„Margir ungir karlmenn vita ekki að það er hægt að vera karlkyns sjúkraliði" Áskoranir og tækifæri í starfi karlkyns sjúkraliða. (Icelandic)

The article deals with the topic of male licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and their experience in an environment almost wholly occupied by females. The main research question deals with the experience of working as a male licensed practical nurse. Other questions included are why they chose that occupation, what the challenges were and opportunities they met, whether they experienced prejudices, and what was their view towards trying to attract more males to become LPNs. This is the first study of this kind among Icelandic LPNs. There are, however, previous comparable studies among the mostly female professions of registered nurses and pre-school teachers. Eight male licensed practical nurses of different ages were interviewed in early 2017. They were asked about their background and why they chose this field; the challenges and opportunities for them on the job; whether they had experienced prejudice on the job and socially for their choice of occupation; and whether it would be wise to try to attract more males to the field of licensed practical nursing. Our interviewees chose this field for various reasons. Besides simply being interested in entering a health profession, some of them had kind of "ended up" studying to become an LPN rather than planning for it. They had worked in various jobs before entering their studies, jobs they had not been satisfied with. Most of them had been pleased with the studies although they tended to be forgotten as they were a tiny minority. They also mentioned that the job was satisfying and rewarding, in contrast to some of the traditional male occupations they had considered or worked at. When we analyzed the challenges and opportunities for them as men in this occupation, our interviewees mentioned that men were not generally expected to work in this field. For instance, the working clothes had been designed for females, and at times the facilities to change clothes was very small or non-existent. They, for instance, sometimes needed to change at home before going to work. The work also offered them various opportunities and usually they were welcomed to the field of being an LPN. The interviewees' experience was that males could administer delicate care and that they were as able as females to demonstrate professionalism and amiability. Although they were pleased with their job, their experience within a female occupation was in line with societies' manifold stereotypes and gender roles. Also, among the advantages mentioned was the fact that the job did not include having to work in an environment of "dust and pollution", as in an aluminium smelter, nor did it demand working outdoors in all sorts of weather, as for example in construction. The results indicate that in almost all factors relating to the job, the consequences of some sort of societal essentialism to the effect that the job was a woman's job, could be observed. Prejudices in this regard were obvious when for example either the users of the service or their relatives were suspicious towards men doing the job, and also when the assumption was made that being male meant that they could be more productive than females. The interviewees, however, did not seem to be bothered by the prejudices they experienced. When asked why there were not more male licensed practical nurses and whether it would be desirable to increase their numbers and how to go about doing that, they often referred to ideas relating to masculinity and essentialism such as more responsibility and better pay. They thought that awareness of the job being suitable for both men and women needed to be raised, similarly to other jobs where care and feelings are strengths and assets to the job. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Umfjöllunarefni greinarinnar er karlkyns sjúkraliðar og störf þeirra á vettvangi þar sem langflest starfsfólk er kvenkyns og var meginrannsóknarspurningin hver reynsla karla væri af starfi sjúkraliða. Tekin voru viðtöl við átta karlkyns sjúkraliða á ólíkum aldri snemma árs 2017. Reynsla viðmælenda var sú að karlar gætu sinnt nærgætinni umönnun og þeir væru jafn færir um að sýna fagmennsku og alúð og konurnar í starfinu. Þótt þeir væru ánægðir með starfið var reynsla þeirra innan kvennastéttar í samræmi við margvíslegar staðalmyndir og kynhlutverk í samfélaginu. Niðurstöður gefa til kynna að í nánast öllum þáttum er lutu að starfinu var hægt að sjá einhvers konar afleiðingar eðlishyggju í samfélaginu um að starfið væri kvennastarf. Ekki síst kom þetta í ljós hvað fordóma varðar, til dæmis þegar notendur þjónustunnar eða aðstandendur voru tortryggnir körlum í starfinu, eða þegar sett var jafnaðarmerki á milli þess að vera karl og eiga að hafa meiri afkastagetu en konurnar. Viðmælendurnir virtust þó ekki taka þá fordóma sem þeir mættu nærri sér. Þegar þeir voru inntir eftir hvers vegna ekki væru fleiri karlar í stéttinni, og hvort rétt væri að reyna að fjölga þeim og þá hvernig, nefndu þeir gjarnan leiðir sem tengdust hugmyndum um karlmennsku og eðlishyggju, svo sem meiri ábyrgð og hærri laun. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Netla: Online Journal on Pedagogy & Education is the property of University of Iceland, School of Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)