Comparison of the new and traditional CKD-EPI GFR estimation equations with urinary inulin clearance: A study of equation performance

Background Diagnosis, prognostication and treatment in chronic kidney disease is often informed by an estimate of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Commonly used GFR estimation (eGFR) equations are based on serum creatinine (Cr) concentrations and display suboptimal precision and accuracy. Newer equations incorporating additional endogenous markers such as β-Trace Protein (BTP), β2-Microglobulin (B2M) and cystatin C (cysC) have been developed but require validation. Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated the performance of 6 eGFR equations developed by the chronic kidney disease - epidemiology collaboration group (CKD-EPI) against urinary inulin clearance GFR in patients recruited from outpatient nephrology clinics. Results Mean biases were negligible and similar between equations. The eGFR-EPI Cr/cysC had the best precision and accuracy of all the equations and the best agreement with inulin mGFR when classifying participants into GFR categories. The BTP and B2M equations displayed the worst precisions and accuracies and showed the least consistent performance across levels of GFR. Thus, the eGFR-EPI Cr/cysC is the least biased, most precise and has the highest accuracy as compared to other eGFR-EPI equations. Conclusions The BTP and B2M equations are the worst performing of the eGFR-EPI equations, and no benefit is observed with the addition of BTP or B2M to Cr/cysC.