by SE may improve the handling of maternal hyperglycemic myopathy in women that developed GDM.

Results

The experimental design included three control groups, i.e., non-diabetic sedentary (NDsed), non-diabetic exercised (NDex), and diabetic sedentary allowing the analysis of the SE intervention in DiM in the authentic study group: the diabetic exercised (Dex). The OGTT showed that Dsed and Dex groups had two or more blood glucose measurements > 140 mg/dl. These data confirm that the generation of MHP rats model was efficient, including the animals in the experimental groups. The aquatic exercise practice during pregnancy did not promote changes in blood glucose levels (Fig. 1).

Graph: Figure 1Oral glucose tolerance test. Blood glucose level before the test and 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of intragastric glucose solution in Dsed and Dex groups.

The RAM DiM was confirmed in diabetic sedentary rats, demonstrated by the lower total muscle area and the fiber diameter compared with NDsed group (Fig. 2A,B). However, the fiber area was unaltered in Dsed compared with NDsed group.

Graph: Figure 2Histological sections of rat rectus abdominis muscle (RAM), obtained from CellSens Dimension (Olympus Corporation®) Version 1.16 image analysis software—(https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/software/cellsens/). (A) RAM samples were taken from non-diabetic sedentary (NDsed), non-diabetic exercised (NDex), diabetic sedentary (Dsed) and diabetic exercised (Dex) rats as described in "Materials and methods". RAM samples were stained with picrosirius red and immunohistochemistry against myosin heavy chain of slow and fast RAM fibers. (B) Picrosirius red staining for total muscle area, fiber area, and fiber diameter in RAM samples as in (A). (C) Immunohistochemistry for total slow-twitch fiber area,slow-twitch fiber area, and slow-twitch fiber diameter as in (A). (D) Immunohistochemistry for total fast-twitch fiber area,fast-twitch fiber area, and fast-twitch fiber diameter as in (A). Values are means ± S.D. (n = 5 animals/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Scale bar: 50 µm. Magnification: ×20.

The immunohistochemical analysis showed that the slow-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2C) were higher in Dsed compared with NDsed group. However, the fast-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2D) were unaltered in Dsed compared with NDsed group. The total collagen area and collagen I/III ratio (Fig. 3B) were unaltered in Dsed compared with NDsed group. However, type I collagen area and type III collagen area (Fig. 3C) were higher in Dsed compared with NDsed group.

Graph: Figure 3Immunohistochemical sections of rat rectus abdominis muscle (RAM), obtained from CellSens Dimension (Olympus Corporation ®) Version 1.16 image analysis software—(https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/software/cellsens/). (A) RAM samples were taken from non-diabetic sedentary (NDsed), non-diabetic exercised (NDex), diabetic sedentary (Dsed) and diabetic exercised (Dex) rats as described in Materials and methods. RAM samples were stained with Picrosirius red and immunohistochemistry using antibodies against type I and III collagen on RAM fibers. (B) Picrosirius red staining for total collagen area and immunohistochemistry for type I/III ratio. (C) Immunohistochemistry for type I and III collagen area as in (A). Values are means ± S.D. (n = 5 animals/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Scale bar: 50 µm. Magnification: ×20.

Electron micrographs of RAM from Dsed group showed disorganized Z lines, sarcomeres disruption areas and an increase in collagen deposition. Also, intermyofibrillar mitochondria, organized triads and myelin figures were observed (Fig. 4).

Graph: Figure 4Electron micrographs of rectus abdominis muscle (RAM). Samples of RAM were obtained from non-diabetic sedentary (NDsed), non-diabetic exercised (NDex), diabetic sedentary (Dsed), and diabetic exercised (Dex) rats. Magnifications (20.000 x) show a detailled area of the micrograph. The micrographs show disorganized Z lines (white arrows), sarcomeres disruption areas (asterisk), intermyofibrillar mitochondria (m), myelin figures (M), organized triads (t) and an increase in collagen deposition (+). Scale bar: 5 µm.

SE intervention in pregnancy in non-diabetic rats

The diameter of RAM fibers was significantly lower in the NDex group compared with NDsed group. However, there was no significant difference in total muscle area and fiber area between both groups (Fig. 2A,B).

Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the slow-twitch fiber area and diameter were higher in NDex compared with NDsed (Fig. 2C). However, the total fast-twitch fiber area and fast-twitch fiber area and diameter were similar in NDex compared with NDsed (Fig. 2D). There was no difference in the total collagen area and type I/III collagen ratio between the groups (Fig. 3A,B). However, type I but not type III collagen area was increased in NDex compared to NDsed (Fig. 3C).

Electron micrographs of RAM from NDsed group showed disorganized Z lines, intermyofibrillar mitochondria, organized triads, and myelin figures associated with degenerated organelles (Fig. 4). However, the analysis of micrographs in samples from NDex group showed abundant intermyofibrillar mitochondria, organized triads, and myelin figures and organized Z lines.

SE in pregnancy in diabetic rats

In diabetic exercised rats, the fiber area and diameter was higher in Dex compared with Dsed group (Fig. 2A,B). However, the total muscle area was similar in both groups.

The immunohistochemical analysis showed that the slow-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2C) and the fast-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2D) were higher in Dex group compared with Dsed group. The total collagen area and type III collagen area were unaltered in Dex compared to Dsed group (Fig. 3A–C). However, type I collagen area and collagen I/III ratio in Dex were lower compared with Dsed group.

Ultrastructural analysis showed that Dex group presents with abundant intermyofibrillar mitochondria, disorganized Z lines, sarcomeres disruption areas, and increase in collagen deposition, as well as organized triads and myelin figures compared with RAM samples from Dsed group (Fig. 4).

SE in pregnancy in Dex, NDsed, NDex and Dsed

The fiber area and diameter were higher in Dex group compared with NDex group (Fig. 2A,B). However, the total muscle area was lower in Dex compared with NDex group.

The immunohistochemical analysis showed that the slow-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2C) and fast-twitch fiber area and diameter (Fig. 2D) were higher in Dex group compared with NDsed group. The total collagen area, type I collagen and collagen I/III ratio (Fig. 3A–C) were unaltered in Dex compared with Ndsed and NDexgroups. However, type III collagen area were higher in Dex group compared with NDsed group.

These results evidence that MHP rats after SE during the 3 weeks of pregnancy in a swim tunnel for up to 60 min/day, 6 days/week, that the study group (Dex) displays similar fiber area and diameter, slow-twitch, fast-twitch fiber area and diameter, total collagen area and type I/III collagen ratio compared to NDsed group (Figs. 2 and 3).

Discussion

We investigated whether swimming exercise (SE) would alter the RAM DiM in rats. This preclinical study of SE started on the first day in MHP rats detailed the reversal of RAM skeletal atrophic and stiff muscle through an integrative morphological, ultrastructural and extracellular matrix (ECM) assessment. The main findings of the present study are as follows: first, the RAM DiM was confirmed, demonstrated by lower total muscle area and fiber diameter and increased type I collagen and type III collagen deposition in Dsed compared with NDsed group. These findings were already reported by our group. Second, SE during the whole pregnancy in MHP rats model reversed the RAM skeletal atrophy through an increase in fiber area and diameter, slow-twitch fiber area and diameter, fast-twitch fiber area and diameter in Dex group compared with NDsed group; and reduction in type I collagen area and type I/III collagen ratio compared with Dsed. Also, the similarity in total collagen area, type I collagen area and type I/III collagen ratio with NDsed rats were demonstrated. The close resemblance between RAM morphological, and ECM profile of MHP rats model submitted to SE (Dex group) and NDsed, suggest that SE since the beginning of pregnancy reversed the DiM. These findings support the hypothesis that DiM is inhibited by 21 days of SE training program through the entire pregnancy. Indeed, SE training plays a critical role in the reversion of DiM. It may be a sufficient duration and intensity to induce recovery of morphological changes in skeletal muscle.

Women who develop GDM are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes and UI later in life[5]–[7],[32]. The underlying mechanism linking GDM and long-term UI seems to be diabetic myopathy, characterized by loss of muscle mass and strength [33],[34]. Many clinical and experimental studies have associated both type 1 and type 2 diabetes to muscle structural changes, including a reduction in myofiber and myofibrilar diameter, reduced muscle mass [3],[33], reduced muscle fiber size [35], and decreased capacity to repair from damage [33].

MHP rats is an experimental model that induces structural changes including reduced muscle area and increased slow-twitch fiber in pregnant rats in RAM [10] and in urethral striated muscle [8],[9], either in women or in rats [11]. These structural harms may be related to functional changes as well as a decline in muscle strength and increased fatigability, which contributes to decreased physical capacity [3],[35]. Therefore, this damage to muscles involved in urinary continence may contribute to increased incidence of PS-UI, a predictor of long-term UI in previous GDM women [5]. These findings allow us to adopt MHP' rats model for studying the effects of SE on the RAM fiber-ECM structure, as it mimics GDM in women [11]. Therefore, further study is necessary to elucidate the influence of exercise types and duration on the muscle fiber cross-sectional area of MHP rats' skeletal muscle.

SE started at the first day of pregnancy in MHP rats may be considered a preclinical study being developed as a prevention strategy of hyperglycemia in pregnancy for long-term UI. Our intention was for longer-lasting interventions leading to significant downstream impact in promoting long-term women's health. The goals of this early intervention program in pregnancy are related to improving future maternal health in GDM women, one of the United Nation's Eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) [36],[37].

Pregnancy is the center of a program established by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) in the Non-Communicable Disease (NCD)—as early as possible but focusing on the first-trimester and follow-up post-pregnancy for mother and offspring, leading to prevent NCD. Pregnancy, in particular the first trimester, receive not only substantial attention but also many points of intervention, from pre-conception to postpartum [37]. However, there are few studies evaluating the impact of hyperglycemia in pregnancy on structural muscles damage involved in urinary continence. This study tested the hypothesis that SE daily, since the beginning of pregnancy in MHP rats could act as a protective non-pharmacological intervention, so we studied its effects on RAM muscle looking at the reversal of muscle atrophy and stiffness.

Increased muscle fiber cross-sectional area, fiber area and diameter in RAM of diabetic pregnant rats after 21 days of SE is similar to the reported after 8 weeks of aerobic training [38]. The results of this study revealed that SE daily, since the beginning of pregnancy in MHP rats, reverses the muscle atrophy caused by the maternal hyperglycemia environment. In short, these findings indicated that SE could reverse muscle atrophy in MHP rats, back into the NDsed group profile. In contrast, sarcomeres disruption areas were observed in both diabetic groups, which means that exercise had no impact on this parameter. Previous results demonstrate that RAM exposed to a hyperglycemic environment is characterized by a decrease in the number and area of the fast fiber and an increase in the number of slow fibers [10]. In our study, daily SE during all pregnancy had an effect not only on increasing fast-twitch fiber area and diameter but also on slow-twitch fiber area and diameter of RAM muscle in both exercised groups.

The present study shows that both exercised groups regardless of diabetes had increased fast-twitch fiber area and diameter. These findings support the possibility that DiM model is inhibited by exercise training [39]. Different SE modalities increased diameter of both slow-twitch and fast-twitch fibers on gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the type 2 diabetes animal model [28]. Thus, the high slow-twitch fiber area and diameter in the RA muscle of both exercised groups regardless of diabetes and high fast-twitch fiber area and diameter in diabetic exercised rats could be attributed to physiological adaptations from aerobic exercise during the whole pregnancy. Consistent with previous studies, we demonstrated that SE training during the whole pregnancy induces an increase not only in the cross-sectional area and slow-twitch fiber, but also the fast-twitch fiber [40],[41]. Indeed, SE applied in this study showed a significant reversal of muscle atrophy in pregnant hyperglycemic rats.

Exercise training plays an important role in the mitigation of muscular atrophy in DiM. Coherent with previous studies, a resistance training protocol enhanced muscle strength on extensor digitorum longus muscle, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles of male diabetic rats, improving muscle physical and motor function, minimizing the deleterious effect of diabetes on muscles[29]. Conversely, the fast and slow-twitch fiber area and diameter increase may be related to improved muscle endurance, possibly caused by mitochondrial biogenesis and increased mitochondrial enzymes activities. These findings enhance aerobic capacity and provide muscle contraction with less energy expenditure and greater oxygen uptake [42].

The urethral extracellular matrix also plays a role in the mechanism of urinary continence [43]. In prior translational studies in rats, it was shown that diabetes during pregnancy results in damaged extracellular matrix (ECM) and urethral striated muscle suggestive of the high long-term UI prevalence in women [8],[9]. Other studies examined the relationship between ECM components (particularly collagens) and diabetes, PFDs and pregnancy, although few comparative data are available [18]. The results in the present study show that SE in MHP rats did not reduce the total collagen area compared with the three other groups. However, SE in MHP rats decreases type I collagen area to similar levels of non-diabetic sedentary group and maintain high levels of type III collagen similar to SE MHP and SE non-diabetic group. The decrease in collagen type I/III ratio in SE-MHP suggests the reversal of a stiff into a soft healthy skeletal muscle. Our findings complement the results of four previously experimental studies, either in RAM or PFM [8],[10],[18],[43] indicating a complete muscle remodeling. It confirms the importance of this biological approach in DiM. This changeover in collagen type I/III ratio in SE in MHP favors normal soft RAM muscle, with likely normalization of biomechanical properties in muscles involved in urinary continence. All these changes allow suggesting SE for assessment as a potential treatment for maternal UI injured by the maternal hyperglycemic environment.

Although this set of results related to SE in mitigating the negative effects of the maternal hyperglycemic environment on DiM in the transformation into a soft health muscle, the molecular regulations of this gain muscle mass is unclear. It was suggested that distinct mechanisms regulate skeletal muscle mass recovery and hypertrophy [44]. Further studies should address this fundamental mechanism. This study as a preclinical model in the obstetrical area, the maternal-placental and fetal (MPF) unit needs to be carefully considered. Although we conducted this experiment by using the same swimming protocol established previously [45]–[47], the whole MPF unit analysis was not performed. Thus, our successful results with SE in MHP rats environment may be analysed with caution to be considered in GDM women. Also, the present study has limitations regarding the experimental diabetes induction, which represents GDM blood glucose levels, but occurred before pregnancy [47]–[49]. In addition, the guidelines recommend that pregnant women should exercise at least 150 min/week or 30 min/day most days of the week [22],[23],[25]. Also, specific analysis of aerobic capacity and muscle function should be explored.

In conclusion, hyperglycemia exerts an impact on DiM generating an atrophic and stiff muscle. SE intervention training during whole pregnancy in rats imposes a positive influence on DiM being capable of reversing this muscle atrophy and transforming a stiff into a soft healthy skeletal muscle. Therefore, these findings of reversal myopathy suggest that SE training during the whole pregnancy may play a therapeutic role in regulating the damages caused by the maternal hyperglycemic environment and may be considered as a potential treatment for RAM damage caused by GDM.

Materials and methods

This current project corresponds to the translational part of the Diamater Study, a cohort Thematic Project with the financial support of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2016/01743-5), a state research foundation in Brazil. The Diamater cohort project has been developed to investigate biomolecular muscle profiles as predictors for long-term urinary incontinence in women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus [4]. According to the requirement to develop innovative treatments for DiM, this translational project was developed.

Ethics and animals

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, São Paulo State University (UNESP), in accordance with the Brazilian Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) (protocol number 007/2016). The study is reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Female and male Wistar rats obtained from ANILAB were housed in a facility with constant temperature (22 ± 2 ˚C) and humidity (55 ± 5%) on a controlled 12 h light–12 h dark cycle with food and water ad libitum, in individual plastic cages during all experimental protocol. The experimental sequence is shown in Fig. 5.

Graph: Figure 5Experimental sequence of groups.

Generation of MHP rats model

The MHP model is the same as previous reports [9]–[11],[46],[47]. To induce MHP rats' model, newborn female Wistar received in the first day of life subcutaneously injection of STZ (Sigma®) diluted in citrate buffer (0.1 mol/l pH 4.5) in a dose of 100 mg/kg. Non-diabetic rats received subcutaneous injection of citrate buffer (0.1 mol/l pH 4.5) [50]. All female newborn rats were maintained with their mothers until the end of the lactation period (21 days). After this period, the mother rats were euthanized by sodium thiopental injection(Thiopentax®—80 mg/kg). The female newborns were maintained until adulthood. Fasting blood glucose level was determined in adult life, and used for inclusion or exclusion criteria in the study. Diabetic animals should present blood glucose level between 120 mg/dl and 300 mg/dl, and non-diabetic animals blood glucose level < 120 mg/dl [51].

Mating process

At approximately day 90 of age, four diabetic and non-diabetic female rats were housed overnight with one adult male rat. The presence of spermatozoa in the vaginal smear was considered gestational day 0 [52]. After, rats were housed in individual cages until 21º day of pregnancy.

Experimental groups

On gestational day 0, female rats were randomly allocated into four experimental groups according to sedentary lifestyle or swimming exercise: Non-Diabetic Sedentary (NDsed) (n = 13), Non-Diabetic Exercised (NDex) (n = 13), Diabetic Sedentary (Dsed) (n = 13) and Diabetic Exercised (Dex) (n = 13). Dex is the study group and the other three (NDsed, NDex and Dsed) are control groups.

Swimming exercise protocol

The swimming exercise protocol was based on previous studies [45]–[47] and considered to be a moderate intensity exercise protocol [45]. The exercised animals were exposed to water daily temperature 31 ± 1°C for 6 days/week, from gestational day 0 until gestational day 20 on a pool at a depth of 40 cm at the water. The first training session started with 20 min, progressively increasing 10 min/day until 60 min. The sedentary rats were exposed to water daily for 15 min, at a depth of 10 cm at water temperature 31 ± 1 °C for 6 days/week, from gestational day 0 until gestational day 20, aiming not to promote physiological adaptations from exercise practice.

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

On gestational day 17, an OGTT was performed to confirm the glucose intolerance in diabetics [50]. Fasting glycemia and at 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after administration of an intragastric glucose solution (0.2 g/mL) in a dose of 2.0 g/kg were measured. Diabetes diagnosis was confirmed with two or more blood glucose measurements > 140 mg/dL [51].

RAM tissue extraction

At the end of pregnancy (gestational day 21) the dams were euthanized by sodium thiopental injection (Thiopentax, Brazil, 80 mg/kg dose). An abdominal incision was performed for RAM sample collection. The lower third on the right side of RAM was exposed, dissected, and removed for integrative morphological analysis. The fragments had approximately 0.25 cm2. Then, a C-section was performed and fetuses and placentas were separately analyzed in different projects.

Integrative morphological analysis

The samples obtained were selected into separate parts according to methodological procedures. The integrative morphological analysis is composed by morphological, morphometric, immunohistochemistry and ultrastructural RAM analysis.

Morphological analysis

For morphological and morphometric analysis, RAM samples were immersed for 24 h in neutral 10% buffered formaldehyde, transferred to 70% alcohol and maintained at room temperature and then embedded in paraffin. The 4-µm-thick sections were cut in microtome (Reichert-Jung model 820) and fixed on microscope glass slides stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and Picrosirius Red. H&E-stained slides were used to observe the general morphology of the RAM. Picrosirius Red-stained slides were analyzed with the color-segmentation method to determine the red (collagen) and yellow (muscle fiber) -stained tissue in the same section and used to determine muscle, fiber and collagen area and fiber diameter. The slides were analyzed in a light microscope (Olympus Corporation®/BX41TF coupled with DP25-4 digital câmera). The photographs were obtained with cell Sens Ver 1.18 Olympus Corporation® software.

Morphometric analysis

For morphometric analysis of muscle and collagen area, 40 sections/group (5 animals/group, 8 sections/animal) were selected. For morphometric analysis of fiber area and diameter, 100 muscle fibers/group were selected. All analyzes were performed using CellSens Dimension Version 1.16 (Olympus Corporation®) image analysis software (20 × magnification).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical analysis was used to stain slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscle fibers and type I and III collagen. For immunohistochemistry (N = 5 samples/group), the samples were immersed for 24 h in neutral 10% buffered formaldehyde, transferred to 70% alcohol and maintained at room temperature and then embedded in paraffin. The 4-µm-thick sections were cut in the microtome. Sections were deparaffinized and incubated with antigenic recovery for 35 min in a pressure cooker. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked using H2O2 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After washing, the sections were incubated with bovine serum albumin solution (BSA 3%) for 1 h. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against myosin heavy chain, slow (Novocastra, NCL-MHCs, #6009289, 1:20) and fast (Novocastra, NCL-MHCf, #6006929, 1:20) muscle fibers, type I Collagen (Sigma Aldrich, SAB4200678, #107M4839V, 1:100) and type III Collagen (Novus Biologicals, COL3A1, #G0809, 1:100). After incubation, the sections were washed three times for five minutes with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h 30 min (Goat Anti-Mouse, Abcam, 1:200). For staining, the sections were incubated with diaminobenzidine for 1 min and hematoxylin for 10 min. The slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscle fibers, and type I and III Collagen were analyzed using a light microscope (Olympus Corporation®/BX41TF coupled with DP25-4 digital câmera) and 40 sections/group (5 animals/group, 8 sections/animal) were selected to quantify the fiber type area and collagen type area. Also, each muscle fiber was manually selected (~ 200 slow fibers/group; ~ 330 fast fibers/group) and fiber type area and diameter were quantified using CellSens Dimension (Olympus Corporation®) Version 1.16 image analysis software (20 × magnification). The fiber type area was quantitatively determined, as described previously[10].

Ultrastructural analysis

As previously described, the RAM tissues obtained to ultrastructural analysis (3 samples/group) were cut into small strips and immediately immersed in Karnovsky fixative for 3 h at room temperature and transferred to the refrigerator to post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide for 24 h and afterward, the samples were embedded in epoxy resin. Ultra-thin sections were obtained at a longitudinal orientation and stained sections were examined using transmission electron microscopy using (JEM 1400, JEOL®).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism® v.8.0 software was used to analyze the data. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons of measurements among groups were performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests. For all statistical comparisons, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support from researchers and for the access to the infrastructure of UNIPEX (Experimental Research Unit) Botucatu Medical School—UNESP and Physiological Sciences Laboratory—School of Phylosophy and Sciences—UNESP.Special thanks to Augusto Nascimento from the Physiological Science Laboratory (Campus of Marília) and PauloGeorgete from UNIPEX (Campus of Botucatu) and Cirilo (University of Marília). Transmission electron microscopy images were obtained at the Centre of Microscopy and Image (CMI), Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP. Technical support of Flavia Sammartino Mariano Rodrigues is appreciated. This study was supported by FAPESP—Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grant number 2016/01743-5), CNPq—Conselho Nacional de DesenvolvimentoCientífico e Tecnológico to MVC Rudge (305116/2018-5). BB Catinelli received a master scholarship from FAPESP—Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2018/03361-8), JF Floriano and RLS Hallur received Posdoc scholarships from FAPESP (Grant numbers 2017/21783-4 and 2018/02979-8). L Sobrevia thanks the support from the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) (Grant number 1190316), Chile, and International Sabbaticals (University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands) from the Vicerectorate of Academic Affairs, Academic Development Office of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: M.V.C.R., A.M.P.B. and P.S.R. Data curation: B.B.C., M.V.C.R., A.M.P.B., P.S.R. and M.A.S. Formal analysis: B.B.C., P.S.R., A.M.P.B. and M.V.C.R. Funding acquisition: M.V.C.R., I.M.P.C. and A.M.P.B. Investigation/Methodology/Sample collection: B.B.C., P.S.R., A.M.C., J.F., M.A.S., S.L.F., R.G.O., N.J.S., L.C.C.U. Project administration: B.B.C., M.V.C.R., A.M.P.B., P.S.R. and I.M.P.C. Supervision: M.V.C.R., A.M.P.B. and P.S.R. Writing-original draft: B.B.C., P.S.R., M.A.S., S.L.F. Writing-review & editing: B.B.C., L.S., P.S.R., A.M.C., J.F., S.L.F., R.H., M.A.S., R.G.O., N.J.S., L.C.C.U., I.M.P.C., A.M.P.B., M.V.C.R. The Diamater Study Group designated as authors qualify for authorship as a fundamental part of this study. B.B.C. master scholarship fromFapesp. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References 1 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42: 13-28 2 Hernández-ochoa EO, Llanos P, Lanner JT. The underlying mechanisms of diabetic myopathy. J. Diabetes Res.. 2017; 2017: 3-6 3 Perry CGR, Hawke TJ. Diabetic myopathy : Current molecular understanding of this novel neuromuscular disorder. Curr. Opin. Neurol.. 2017. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000479. 28665810. 6051727 4 Rudge MVC. Study protocol to investigate biomolecular muscle profile as predictors of long-term urinary incontinence in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Pregnancy Childb.. 2020; 20: 1-14. 10.1186/s12884-020-2749-x. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXksFGltLs%3D 5 Barbosa AMP. Urinary incontinence and vaginal squeeze pressure two years post-cesarean delivery in primiparous women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Clinics. 2011; 66: 1341-1346. 21915481. 3161209 6 Kim C, McEwen LN, Sarma AV, Piette JD, Herman WH. Stress urinary incontinence in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Women's Health. 2008; 17: 783-792. 10.1089/jwh.2007.0616 7 Chuang CM. The impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on postpartum urinary incontinence: A longitudinal cohort study on singleton pregnancies. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.. 2012; 119: 1334-1343. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03468.x 8 Piculo F. Urethral striated muscle and extracellular matrix morphological characteristics among mildly diabetic pregnant rats: Translational approach. Int. Urogynecol. J.. 2014; 25: 403-415. 24043129. 10.1007/s00192-013-2218-4 9 Marini G, Piculo F, Vesentini G, Barbosa AMP, Damasceno DC, Matheus SMM, Rudge M. Effects of short-term severe and long-term mild STZ-induced diabetes in urethral tissue of female rats. Neurourol. Urodyn.. 2017; 36: 574-579. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXks12ns7g%3D. 26949929. 10.1002/nau.22974 Vesentini G. Morphological changes in rat rectus abdominis muscle induced by diabetes and pregnancy. J. Med. Biol. Res.. 2018; 51: 1-10 Vesentini G. Alterations in the structural characteristics of rectus abdominis muscles caused by diabetes and pregnancy: A comparative study of the rat model and women. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: 1-17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231096. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnvVGmsLc%3D SartorãoFilho CI. Impact of gestational diabetes on pelvic floor: A prospective cohort study with three-dimensional ultrasound during two-time points in pregnancy. Neurourol. Urodyn.. 2020; 39: 2329-2337. 10.1002/nau.24491 Prudencio CB. Negative impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on progress of pelvic floor muscle electromyography activity: Cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14: 1-13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0223261. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXit1emt7%2FL Floriano JF, Willis G, Catapano F. Exosomes could offer new options to combat the long-term complications inflicted by gestational diabetes mellitus. Cells. 2020; 9: 675. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhsVSqtL3O. 7140615. 10.3390/cells9030675 Marianna Alperin TK, Pichika R, Esparza MC, Lieber RL. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in intramuscular extracellular matrix of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.. 2016. 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.018. 26953079. 5003683 Liu G, Daneshgari F. Temporal diabetes- and diuresis-induced remodeling of the urinary bladder in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.. 2020; 44195: 837-843 Marini G. The influence of hyperglycemia on the remodeling of urethral connective tissue in pregnant rats. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.. 2018; 221: 81-88. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXitVaktbzI. 29275277. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.032 Agha-jaffar R, Oliver N, Johnston D, Robinson S. Gestational diabetes mellitus : Does an effective prevention strategy exist ?. Nat. Publ. Gr.. 2016; 12: 533-546 Russo LM, Nobles C, Whitcomb BW, Ertel KA, Chasan-taber L. Physical activity interventions in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol.. 2015; 125: 576-582. 25730218. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000691 Wang C. Reports of major impact a randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Obstet. Gyecol.. 2017. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.037 Colberg SR, Castorino K, Jovanovič L. Prescribing physical activity to prevent and manage gestational diabetes. World J. Diabetes. 2013; 4: 256-262. 24379915. 3874484. 10.4239/wjd.v4.i6.256 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. American Diabetes Association. 5. Lifestyle management. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42: 46-60 Cordero Y, Mottola MF, Vargas J, Blanco M, Barakat R. Exercise is associated with a reduction in gestational diabetes mellitus. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.. 2015; 47: 1328-1333. 25333246. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000547 Di Biase N. Review of general suggestions on physical activity to prevent and treat gestational and pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy and in postpartum. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.. 2019; 29: 115-126. 30642790. 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.10.013 Huang X, Huang J, Wu J, Li M, Yang Z, Liu L, Lin T, Lan Y. Different exercises for pregnant women with gestational diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Sport. Med Phys Fit.. 2020; 60: 464-471 Davenport MH. Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med.. 2019. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099355. 31377724 Barakat R, Perales M, Cordero Y, Bacchi M, Mottola MF. Influence of land or water exercise in pregnancy on outcomes: A cross-sectional study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.. 2017; 49: 1397-1403. 28198729. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001234 Alaca N. Effects of different aerobic exercise frequencies on streptozotocin–nicotinamide-induced type 2 diabetic rats: Continuous versus short bouts and weekend warrior exercises. J. Diabetes. 2018; 10: 73-84. 4246001. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXjtFGguw%3D%3D. 28425181. 10.1111/1753-0407.12561 Martins CEC, Lima VBdS, Schoenfeld BJ, Tirapegui J. Effects of leucine supplementation and resistance training on myopathy of diabetic rats. Physiol. Rep.. 2017; 5: 1-10. 10.14814/phy2.13273. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXosl2ksLw%3D Tedesco FS, Dellavalle A, Diaz-manera J, Messina G, Cossu G. Review series repairing skeletal muscle : Regenerative potential of skeletal muscle stem cells. J. Clin. Invest.. 2010; 120: 16. 10.1172/JCI40373. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXislWgsA%3D%3D Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1773-1779. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmtlektr4%3D. 19465232. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5 Souza DMD, Al-sajee D, Hawke TJ, Pinheiro CHJ. Diabetic myopathy : Impact of diabetes mellitus on skeletal muscle progenitor cells. Front. Physiol.. 2013; 4: 1-7. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00379 Hernández-ochoa EO, Vanegas C. Diabetic myopathy and mechanisms of disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. (Los Angeles). 2015; 4: 1-5 Krause MP, Riddell MC, Hawke TJ. Effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus on skeletal muscle: Clinical observations and physiological mechanisms. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011; 12: 345-364. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXoslOmu78%3D. 20860561. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00699.x Hanson MA, Gluckman PD, Ma RCW, Matzen P, Biesma RG. Early life opportunities for prevention of diabetes in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 1. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1025 Poon LC, McIntyre HD, Hyett JA, da Fonseca EB, Hod M. The first-trimester of pregnancy—A window of opportunity for prediction and prevention of pregnancy complications and future life. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.. 2018; 145: 20-30. 29852233. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.002 Orleans ED. Comparison betweent the effects of swimming and treadmill-based aerobic training protocols in diabetic rats. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci.. 2018; 31: 610-618 Soares TS, Moraes-Souza RQ, Carneiro TB, Araujo-Silva VC, Schavinski AZ, Gratao TB, Damasceno DC, Volpato GT. Maternal-fetal outcomes of exercise applied in rats with mild hyperglycemia after embryonic implantation. Birth Defects Res.. 2020; 113: 1 Harber M, Trappe S. Single muscle fiber contractile properties of young competitive distance runners. J. Appl. Physiol.. 2008; 105: 629-636. 18535124. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00995.2007 Fry CS. Fibre type-specific satellite cell response to aerobic training in sedentary adults. J. Physiol.. 2014; 592: 2625-2635. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXps1Ojs7o%3D. 24687582. 4080942. 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271288 Qaisar R, Bhaskaran S, Remmen HV. Free radical biology and medicine muscle fiber type diversi fi cation during exercise and regeneration. Free Radic. Biol. Med.. 2016; 98: 56-67. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XltlOktbw%3D. 27032709. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.03.025 Marini G, de Rinaldi JC, Damasceno DC, Felisbino SL, Rudge MVC. Alterações da matriz extracelular causadas pelo diabetes: O impacto sobre a continência urinária. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obs.. 2014; 36: 328-333. 10.1590/SO100-720320140005014 Marangon L, Gobatto C, de Mello MKE. Utilization of an hyperbolic model for the determination of the critical load in swimming rats. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc.. 2002; 34: 149. 10.1097/00005768-200205001-00834 Manchado FDB, Gobatto CA, Contarteze RVL, Papoti MMM. Máxima fase estável de lactato é ergômetro-dependente em modelo experimental utilizando ratos. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. 2006; 6: 259-262. 10.1590/S1517-86922006000500007 Volpato GT, Damasceno DC, Kempinas WG, Rudge MVC, Calderon IMP. Effect of exercise on the reproductive outcome and fetal development of diabetic rats. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2009; 19: 852-858. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mfkt1Gitw%3D%3D. 20031028. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.027 Damasceno DC. Mild diabetes models and their maternal-fetal repercussions. J. Diabetes Res.. 2013; 2013: 26. 10.1155/2013/473575 Damasceno DC. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes models : Pathophysiological mechanisms and fetal outcomes. Biomed. Res. Int.. 2014; 1: 2014 Sinzato YK, Damasceno DC, Laufer-Amorim R, Rodrigues MMP, Oshiiwa M, Taylor KN. Plasma concentrations and placental immunostaining of interleukin-10 and tumornecrosis factor-α as predictors of alterations in the embryo-fetal organism and the placental development of diabetic rats. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.. 2011; 44: 206-211. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlvVSlsrg%3D. 21344139. 10.1590/S0100-879X2011007500015 Iessi IL. Evaluation of neonatally-induced mild diabetes in rats: Maternal and fetal repercussions. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr.. 2010; 2: 1-8. 10.1186/1758-5996-2-37. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnsVCjsb4%3D Damasceno, D.C., Kempinas, W.G., Volpato, G.T., Consoni, M., Rudge, M.V.C., Paumgartten, F. Anomalias Congênitas: Estudos Experimentais. (Coopmed, 2008). Nascimento, L. Avaliação de diferentes modelos de indução do diabete moderado em ratas Wistar e suas repercussões no organismo materno-fetal. (2014).

Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author

Titel:
Reversal of diabetic-induced myopathy by swimming exercise in pregnant rats: a translational intervention study.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Catinelli, BB ; Rossignoli, PS ; Floriano, JF ; Carr, AM ; de Oliveira RG ; Dos Santos, NJ ; Úbeda, LCC ; Spadella, MA ; Hallur, RLS ; Sobrevia, L ; Felisbino, SL ; Calderon, IMP ; Barbosa, AMP ; Rudge, MVC
Link:
Zeitschrift: Scientific reports, Jg. 12 (2022-05-05), Heft 1, S. 7375
Veröffentlichung: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-, 2022
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 2045-2322 (electronic)
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10801-z
Schlagwort:
  • Animals
  • Female
  • Pregnancy
  • Rats
  • Rats, Wistar
  • Streptozocin adverse effects
  • Swimming physiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental chemically induced
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental complications
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental therapy
  • Diabetes, Gestational
  • Muscular Diseases etiology
  • Muscular Diseases therapy
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Corporate Authors: Diamater Study Group
  • Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language: English
  • [Sci Rep] 2022 May 05; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 7375. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 May 05.
  • MeSH Terms: Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental* / chemically induced ; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental* / complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental* / therapy ; Diabetes, Gestational* ; Muscular Diseases* / etiology ; Muscular Diseases* / therapy ; Physical Conditioning, Animal* ; Animals ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Streptozocin / adverse effects ; Swimming / physiology
  • References: J Diabetes. 2018 Jan;10(1):73-84. (PMID: 28425181) ; Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):210.e1-7. (PMID: 26875952) ; Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S46-S60. (PMID: 30559231) ; Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Dec;19(6):852-8. (PMID: 20031028) ; J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):629-36. (PMID: 18535124) ; Cells. 2020 Mar 10;9(3):. (PMID: 32164322) ; Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):576-582. (PMID: 25730218) ; Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S13-S28. (PMID: 30559228) ; Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):403-15. (PMID: 24043129) ; Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:819065. (PMID: 24977161) ; J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:473575. (PMID: 23878822) ; World J Diabetes. 2013 Dec 15;4(6):256-62. (PMID: 24379915) ; Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014 Jul;36(7):328-33. (PMID: 25140572) ; J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;120(1):11-9. (PMID: 20051632) ; J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Mar;60(3):464-471. (PMID: 31684704) ; Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2329-2337. (PMID: 32857893) ; Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;145:20-30. (PMID: 29852233) ; Birth Defects Res. 2021 Feb 1;113(3):287-298. (PMID: 33058545) ; Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(8):1341-6. (PMID: 21915481) ; Front Physiol. 2013 Dec 20;4:379. (PMID: 24391596) ; Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Jun;12(4 Pt 1):345-64. (PMID: 20860561) ; Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):340-351. (PMID: 28161306) ; J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;17(5):783-92. (PMID: 18537481) ; Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018 Mar 01;51(4):e7035. (PMID: 29513796) ; Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1773-9. (PMID: 19465232) ; Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jul;47(7):1328-33. (PMID: 25333246) ; PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0231096. (PMID: 32243473) ; Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;29(2):115-126. (PMID: 30642790) ; PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0223261. (PMID: 31697712) ; Biochem Pharmacol (Los Angel). 2015 Oct;4(5):. (PMID: 26693099) ; Physiol Rep. 2017 May;5(10):e13273. (PMID: 28536139) ; Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 Sep;12(9):533-46. (PMID: 27339886) ; BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 23;12:1025. (PMID: 23176627) ; Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006 Sep;291(3):R837-43. (PMID: 16513765) ; J Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;592(12):2625-35. (PMID: 24687582) ; Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1397-1403. (PMID: 28198729) ; Free Radic Biol Med. 2016 Sep;98:56-67. (PMID: 27032709) ; Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Mar;36(3):574-579. (PMID: 26949929) ; Br J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;52(21):1367-1375. (PMID: 30337463) ; Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Mar;44(3):206-11. (PMID: 21344139) ; Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Oct;30(5):545-552. (PMID: 28665810) ; J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:7485738. (PMID: 29238729) ; Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Feb;221:81-88. (PMID: 29275277) ; BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1334-43. (PMID: 22901044) ; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):117. (PMID: 32075598) ; Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010 Jun 08;2(1):37. (PMID: 20529353)
  • Contributed Indexing: Investigator: MVC Rudge; AMP Barbosa; IMP Calderon; L Sobrevia; FP Souza; B Berghmans; L Thabane; B Junginger; CFO Graeff; CG Magalhães; RA Costa; SAM Lima; MR Kron-Rodrigues; SL Felisbino; W Barbosa; FJ Campos; G Bossolan; JE Corrente; HRC Nunes; J Abbade; PS Rossignoli; CR Pedroni; AN Atallah; ZIKJ Di Bella; SMM Uchoa; MAH Duarte; EA Mareco; ME Sakalem; N Martinho; LSR Hallur; DRA Reyes; FCB Alves; JPC Marcondes; CB Prudencio; FA Pinheiro; CI SartorãoFilho; SBCV Quiroz; T Pascon; SK Nunes; BB Catinelli; FVDS Reis; RG Oliveira; S Barneze; EMA Enriquez; L Takano; AM Carr; ABM Magyori; LF Iamundo; CNF Carvalho; M Jacomin; RE Avramidis; AJB Silva; MIG Orlandi; TD Dangió; HCM Bassin; MLS Takemoto; TD Caldeirão; NJ Santos; IO Lourenço; JM de Sá; IP Caruso; LT Rasmussen; GA Garcia; GTA Nava; CP Marques; DG Bussaneli; VKC Nogueira; CVC Rudge; F Piculo; GM Prata; VP Barbosa
  • Substance Nomenclature: 5W494URQ81 (Streptozocin)
  • Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20220505 Date Completed: 20220509 Latest Revision: 20220716
  • Update Code: 20240513
  • PubMed Central ID: PMC9072313

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -