Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, energy technology investment, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in the United States: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with novel Fourier estimation.

Apergis, N ; Degirmenci, T ; et al.
In: Environmental science and pollution research international, Jg. 30 (2023-12-01), Heft 60, S. 125570-125584
Online academicJournal

Titel:
Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, energy technology investment, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in the United States: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with novel Fourier estimation.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Apergis, N ; Degirmenci, T ; Aydin, M
Link:
Zeitschrift: Environmental science and pollution research international, Jg. 30 (2023-12-01), Heft 60, S. 125570-125584
Veröffentlichung: <2013->: Berlin : Springer ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Landsberg, Germany : Ecomed, 2023
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 1614-7499 (electronic)
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-30901-1
Schlagwort:
  • United States
  • Economic Development
  • Carbon Dioxide analysis
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Inventions
  • Renewable Energy
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Publication Type: Journal Article
  • Language: English
  • [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] 2023 Dec; Vol. 30 (60), pp. 125570-125584. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2023 Nov 25.
  • MeSH Terms: Inventions* ; Renewable Energy* ; United States ; Economic Development ; Carbon Dioxide / analysis ; Investments ; Technology
  • References: Adedoyin FF, Alola AA, Bekun FV (2020) An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor: The role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Sci Total Environ 713:136726. ; Ahmad N, Youjin L, Žiković S, Belyaeva Z (2023) The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technol Soc 72:102184. ; Ahmed Z, Cary M, Ali S, Murshed M, Ullah H, Mahmood H (2021) Moving toward a green revolution in Japan: symmetric and asymmetric relationships among clean energy technology development investments, economic growth, and CO2 emissions. Energy Environ 33(7):1417–1440. ; Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Murshed M, Shah MI, Mahmood H, Abbas S (2022) How do green energy technology investments, technological innovation, and trade globalization enhance green energy supply and stimulate environmental sustainability in the G7 countries? Gondwana Res 112:105–115. ; Albitar K, Borgi H, Khan M, Zahra A (2023) Business environmental innovation and CO2 emissions: The moderating role of environmental governance. Bus Strateg Environ 32(4):1996–2007. ; Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79:621–644. ; Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017) Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100. ; Ang JB (2009) CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China. Ecol Econ 68(10):2658–2665. ; Anwar MA, Nasreen S, Tiwari AK (2021) Forestation, renewable energy and environmental quality: Empirical evidence from Belt and Road Initiative economies. J Environ Manage 291:112684. ; Appiah M, Li M, Sehrish S, Abaji EE (2023) Investigating the connections between innovation, natural resource extraction, and environmental pollution in OECD nations; examining the role of capital formation. Resour Policy 81:103312. ; Aydin M, Bozatli O (2023) The effects of green innovation, environmental taxes, and financial development on renewable energy consumption in OECD countries. Energy 128105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128105. ; Aydin M, Degirmenci T (2023) The impact of clean energy consumption, green innovation, and technological diffusion on environmental sustainability: New evidence from load capacity curve hypothesis for 10 European Union countries. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2794. (PMID: 10.1002/sd.2794) ; Aydin M, Degirmenci T, Gurdal T, Yavuz H (2023a) The role of green innovation in achieving environmental sustainability in European Union countries: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Gondwana Res 118:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.013. ; Aydin M, Degirmenci T, Yavuz H (2023b) The influence of multifactor productivity, research and development expenditure, renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in G7 countries: testing the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Environ Model Assess 28:693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-023-09879-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s10666-023-09879-0) ; Aydin M, Sogut Y, Altundemir ME (2023c) Moving toward the sustainable environment of European Union countries: Investigating the effect of natural resources and green budgeting on environmental quality. Resour Policy 83:103737. ; Chen YC (2018) Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from municipal and industrial solid waste using waste-to-energy technology. J Clean Prod 192:262–269. ; Chen W, Lei Y (2018) The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: New evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renew Energy 123:1–14. ; Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67(4):331–339. ; Cheng Y, Yao X (2021) Carbon intensity reduction assessment of renewable energy technology innovation in China: A panel data model with cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110157. ; Climate Watch (2023) Historical GHG Emissions, https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Wu S (2008) Industrial activity and the environment in China: an industry-level analysis. China Econ Rev 19:393–408. ; Danish, Ulucak R (2022) Analyzing energy innovation-emissions nexus in China: a novel dynamic simulation method. Energy 123010. ; Degirmenci T, Aydin M (2023) The effects of environmental taxes on environmental pollution and unemployment: A panel co-integration analysis on the validity of double dividend hypothesis for selected African countries. Int J Financ Econ 28(3):2231–2238. ; Destek MA, Manga M (2021) Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21991–22001. ; Destek MA, Pata UK (2023) Carbon efficiency and sustainable environment in India: impacts of structural change, renewable energy consumption, fossil fuel efficiency, urbanization, and technological innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(40):92224–92237. ; Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537. ; Enders W, Lee J (2012) A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 74(4):574–599. ; Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy (2023) https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; Erdogan S, Pata UK, Solarin SA (2023) Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 186:113683. ; Fernández YF, López MF, Blanco BO (2018) Innovation for sustainability: the impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 172:3459–3467. ; Fethi S, Rahuma A (2019) The role of eco-innovation on CO 2 emission reduction in an extended version of the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the top 20 refined oil exporting countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:30145–30153. ; Ganda F (2019) The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 217:469–483. ; Garrone P, Grilli L (2010) Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An Empirical Investigation. Energy Policy 38(10):5600–5613. ; Global Footprint Network (2023). https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/ . Accessed 08.09.2023. ; Gu W, Zhao X, Yan X, Wang C, Li Q (2019) Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 236:117666. ; Hassan T, Khan Y, Safi A, Chaolin H, Wahab S, Daud A, Tufail M (2023) Green financing strategy for low-carbon economy: The role of high-technology imports and institutional strengths in China. J Clean Prod 415:137859. ; Hayat S, Safi A, Wahab S, Shahzad K, Chen Y (2023) Renewable energy R&D and natural resources: A success story of environmentally friendly financing in OECD economies. Resour Policy 83:103655. ; He A, Xue Q, Zhao R, Wang D (2021) Renewable energy technological innovation, market forces, and carbon emission efficiency. Sci Total Environ 796:148908. ; IEA (2021) Tracking SDG7: the energy progress report, 2021. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-sdg7-the-energy-progress-report-2021 . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; IEA (2022) Tracking SDG7: the energy progress report, 2022. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-sdg7-the-energy-progress-report-2022 . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; IEA (2023) Energy Technology RD&D Budgets Data Explorer, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-technology-rdd-budgets-data-explorer . Accessed 07.09.2023. ; Inal V, Gurdal T, Degirmenci T, Aydin M (2022) The effects of military expenditures on labor productivity, innovation and economic growth for the most militarized countries: panel data analysis, Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0852. ; Inglesi-Lotz R (2017) Social rate of return to R&D on various energy technologies: Where should we invest more? A study of G7 countries. Energy Policy 101:521–525. ; Jiao Z, Sharma R, Kautish P, Hussain HI (2021) Unveiling the asymmetric impact of exports, oil prices, technological innovations, and income inequality on carbon emissions in India. Res Policy 74:102408. ; Kahouli B (2018) The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy 145:388–399. ; Khattak SI, Ahmad M, ulHaq Z, Shaofu G, Hang J (2022) On the goals of sustainable production and the conditions of environmental sustainability: Does cyclical innovation in green and sustainable technologies determine carbon dioxide emissions in G-7 economies. Sustain Pro Cons 29:406–420. ; Kocak E, Alnour M (2022) Energy R&D expenditure, bioethanol consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: Non-linear analysis and political implications. J Clean Prod 374:133887. ; Lee CW, Zhong J (2014) Top down strategy for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and implementation. Renew Energy 68:761–773. ; Leenders MA, Chandra Y (2013) Antecedents and consequences of green innovation in the wine industry: the role of channel structure. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 25(2):203–218. ; Li ZZ, Li RYM, Malik MY, Murshed M, Khan Z, Umar M (2021) Determinants of carbon emission in China: how good is green investment? Sustain Pro Cons 27:392–401. ; Lin B, Zhu J (2019) Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. J of Environ Manag 247:662–671. ; Liu X, Wahab S, Hussain M, Sun Y, Kirikkaleli D (2021) China carbon neutrality target: revisiting FDI-trade-innovation nexus with carbon emissions. J Environ Manag 294:113043. ; Luo B, Khan AA, Safi A, Yu J (2023) Research methods in economics to evaluate the role of energy efficiency and financial inclusion in achieving China’s carbon neutrality target. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(1):1774–1802. ; Ma Q, Murshed M, Khan Z (2021) The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy 155:112345. ; Mahesh A, Jasmin KS (2013) Role of renewable energy investment in India: An alternative to CO2 mitigation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:414–424. ; Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books, New York. ; Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990. ; Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Economet 16(3):289–326. ; Razzaq A, Sharif A, Ahmad P, Jermsittiparsert K (2021) Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach. Sust Dev 29(1):176–193. ; Safi A, Chen Y, Zheng L (2022) The impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on sustainable environment in emerging seven (E-7) countries: does institutional quality matter? Front Public Health 10:878243. ; Safi N, Rashid M, Shakoor U, Khurshid N, Safi A, Munir F (2023) Understanding the role of energy productivity, eco-innovation and international trade in shaping consumption based carbon emissions: a study of BRICS nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:98338–98350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29358-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-023-29358-z) ; Sam CY, McNown R, Goh SK (2019) An augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration. Econ Model 80:130–141. ; Shan S, Genç SY, Kamran HW, Dinca G (2021) Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: A sustainable investigation from Turkey. J Environ Manag 294:113004. ; Shao X, Zhong Y, Liu W, Li RYM (2021) Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. J Environ Manag 296:113189. ; Syed QR, Apergis N, Goh SK (2023) The dynamic relationship between climate policy uncertainty and renewable energy in the US: Applying the novel Fourier augmented autoregressive distributed lags approach. Energy 275:127383. ; Tao Y, Destek MA, Pata UK, Khan Z (2023) Environmental Regulations and Carbon Emissions: The Role of Renewable Energy Research and Development Expenditures. Sustainability 15(18):13345. ; Umar M, Safi A (2023) Do green finance and innovation matter for environmental protection? A case of OECD economies. Energy Econ 119:106560. ; UNFCCC (2002) United States of America. National Communication (NC). NC 3, https://unfccc.int/documents/198780 . Accessed 05.09.2023. ; Usman M, Radulescu M (2022) Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci Total Environ 841:156662. ; Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Jahanger A, Ahmad P (2023) Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions. Gondwana Res 13:53–70. ; Wang M, Feng C (2018) Using an extended logarithmic mean Divisia index approach to assess the roles of economic factors on industrial CO2 emissions of China. Energy Econ 76:101–114. ; Wang Z, Zhu Y (2020) Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Sci Total Environ 726:138574. ; Wang B, Sun Y, Wang Z (2018) Agglomeration effect of CO2 emissions and emissions reduction effect of technology: A spatial econometric perspective based on China’s province-level data. J Clean Prod 204:96–106. ; Wang X, Zhang T, Nathwani J, Yang F, Shao Q (2022) Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons’ Paradox in China’s iron & steel industry. Tech Forecast Soc Chang 176:121471. ; WHO (2023) Air Pollution, https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1 . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; WHO (2023), Clean air and energy access for healthier populations and universal health coverage, https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/air-pollution-documents/air-quality-and-health/aqh_strategy_layout_v14_spreads.pdf?sfvrsn=918db48f_6&download=true . Accessed 03.09.2023. ; Wong SL, Chang Y, Chia WM (2013) Energy consumption, energy R&D and real GDP in OECD countries with and without oil reserves. Energy Econ 40:51–60. ; Xin D, Ahmad M, Lei H, Khattak SI (2021) Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States? Tech Soc 67:101761. ; Xu L, Fan M, Yang L, Shao S (2021) Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: evidence at China’s city level. Energy Econ 99:105269. ; Yang X, He L, Zhong Z, Wang D (2020) How does China’s green institutional environment affect renewable energy investments? The nonlinear perspective. Sci Total Environ 727:138689. ; Yii KJ, Geetha C (2017) The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from Granger causality test. Energy Proc 105:3118–3124. ; Zha D, Yang G, Wang Q (2019) Investigating the driving factors of regional CO2 emissions in China using the IDA-PDA-MMI method. Energy Econ 84:104521. ; Zhang M, Liu Y (2022) Influence of digital finance and green technology innovation on China’s carbon emission efficiency: Empirical analysis based on spatial metrology. Sci Total Environ 838(3):156463. ; Zhang X, Ma C, Song X, Zhou Y, Chen W (2016) The impacts of wind technology advancement on future global energy. Appl Energy 184:1033–1037. ; Zhang YJ, Peng YL, Ma CQ, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28. ; Zhao M, Sun T, Feng Q (2021) Capital allocation efficiency, technological innovation and vehicle carbon emissions: Evidence from a panel threshold model of Chinese new energy vehicles enterprises. Sci Total Env 784:147104.
  • Contributed Indexing: Keywords: EKC; Energy technology budget; Fourier A-ARDL; Green innovation; LCC; Renewable energy
  • Substance Nomenclature: 142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide)
  • Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20231124 Date Completed: 20240101 Latest Revision: 20240117
  • Update Code: 20240117

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -