The Battle of Ideas under LOSC Dispute Settlement Procedures
In: The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Jg. 38 (2023-04-05), S. 207-227
Online
unknown
Zugriff:
Dispute settlement procedures under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) can be a great laboratory for observing judicial processes of exploring and testing the acceptability of multiple solutions to issues of interpretation through a battle of ideas among LOSC adjudicators. The analysis observes that LOSC tribunals tend towards two jurisprudential patterns when battling their ideas: (1) the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) takes an implicit approach of deviating from previous case law of other LOSC tribunals; and (2) Annex VII arbitral tribunals have been quite straightforward when facing a diverging interpretative discourse. This article explains the institutional dynamics underpinning these two jurisprudential patterns. Calibrating judicial reasoning of the ITLOS is proposed, which would hopefully stimulate a vibrant battle of ideas facilitating coherent development of international law.
Titel: |
The Battle of Ideas under LOSC Dispute Settlement Procedures
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Song, Ke |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Jg. 38 (2023-04-05), S. 207-227 |
Veröffentlichung: | Brill, 2023 |
Medientyp: | unknown |
ISSN: | 1571-8085 (print) ; 0927-3522 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1163/15718085-bja10125 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|