[High-resolution volumetric computerized tomography of the lung: optimization of technique and image quality as a function of its clinical-diagnostic use and dose to the patient].

Purpose: The aim of this project was to analyze and validate the diagnostic applications of Volumetric High Resolution CT in the study of focal or diffuse infiltrative lung disease compared with High Resolution CT. To date HRCT is the gold standard in the assessment of infiltrative lung diseases, but it shows some limitations such as artifacts due to both respiratory and cardiac motions, as well as the need for multiple breath-holds.

Material and Methods: September, 1996, to September, 1997, anthropomorphic test phantoms and a group of 34 subjects (8 without lung disease and 26 with aspecific lung disease: TBC, BPCO, micronodular conditions, cardiogenic interstitial pulmonary edema) were submitted to both HRCT and VHRCT. VHRCT was carried out with a 3-mm slab thickness and the images were reconstructed with a 1-mm interval and processed with MIP and MinIP reconstructions. With both techniques we compared some physical parameters (slice sensitivity profile, noise, longitudinal resolution) and some radiographic findings (central and peripheral airways lumen, peripheral vessels, nodular and interstitial abnormalities, emphysema foci, focal areas of ground glass pattern and bronchiectasis). We calculated the radiation exposure dose of both HRCT and VHRCT, also testing a low-dose protocol.

Results: The analysis of physical parameters showed no major differences between HRCT and VHRCT regarding longitudinal resolution, while minimal advantages were found with HRCT for slice sensitivity profile and image noise. Radiographic analysis showed additional findings in 27% of patients with nodular disease using VHRCT-MIP in 8% of patients with emphysema and 25% of cases with focal areas of ground glass opacities, using VHRCT-MinIP. Relative to HRCT findings, VHRCT better depicted all patterns but subpleural nodules. The surface radiation dose was 2.8 times higher with VHRCT than HRCT. It is possible to halve radiation exposure using a low dose protocol (120 kV, 110-150 mA).

Conclusions: Our study provides conclusive results concerning the use of VHRCT with standard technical parameters because this technique showed some advantages in the study of a wide range of diffuse or focal lung diseases. We suggest that this protocol be applied only in patients with mild forms of lung disease or in the cases of difficult interpretation, such as suspicious abnormal areas at HRCT, because its doses are higher. Out low-dose protocol is currently on trial but we expect promising results.