Rebuttal to "(2943) Proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type": An unwarranted and disruptive idea.
In: Taxon, Jg. 73 (2024-04-01), Heft 2, S. 573-585
Online
academicJournal
Zugriff:
A rebuttal to the proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., with a conserved type is submitted. We further discuss why this proposal is unwarranted and disruptive to nomenclatural stability as is the intention to split Selaginella since potentially segregated genera fail to reconcile monophyly and taxonomic diagnosability. Accordingly, we recommend the rejection of the Proposal (2943) and not to follow the dismembering of Selaginella. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Taxon is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
| Titel: |
Rebuttal to "(2943) Proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type": An unwarranted and disruptive idea.
|
|---|---|
| Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Valdespino, Iván A. ; Korall, Petra ; Weststrand, Stina ; López, Christian A. ; Tang, Jun‐Yong ; Shalimov, Alexander ; Zhang, Xian‐Chun |
| Link: | |
| Zeitschrift: | Taxon, Jg. 73 (2024-04-01), Heft 2, S. 573-585 |
| Veröffentlichung: | 2024 |
| Medientyp: | academicJournal |
| ISSN: | 0040-0262 (print) |
| DOI: | 10.1002/tax.13145 |
| Schlagwort: |
|
| Sonstiges: |
|