| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Corporate Authors: Sanger Mouse Genetics Project
- Publication Type: Journal Article
- Language: English
- [Nature] 2024 Mar; Vol. 627 (8002), pp. 130-136. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 14.
- MeSH Terms: Genomic Instability* / genetics ; Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective* ; Animals ; Humans ; Mice ; Chromosomes / genetics ; DNA Damage ; Phenotype ; Sirtuin 1 ; Synthetic Lethal Mutations
- References: Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461, 1071–1078 (2009). (PMID: 19847258290670010.1038/nature08467) ; Leibowitz, M. L., Zhang, C.-Z. & Pellman, D. Chromothripsis: a new mechanism for rapid karyotype evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 183–211 (2015). (PMID: 2644284810.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092228) ; Campbell, P. J. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020). (PMID: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6) ; Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017). (PMID: 28738408587083010.1038/nature23449) ; Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017). (PMID: 28759889585735710.1038/nature23470) ; Bolognesi, C. et al. Chromosomal damage and ageing: effect on micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Age Ageing 28, 393–397 (1999). (PMID: 1045979410.1093/ageing/28.4.393) ; Yang, H., Wang, H., Ren, J., Chen, Q. & Chen, Z. J. cGAS is essential for cellular senescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E4612–E4620 (2017). (PMID: 28533362546861710.1073/pnas.1705499114) ; Glück, S. et al. Innate immune sensing of cytosolic chromatin fragments through cGAS promotes senescence. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1061–1070 (2017). (PMID: 28759028582656510.1038/ncb3586) ; Fenech, M. et al. Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis 26, 125–132 (2011). (PMID: 2116419310.1093/mutage/geq052) ; Ly, P. et al. Selective Y centromere inactivation triggers chromosome shattering in micronuclei and repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 68–75 (2016). (PMID: 27918550553976010.1038/ncb3450) ; Umbreit, N. T. et al. Mechanisms generating cancer genome complexity from a single cell division error. Science 368, eaba0712 (2020). ; Flynn, P. J., Koch, P. D. & Mitchison, T. J. Chromatin bridges, not micronuclei, activate cGAS after drug-induced mitotic errors in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103585118 (2021). (PMID: 34819364864093610.1073/pnas.2103585118) ; Liu, S. et al. Nuclear envelope assembly defects link mitotic errors to chromothripsis. Nature 561, 551–555 (2018). (PMID: 30232450659962510.1038/s41586-018-0534-z) ; Agustinus, A. S. et al. Epigenetic dysregulation from chromosomal transit in micronuclei. Nature 619, 176–183 (2023). (PMID: 372865931032272010.1038/s41586-023-06084-7) ; Papathanasiou, S. et al. Heritable transcriptional defects from aberrations of nuclear architecture. Nature 619, 184–192 (2023). (PMID: 372866001032270810.1038/s41586-023-06157-7) ; Crasta, K. et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482, 53–58 (2012). (PMID: 22258507327113710.1038/nature10802) ; Zhang, C.-Z. et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015). (PMID: 26017310474223710.1038/nature14493) ; Pereira, C. et al. Sequencing micronuclei reveals the landscape of chromosomal instability. Preprint at Biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.28.466311 (2021). ; Lin, Y.-F. et al. Mitotic clustering of pulverized chromosomes from micronuclei. Nature 618, 1041–1048 (2023). (PMID: 371651911030763910.1038/s41586-023-05974-0) ; Balmus, G. et al. A high-throughput in vivo micronucleus assay for genome instability screening in mice. Nat. Protoc. 10, 205–215 (2015). (PMID: 2555166510.1038/nprot.2015.010) ; Houlard, M. et al. MCPH1 inhibits condensin II during interphase by regulating its SMC2-Kleisin interface. eLife 10, e73348 (2021). (PMID: 34850681867383810.7554/eLife.73348) ; McIntyre, R. E. et al. Disruption of mouse Cenpj, a regulator of centriole biogenesis, phenocopies Seckel syndrome. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003022 (2012). (PMID: 23166506349925610.1371/journal.pgen.1003022) ; Holloway, J. K. et al. Mammalian BTBD12 (SLX4) protects against genomic instability during mammalian spermatogenesis. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002094 (2011). (PMID: 21655083310720410.1371/journal.pgen.1002094) ; Maciejowski, J. et al. APOBEC3-dependent kataegis and TREX1-driven chromothripsis during telomere crisis. Nat. Genet. 52, 884–890 (2020). (PMID: 32719516748422810.1038/s41588-020-0667-5) ; Pillai, R. S., Will, C. L., Lührmann, R., Schümperli, D. & Müller, B. Purified U7 snRNPs lack the Sm proteins D1 and D2 but contain Lsm10, a new 14 kDa Sm D1‐like protein. EMBO J. 20, 5470–5479 (2001). (PMID: 1157447912564510.1093/emboj/20.19.5470) ; Thompson, D. J. et al. Genetic predisposition to mosaic Y chromosome loss in blood. Nature 575, 652–657 (2019). (PMID: 31748747688754910.1038/s41586-019-1765-3) ; Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015). (PMID: 25826379438046510.1371/journal.pmed.1001779) ; de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015). (PMID: 25885710440165710.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219) ; Fitzgerald, T. et al. Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature 519, 223–228 (2015). (PMID: 10.1038/nature14135) ; Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019). (PMID: 3037187810.1093/nar/gky1015) ; Kaplanis, J. et al. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature 586, 757–762 (2020). (PMID: 33057194711682610.1038/s41586-020-2832-5) ; Uhlmann, F. SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 399–412 (2016). (PMID: 2707541010.1038/nrm.2016.30) ; Skibbens, R. V. et al. Cohesinopathies of a feather flock together. PLoS Genet. 9, e1004036 (2013). (PMID: 24367282386859010.1371/journal.pgen.1004036) ; Deardorff, M. A. et al. RAD21 mutations cause a human cohesinopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 1014–1027 (2012). (PMID: 22633399337027310.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.019) ; Bermudez, V. P. et al. The alternative Ctf18-Dcc1-Ctf8-replication factor C complex required for sister chromatid cohesion loads proliferating cell nuclear antigen onto DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10237–10242 (2003). (PMID: 1293090219354510.1073/pnas.1434308100) ; Zhang, J. et al. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol. Cell 31, 143–151 (2008). (PMID: 1861405310.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.006) ; Ben-Shahar, T. R. et al. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 563–566 (2008). (PMID: 10.1126/science.1157774) ; Nasmyth, K. & Haering, C. H. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 525–558 (2009). (PMID: 1988681010.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233) ; Souza, R. F. et al. Microsatellite instability in the insulin–like growth factor II receptor gene in gastrointestinal tumours. Nat. Genet. 14, 255–257 (1996). (PMID: 889655210.1038/ng1196-255) ; Bonkowski, M. S. & Sinclair, D. A. Slowing ageing by design: the rise of NAD + and sirtuin-activating compounds. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 679–690 (2016). (PMID: 27552971510730910.1038/nrm.2016.93) ; Decarreau, J. et al. The tetrameric kinesin Kif25 suppresses pre-mitotic centrosome separation to establish proper spindle orientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 384–390 (2017). (PMID: 28263957537623810.1038/ncb3486) ; Kwon, N. H., Fox, P. L. & Kim, S. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 629–650 (2019). (PMID: 3107324310.1038/s41573-019-0026-3) ; Terret, M.-E., Sherwood, R., Rahman, S., Qin, J. & Jallepalli, P. V. Cohesin acetylation speeds the replication fork. Nature 462, 231–234 (2009). (PMID: 19907496277771610.1038/nature08550) ; Westerberg, G. et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics and QT concentration–effect modelling of the SirT1 inhibitor selisistat in healthy volunteers. Brit. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 79, 477–491 (2015). (PMID: 10.1111/bcp.12513) ; Napper, A. D. et al. Discovery of indoles as potent and selective inhibitors of the deacetylase SIRT1. J. Med. Chem. 48, 8045–8054 (2005). (PMID: 1633592810.1021/jm050522v) ; Brooks, C. L. & Gu, W. How does SIRT1 affect metabolism, senescence and cancer? Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 123–128 (2009). (PMID: 1913200710.1038/nrc2562) ; van Leen, E., Brückner, L. & Henssen, A. G. The genomic and spatial mobility of extrachromosomal DNA and its implications for cancer therapy. Nat. Genet. 54, 107–114 (2022). (PMID: 3514530210.1038/s41588-021-01000-z) ; Unal, E. et al. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 566–569 (2008). (PMID: 1865389410.1126/science.1157880) ; Li, S., Yue, Z. & Tanaka, T. U. Smc3 deacetylation by Hos1 facilitates efficient dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion during early anaphase. Mol. Cell 68, 605–614 (2017). (PMID: 29100057567828010.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.009) ; Deardorff, M. A. et al. HDAC8 mutations in Cornelia de Lange syndrome affect the cohesin acetylation cycle. Nature 489, 313–317 (2012). (PMID: 22885700344331810.1038/nature11316) ; van Schie, J. J. et al. MMS22L-TONSL functions in sister chromatid cohesion in a pathway parallel to DSCC1-RFC. Life Sci. Alliance 6, e202201596 (2022). (PMID: 36622344973357010.26508/lsa.202201596) ; Oberdoerffer, P. et al. SIRT1 redistribution on chromatin promotes genomic stability but alters gene expression during aging. Cell 135, 907–918 (2008). (PMID: 19041753285397510.1016/j.cell.2008.10.025) ; Meng, F. et al. Synergy between SIRT1 and SIRT6 helps recognize DNA breaks and potentiates the DNA damage response and repair in humans and mice. eLife 9, e55828 (2020). (PMID: 32538779732416110.7554/eLife.55828) ; Vaquero, A. et al. SIRT1 regulates the histone methyl-transferase SUV39H1 during heterochromatin formation. Nature 450, 440–444 (2007). (PMID: 1800438510.1038/nature06268) ; Thakur, B. L. et al. Convergence of SIRT1 and ATR signaling to modulate replication origin dormancy. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 5111–5128 (2022). (PMID: 35524559912259010.1093/nar/gkac299) ; Utani, K. et al. Phosphorylated SIRT1 associates with replication origins to prevent excess replication initiation and preserve genomic stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, gkx468 (2017). (PMID: 10.1093/nar/gkx468) ; Gandhi, S. et al. Mitotic H3K9ac is controlled by phase-specific activity of HDAC2, HDAC3, and SIRT1. Life Sci. Alliance 5, e202201433 (2022). (PMID: 35981887938959310.26508/lsa.202201433) ; Zhu, X. et al. SIRT1 deacetylates WEE1 and sensitizes cancer cells to WEE1 inhibition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 585–595 (2023). (PMID: 3663556610.1038/s41589-022-01240-y) ; Dickinson, M. E. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016). (PMID: 27626380529582110.1038/nature19356) ; Skarnes, W. C. et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474, 337–342 (2011). (PMID: 21677750357241010.1038/nature10163) ; Birling, M.-C. et al. A resource of targeted mutant mouse lines for 5,061 genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 416–419 (2021). (PMID: 33833456839725910.1038/s41588-021-00825-y) ; Karp, N. A. et al. Applying the ARRIVE guidelines to an in vivo database. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002151 (2015). (PMID: 25992600443917310.1371/journal.pbio.1002151) ; Zhu, Z. et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet. 48, 481–487 (2016). (PMID: 2701911010.1038/ng.3538) ; Võsa, U. et al. Unraveling the polygenic architecture of complex traits using blood eQTL metaanalysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/447367 (2018). ; Carrasco-Zanini, J. et al. Proteomic signatures for identification of impaired glucose tolerance. Nat. Med. 28, 2293–2300 (2022). (PMID: 36357677761463810.1038/s41591-022-02055-z) ; Morris, J. A. et al. An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat. Genet. 51, 258–266 (2019). (PMID: 3059854910.1038/s41588-018-0302-x) ; Mathieson, I. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies genetic effects on reproductive success and ongoing natural selection at the FADS locus. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 790–801 (2023). ; McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016). (PMID: 27268795489382510.1186/s13059-016-0974-4) ; Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020). (PMID: 32461654733419710.1038/s41586-020-2308-7) ; Choi, J. K. & Kim, Y.-J. Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences. Nat. Genet. 41, 498–503 (2009). (PMID: 1925248910.1038/ng.319) ; Zhao, Y. et al. GIGYF1 loss of function is associated with clonal mosaicism and adverse metabolic health. Nat. Commun. 12, 4178 (2021). (PMID: 34234147826375610.1038/s41467-021-24504-y) ; Ghoussaini, M. et al. Open Targets Genetics: systematic identification of trait-associated genes using large-scale genetics and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1311–D1320 (2021). (PMID: 3304574710.1093/nar/gkaa840) ; Mohun, T. J. & Weninger, W. J. Embedding embryos for high-resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012, pdb.prot069583 (2012). (PMID: 10.1101/pdb.prot069583) ; Weninger, W. J. et al. Phenotyping structural abnormalities in mouse embryos using high-resolution episcopic microscopy. Dis. Model. Mech. 7, 1143–1152 (2014). (PMID: 25256713417452510.1242/dmm.016337) ; Geyer, S. H. et al. A staging system for correct phenotype interpretation of mouse embryos harvested on embryonic day 14 (E14.5). J. Anat. 230, 710–719 (2017). (PMID: 28185240538259110.1111/joa.12590) ; Balmus, G. et al. Disease severity in a mouse model of ataxia telangiectasia is modulated by the DNA damage checkpoint gene Hus1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 3408–3420 (2012). (PMID: 22575700339211510.1093/hmg/dds173) ; Carette, J. E. et al. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature 477, 340–343 (2011). (PMID: 21866103317532510.1038/nature10348) ; van Ruiten, M. S. et al. The cohesin acetylation cycle controls chromatin loop length through a PDS5A brake mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 586–591 (2022). (PMID: 35710836920577610.1038/s41594-022-00773-z) ; Haarhuis, J. H. I. et al. The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension. Cell 169, 693–707 (2017). (PMID: 28475897542221010.1016/j.cell.2017.04.013) ; Turner, G. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Screening to Study Cancer Drivers and to Identify Novel Cancer Vulnerabilities (2020); www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/303478 . ; Balmus, G. et al. Cross-species chromosome painting among camel, cattle, pig and human: further insights into the putative Cetartiodactyla ancestral karyotype. Chromosome Res. 15, 499–515 (2007). (PMID: 1767184310.1007/s10577-007-1154-x) ; Balmus, G. et al. ATM orchestrates the DNA-damage response to counter toxic non-homologous end-joining at broken replication forks. Nat. Commun. 10, 87 (2019). (PMID: 30622252632511810.1038/s41467-018-07729-2) ; Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E.-P., Velasco-Herrera, M. D. C. & Yusa, K. Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 267–273 (2014). (PMID: 2453556810.1038/nbt.2800) ; Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014). (PMID: 25476604429082410.1186/s13059-014-0554-4) ; Tzelepis, K. et al. A CRISPR dropout screen identifies genetic vulnerabilities and therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep. 17, 1193–1205 (2016). (PMID: 27760321508140510.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.079) ; Solomon, J. M. et al. Inhibition of SIRT1 catalytic activity increases p53 acetylation but does not alter cell survival following DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 28–38 (2006). (PMID: 16354677131761710.1128/MCB.26.1.28-38.2006) ; Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019). (PMID: 3039528910.1093/nar/gky1106) ; Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D605–D612 (2020). (PMID: 777900410.1093/nar/gkaa1074) ; Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 30, 187–200 (2021). (PMID: 3307038910.1002/pro.3978) ; Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. & Sturdivant, R. X. Applied Logistic Regression (Wiley, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387 .
- Grant Information: United Kingdom WT_ Wellcome Trust; 18796 United Kingdom CRUK_ Cancer Research UK; 206388/Z/17/Z United Kingdom WT_ Wellcome Trust; U54 HG006370 United States HG NHGRI NIH HHS
- Contributed Indexing: Investigator: CL Tudor; AL Green; CI Mazzeo; E Siragher; C Lillistone; D Gleeson; D Sethi; T Bayzetinova; J Burvill; B Habib; L Weavers; R Maswood; E Miklejewska; M Woods; E Grau; S Newman; C Sinclair; E Brown; B Doe; A Galli; R Ramirez-Solis; E Ryder; K Steel; A Bradley; WC Skarnes; DJ Adams; D Lafont; VE Vancollie; RSB McLaren; L Hughes-Hallett; C Rowley; E Sanderson; E Tuck; M Dabrowska; M Griffiths; D Gannon; N Cockle; A Kirton; J Bottomley; C Ingle; C Lelliott; JK White
- Substance Nomenclature: 0 (DSCC1 protein, human) ; EC 3.5.1.- (SIRT1 protein, human) ; EC 3.5.1.- (Sirtuin 1) ; 0 (SMC3 protein, human)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240214 Date Completed: 20240308 Latest Revision: 20240318
- Update Code: 20240318
- PubMed Central ID: PMC10917660
|
