Comparison of computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the quantitative evaluation of an ablation defect following radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver lesions

Objective To compare contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the quantitative evaluation of an ablation defect following radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver lesions in a prospective study. Materials and methods 22 radiofrequency ablations of malignant liver tumors were performed. The ablation defects were then measured and evaluated by two independent examiners via contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using a 1-5 MHz multifrequency convex ultrasound transducer (LOGIQ E9, GE) with respect to the short-axis diameter, the long-axis diameter, and the area. Results Quantitative evaluation of ablation defects is possible with both contrast-enhanced CT and CEUS. The average long-axis diameter was 47.1 mm (±11.08;±23,5%) on CEUS and 56.48 mm (±14.14;±25,0%) on CT; the short-axis diameter was 39.72 mm (±11.14;±28,05%) on CEUS and 40.27 mm (±10.50;±26,07%) on CT; the area was 1439.82 mm2 (±678.57;±47,13%) on CEUS and 2392.68 mm2 (1147.67;±48,0%) on CT. On average, ablation defects are assessed to be larger on CT than on CEUS. A significant correlation between the modalities could not be achieved for all measurement axes. Conclusion CEUS can be used for the postinterventional detection and evaluation of ablation defects. However, these are always assessed to be larger on contrast-enhanced CT than CEUS.