Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Objective: To assess the impact of enhancement filters on the formation of halo artifacts in radiographs of dental implants obtained with a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) system.

Methods: Digital radiographs of dental implants placed in dry human mandibles were processed with the Noise Reduction smoothing filter, as well as the Sharpen 1, Sharpen 4, and Sharpen UM high-pass filters available in the CLINIVIEW™ software (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland). Subjective analysis involved evaluating the left, right, and apical surfaces of each implant for the presence of much, few, or no halo. The objective analysis involved measurement of the halo area using the Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Data were analyzed using Friedman's test (subjective analysis) and ANOVA (objective analysis) (α = 5%).

Results: In the subjective evaluation, the Sharpen 4 filter produced more radiographs with much halo present, and in the objective evaluation, a bigger halo area when compared to the original images and the Noise Reduction filter for all surfaces (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: When evaluating dental implants, priority should be given to original images and those enhanced with smoothing filters since they exhibit fewer halo artifacts.

Clinical Relevance: Post-processing tools, such as enhancement filters, may improve the image quality and assist some diagnostic tasks. However, little is known regarding the impact of enhancement filters in halo formation on CMOS systems, which have been increasingly used in dental offices.

Titel:	Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Braga, MS ; de Almeida Ramos AM ; Coelho-Silva, F ; Bonadiman, EA ; Pereira, TCR ; SL, de-Azevedo-Vaz
Link:	View record at Springer (Volltext)
Zeitschrift:	Clinical oral investigations, Jg. 28 (2024-02-21), Heft 3, S. 161
Veröffentlichung:	Berlin : Springer-Verlag ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Berlin : Springer, c1997-, 2024
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1436-3771 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1007/s00784-024-05553-1
Schlagwort:	United States Humans Bone-Implant Interface Oxides Semiconductors Artifacts Dental Implants
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article Language: English [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 Feb 21; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 161. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 21. MeSH Terms: Artifacts* ; Dental Implants* ; United States ; Humans ; Bone-Implant Interface ; Oxides ; Semiconductors References: Haiter-Neto F, Spinelli Casanova M, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A (2009) Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.031. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.03119101494) ; De-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Rovaris K, Campos PSF, Haiter-Neto F (2013) Filtros de imagem em radiografia digital. Rev Bras Pesq Saúde 15:137–143. ; De-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Neves FS, Figueirêdo EP, Haiter-Neto F, Campos PSF (2013) Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:1074–1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02511.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02511.x22762154) ; Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos PA, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A (2008) Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin Oral Investig 12:217–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0173-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-007-0173-518210170) ; Kamburòlu K, Murat S, Pehlivan SY (2010) The effects of digital image enhancement on the detection of vertical root fracture. Dent Traumatol 26:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00841.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00841.x) ; Kositbowornchai S, Basiw M, Promwang Y, Moragorn H, Sooksuntisakoonchai N (2004) Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images. Dentomaxillofac Rad 33:236–240. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/94305126. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr/94305126) ; Brettle D, Carmichael F (2011) The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations. Br Dent J 211:167–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.676. (PMID: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.67621869791) ; Vidor MM, Liedke GS, Vizzotto MB, Da Silveira H, Da Silveira PF, Araujo CW et al (2017) Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface—an in vitro radiographic study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 46:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160296. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr.20160296) ; Zhang B, Allebach JP (2008) Adaptive bilateral filter for sharpness enhancement and noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 17:664–678. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2008.919949. (PMID: 10.1109/TIP.2008.91994918390373) ; Schweitzer DM, Berg RW (2010) A digital radiographic artifact: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 103:326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00082-X. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00082-X20493320) ; Liedke GS, Spin-Neto R, Vizzotto MB, Da Silveira PF, Silveira HED, Wenzel A (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 113:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.00325311793) ; Yalcinkaya S, Künzel A, Willers R, Thoms M, Becker J (2006) Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.00316632278) ; Wenzel A, Møystad A (2010) Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 68:106–114. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016350903514426. (PMID: 10.3109/0001635090351442620141365) ; Neto JDP, Melo G, Marin C, Rivero ERC, Cruz ACC, Flores-Mir C et al (2021) Diagnostic performance of periapical and panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for detection of circumferential gaps simulating osseointegration failure around dental implants: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 132:208–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.012) ; Oliveira B, Valerio C, Jansen W, Zenóbio E, Manzi F (2016). Accuracy of digital versus conventional periapical radiographs to detect misfit at the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1023–9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4525 . ; Arganda-Carreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Cardona A et al (2017) Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics 33:2424–2436. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180. (PMID: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx18028369169) ; Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. (PMID: 10.2307/2529310843571) ; Szklo M, Nieto FJ (2000) Quality assurance and control. In: Szklo M, Nieto FJ (eds) Epidemiology: beyond the basics, 1st edn. Aspen, Maryland, Aspen, pp 343–404. ; Chiu HL, Lin SH, Chen CH, Wang WC, Chen JY, Chen YK et al (2008) Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.00318547836) ; Gomes AF, Nejaim Y, Fontenele RC, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ (2019) Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Rad 48:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180369. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr.20180369) ; Solomon SL, Gilbert R, Glazer HS, Sagel SS, Anderson DJ, Molina PL (1991) Artifacts in computed radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:181–186. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048517. (PMID: 10.2214/ajr.157.1.20485172048517) ; Shetty CM, Barthur A, Kambadakone A, Narayanan N, Kv R (2011) Computed radiography image artifacts revisited. Am J Roentgenol 196:37–47. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5563. (PMID: 10.2214/AJR.10.5563) ; Clark JL, Wadhwani CP, Abramovitch K, Rice DD, Kattadiyil MT (2018) Effect of image sharpening on radiographic image quality. J Prosthet Dent 120:927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.034. (PMID: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.03430166247) ; Cesar LJ, Zink FE, Daly TR, Taubel JP, Jorgenson LL (2001) Artefacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol 74:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.74.878.740195. (PMID: 10.1259/bjr.74.878.74019511718396) ; Shrout MK, Russell CM, Potter BJ, Powell BJ, Hildebolt CF (1996) Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 127:469–473. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0238. (PMID: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.02388655867) ; Instrumentarium dental (2021) CLINIVIEW™ 11. User Manual, vol 32. https://www.dentalimaging.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/IFU_CLINIVIEW-11_USER-MANUAL_212520-R7_EN-WW.pdf . Accessed 3 Jan 2024. Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Artifacts; Dental digital radiography; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Radiographic image enhancement Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Dental Implants) ; 0 (Oxides) Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240221 Date Completed: 20240222 Latest Revision: 20240320 Update Code: 20240320

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface.