Umetnost in matematika. (Slovak)
In: Filozofski Vestnik, Jg. 32 (2011-12-01), Heft 3, S. 23-34
Online
academicJournal
Zugriff:
It has been well known since ancient times that mathematical activity and artistic creativity are connected, but for philosophers their relationship is linked with the juxtaposition of Plato and Aristotle. If we compare their standpoints to mathematics and art, we come to two contemporary tendencies in philosophy which differ regarding the question of what the proper didactic functions for the Subject supposed to be oriented by an Idea are. For the Platonic tendency, this is a function of mathematics, for the Nietzschean tendency, this is a function of art. There is a third tendency, the Aristotelian, for which mathematics is a branch of aesthetics, and a fourth, the Wittgensteinian tendency, today the dominant one, which sees in mathematical aesthetics a coldness, an impersonality in accordance with the contemporary humanism of the victim. All these tendencies should be reconsidered from the viewpoint of choice and form, which is the fundamental question of contemporary art as well as mathematics. A comparison of the four tendencies one has to choose from (the author has already chosen a Platonic one) shows that they form a discordant quartet, but occasionally, here and there, they nevertheless reach an accord concerning the question "What is form?", when an event occurs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Znano je, da sta matematišna dejavnost in umetnigka ustvarjalnost že od nekdaj povezani, za filozofe pa gre pri tem tudi za vprašanje zoperstavitve Platona in Aristotela. Toda skozi primerjavo njunih stališč do matematike in umetnosti pridemo tudi do dveh tendenc v sodobni filozofiji, ki se razlikujeta glede tega, kakšne so didaktične funkcije za Subjekt, za katerega se predpostavlja, da ga usmerja Ideja. Na eni je platonistična tendenca, ki meni, da je to matematika, na drugi nietzschejanska, za katero je to umetnost. Obstajata še tretja, aristotelovska tendenca, ki meni, da je matematika veja estetike, in četrta, wittgensteinovska, danes prevladujo ča, ki v matemati čni estetiki vidi hladnost, neosebnost in ki ustreza sodobnemu humanizmu žrtve. Ob vsem tem se je treba vrniti k vpraganju izbire in forme, ki je temeljno vpraganje tako sodobne umetnosti kot tudi matematike, ter s tega vidika obravnavati navedene tendence. Primerjava gtirih tendenc, med katerimi je pa č treba izbrati, pri čemer sam nastopam z gledi žča platonisti čne, poka- že, da gre za neuglagen kvartet, kljub temu pa se ob nastopu dogodka vse gtifi tendence uglasijo glede tega, kaj je forma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Filozofski Vestnik is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Titel: |
Umetnost in matematika. (Slovak)
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Badiou, Alain |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Filozofski Vestnik, Jg. 32 (2011-12-01), Heft 3, S. 23-34 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2011 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 0353-4510 (print) |
Sonstiges: |
|