校園水池生命週期成本(LCC)之研究-以台中市國小為例 ; A Study on the Life Cycle Costing (LCC) of Water Features of Elementary Schools － Elementary Schools in Taichung City

部分未開放全文之論文可透過本校博碩士論文系統於校內網域使用，實際授權情形以該系統為準。 ; 由二十世紀末以來，「永續」(sustainability)的概念，已成為各國社會、經濟與環境發展最主要的指導方針。為達到資源永續發展利用的目標，本研究從生命週期成本分析的角度探討校園中不同類型水池的建造工法與維護管理方式等項目之生命週期成本，主要以台中市之國小水池為主要研究對象。藉由實地調查法對各國小水池做調查與紀錄，並以訪談法來瞭解設計人員與維護管理者之建造工法、維護管理方式及使用後評估，再以歸納法進行分類後針對不同類型的水池作生命週期成本（LCC）計算；生命週期成本主要以下列五項為主；資本（Capital）、保養（Maintenance）、燃料（Fuel）、替換（Replacement）、轉賣（Salvage），其主要計算項目包括使用年限、水池的施工方式與其成本、維護管理方式與其成本等。本研究歸納出，各國小之水池以施工方式可分為三大類：（1）傳統工法(混凝土為主的工法)施作式；（2）傳統工法與生態工法混合式；（3）全生態工法三大類，而維護管理方式則可分為三大類：（1）委外管理方式；（2）校內師生共同管理方式；（3）由校工管理方式，而各國小之生態水池生命週期若以30年為期，則以採全生態工法施做方式加校內師生共同管理之組合最為符合經濟與永續發展之效益；次之為傳統工法與生態工法混合方式加校內師生共同管理之組合，而費用最高及維護管理層級最低的，則是以採用傳統工法施作方式加委外管理方式為最；次之為傳統工法與生態工法混合式加委外管理方式。 ; Since late 20st century, the concept of “Sustainability” has been aware by most governments and become the most important guideline for society, economy and environment development. To achieve the goal of sustainable development, this study investigates the construction and maintenance methods of school pools in elementary schools in Taichung city from the aspect of Life Cycle Costing Analysis, LCCA. Through site survey and interviews, the construction technologies employed, maintenance methods, and evaluations after use were recorded. Subsequently the LCC of different types of pools were deduced. The LCC mainly consists of the following elements: Capital, Maintenance, Fuel, Replacement, and Salvage. The major items calculated including expiration time, method of construction and initial capital cost, ways of maintenance and cost.This study concludes that pools construction methods can be divided into three categories: (1) Conventional method (concrete-based method), (2) Mixture of the conventional method and Eco-technology, and (3) Eco-technology. The maintenance methods are divided into: (1) Commissioned management, (2) Joint management by teachers and students, (3) Management by school technicians. With a life span of 30 years, the combination of “Eco-technology” and “Joint maintenance by teacher and students” is the most economical one, followed by “Mixture of the conventional method and Eco-technology” and “Joint maintenance by teachers and students”. The combination of “Conventional method” and “Commissioned management” is the most expensive option and the least management level, followed by that of “Mixture of the conventional method and Eco-technology” and “Commissioned management”.