Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [Med Phys] 2024 Mar; Vol. 51 (3), pp. 2277-2292. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2023 Nov 22.
- MeSH Terms: Protons* ; Proton Therapy* ; Radiometry / methods ; Computer Simulation ; Calibration ; Monte Carlo Method ; Radiotherapy Dosage
- References: Andreo P, Burns D, Hohlfeld K, et al. TRS-398: Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. IAEA; 2004. ; DeLuca P, Wambersie A, Seltzer S, Dawson P. ICRU Report 78. Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. J ICRU. 2007;7:29-48. ; Karger CP, Jäkel O, Palmans H, Kanai T. Dosimetry for ion beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:R193. ; Palmans H, Lourenço A, Medin J, Vatnitsky SM, Andreo P. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:195012. ; Vedelago J, Karger CP, Jäkel O. A review on reference dosimetry in radiation therapy with proton and light ion beams: status and impact of new developments. Radiat Meas. 2022;157:106844. ; Lyman JT, Awschalom M, Berardo PA, et al. Protocol for heavy charged-particle therapy beam dosimetry. American Association of Physics in Medicine. Report No. 16 (1986). ; Diffenderfer ES, Verginadis II, Kim MM, et al. Design, implementation, and in vivo validation of a Novel Proton FLASH radiation therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106:440-448. ; Darafsheh A, Hao Y, Zwart T, et al. Feasibility of proton FLASH irradiation using a synchrocyclotron for preclinical studies. Med Phys. 2020;47:4348-4355. ; Winterhalter C, Togno M, Nesteruk K, et al. Faraday cup for commissioning and quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning beams at conventional and ultra-high dose rates. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66:124001. ; Togno M, Nesteruk KP, Schäfer R, et al. Ultra-high dose rate dosimetry for pre-clinical experiments with mm-small proton fields. Phys Med. 2022;104:101-111. ; Palmans H, Vatnitsky SM. Comment on ‘Proton beam monitor chamber calibration'. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:6585. ; DIN 6801-1:2019-09: Dosismessverfahren nach der Sondenmethode für Protonen- und Ionenstrahlung - Teil 1: Ionisationskammern, DIN-Normenausschuss Radiologie, DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.31030/3038366. ; Palmans H, Medin J, Vynckier S, et al. Reference Dosimetry of Scanned Proton Beams-State of the Art. Book of Extended Synopses, IDOS; 2019:120-122. ; Andreo P, Burns D, Kapsch R, McEwen M, Vatnitsky S. Status of the Update of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice. Book of Extended Synopses, IDOS; 2019:71. ; Gottschalk B, Cascio EW, Daartz J, Wagner MS. On the nuclear halo of a proton pencil beam stopping in water. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:5627-5654. ; Grusell E. On the definition of absorbed dose. Radiat Phys Chem. 2015;107:131-135. ; Palmans H, Vatnitsky SM. Beam monitor calibration in scanned light-ion beams. Med Phys. 2016;43:5835-5847. ; Gomà C, Safai S, Vörös S. Reference dosimetry of proton pencil beams based on dose-area product: a proof of concept. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:4991-5005. ; Zhu L, Zhang M, Xiang X, Wang X. Dose-area product determination and beam monitor calibration for the fixed beam of the Shanghai advanced proton therapy facility. Appl Sci. 2022;12(9):4111. ; Osorio J, Dreindl R, Grevillot L, et al. Monitor calibration of a synchrotron-based scanned light-ion beam delivery system. Z Med Phys. 2021;31:154-165. Special Issue: Ion Beam Therapy, Part I. ; Sawakuchi GO, Zhu XR, Poenisch F, et al. Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:3467. ; Bäumer C, Koska B, Lambert J, Timmermann B, Mertens T, Talla PT. Evaluation of detectors for acquisition of pristine depth-dose curves in pencil beam scanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(6):151163. ; Kuess P, Haupt S, Osorio J, et al. Characterization of the PTW-34089 type 147 mm diameter large-area ionization chamber for use in light-ion beams. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65:17NT02. ; ICRU. Key Data for Ionizing-Radiation Dosimetry: Measurement Standards and Measurement Standards and Applications. ICRU Report 90, Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 2014;14. ; Kern A, Bäumer C, Kröninger K., et al. Determination of surface dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2020;47:2277-2288. ; Tanaka M, Girard G, Davis R, Peuto A, Bignell N. Recommended table for the density of water between 0 ∘$^\circ$C and 40 ∘$^\circ$C based on recent experimental reports. Metrologia. 2001;38:301. ; Grusell E, Isacsson U, Montelius A, Medin J. Faraday cup dosimetry in a proton therapy beam without collimation. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40:1831. ; Janni JF. Energy loss, range, path length, time-of-ight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability: In two parts. Part 1. For 63 compounds Part 2. For elements 1 ≤$\le$ Z ≤$\le$ 92. At Data Nucl Data Tables. 1982;27:341-529. ; ICRU. Stopping powers and ranges for protons and alpha particles. ICRU Report 49, Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 1993:25. ; Verhey LJ, Koehler AM, McDonald JC, et al. The determination of absorbed dose in a proton beam for purposes of charged-particle radiation therapy. Radiat Res. 1979;79:34-54. ; Delacroix S, Bridier A, Mazal A, et al. Proton dosimetry comparison involving ionometry and calorimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:711-718. ; Cuttone G, et al. First dosimetry intercomparison results for the CATANA project. Physica Med. 1999;15:121-130. ; Jones A, Bloch C, Hall E, et al. Comparison of Indiana University Cyclotron Facility Faraday cup proton dosimetry with radiochromic films, a calorimeter, and a calibrated ion chamber. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46:1762-1765. ; Bäumer C, Ackermann B, Hillbrand M, et al. Dosimetry intercomparison of four German proton therapy institutions employing spot scanning. Z Med Phys. 2017;27:80-85. ; Bäumer C, Farr JB. Lateral dose profile characterization in scanning particle therapy. Med Phys. 2011;38:2904-2913. ; Verbeek N, Wulff J, Bäumer C, Smyczek S, Timmermann B, Brualla L. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code. Med Phys. 2021;48:456-476. ; Farah J, Mares V, Romero-Expósito M, et al. Measurement of stray radiation within a scanning proton therapy facility: EURADOS WG9 intercomparison exercise of active dosimetry systems. Med Phys. 2015;42:2572-2584. ; Trinkl S, Mares V, Englbrecht FS, et al. Systematic out-of-field secondary neutron spectrometry and dosimetry in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2017;44:1912-1920. ; De Saint-Hubert M, Verbeek N, Bäumer C, et al. Validation of a Monte Carlo framework for out-of-field dose calculations in proton therapy. Front Oncol. 2022;12:882489. ; Faddegon B, Ramos-Mendez J, Schuemann J, McNamara A, Shin J, Perl J, Paganetti H. The TOPAS Tool for Particle Simulation, a Monte Carlo Simulation Tool for Physics, Biology and Clinical Research, Physica Medica, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.03.019. ; Perl J, Shin J, Schumann J, Faddegon B, Paganetti H. TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6818-6837. ; Ehwald J, Togno M, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Safai S, Winterhalter C. Detailed Monte-Carlo characterization of a Faraday cup for proton therapy. Med Phys. 2023;50(9):5828-5841. ; Courtois C, Boissonnat G, Brusasco C, et al. Characterization and performances of a monitoring ionization chamber dedicated to IBA-universal irradiation head for Pencil Beam Scanning. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A: Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2014;736:112-117. ; Zhu XR, Poenisch F, Lii M, et al. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys. 2013;40:041723. ; Kugel F, Wulff J, Bäumer C, et al. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine. Z Med Phys. 2022;S0939-3889(22)00132-5. ; Peterson S, Polf J, Ciangaru G, Frank SJ, Bues M, Smith A. Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering. Med Phys. 2009;36:3693-3702. ; Medin J, Andreo P, Palmans H. Experimental determination of kQ$_Q$ factors for two types of ionization chambers in scanned proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:055001. ; Eaton JW, Bateman D, Hauberg S, Wehbring R. GNU Octave manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations, 2021. ; Pelliccioni M. Overview of fluence-to-effective dose and fluence-to-ambient dose equivalent conversion coefficients for high energy radiation calculated using the FLUKA code. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2000;88:279-297. ; Englbrecht FS, Trinkl S, Mares V, et al. A comprehensive Monte Carlo study of out-of-field secondary neutron spectra in a scanned-beam proton therapy gantry room. Z Med Phys. 2021;31:215-228. Special Issue: Ion Beam Therapy, Part I. ; Koning A, Rochman D, Sublet J-C, Dzysiuk N, Fleming M, van der Marck S. TENDL: complete nuclear data library for innovative nuclear science and technology. Nucl Data Sheets. 2019;155:1-55. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data. ; Gomà C, Lorentini S, Meer D, Safai S. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:4961. ; Lin S, Boehringer T, Coray A, Grossmann M, Pedroni E. More than 10 years experience of beam monitoring with the Gantry 1 spot scanning proton therapy facility at PSI. Med Phys. 2009;36:5331-5340. ; Winterhalter C, Fura E, Tian Y, et al. Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:175001. ; Cascio EW, Gottschalk B. A simplified vacuumless Faraday Cup for the experimental beamline at the Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center. In: IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop. IEEE; 2009:161-165. ; Clasie B, Depauw N, Fransen M. et al. Golden beam data for proton pencil-beam scanning. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:1147. ; Cambria R, Hérault J, Brassart N, Silari M, Chauvel P. Proton beam dosimetry: a comparison between the Faraday cup and an ionization chamber. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:1185. ; Sorriaux J, Testa M, Paganetti H, et al. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy. Med Phys. 2017;44:4919-4927. ; Moyers MF, Coutrakon GB, Ghebremedhin A, Shahnazi K, Koss P, Sanders E. Calibration of a proton beam energy monitor. Med Phys. 2007;34:1952-1966. ; Vignati A, Mas Milian F, Shakarami Z, et al. Calibration method and performance of a time-of-flight detector to measure absolute beam energy in proton therapy. Med Phys. 2023;50(9):5817-5827. ; Paganetti H, Gottschalk B. Test of GEANT3 and GEANT4 nuclear models for 160 MeV protons stopping in CH2$_2$. Med Phys. 2003;30:1926-1931. ; Hall DC, Makarova A, Paganetti H, Gottschalk B. Validation of nuclear models in Geant4 using the dose distribution of a 177 MeV proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol. 2015;61:N1-N10. ; Battistoni G, Toppi M, Patera V, The FOOT Collaboration. Measuring the impact of nuclear interaction in particle therapy and in radio protection in space: the FOOT experiment. Front Phys. 2021;8. ; Verburg JM, Seco J. Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:7089. ; Verburg JM, Shih HA, Seco J. Simulation of prompt gamma-ray emission during proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:5459-5472. ; Jeyasugiththan J, Peterson SW. Evaluation of proton inelastic reaction models in Geant4 for prompt gamma production during proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:7617-7635. ; Wrońska A, Kasper J, Ahmed AA, et al. Prompt-gamma emission in GEANT4 revisited and confronted with experiment. Physica Med. 2021;88:250-261. ; Kuess P, Böhlen TT, Lechner W, Elia A, Georg D, Palmans H. Lateral response heterogeneity of Bragg peak ionization chambers for narrow-beam photon and proton dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:9189. ; Bäumer C, Bäcker CM, Gerhardt M, et al. Measurement of absolute activation cross sections from carbon and aluminum for proton therapy. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2019;440:75-81. ; Lourenço A, Subiel A, Lee N, et al. Absolute dosimetry for FLASH proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2054. ; Schüller A, Heinrich S, Fouillade C, et al. The European Joint Research Project UHDpulse - Metrology for advanced radiotherapy using particle beams with ultra-high pulse dose rates. Physica Med. 2020;80:134-150. ; Romano F, Subiel A, McManus M, et al. Challenges in dosimetry of particle beams with ultra-high pulse dose rates. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1662:012028. ; Palmans H. SP-0231 IAEA TRS 398: Update for modern radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2021;161:159.
- Grant Information: 847707 EU Horizon 2020
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Faraday cup; proton therapy; reference dosimetry
- Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Protons)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20231122 Date Completed: 20240313 Latest Revision: 20240313
- Update Code: 20240313
|