Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement from aircraft and comparison with OCO-2 and CarbonTracker model data.

Accurate monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) and its distribution is of great significance for studying the carbon cycle and predicting future climate change. Compared to the ground observational sites, the airborne observations cover a wider area and simultaneously observe a variety of surface types, which helps with effectively monitoring the distribution of CO 2 sources and sinks. In this work, an airborne experiment was carried out in March 2019 over the Shanhaiguan area, China (39–41 ∘ N, 119–121 ∘ E). An integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) light detection and ranging (lidar) system and a commercial instrument, the ultraportable greenhouse gas analyser (UGGA), were installed on an aircraft to observe the CO 2 distribution over various surface types. The pulse integration method (PIM) algorithm was used to calculate the differential absorption optical depth (DAOD) from the lidar data. The CO 2 column-averaged dry-air mixing ratio (XCO 2) was calculated over different types of surfaces including mountain, ocean, and urban areas. The concentrations of the XCO 2 calculated from lidar measurements over ocean, mountain, and urban areas were 421.11 ± 1.24, 427.67 ± 0.58, and 432.04 ± 0.74 ppm, respectively. Moreover, through the detailed analysis of the data obtained from the UGGA, the influence of pollution levels on the CO 2 concentration was also studied. During the whole flight campaign, 18 March was the most heavily polluted day with an Air Quality Index (AQI) of 175 and PM 2.5 of 131 µ g m -3. The aerosol optical depth (AOD) reported by a sun photometer installed at the Funing ground station was 1.28. Compared to the other days, the CO 2 concentration measured by UGGA at different heights was the largest on 18 March with an average value of 422.59 ± 6.39 ppm, which was about 10 ppm higher than the measurements recorded on 16 March. Moreover, the vertical profiles of Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and CarbonTracker were also compared with the aircraft measurements. All the datasets showed a similar variation with some differences in their CO 2 concentrations, which showing a good agreement among them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques is the property of Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)