| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article; Comparative Study
- Language: English
- [J Esthet Restor Dent] 2024 Jun; Vol. 36 (6), pp. 920-929. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 26.
- MeSH Terms: Composite Resins* / chemistry ; Humans ; Hardness ; Surface Properties ; Dental Marginal Adaptation ; Gingiva ; Materials Testing ; Dental Restoration, Permanent / methods
- References: Hardan L, Lukomska‐Szymanska M, Zarow M, et al. One‐year clinical aging of low stress bulk‐fill flowable composite in class II restorations: a case report and literature review. Coatings. 2021;11(5):504. ; Arbildo‐Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, Lamas‐Lara C, Khan AS, Lukomska‐Szymanska M. Clinical effectiveness of bulk‐fill and conventional resin composite restorations: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8):1786. ; Leprince J, Palin W, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico‐mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk‐fill composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(4):234‐235. ; Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk‐fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(2):95‐109. ; Dietschi D, Curto FDD, Di Bella E, Krejci I, Ardu S. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in medium‐ and large size direct class II restorations using a bulk‐fill or layering technique. J Dent. 2021;115:103828. ; Abdelwahed AG, Essam S, Abdelaziz MM. Marginal adaptation and depth of cure of flowable versus packable bulk‐fill restorative materials: an in vitro study marginal adaptation and depth of cure of flowable versus packable bulk‐fill restorative materials: an in vitro study. OAMJMS. 2022;10(D):47‐56. ; Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, de Munck J, Brooks NR, van Meerbeek B. Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk‐fill composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(4):1201‐1212. ; Engelhardt F, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Comparison of flowable bulk‐fill and flowable resin‐based composites: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2123‐2130. ; Alshehri A, Alhalabi F, Robaian A, et al. No‐cap flowable bulk‐fill composite: physico‐mechanical assessment. Polymers. 2023;15(8):1847. ; Balkaya H, Demirbuğa S, Uçar EN, Burhanettin A. Micro‐computed tomography assesment of structural microporosity and marginal gaps in different flowable composites placed with different instruments. Cumhur Dent J. 2022;25(4):323‐329. ; Akarsu S, Atasoy S. Comparison of microleakage in class V restorations using different composite resins and techniques. J Dent Mater Tech. 2021;10(4):206‐213. ; Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate‐based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater J. 2011;27(4):348‐355. ; Degirmenci A, Can DB. Pre‐heating effect on the microhardness and depth of cure of bulk‐fill composite resins. Odovtos Int J Dent S. 2022;24(1):99‐112. ; Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent. 2008;7(4):79‐88. ; Rizzante FAP, Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Mondelli RFL, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(3):403‐410. ; Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, et al. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk‐fill resin composites. Dent Mater. 2015;31(12):1542‐1551. ; Kelić K, Matić S, Marović D, et al. Microhardness of bulk‐fill composite materials. Acta Clin Croat. 2016;55(4):607‐614. ; Oglakci B, Kazak M, Donmez N, Dalkilic EE, Koymen SS. The use of a liner under different bulk‐fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x‐ray microcomputed tomography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190042. ; Gerula‐Szymańska A, Kaczor K, Lewusz‐Butkiewicz K, Nowicka A. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:335‐344. ; Corral‐Núnez C, Vildósola‐Grez P, Bersezio‐Miranda C, Campos EA‐D, Fernández‐Godoy E. State of the art of bulk‐fill resin‐based composites: a review. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2015;27:177‐196. ; Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Bulk‐filling of high C‐factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity‐bottom dentin. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):269‐277. ; Goodchild JHJID. Why use bulk‐fill flowable composites. Inside Dent. 2013;9(8):925. ; Kim JH, Cho J, Lee Y, Cho BH. The survival of class V composite restorations and analysis of marginal discoloration. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):e93‐e101. ; Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five‐year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non‐carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2006;34(2):97‐105. ; Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215‐235. ; Dennis D, Pintauli S, Debora S. Microleakage comparative evaluation of RMGIC and alkasite with and without adhesive system in class V cavity: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent. 2021;22(7):735‐738. ; Meshram P, Meshram V, Palve D, Patil S, Gade V, Raut A. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: an in vitro study. Indian J dent Res. 2019;30(3):403‐407. ; Canali GD, Ignácio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One‐year clinical evaluation of bulk‐fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non‐carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:889‐897. ; Arslan S, Demirbuga S, Ustun Y, Dincer AN, Canakci BC, Zorba YO. The effect of a new‐generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(3):189‐193. ; Lokhande NA, Padmai AS, Rathore VPS, Shingane S, Jayashankar DN, Sharma U. Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(3):111‐114. ; Parasher A, Ginjupalli K, Somayaji K, Kabinale P. Comparative evaluation of the depth of cure and surface roughness of bulk‐fill composites: an in vitro study. Dent Med Probl. 2020;57(1):39‐44. ; Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of three glass ionomer‐based class V restorations: in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(4):599‐606. ; Alagha EI. Effect of different bonding techniques on marginal adaptation of harmonize composite resin at different storage times. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(suppl 1):S586‐s589. ; Sooraparaju SG, Kanumuru PK, Nujella SK, Konda KR, Reddy KBK, Penigalapati S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage in class v composite restorations. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:685643. ; Orłowski M, Tarczydło B, Chałas R. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk‐fill dental composite materials: in vitro study. Sci World J. 2015;2015:701262. ; Casselli DS, Faria‐e‐Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LR. Marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical cycling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(1):68‐73. ; Wahab FK, Shaini FJ, Morgano SM. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):168‐174. ; Mayoral JR, Gregor L, Campos EA, Roig M, Krejci I. Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in class V vs class I cavities. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(2):257‐264. ; Shimokawa CA, Carneiro PM, Lobo TR, Arana‐Chavez VE, Youssef MN, Turbino ML. Five second photoactivation? A microhardness and marginal adaptation in vitro study in composite resin restorations. Int Dent J. 2016;66:257‐263. ; Benetti AR, Havndrup‐Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U. Bulk‐fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):190‐200. ; Biradar N, Allappanavar KS, Shetty NK, Patil BS, Hegde RS, Moogi P. Evaluation of marginal adaptation of composite restorations reinforced with novel enamel inserts (biofillers) in class V cavities. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21:1369. ; Deb A, Pai V, Nadig RR. Evaluation of immediate and delayed microleakage of class V cavities restored with chitosan‐incorporated composite resins: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:621‐627. ; Bin‐Shuwaish M, AlHussaini A, AlHudaithy L, AlDukhiel S, AlJamhan A, Alrahlah A. Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk‐fill composite bonded to different tooth structures. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:1‐9. ; Hasani Z, Khodadadi E, Ezoji F, Khafri S. Effect of mechanical load cycling on microleakage of restorative glass ionomers compared to flowable composite resin in class V cavities. Front Dent. 2019;16:136. ; Bajabaa S, Balbaid S, Taleb M, Islam L, Elharazeen S, Alagha E. Microleakage evaluation in class V cavities restored with five different resin composites: in vitro dye leakage study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021;13:405‐411. ; Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? a literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295‐308. ; Rahiotis C, Tzoutzas J, Kakaboura A. In vitro marginal adaptation of high‐viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:49‐53. ; Mahmoud SH, Al‐Wakeel ES. Marginal adaptation of ormocer‐, silorane‐, and methacrylate‐based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(10):e131‐e139.
- Contributed Indexing: Keywords: class V resin composite; flowable bulk‐fill; marginal adaptation; microhardness; thermal cycling
- Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Composite Resins)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240226 Date Completed: 20240507 Latest Revision: 20240507
- Update Code: 20240507
|
