Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Cardiovascular disease (CVD): assessment, prediction and policy implications

Jianglin, Zhang ; Ikram, Muhammad ; et al.
In: BMC Public Health, Jg. 21 (2021), Heft 1, S. 1-14
Online unknown

Cardiovascular disease (CVD): assessment, prediction and policy implications 

Background: The study aims to predict and assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) patterns in highly affected countries such as Pakistan, India, China, Kenya, the USA, and Sweden. The data for CVD deaths was gathered from 2005 to 2019. Methods: We utilized non-homogenous discrete grey model (NDGM) to predict growth of cardiovascular deaths in selected countries. We take this process a step further by utilizing novel Synthetic Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Synthetic Doubling Time (Dt) model to assess how many years it takes to reduce the cardiovascular deaths double in numbers. Results: The results reveal that the USA and China may lead in terms of raising its number of deaths caused by CVDs till 2027. However, doubling time model suggests that USA may require 2.3 years in reducing the cardiovascular deaths. Conclusions: This study is significant for the policymakers and health practitioners to ensure the execution of CVD prevention measures to overcome the growing burden of CVD deaths.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; CVD; Relative growth rate; Doubling time model, assessment, forecast

Introduction

The upsurge of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in early 2020 caused a disease pandemic known as COVID-19 [[1]]. There is practically no country in the world which is not influenced by COVID-19 and the health services worldwide have never operated under this tremendous burden. Everything begun in Wuhan [[3]], China, but it has expanded exponentially all over the world. The core of the pandemic then moved to Europe and the US [[4]]. Studies also shown that patients with Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) are especially at great risk of COVID-19 mortality owing to their frailty and vulnerability [[5]]. Patients with pre-existent CV risk factors and CVDs are among the most vulnerable with significantly greater risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 infection, acquiring CV complications associated with COVID-19, and having undesirable consequences [[7]].

Since the number of deaths has been increasing globally due to different reasons, CVD is one of the world's most significant causes of mortality and morbidity. During the past decade, the number of deaths from CVD has increased by 12.5% globally [[8]]. There are various reasons behind this progressive number of cardiovascular deaths. In 2016, the primarily cause of total global burden of CVD was ischemic heart disease (IHD) contributed to 49% of total burden of CVD, followed by stroke with 33% of total CVD burden. In comparison, other CVD causes account for a significantly lower percentage of the global disease burden [[10]].

CVDs have affected all the income level countries, especially low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) contribute the greatest portion to the overall CVD burden, specifically in terms of deaths at younger ages than in high-income countries, because of scarce human and financial resources [[11]–[13]]. Whereas, several of the largest LMIC had an increase in the overall burden of CVD; in decreasing pattern of percent burden increase, those included: India (15.4%), Bangladesh (27.4%), Indonesia (8.8%), China (6.6%), the Philippine (25.3%), and Mexico (19.7%) [[14]]. However, the CVD burden remains the most significant per capita in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. While, East Asia and South Asia are roots to the increased CVD burden, because of their growing and aging of the populations [[15]]. The 2016 Global Burden of Diseased Disease (GBD) report reveals that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) comprise 40% of the total age standardized global disease burden for women and about 50% of the global standardized men 's overall age burden. CVD alone accounted for 20% of women 's total burden and 24% of men 's total burden [[16]]. The frequency of steady or growing CVD Disability Adjusted Life-Year (DALY) epidemiological drivers vary across different countries. In countries such as Japan, a reduced CVD mortality rate has been offset by accelerated population aging. A slight rise of the CVD rate is associated with population ageing and limited resources in South Asian countries such as Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh [[17]].

Several epidemiological studies have forecast future trends in the occurrence of CVD and mortality rates for all age groups in various countries of the world [[18]–[20]], yet little is known about the absolute burden of deaths. To prepare for future cardiovascular care needs with certainty, the purpose of this study is to forecast the number of deaths caused by CVD from 2020 to 2027 of six higly effected countries which include Pakistan, India, China, Keyna, the USA and Sweden. We employed advanced mathematical modeling, namely Non-Homogenous Discrete Grey Model (NDGM) to predict the cardiovascular deaths of selected countries. The grey forecasting models, especially, the NDGM model, can be superior to other forecasting models in the context of small samples and poor information [[21]]. Hence, we have utilized NDGM model in the current paper to predict the future trends of CVD of top six countries globally. Further, a novel Synthetic Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Synthetic Doubling Time (Dt) models employed to undertake a comparative analysis of CVD relative growth rate among six countries. Moreover, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) % criterion was used to measure the accuracy of NDGM model. Hence, present research is a pioneer study to forecast relative growth and required time to reduce the number of deaths double in number caused by CVD among six countries. The study is principally significant for the policymakers to convey, empower and stimulate the execution of CVD prevention approaches to end this growing burden of CVD during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and time ahead.

The rest of paper follow as: Section 2 represent the research methodology. Whereas the result and discussion section are presented in section 3. Finally, conclusion, policy implications along with study limitations presented in last section is study.

Research methodology

This section provides steps involved in development of NDGM model. Additionally, synthetic RGR and synthetic Dt models have been discussed to analyze the growth and time of CVD deaths for selected countries. Finally, the performance evaluation of NDGM model through MAPE is also elaborated in this section.

Data source and study population

The CVD number of deaths data was abstracted from the official website of Our World in Data for the period 2005–2019. The top six countries which are Pakistan, India, China, Kenya, USA and Sweden with highly affected from cardiovascular deaths were selected, globally. The source of the data available at Our World in Data was the global burden of disease (GBD) collaborative network (2016), World Health Organization (WHO) and Institute for health metrics and evaluation (IHME) 2017. Grey system software (v8.0) has been used to forecast cardiovascular deaths for the period of 2020 to 2027 by NDGM. However, MATLAB and MS EXCEL were also used to solve NDGM. The current analysis and modeling methodology were employed for the first time in the study of forecasting CVD related deaths. The structure of forecasting the CVD deaths is operationalized in this study presented in Fig.1.

Graph: Fig. 1 Framework operationalized in this study

Grey forecasting model

In 1982 Deng Julong originally introduced the concept of a Grey Systems Theory (GST) as a scientific theory for predicting uncertain system, which involves limited and inadequate information. Ultimately, theoretical forecasts based on the grey framework surpassed the standards of statistical and mathematical methods [[22]]. Theory of grey systems has been applied successfully in several fields so far [[23]–[25]] and grey prediction theory is a significant branch of the theory of grey systems. There are five major types of grey prediction, such as time series forecasts, calamity forecasts, seasonal calamity forecasts, topological forecasts, and systemic forecasts. Till date, GS theory has introduced a variety of theories and techniques like grey mathematics, grey modeling, grey forecasting, grey clustering, grey decision making, grey programming, grey relational analysis, and grey control, which has been effectively implemented in various fields and has shown satisfactory results [[26]]. The key benefit of grey theory is that it can manage both with limited and uncertain information with great precision. It functions as an analytical tool particularly in situations where data is inadequate.

Nonhomogeneous discrete grey model (NDGM)

In order to predict data, there are different types of grey models, we will analyze NDGM to predict future cardiovascular deaths. The NDGM system is designed on the basis of law of approximation non-homogenous exponential growth in accordance with assumptions of a sequence of real data [[24]] [[28]];. Xie et al. [[25]] recommended that the actual data sequence is a concurrence with a homogenous pattern like GM (1, 1). The accuracy level of NDGM model is considerably improved over other grey models so far as mean sequence value and value set of intervals [[29]]. NDGM model has been utilized in various fields, for example, in a study the electricity consumption of Turkey was predicted and analyzed the NDGM as best fit and more accurate prediction model over other grey forecasting models [[30]]. Whereas, Duan et al. forecast the crude oil consumption in China and investigated that NDGM showed superior performance [[31]].

x (0), represent the original data sequence and x(1) follows the accumulated data sequence in NDGM model so, we can write as follows:

x̂1L+1=β1x̂1L+β2L+β3

Graph

x̂11=x11+β4

Graph

Where, x̂1 (L), is the forecasting value of x(1) along with parameters β 1, β 2, β 3 and β 4. So, we can write the above equation in matrix form as this: if L = 1, 2, and 3 .

x12x23x1n=β1β2β3x1111x1222x1n1L11

Graph

The input data shows constant sequence in single case in order to satifsy NDGM parameters β1, β2, β3, and β4 by applying the following relation:

β^=BTB1BTY=β1β2β3T

Graph

The following formula to be used to calculate β4 for minimizing the sum of square error:

β4=L=1n1x1L+1β1Lx11β2j=1Ljβ1Lj1β1L1β1.β3.β1L1L=1n1β1L2)

Graph

For further knowledge about NDGM model, its parameter and properties, Liu et. al. (2010) is referred [[25]].

Performance evaluation approach of NDGM

We employed mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) to evaluate the accuracy of NDGM model. The formula to calculate MAPE % is as follows:

MAPE%=1nn=1ky0kŷ0ky0k×100%

Graph

Where y(0)(k) represents the original sequence of data and ŷ0k denotes the forecasting sequence data values.

Relative growth rate (RGR) and doubling time (Dt) analysis

To best of our knowledge, there is no model available to check the growth rate for cardiovascular deaths. In this manner, RGR model was used to analyze the relative growth of cardiovascular deaths for selected countries [[32]]. Two parameters (Dt and RGR) were employed in order to forecast the number of deaths caused by CVD of selected countries by utilizing NDGM model. The equation of RGR is given by,

RGR=lnL2lnL1/lnN2lnN1t2t1t2t1

Graph

Where L2 denotes the cumulative number of cardiovascular deaths in year t2 & L1 represent the cumulative number of cardiovascular deaths in year t1,as in our case, the equation can be reduced to

RGR=lnL2/N2N1L1

Graph

The Dt is the time required for publications to reduce the number of cardiovascular deaths for a given RGR is represented as:

Dt=t2t1ln2/2lnN2lnN1lnL2lnL1

Graph

In our case, it can be written as:

Dt=ln2/2lnN2lnN1lnL2lnL1

Graph

Synthetic RGR and synthetic doubling time model

In any case, if the RGR and Dt make an alternate pattern, when compared with that of actual data pattern create issue, in this regard synthetic Relative Growth Rate (RGRsyn) and Synthetic Doubling Time (Dsyn) models have been introduced [[33]]. The equation for Synthetic Relative Growth Rate (RGRsyn) model can be written as follows:

RGRsyn=θRGRoriginal+1θRGRforecast

Graph

Whereas RGRoriginal denotes the Relative Growth Rate of original data and RGRforecast explains the Relative Growth Rate of predicted values. However, θ indicate relative weights coefficient and its value can be taken as 0.5 in general.

The Synthetic Doubling Time (Dsyn) model is presented as:

Dsyn=θDoriginal+1θDforecast

Graph

Here, Doriginal demonstrates the Doubling Time obtained from original data values, whereas RGRforecast indicate Relative Growth Rate based on forecasting data values.

Results

We employed NDGM to forecast the relative growth of cardiovascular deaths among six participated countries. The calculated simulated values for the data 2005–2019 are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Table 1 shows the forecasts results for Pakistan. The values obtained from MAPE % demonstrate the effectiveness level of 97.05% which shows NDGM as a best-fit grey model to forecast number of deaths caused by CVD. The simulated values based on NDGM showed an increasing trend for future. Figure 1 has been shown to better understand the comparison between actual data and the simulated NDGM data from 2005 to 2027 against the increasing deaths pattern for CVD in Pakistan.

Table 1 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in Pakistan

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

RGR Mean

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

295,320

295,320

295,320

2006

298,835

297,535

594,156

0.699

0.223

1.051

2.397

2007

302,305

302,502

896,461

0.411

1.582

2008

307,782

307,896

1,204,244

0.295

1.913

2009

313,037

313,753

1,517,282

0.231

2.158

2010

319,323

320,113

1,836,606

0.191

2.349

2011

326,241

327,019

2,162,848

0.164

2.504

2012

334,172

334,517

2,497,021

0.144

2.9

2013

342,768

342,660

2,839,790

0.129

2.644

2014

352,846

351,502

3,192,636

0.117

2.838

2015

362,180

361,102

3,554,816

0.107

2.924

2016

372,093

371,527

3,926,909

0.100

3.12

2017

381,421

382,847

4,308,331

0.093

3.072

2018

395,139

399,214

395,139

0.201

1.914

2019

408,486

412,578

803,625

0.230

0.351

2020

422,979

1,226,605

2021

438,716

1,665,321

0.7521

0.265

1.887

2.125

2022

455,804

2,121,126

0.212

2.112

2023

474,360

2,595,486

0.252

2.423

2024

494,508

3,089,995

02174

2.521

2025

516,386

3,606,381

0.300

2.656

2026

540,143

4,146,525

0.268

2.721

2027

565,939

4,712,464

0.228

2.905

MAPE %

1.56

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

Table 2 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in India

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

RGR Mean

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

1,653,599

1,653,599

1,653,599

2006

1,734,072

1,722,462

3,387,671

0.431

0.224

1.026

2.362

2007

1,818,917

1,822,164

5,206,588

0.312

1.538

2008

1,909,307

1,918,236

7,115,895

0.257

1.857

2009

1,996,194

2,010,811

9,112,089

0.217

2.119

2010

2,095,862

2,100,015

11,207,951

0.169

2.268

2011

2,197,149

2,185,971

13,405,100

0.157

2.453

2012

2,285,131

2,268,798

15,690,230

0.14

2.562

2013

2,351,070

2,348,609

18,041,301

0.126

2.652

2014

2,418,358

2,425,515

20,459,659

0.115

2.766

2015

2,490,513

2,499,621

22,950,172

0.107

2.857

2016

2,583,709

2,571,028

25,533,881

0.038

2.931

2017

2,632,780

2,639,836

28,166,660

0.271

3.315

2018

2,706,138

2,712,540

2,706,138

0.19

3.214

2019

2,770,027

2,790,214

5,476,166

0.617

2.014

2020

2,831,590

8,307,755

2021

2,890,911

11,198,666

0.431

0.266

1.825

2.143

2022

2,948,073

14,146,739

0.234

2.217

2023

3,003,153

17,149,892

0.293

2.342

2024

3,056,228

20,206,120

0.264

2.522

2025

3,107,371

23,313,490

0.243

2.608

2026

3,156,651

26,470,142

0.327

2.777

2027

3,204,138

29,674,280

0.190

2.862

MAPE %

2.88%

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

Table 3 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in China

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

Mean RGR

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

3,123,852

3,123,852

3,123,852

2006

3,080,393

3,030,930

6,204,245

0.616

0.236

1.070

2.330

2007

3,126,022

3,171,122

9,330,267

0.408

1.590

2008

3,260,751

3,308,158

12,591,018

0.352

1.681

2009

3,440,057

3,442,107

16,031,075

0.242

2.104

2010

3,610,887

3,573,039

19,641,962

0.263

2.257

2011

3,744,796

3,701,023

23,386,759

0.165

2.459

2012

3,844,071

3,826,124

27,230,830

0.161

2.576

2013

3,872,996

3,948,408

31,103,826

0.153

2.651

2014

4,039,145

4,067,937

35,142,971

0.141

2.726

2015

4,221,832

4,184,775

39,364,803

0.133

2.862

2016

4,344,334

4,298,982

43,709,137

0.105

2.924

2017

4,377,972

4,410,616

48,087,109

0.095

3.062

2018

4,519,736

4,532,154

4,519,736

0.299

1.711

2019

4,626,399

4,678,514

9,146,135

0.168

0.524

2020

4,730,659

13,876,794

2021

4,832,572

18,709,366

0.524

0.275

1.240

2.117

2022

4,932,189

23,641,555

0.334

2.146

2023

5,029,563

28,671,118

0.193

2.315

2024

5,124,744

33,795,862

0.284

2.451

2025

5,217,781

39,013,642

0.174

2.514

2026

5,308,722

44,322,365

0.258

2.612

2027

5,397,616

49,719,981

0.215

2.701

MAPE %

4.15%

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

Table 4 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in Kenya

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

RGR Mean

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

28,096

28,096

28,096

2006

28,709

28,780

56,805

0.704

0.212

1.044

2.400

2007

29,283

29,338

86,088

0.416

1.571

2008

29,907

29,911

115,995

0.258

1.903

2009

30,578

30,500

146,574

0.224

2.146

2010

31,216

31,104

177,790

0.183

2.338

2011

31,891

31,724

209,681

0.155

2.495

2012

32,452

32,361

242,133

0.143

2.632

2013

32,895

33,015

275,029

0.127

2.754

2014

33,453

33,686

308,482

0.117

2.858

2015

34,203

34,375

342,686

0.105

2.946

2016

35,107

35,083

377,793

0.068

3.021

2017

35,992

35,809

413,786

0.041

3.090

2018

36,555

36,624

36,555

0.255

1.903

2019

37,321

37,652

73,876

0.324

2.014

2020

38,107

111,983

2021

38,914

150,897

0.119

0.261

1.751

2.190

2022

39,742

190,640

0.234

2.146

2023

40,593

231,234

0.193

2.338

2024

41,467

272,701

0.165

2.495

2025

42,363

315,065

0.244

2.628

2026

43,284

358,349

0.329

2.743

2027

44,229

402,579

0.206

2.844

MAPE %

1.9%

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

Table 5 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in USA

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

RGR Mean

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

857,472

857,472

857,472

2006

842,430

817,100

1,699,903

0.684

0.228

1.072

2.514

2007

827,191

817,591

2,527,094

0.528

1.618

2008

823,970

818,325

3,351,065

0.442

1.958

2009

814,684

819,425

4,165,749

0.219

2.216

2010

805,696

821,073

4,971,446

0.166

2.426

2011

817,311

823,541

5,788,758

0.152

2.546

2012

821,111

827,238

6,609,869

0.135

2.713

2013

830,227

832,776

7,440,096

0.128

2.828

2014

840,356

841,071

8,280,452

0.107

2.928

2015

857,259

853,496

9,137,711

0.089

3.145

2016

880,573

872,107

10,018,285

0.052

3.309

2017

902,270

899,984

10,920,556

0.036

3.414

2018

941,740

942,407

941,740

0.341

2.045

2019

1,004,285

101,248

1,946,025

0.215

2.000

2020

1,097,970

3,043,995

2021

1,238,298

4,282,293

0.124

0.329

3.412

2.193

2022

1,448,492

5,730,785

0.291

2.104

2023

1,763,336

7,494,121

0.468

2.302

2024

2,234,934

9,729,054

0.361

2.431

2025

2,441,328

12,170,382

0.224

2.554

2026

2,999,418

15,169,801

0.320

2.856

2027

3,050,121

18,219,922

0.383

2.935

MAPE %

1.02%

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

Table 6 Forecasting cardiovascular deaths in Sweden

Years

Original Data

NDGM

Cumulative

RGR

RGR Mean

Dt

Mean Dt

2005

38,572

38,572

38,572

2006

38,317

38,716

76,889

0.690

0.208

1.064

2.464

2007

38,053

37,881

114,943

0.402

1.604

2008

37,525

37,151

152,469

0.283

1.957

2009

36,792

36,513

189,262

0.216

2.225

2010

35,644

35,955

224,907

0.173

2.450

2011

35,642

35,467

260,550

0.147

2.552

2012

35,070

35,041

295,620

0.126

2.562

2013

34,559

34,668

330,180

0.111

2.615

2014

33,961

34,342

364,141

0.098

2.901

2015

33,768

34,057

397,909

0.089

3.106

2016

33,710

33,808

431,619

0.081

3.232

2017

34,163

33,590

465,783

0.076

3.305

2018

33,399

33,410

33,399

0.286

2.597

2019

33,233

33,521

66,633

0.102

2.751

2020

33,087

99,721

2021

32,960

132,681

0.321

0.254

2.100

2.893

2022

32,849

165,530

0.221

2.765

2023

32,751

198,282

0.381

2.864

2024

32,666

230,949

0.253

2.943

2025

32,592

263,542

02132

3.764

2026

32,527

296,069

0.116

3.888

2027

32,470

328,540

0.304

3.978

MAPE %

2.02%

Abbreviations: EGM even grey model, DGM discrete grey model, NDGM nonhomogeneous discrete grey model, RGR relative growth rate, Dt doubling time

With the turn of the century, CVDs became the leading cause of mortality in India. Table-2 represents the results from India with the MAPE accuracy level of 98.35%. The NDGM based simulated values also showed an inclined pattern in progressive number of cardiovascular deaths in future.

Table 3 represents the results for china. The forecast values based on NDGM simulated data showed an anticipated trend until 2027. The MAPE accuracy level turned out to be 96.88%. The NDGM model findings are found consistent with a range of other cardiovascular disease predictions in China, as the burden of CVD was increasing and primary and secondary prevention is likely to be core health policy priorities in the immediate future [[34]].

Likewise, Tables 4, 5 and 6 represents the results for Kenya, USA and Sweden with MAPE accuracy level of 97.77, 96.8 and 97.74% respectively (Table 8). These findings are similar with some prior findings in which increasing trends have been reported [[36]]. According to a study in USA if projected trends in ischemic stroke mortality continue, increase in US stroke deaths will outpace overall population growth, with a doubling in deaths by the year 2032 [[37]]. For an easy and clear comparison of cardiovascular raising trends, Fig. 2a-f can be seen. All participated countries showed an increasing trend in raising their number of cardiovascular deaths, except for Sweden. A study has reported decline in mortality and incidence of cardiovascular related diseases since 1980s in Sweden. Changes in lifestyle have helped to break the increasing trend in CVD [[38]]. The outcomes reveal that the MAPE accuracy level for NDGM in case of India is found slightly higher than the rest of the five countries whereas Pakistan, Kenya and Sweden showed almost same MAPE accuracy level. The average MAPE accuracy level for NDGM showed a value of 97.44% (Table 8). The anticipated future trends in cardiovascular deaths for the participated countries compel to focus on the importance of increased investment in prevention and treatment of CVD.

Graph: Fig. 2 a Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for Pakistan. b Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for India. c Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for China. d Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for Kenya. e Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for USA. f Simulative and Predictive values of NDGM for Sweden

CV death growth and doubling time model based on NDGM

The relative growth rates and doubling time model have been employed to calculate the relative growth of cardiovascular deaths and an expected time to reduce the deaths in selected countries. Table 7 represents the ranking order of six countries for an estimated RGR and doubling time (Dt) as per original and simulated data. The RGR equation of original data showed a ranking order given below:

China0.236>USA0.228>India0.224>Pakistan0.223>Kenya0.212>Sweden0.208

Graph

Table 7 Ranking

Relative Growth rate/ Double Time

Ranking

RGR (original data)

China(0.236) > USA(0.228) > India(0.224) > Pakistan(0.223) > Kenya(0.212) > Sweden(0.208)

Dt (Original Data)

China(2.330) < India(2.362) < Pakistan(2.397) < Kenya(2.400) < Sweden(2.464) < USA(2.514)

RGR (Forecast Data)

USA(0.329) > China(0.275) > Pakistan(0.269) > India(0.266) > Kenya(0.261) > Sweden(0.254)

Dt (Forecast data)

China(2.117) < Pakistan(2.125) < India(2.143) < Kenya(2.190) < USA(2.193) < Sweden(2.893)

Table 8 MAPE %

Countries

MAPE % (NDGM)

Pakistan

2.95

India

1.65

China

3.12

Kenya

2.23

USA

3.20

Sweden

2.26

Average MAPE %

2.56

Overall accuracy Level

97.43

To calculate the required time for cardiovascular death reduction among six countries based on original data, the following sequence was observed as per doubling time (Dt) model:

China2.330<India2.362<Pakistan2.397<Kenya2.400<Sweden2.464<USA2.514

Graph

The above-mentioned findings demonstrate that the relative growth of cardiovascular deaths in China as an upper middle-income country and USA as a high-income country rank higher followed by India, Pakistan, Kenya and Sweden based on original data. On the contrary, the doubling time model suggest that developed countries like USA and Sweden require an additional time and endeavors to reduce cardiovascular deaths double in number than in developing countries (India, Pakistan, China, Kenya). Therefore, the relative growth rate can be a source of competitive edge among developing and developed countries.

Likewise, we utilized NDGM-based simulated data to find out the status of deaths due to CVD for the period from 2020 to 2027. As indicated by RGR sequence, the following results was acquired:

USA0.329>China0.275>Pakistan0.269>India0.266>Kenya0.261>Sweden0.254

Graph

Approximately same sequence was observed based on the simulated data. For the period 2020–2027, USA and China may endure progressively number of deaths due to CVD in terms of RGR i.e. (3.29%) and (2.75%) respectively followed-by Pakistan, Kenya, India and Sweden.

As per doubling time (Dt) model, the following pattern of results is obtained:

China2.117<Pakistan2.125<India2.143<Kenya2.190<USA2.193<Sweden2.893

Graph

Our findings also revealed that USA and Sweden need relatively additional timespan to double reduce the number of cardiovascular deaths, followed by Kenya, India, Pakistan and China.

By using NDGM (based on actual and simulated data), we forecast the number of cardiovascular deaths for the period from 2020 to 2027.

Synthetic RGR and synthetic DTM for cardiovascular deaths

Presently a query arises here eventually as which country may endure maximum number of deaths by CVD in the long run. Therefore, to respond the query synthetic indices by original and forecasting values have been calculated.

By using synthetic indices, the sequence obtained for RGR is as follows:

USA0.271>China0.255>India0.251>Pakistan0.248>Kenya0.246>Sweden0.231

Graph

As per synthetic doubling time model Dt, we obtained a sequence as follows:

China2.179<India2.263<Pakistan2.270<Kenya2.276<Sweden2.297<USA2.386

Graph

Both sequences are found almost similar to the sequences obtained against the actual data thus the results are aligned with the actual data and the feasibility of the synthetic models has also been tested successfully.

Discussion

In spite of significant reductions in incidence and mortality, CVDs are still the greatest reason for death globally, both in terms of health and economic cost. We built up a forecasting framework to estimate the expected number of cardiovascular deaths in Pakistan, India, China, Kenya, the USA and Sweden by utilizing the most accurate methodology of the grey forecasting framework. Results depicted that grey prediction model was effectively applied to forecast the number of deaths caused by CVD for the period from 2020 to 2027. In addition, this study also suggests an expected time to reduce the number of deaths double in numbers using doubling time (Dt) formula. All six countries showed an increasing trend in forecasting number of deaths due to CVD for the period 2020–2027, except for Sweden. However, the results indicated that USA and China are more likely to suffer from cardiovascular deaths in future followed by Pakistan, Kenya, India and Sweden. Though China found prone to suffer maximum deaths in future, the doubling time (Dt) suggests less time expected to control and prevent from cardiovascular deaths double in number.

The results confirm that developed countries need relatively more time to reduce the deaths double in numbers whereas, developing countries require less time to do so. Whereas the USA and China may lead in terms of raising its cardiovascular mortality in future. While in case of lower middle-income countries, India and Pakistan are more likely to suffer from cardiovascular deaths in future followed by Kenya and Sweden. Figuratively speaking, a sword of Damocles hangs over the people of the USA and China, indeed most of the entire world, for the near future. Through CVD prevention and the implementation of workable approaches, we are foreseeing a future wherein the CVD epidemic is being tamed.

Statistics from various parts of the world show a large percentage of cerebrovascular and CV associated diseases in patients with COVID-19, which posed several questions about the higher sensitivity of patients with any of these comorbidities to the novel coronavirus, and also the function of CVD in progression and COVID-19 patient prognosis. Patients with Cardiovascular diseases should be monitored by their healthcare professionals with special preventive procedures for COVID-19 infection. The level of severity of both the primary respiratory syndrome and risk of adverse events is elevated in patients associated with COVID-19 and also with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Hospitals and health care networks must embrace a comprehensive approach to provide all patients with the best quality treatment, irrespective of their COVID-19 status. This is especially significant for the cardiology community, considering patients with prior symptoms of CVD and risk factors are potentially more likely to experience COVID-19 and encounter undesirable consequences. As the rate of infection rises, several cardiac patients may seek immediate treatment for either COVID-19 associated diseases or common cardiac complications. Most of these patients would need a cardiac intervention while at the same time getting SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19, triggered by SARS-CoV-2, is a worldwide pandemic emerging in real time. Cardiovascular and associated comorbidities are very common in COVID-19 patients and those are at greater risk of morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 raised an additional constraint on pre-existing CVDs. Findings from COVID-19 infection with a significant number of patients showed that fatality rate was of 10.5% for CVD among 72,314 COVID-19 cases [[39]]. Studies have revealed that there is a greater risk of mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 due to CVD. Given the growing number of COVID-19 patients other than regular clinical presentations of illness, CVD in COVID-19 infected patients appear to be alarming [[40]]. CVDs have played an important role in patient outcomes infected from the virus. Thus, careful review and monitoring of CVD in COVID-19 patients are required, from diagnosis to bedside.

CV associated complications have been identified in prior respiratory infections with related etiology and their occurrence affects the severity of the illness, so even pneumonia related hospitalization is found related with long-term and short-term risk of CVD [[42]]. Infection from viruses lead to an imbalance in cardiac supply and demand, as well as an increase in systemic inflammation. Consequently, patients with pre-existing CVD are more likely to experience acute cardiac complications, and thrombosis, and lead to severe infections. An investigation from a meta-analysis analyzed pooled prevalence of CVD in COVID-19 infected patients in various countries. The following are the findings of the meta-analysis: the US (24%), Brazil (50%), Netherlands (44%), Germany (46%), Iran (4%), Italy (25%), China (8%), South Korea (11%), Spain (17%), Switzerland (71%), United Kingdome (15%), and France (48%) Fig. 3a. The prevalence of CV complications in infected patients was shown to be substantially correlated with ICU admissions and mortality in that meta-analysis Fig. 3b [[44]].

Graph: Fig. 3 a Prevalence of Cardiovascular Complications Among COVID-19 Patients (Source [[43]];). b Cardiovascular Disease Burden among COVID-19 Patients in different countries (Source [[43]];)

However, valid information to assess the exact burden of CVD is inadequate in many parts of the world, which compels the foundation of nationwide prevention and management policies. It is clear that while many advances have been introduced in our comprehension of worldwide CVD epidemiology, there is wide variation present in data, mainly in MICs and LICs such as Pakistan and India. In these regions, there is a requirement for significantly advanced frameworks for the supervision of risk factors and disease and for strategies that can diminish CVD's morbidity and mortality at a low cost in ways that are practical and sustainable. The former can be achieved with large but simple health surveys that gather reliable data on health behaviors, CVD associated risk factors, incidence, and mortality, and access to health care in every region of the world.

Though these predictions are sober, they do not need to become true, as CVD is potentially preventable. Improving risk factors at population level in the past obviously had a decisive effect on the reduction in death rates for CVD worldwide. Several studies have shown that there is a considerable decrease in CVD mortality rates among individuals with favorable levels of significant CVD risks [[45]] [[8], [46]]. Likewise, people who practice a healthy lifestyle face a comparatively lower risk of suffering from cardiovascular related diseases. A greater emphasis on prevention may therefore alter these anticipated trends in the future and eventually may overcome the growing pandemic of COVID-19.

Limitations

The present study has several limitations. The data from Our World in Data, however comprehensive and easily accessible to almost all countries and regions, is based on regularly available data from those countries and regions. Variations may occur in the robustness of the data selection and processing and reliability of the cause of the death. Secondly, these predictions are made for developed and developing countries data together, and their generalizability to other countries should be considered with caution. It should be acknowledged that there are many differences between developed and developing countries when comparing health-care systems and how diseases are dealt. We believe that this has kept our analysis conservative. Another limitation of the study is the application of single grey prediction model which is NDGM. The further research can be carried out by employing other grey prediction models and should consider the other regions of the world for more insight information.

Conclusion

In conclusion, CVD plays a key role in disease burden and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Since CVD complications in COVID-19 patients could be fatal, they must be carefully monitored and managed in the case of an acute illness. It is yet not clear whether the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities poses independent risk or if this is affected by other factors such as age etc. The results from the forecasting model against all selected countries showed an increasing trend in terms of raising its number of deaths due to CVD till 2027, except for Sweden. However, the growth rate for the USA (RGR: 2.71%) and China (RGR: 2.55%) was found relatively higher than the rest of the three countries. The findings also revealed that USA (2.3 years) and Sweden (2.2 years) may require relatively additional timespan to double reduce the number of cardiovascular deaths when compared with China (2.1 years). The findings of this study can aid policymakers, doctors, and front-line healthcare workers in making evidence-based decisions and reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with this 21st-century pandemic.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

SR wrote the first draft of the article and conceptualized the overall study. SR and MI are involved in the data analysis. SR, ER and MI wrote the final manuscript. ZJL is responsible for project administration and supervision of the overall manuscript. All authors contributed to a second and third iteration of the manuscript, and everyone read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Union Program of Science and Health of Hunan Province, China (2019JJ80011). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in the current study is available publicly at http://www.ourworldindata.com.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study used secondary data and did not involve human subjects directly, informed consent was not obtained from the patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

• CVD

  • Cardiovascular disease

• NDGM

  • Non-homogeneous discrete grey model

• EGM

  • Even Grey Model

• DGM

  • Discrete Grey Model
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

• RGR

  • Relative Growth Rate
  • Dt
  • Doubling Time

• GST

  • Grey Systems Theory

• IHD

  • Ischemic Heart Disease

• LMICs

  • Low- and middle-income Countries

• GBD

  • Global Burden of Disease

• NCDs

  • Non-communicable diseases

• DALY

  • Disability adjusted life-years

• MAPE

  • Mean Absolute Percentage Error

• WHO

  • World Health Organization

• IHME

  • Institute of health metrics and evaluation
Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References 1 Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395; 10229: 1054-1062. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXkvVGktL8%3D. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. 32171076. 32171076 2 Siddiqi HK, Neilan TG. COVID-19, Immuno-oncology and cardiovascular disease: viewpoint from the intersection. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020; 13; 3: 347-348. 10.1007/s12265-020-10013-8. 32367343 3 Liu Z, Magal P, Seydi O, Webb G. Understanding unreported cases in the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in Wuhan, China, and the importance of major public health interventions. Biology. 2020; 9: 50. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtl2lsbzN. 10.3390/biology9030050 4 Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Mancia G, Dell'Oro R, Grassi G. COVID-19, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases: Should we change the therapy?. Pharmacol Res. 2020; 13: 104906. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104906 5 Bansal M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2020; 14; 3: 247-250. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.013 6 Clerkin KJ, Fried JA, Raikhelkar J, Sayer G, Griffin JM, Masoumi A, Jain SS, Burkhoff D, Kumaraiah D, Rabbani LR, Schwartz A, Uriel N. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2020; 141; 20: 1648-1655. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtVShtrjJ. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046941. 32200663 7 Ganatra S, Dani SS, Shah S, Asnani A, Neilan TG, Lenihan D, Ky B, Barac A, Hayek SS, Leja M, Herrmann J, Thavendiranathan P, Fradley M, Bang V, Shreyder K, Parikh R, Patel R, Singh A, Brar S, Guha A, Gupta D, Mascari P, Patten RD, Venesy DM, Nohria A, Resnic FS. Management of cardiovascular disease during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 30; 6: 315-325. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtFSktLrM. 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.05.004. 32474135. 7255720 8 Joseph P, Leong D, McKee M, Anand SS, Schwalm JD, Teo K, Mente A, Yusuf S. Reducing the global burden of cardiovascular disease, part 1: the epidemiology and risk factors. Circ Res. 2017; 121; 6: 677-694. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhsVWhsbfO. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.308903. 28860318 9 Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 1-25. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052 Watkins DA, Beaton AZ, Carapetis JR, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, Wyber R. Rheumatic heart disease worldwide: jacc scientific expert panel. J Am College Cardiol. 2018; 72: 1397-1416. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.063 Bowry ADK, Lewey J, Dugani SB, Choudhry NK. The burden of cardiovascular disease in low-and middle-income countries: epidemiology and management. Can J Cardiol. 2015; 31; 9: 1151-1159. 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.028. 26321437 Gheorghe A, Griffiths U, Murphy A, Legido-Quigley H, Lamptey P, Perel P. The economic burden of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18; 1: 975. 10.1186/s12889-018-5806-x. 30081871. 6090747 Rehman S, Li X, Wang C, Ikram M, Rehman E, Liu M. Quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Pakistan: a retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16; 20: 3890. 10.3390/ijerph16203890. 6844119 Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, Bo J, Lou Q, Lu F, Liu T, Yu L, Zhang S, Mony P, Swaminathan S, Mohan V, Gupta R, Kumar R, Vijayakumar K, Lear S, Anand S, Wielgosz A, Diaz R, Avezum A, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Lanas F, Yusoff K, Ismail N, Iqbal R, Rahman O, Rosengren A, Yusufali A, Kelishadi R, Kruger A, Puoane T, Szuba A, Chifamba J, Oguz A, McQueen M, McKee M, Dagenais G. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371; 9: 818-827. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhs12jtLbF. 10.1056/NEJMoa1311890. 25162888 Ohira T, Iso H. Cardiovascular disease epidemiology in Asia. Circ J. 2013; 2013: CJ-13 Benziger CP, Roth GA, Moran AE. The global burden of disease study and the preventable burden of NCD. Glob Heart. 2016; 11; 4: 393-397. 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.10.024. 27938824 Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1333-1341. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXns1CltL0%3D. 10.1056/NEJMoa1406656 Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123; 8: 933-944. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5. 21262990 Chernova IV, Sumin SA, Bobyr MV, Seregin SP. Forecasting and diagnosing cardiovascular disease based on inverse fuzzy models. Biomed Eng. 2016; 49: 263-267. 10.1007/s10527-016-9545-y Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Delling FN, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Lutsey PL, Mackey JS, Matchar DB, Matsushita K, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, O'Flaherty M, Palaniappan LP, Pandey A, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Ritchey MD, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner PAmerican Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 137; 12: e67-492. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. 29386200 Ikram M, Sroufe R, Zhang Q, Ferasso M. Assessment and prediction of environmental sustainability: novel grey models comparative analysis of China vs. the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28; 14: 17891-17912. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhtFGnsLbE. 10.1007/s11356-020-11418-3 Chiang JS, Wu PL, Chiang SD, Chang TJ, Chang ST, Wen KL. Introduction to Grey system theory. J Grey Syst. 1998; 1: 1-24 Rehman E, Ikram M, Feng MT, Rehman S. Sectoral-based CO2 emissions of Pakistan: a novel Grey relation analysis (GRA) approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020; 27; 23: 29118-29129. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtlagsLbF. 10.1007/s11356-020-09237-7 Javed SA, Liu S. Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models. Scientometrics. 2018; 115; 1: 395-413. 10.1007/s11192-017-2586-5 Xie N-M, Liu S-F, Yang Y-J, Yuan C-Q. On novel grey forecasting model based on non-homogeneous index sequence. Appl Math Model. 2013; 37; 7: 5059-5068. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.037 Wu L-F, Liu S-F, Cui W, Liu D-L, Yao T-X. Non-homogenous discrete grey model with fractional-order accumulation. Neural Comput Appl. 2014; 25; 5: 1215-1221. 10.1007/s00521-014-1605-1 Ikram M, Zhang Q, Sroufe R. Developing integrated management systems using an AHP-fuzzy VIKOR approach. Bus Strateg Environ. 2020; 29; 6: 2265-2283. 10.1002/bse.2501 Liu S, Forrest JYL. Grey systems: theory and applications: Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13938-3. Ikram M, Mahmoudi A, Shah SZA, Mohsin M. Forecasting number of ISO 14001 certifications of selected countries: application of even GM (1,1), DGM, and NDGM models. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019; 26; 12: 12505-12521. 10.1007/s11356-019-04534-2 Kusakci AO, Ayvaz B. Electrical energy consumption forecasting for Turkey using grey forecasting technics with rolling mechanism. In: Conference Proceedings of 2015 2nd international conference on knowledge-based engineering and innovation: KBEI 2015. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2016. Duan H, Lei GR, Shao K. Forecasting crude oil consumption in China using a grey prediction model with an optimal fractional-order accumulating operator. Complexity. 2018; 2018: 1-12. 10.1155/2018/3869619 Bajwa RS, Yaldram K, Rafique S. A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective. Scientometrics. 2013; 94; 1: 333-342. 10.1007/s11192-012-0699-4 Liu S, Yang Y, Forrest J. Grey data analysis. Singapore: Springer; 2017. Shen C, Ge J. Epidemic of cardiovascular disease in China: current perspective and prospects for the future. Circulation. 2018; 138; 4: 342-344. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033484. 30571361 Stevens W, Peneva D, Li JZ, Liu LZ, Liu G, Gao R. Estimating the future burden of cardiovascular disease and the value of lipid and blood pressure control therapies in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 1-10. 10.1186/s12913-016-1420-8 Pearson-Stuttard J, Guzman-Castillo M, Penalvo JL, Rehm CD, Afshin A, Danaei G, Kypridemos C, Gaziano T, Mozaffarian D, Capewell S, O'Flaherty M. Modeling future cardiovascular disease mortality in the United States: national trends and racial and ethnic disparities. Circulation. 2016; 133; 10: 967-978. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019904. 26846769. 4783256 Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke. 2003; 34; 9: 2109-2112. 10.1161/01.STR.0000085829.60324.DE. 12881608 Bengtsson T, Keilman N. Old and new perspectives on mortality forecasting. Cham: Springer Nature; 2019. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020; 323; 13: 1239-1242. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnsFCqsrs%3D. 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. 32091533. 32091533 Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, Wang H, Wan J, Wang X, Lu Z. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5; 7: 811-818. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. 32219356. 32219356 Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system. JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5; 7: 831-840. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286. 32219363 Violi F, Cangemi R, Calvieri C. Hospitalization for pneumonia and risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2015; 313; 17: 1753. 10.1001/jama.2015.3130. 25942728 Guzik TJ, Mohiddin SA, Dimarco A, Patel V, Savvatis K, Marelli-Berg FM, Madhur MS, Tomaszewski M, Maffia P, D'Acquisto F, Nicklin SA, Marian AJ, Nosalski R, Murray EC, Guzik B, Berry C, Touyz RM, Kreutz R, Wang DW, Bhella D, Sagliocco O, Crea F, Thomson EC, McInnes IB. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovasc Res. 2020; 116; 10: 1666-1687. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXit1SrtbrN. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa106. 32352535. 7197627 Hessami A, Shamshirian A, Heydari K, Pourali F, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Moosazadeh M, et al. Cardiovascular diseases burden in COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis: medRxiv; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.022. Barber RM, Fullman N, Sorensen RJD, Bollyky T, McKee M, Nolte E, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, Abdulle AM, Abdurahman AA, Abera SF, Abraham B, Abreha GF, Adane K, Adelekan AL, Adetifa IMO, Afshin A, Agarwal A, Agarwal SK, Agarwal S, Agrawal A, Kiadaliri AA, Ahmadi A, Ahmed KY, Ahmed MB, Akinyemi RO, Akinyemiju TF, Akseer N, al-Aly Z, Alam K, Alam N, Alam SS, Alemu ZA, Alene KA, Alexander L, Ali R, Ali SD, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Alkerwi A', Alla F, Allebeck P, Allen C, al-Raddadi R, Alsharif U, Altirkawi KA, Martin EA, Alvis-Guzman N, Amare AT, Amini E, Ammar W, Amo-Adjei J, Amoako YA, Anderson BO, Androudi S, Ansari H, Ansha MG, Antonio CAT, Ärnlöv J, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Assadi R, Astatkie A, Atey TM, Atique S, Atnafu NT, Atre SR, Avila-Burgos L, Avokpaho EFGA, Quintanilla BPA, Awasthi A, Ayele NN, Azzopardi P, Saleem HOB, Bärnighausen T, Bacha U, Badawi A, Banerjee A, Barac A, Barboza MA, Barker-Collo SL, Barrero LH, Basu S, Baune BT, Baye K, Bayou YT, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Bedi N, Beghi E, Béjot Y, Bello AK, Bennett DA, Bensenor IM, Berhane A, Bernabé E, Bernal OA, Beyene AS, Beyene TJ, Bhutta ZA, Biadgilign S, Bikbov B, Birlik SM, Birungi C, Biryukov S, Bisanzio D, Bizuayehu HM, Bose D, Brainin M, Brauer M, Brazinova A, Breitborde NJK, Brenner H, Butt ZA, Cárdenas R, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Campos-Nonato IR, Car J, Carrero JJ, Casey D, Caso V, Castañeda-Orjuela CA, Rivas JC, Catalá-López F, Cecilio P, Cercy K, Charlson FJ, Chen AZ, Chew A, Chibalabala M, Chibueze CE, Chisumpa VH, Chitheer AA, Chowdhury R, Christensen H, Christopher DJ, Ciobanu LG, Cirillo M, Coggeshall MS, Cooper LT, Cortinovis M, Crump JA, Dalal K, Danawi H, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dargan PI, das Neves J, Davey G, Davitoiu DV, Davletov K, de Leo D, del Gobbo LC, del Pozo-Cruz B, Dellavalle RP, Deribe K, Deribew A, Des Jarlais DC, Dey S, Dharmaratne SD, Dicker D, Ding EL, Dokova K, Dorsey ER, Doyle KE, Dubey M, Ehrenkranz R, Ellingsen CL, Elyazar I, Enayati A, Ermakov SP, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Estep K, Fürst T, Faghmous IDA, Fanuel FBB, Faraon EJA, Farid TA, Farinha CSS, Faro A, Farvid MS, Farzadfar F, Feigin VL, Feigl AB, Fereshtehnejad SM, Fernandes JG, Fernandes JC, Feyissa TR, Fischer F, Fitzmaurice C, Fleming TD, Foigt N, Foreman KJ, Forouzanfar MH, Franklin RC, Frostad J, G/hiwot TT, Gakidou E, Gambashidze K, Gamkrelidze A, Gao W, Garcia-Basteiro AL, Gebre T, Gebremedhin AT, Gebremichael MW, Gebru AA, Gelaye AA, Geleijnse JM, Genova-Maleras R, Gibney KB, Giref AZ, Gishu MD, Giussani G, Godwin WW, Gold A, Goldberg EM, Gona PN, Goodridge A, Gopalani SV, Goto A, Graetz N, Greaves F, Griswold M, Guban PI, Gugnani HC, Gupta PC, Gupta R, Gupta R, Gupta T, Gupta V, Habtewold TD, Hafezi-Nejad N, Haile D, Hailu AD, Hailu GB, Hakuzimana A, Hamadeh RR, Hambisa MT, Hamidi S, Hammami M, Hankey GJ, Hao Y, Harb HL, Hareri HA, Haro JM, Hassanvand MS, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hay SI, Hendrie D, Heredia-Pi IB, Hoek HW, Horino M, Horita N, Hosgood HD, Htet AS, Hu G, Huang H, Huang JJ, Huntley BM, Huynh C, Iburg KM, Ileanu BV, Innos K, Irenso AA, Jahanmehr N, Jakovljevic MB, James P, James SL, Javanbakht M, Jayaraman SP, Jayatilleke AU, Jeemon P, Jha V, John D, Johnson C, Johnson SC, Jonas JB, Juel K, Kabir Z, Kalkonde Y, Kamal R, Kan H, Karch A, Karema CK, Karimi SM, Kasaeian A, Kassebaum NJ, Kastor A, Katikireddi SV, Kazanjan K, Keiyoro PN, Kemmer L, Kemp AH, Kengne AP, Kerbo AA, Kereselidze M, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khalil I, Khan AR, Khan EA, Khan G, Khang YH, Khoja ATA, Khonelidze I, Khubchandani J, Kibret GD, Kim D, Kim P, Kim YJ, Kimokoti RW, Kinfu Y, Kissoon N, Kivipelto M, Kokubo Y, Kolk A, Kolte D, Kopec JA, Kosen S, Koul PA, Koyanagi A, Kravchenko M, Krishnaswami S, Krohn KJ, Defo BK, Bicer BK, Kuipers EJ, Kulkarni VS, Kumar GA, Kumsa FA, Kutz M, Kyu HH, Lager ACJ, Lal A, Lal DK, Lalloo R, Lallukka T, Lan Q, Langan SM, Lansingh VC, Larson HJ, Larsson A, Laryea DO, Latif AA, Lawrynowicz AEB, Leasher JL, Leigh J, Leinsalu M, Leshargie CT, Leung J, Leung R, Levi M, Liang X, Lim SS, Lind M, Linn S, Lipshultz SE, Liu P, Liu Y, Lo LT, Logroscino G, Lopez AD, Lorch SA, Lotufo PA, Lozano R, Lunevicius R, Lyons RA, Macarayan ERK, Mackay MT, el Razek HMA, el Razek MMA, Mahdavi M, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mantovani LG, Manyazewal T, Mapoma CC, Marcenes W, Marks GB, Marquez N, Martinez-Raga J, Marzan MB, Massano J, Mathur MR, Maulik PK, Mazidi M, McAlinden C, McGrath JJ, McNellan C, Meaney PA, Mehari A, Mehndiratta MM, Meier T, Mekonnen AB, Meles KG, Memish ZA, Mengesha MM, Mengiste DT, Mengistie MA, Menota BG, Mensah GA, Mereta ST, Meretoja A, Meretoja TJ, Mezgebe HB, Micha R, Millear A, Mills EJ, Minnig S, Mirarefin M, Mirrakhimov EM, Mock CN, Mohammad KA, Mohammed S, Mohanty SK, Mokdad AH, Mola GLD, Molokhia M, Monasta L, Montico M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moraga P, Morawska L, Mori R, Moses M, Mueller UO, Murthy S, Musa KI, Nachega JB, Nagata C, Nagel G, Naghavi M, Naheed A, Naldi L, Nangia V, Nascimento BR, Negoi I, Neupane SP, Newton CR, Ng M, Ngalesoni FN, Ngunjiri JW, Nguyen G, Ningrum DNA, Nolte S, Nomura M, Norheim OF, Norrving B, Noubiap JJN, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Oh IH, Okoro A, Oladimeji O, Olagunju AT, Olivares PR, Olsen HE, Olusanya BO, Olusanya JO, Opio JN, Oren E, Ortiz A, Osborne RH, Osman M, Owolabi MO, PA M, Pain AW, Pakhale S, Castillo EP, Pana A, Papachristou C, Parsaeian M, Patel T, Patton GC, Paudel D, Paul VK, Pearce N, Pereira DM, Perez-Padilla R, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Petzold M, Phillips MR, Pigott DM, Pillay JD, Pinho C, Polinder S, Pond CD, Prakash V, Purwar M, Qorbani M, Quistberg DA, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahimi K, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Rahman M, Rahman MHU, Rai RK, Ram U, Rana SM, Rankin Z, Rao PV, Rao PC, Rawaf S, Rego MAS, Reitsma M, Remuzzi G, Renzaho AMNN, Resnikoff S, Rezaei S, Rezai MS, Ribeiro AL, Roba HS, Rokni MB, Ronfani L, Roshandel G, Roth GA, Rothenbacher D, Roy NK, Sachdev PS, Sackey BB, Saeedi MY, Safiri S, Sagar R, Sahraian MA, Saleh MM, Salomon JA, Samy AM, Sanabria JR, Sanchez-Niño MD, Sandar L, Santos IS, Santos JV, Milicevic MMS, Sarmiento-Suarez R, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Savic M, Sawhney M, Saylan MI, Schöttker B, Schutte AE, Schwebel DC, Seedat S, Seid AM, Seifu CN, Sepanlou SG, Serdar B, Servan-Mori EE, Setegn T, Shackelford KA, Shaheen A, Shahraz S, Shaikh MA, Shakh-Nazarova M, Shamsipour M, Islam SMS, Sharma J, Sharma R, She J, Sheikhbahaei S, Shen J, Shi P, Shigematsu M, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shoman H, Shrime MG, Sibamo ELS, Sigfusdottir ID, Silva DAS, Silveira DGA, Sindi S, Singh A, Singh JA, Singh OP, Singh PK, Singh V, Sinke AH, Sinshaw AE, Skirbekk V, Sliwa K, Smith A, Sobngwi E, Soneji S, Soriano JB, Sousa TCM, Sposato LA, Sreeramareddy CT, Stathopoulou V, Steel N, Steiner C, Steinke S, Stokes MA, Stranges S, Strong M, Stroumpoulis K, Sturua L, Sufiyan MB, Suliankatchi RA, Sun J, Sur P, Swaminathan S, Sykes BL, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Tabb KM, Taffere GR, Talongwa RT, Tarajia M, Tavakkoli M, Taveira N, Teeple S, Tegegne TK, Tehrani-Banihashemi A, Tekelab T, Tekle DY, Shifa GT, Terkawi AS, Tesema AG, Thakur JS, Thomson AJ, Tillmann T, Tiruye TY, Tobe-Gai R, Tonelli M, Topor-Madry R, Tortajada M, Troeger C, Truelsen T, Tura AK, Uchendu US, Ukwaja KN, Undurraga EA, Uneke CJ, Uthman OA, van Boven JFM, van Dingenen R, Varughese S, Vasankari T, Venketasubramanian N, Violante FS, Vladimirov SK, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wagner JA, Wakayo T, Waller SG, Walson JL, Wang H, Wang YP, Watkins DA, Weiderpass E, Weintraub RG, Wen CP, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Whiteford HA, Wilkinson JD, Wiysonge CS, Woldeyes BG, Wolfe CDA, Won S, Workicho A, Workie SB, Wubshet M, Xavier D, Xu G, Yadav AK, Yaghoubi M, Yakob B, Yan LL, Yano Y, Yaseri M, Yimam HH, Yip P, Yonemoto N, Yoon SJ, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, el Sayed Zaki M, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Zapata T, Zenebe ZM, Zodpey S, Zoeckler L, Zuhlke LJ, Murray CJL. Healthcare access and quality index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2017; 390; 10091: 231-266. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8 Fuster V, Kelly BB, Vedanthan R. Promoting global cardiovascular health: moving forward. Circulation. 2011; 123; 15: 1671-1678. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009522. 21502585

By Shazia Rehman; Erum Rehman; Muhammad Ikram and Zhang Jianglin

Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author

Titel:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD): assessment, prediction and policy implications
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Jianglin, Zhang ; Ikram, Muhammad ; Rehman, Erum ; Rehman, Shazia
Link:
Zeitschrift: BMC Public Health, Jg. 21 (2021), Heft 1, S. 1-14
Veröffentlichung: BMC, 2021
Medientyp: unknown
ISSN: 1471-2458 (print)
Schlagwort:
  • medicine.medical_specialty
  • business.industry
  • Cvd prevention
  • Public health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Disease
  • 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • CVD
  • 03 medical and health sciences
  • Relative growth rate
  • 0302 clinical medicine
  • Environmental health
  • Epidemiology
  • medicine
  • Doubling time model, assessment, forecast
  • 030212 general & internal medicine
  • Biostatistics
  • Public aspects of medicine
  • RA1-1270
  • business
  • Research Article
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: OpenAIRE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Language: English
  • Rights: OPEN

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -