Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?
In: International Urogynecology Journal, Jg. 27 (2016-06-20), S. 1313-1320
Online
unknown
Zugriff:
The objective of this study was to assess outcomes in native tissue (NT) and transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair in women with recurrent prolapse. A retrospective two-group observational study of 237 women who underwent prolapse repair after failed NT repair in two tertiary hospitals. A primary outcome of “success” was defined using a composite outcome of no vaginal bulge symptoms, no anatomical recurrence in the same compartment beyond the hymen (0 cm on POPQ) and no surgical re-treatment for prolapse in the same compartment. Secondary outcomes assessed included re-operation for prolapse in the same compartment, dyspareunia and mesh-related complications. Of a total of 336 repairs, 196 were performed in the anterior compartment and 140 in the posterior compartment. Compared with the TVM groups, women undergoing repeat NT repair were more likely to experience anatomical recurrence (anterior 40.9 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02, posterior 25.3 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.01), report vaginal bulge (anterior 34.1 % vs 12 %, p
Titel: |
Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Thomas, Elizabeth A. ; Lin Li Ow ; Dwyer, Peter L. ; Rosamilia, Anna ; Lim, Yik N. ; Murray, Christine ; Karmakar, Debjyoti |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | International Urogynecology Journal, Jg. 27 (2016-06-20), S. 1313-1320 |
Veröffentlichung: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016 |
Medientyp: | unknown |
ISSN: | 1433-3023 (print) ; 0937-3462 (print) |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-016-3069-6 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|