Keywords: cotton; somatic embryogenesis; embryogenic redifferentiation; single‐base resolution DNA methylation; mCHH hypomethylation; epigenetic marker and molecular basis; lipid pathway
As a notable illustration of totipotency, somatic embryogenesis (SE) is the developmental reprogramming of somatic cells towards the embryogenesis pathway (Yang and Zhang,). Investigations examining the totipotency process are of great fundamental and practical importance in crop biotechnology. Moreover, high‐frequency regeneration of SE has been limited due to the genotype‐dependent response. To date, the epigenetic molecular basis underlying embryogenic redifferentiation during SE remains largely unexplored.
Plant embryogenesis is accompanied by changes at chromatin level and reprogramming of gene expression, highlighting the central role of epigenetic regulation (Miguel and Marum,). During SE, DNA methylation is continually changing to satisfy cell requirements (Nic‐Can and De‐la‐Peña,). The methylation of DNA is essential to SE (De‐la‐Peña et al., ; Kumar and Van Staden,). Recently, Ji et al. () and Li et al. () also reported DNA methylation variations during plant SE.
SE is the concerted process involving multiple cellular pathways controlled by epigenetic and genetic variability (De‐la‐Peña et al., ; Miguel and Marum,). Genome‐wide dissection of dynamic methylation modification features is conducive to explaining the complex underlying genotype‐dependent SE transdifferentiation at overall level. In this study, a single‐base resolution of genome‐wide bisulfite sequencing (BS‐seq) and transcriptome sequencing was performed to comprehensively analyse the DNA methylation and gene regulatory patterns involved in SE transdifferentiation in two cotton genotypes with distinct embryogenic abilities. Three typical stages of early SE: hypocotyls (HY), nonembryogenic calli (NEC) and primary embryogenic calli (PEC), extending from callus dedifferentiation (NEC‐VS‐HY) to embryogenic redifferentiation (PEC‐VS‐NEC) were examined for BS‐seq (Figure a–c). Two genotypes, Yuzao 1 (YZ) with a high embryogenic ability (>80%) and Lumian 1 (LM) with a very low ability (<10%) (Jin et al.,), were selected.
Total methylcytosines (
The methylcytosine levels of three sequence contexts (
The methylcytosine levels of
To further investigate SE initiation promoting methylated genes, the differentially methylated genes (DMGs) were identified and significantly enriched in lipid biosynthetic and metabolic processes in YZ embryonic redifferentiation (Figure k). Differentially methylated key genes involved in lipid pathway were confirmed to be transcriptionally affected during embryogenic redifferentiation. The results in the highly embryogenic genotype were consistent with and extended our recent report (Guo et al.,).
Simultaneously, for association analysis of DNA methylation and expression levels at embryonic redifferentiation during SE transdifferentiation in the two genotypes, a cross‐analysis identified 1569 and 1977 genes in two genotypes respectively showing significant variations in both methylation and gene expression (termed codifferential genes) (Figure l). Among these genes, 1263/306 and 1606/371 codifferential genes were modified by methylation in their upstream/gene‐body regions, respectively. Furthermore, we quantitatively examined the correlations between variations in DNA methylation and variations in gene expression during SE initiation. The results showed that compared with YZ, there was a higher negative correlation of variations in LM in both upstream and gene‐body regions (Figure m,n), which suggested that transcription variations were more negatively modulated by DNA methylation in LM, the SE recalcitrant genotype in cotton.
For successful achievement of plant SE, genotype‐dependent DNA methylation remains crucial. In this study, we reported that CHH demethylation could serve as the critical epigenetic marker and associated with embryonic redifferentiation in the highly embryogenic genotype, while CHH hypermethylation in the recalcitrant genotype, which suggested the negative effect on SE‐associated genes during embryonic redifferentiation. However, future research is necessary to explain how DNA methylation is established and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms regulating SE transdifferentiation.
The systematic epigenetic molecular basis underlying cell totipotency and SE transdifferentiation are poorly understood in plants. Especially, the genotype‐dependent critical methylation features associated with embryogenic redifferentiation remains largely unexplored. In our study, integrated maps of genome‐wide DNA methylomes at single‐base resolution and transcriptomes were generated during cotton SE, spanning cell dedifferentiation to embryogenic redifferentiation, in two genotypes with distinct embryogenic abilities. Dynamic DNA methylation variations and their relationships with transcriptional divergence between different genotypes and developmental stages were globally surveyed. Our data revealed that total methylcytosine (
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0100306; 2018YFD0100303), Taishan Scholar Talent Project from PRC (TSQN20161018) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401428).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
H.H.G. and F.C.Z. conceived and designed the research project. H.H.G., H.X.G., X.M.Y., J.M.W. and Y.P.F. performed cell culture and sampling, H.H.G., Y.J.F. and L.Z. performed all morphological and molecular experiments. H.H.G., J.F.W., X.L, Z.Y.G and L.Z. performed the BS‐Seq and RNA‐Seq studies and data analysis. H.H.G. and F.C.Z. wrote the article.
By Huihui Guo; Yijie Fan; Haixia Guo; Jianfei Wu; Xiaoman Yu; Junmei Wei; Xin Lian; Li Zhang; Zhongyuan Gou; Yupeng Fan and Fanchang Zeng
Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author