Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan
In: Critical care, Jg. 20 (2016-12-01), Heft 1, S. 400-400
Online
unknown
Zugriff:
Background Measures of aortic occlusion (AO) for resuscitation in patients with severe torso trauma remain controversial. Our aim was to characterize the current use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative open aortic cross-clamping (ACC), and to evaluate whether REBOA should be an alternative method to resuscitative open ACC. Methods This study was a retrospective cohort study between 2004 and 2013 from a nationwide trauma registry in Japan. Participants were selected who underwent either REBOA or ACC. Their characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were analyzed to compare REBOA and ACC directly. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was mortality in the emergency department. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between REBOA and ACC with adjustment for severity; 1:1 propensity score matching was also performed. Results Of the 159,157 trauma patients, 903 were eligible based on the selection criteria. Overall, 405/607 patients (67%) who had REBOA died compared to 210/233 patients (90%) who had ACC. Patients with REBOA had higher revised trauma score (RTS) (mean ± SD, 5.2 ± 2.0 vs. 4.2 ± 2.2; P
Titel: |
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Abe, Toshikazu ; Nagata, Isao ; Saitoh, Daizoh ; Uchida, Masatoshi ; Tamiya, Nanako |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Critical care, Jg. 20 (2016-12-01), Heft 1, S. 400-400 |
Veröffentlichung: | BioMed Central, 2016 |
Medientyp: | unknown |
ISSN: | 1364-8535 (print) |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|