Domain theory and method theory revisited: a reply to Lowe, De Loo and Nama
In: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Jg. 29 (2016-02-15), S. 317-322
Online
unknown
Zugriff:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors’ previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8. Design/methodology/approach – The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al. Findings – In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument. Originality/value – The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.
Titel: |
Domain theory and method theory revisited: a reply to Lowe, De Loo and Nama
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Vinnari, Eija ; Lukka, Kari |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Jg. 29 (2016-02-15), S. 317-322 |
Veröffentlichung: | Emerald, 2016 |
Medientyp: | unknown |
ISSN: | 0951-3574 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1108/aaaj-06-2015-2080 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|