Mapping contiguous XCO <subscript>2</subscript> by machine learning and analyzing the spatio-temporal variation in China from 2003 to 2019.

As China is the world's largest CO 2 emitter, it is important to understand the spatio-temporal variation of atmospheric CO 2 to reduce carbon emissions. Satellite remote sensing for carbon monitoring has been widely used and studied because of its long-term and large-scale characteristics. However, the satellite data results are very sparse with significant gaps due to narrow swath and other factors on CO 2 retrieval. The simple interpolation methods ignore the influential factors of CO 2 and loss the spatial resolution, which leads to the inability to quantify the spatio-temporal variation well. This study developed a machine learning method that considers carbon emissions, vegetation, and meteorology. Using the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO 2 (XCO 2 ) data of SCIAMACHY, GOSAT, and OCO-2, we derived monthly-scale contiguous XCO 2 data across China from 2003 to 2019 with 0.25° resolution. The results showed a good agreement with the satellite measurements, with the bias and standard deviation of 0.11 and 1.38 ppmv for the validation dataset, respectively. Moreover, the results were consistent with the model simulation and in-situ sites, indicating the ability to reflect long-term spatio-temporal variation with a finer texture. We analyzed the spatial distribution, seasonal variation, and long-term trends of XCO 2 in China, revealing that the machine learning method has comparable performance to model simulations. The results showed that XCO 2 is dominated by anthropogenic emissions spatially and has a clear seasonal cycle, with a larger amplitude the further north. The long-term trend shows the XCO 2 increased by an average rate of 2.17 ppmv per year from 2003 to 2019 in China, which is consistent with the global. The method and data can further study the carbon cycle and climate change.

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)