Assessment of Five Questionnaires for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Southern Italian Population: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Background and Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a growing burden to society, and remains underdiagnosed in Italy. This study aimed at evaluating five validated screening questionnaires to consider which one was the most accurate, and the optimal cut-off score for each to be considered for the Southern Italian population. Materials and Methods: A total of 144 patients were recruited in the study. The age range was 46–85 years. All subjects underwent spirometry, and completed the five questionnaires: CDQ, LFQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE. Receiver-operator curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), values for the optimal cut-off score and previously recommended score were calculated and compared. Results: Of the questionnaires, the CDQ, LFQ, and COPD-SQ had significant differences between COPD (n = 86) and non-COPD (n = 52) groups. The AUCs for each questionnaire with (95%CI) were: CAPTURE, 0.602 (0.431–0.773); CDQ, 0.714 (0.555–0.872); LFQ, 0.331 (0.183–0.479; COPD-PS, 0.652 (0.497–0.807); and COPD-SQ, 0.679 (0.520–0.837). Only the CDQ and COPD-SQ had significant AUC screening characteristics. The optimal cut-off values for the CDQ, LFQ, and COPD-PS were modified to 22, 10, and 4, respectively. The COPD-SQ remained at 17. Conclusion: The CDQ and COPD-SQ can discriminate between individuals with and without COPD in the Italian population. The CDQ has a moderate screening accuracy, and the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ have low accuracy, when the optimal cut-off scores are used. Of the five questionnaires assessed, the CDQ and COPD-SQ questionnaires could be used for screening for COPD in the Southern Italian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Medicina (1010660X) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)