| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: BASE
- Sprachen: Russian
- Collection: Medical Visualization (E-Journal) / Медицинская визуализация
- Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
- File Description: application/pdf
- Language: Russian
- Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/187/188; Фомина С.В., Завадовская В.Д., Юсубов М.С. и др. Контрастные препараты для ультразвукового исследования. Бюллетень сибирской медицины. 2011; 6: 137-141.; Зубарев А.В. Современная ультразвуковая диагностика: теория и практика. Радиология - практика. 2008; 5: 1-14.; Schroder R.J., Bostanjoglo M., Hidajat N. et al. Analysis of vascularity in breast tumors - comparison of high frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced color harmonic imaging. Rofo. 2002; 174: 1132-1141.; Algul A., Balci P., Segil M. et al. Contrast enhanced power Doppler and color Doppler ultrasound in breast masses: Efficiency in diagnosis and contributions to differential diagnosis. Tani Girisim Radyol. 2003; 9: 199-206.; Kook S.H., Kwag H.J. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2003; 31: 227-238.; Зубарев А.В., Гажонова В.Е. Диагностический ультразвук. Уронефрология: Практическое руководство. М.: Стром, 2002. 8-22.; Gramiak R., Shah P.M. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest. Radiol. 1968; 3: 356-366.; Kremkau F.W., Gramiak R., Carstens E.L. et al. Ultrasonic detection of cavitation at catheter tips. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1970; 110: 177-183.; Kerber R., Kioschos J., Lauer R. Use of ultrasonic contrast method in the diagnosis of valvular regurgitation and intracardiac shunts. Am. J. Cardol. 1974; 34:722-727.; Greis C.H., Technology overview: SonoVue (Bracco, Milan). Eur. Radiol. 2004; 14 (8): 11-15.; Соновью. Научная монография. Динамическое контрастное усиление в режиме реального времени. 2013: 6-40.; Seidel G., Meyer K. Impact of ultrasound contrast agents in cerebrovascular diagnostics. Eur. J. Ultrasound. 2002; 16 (1-2): 81-90.; Kamiyama N., Moriyasu F., Mine Y. et al. Analysis of flashecho from contrast agent for designing optimal ultrasound diagnostic systems. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1999; 25: 411-420.; Blomley M.J.K., Albrecht T., Cosgrove D.O. et al. Stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver and spleen- specific phase of Levovist win normal volunteers and patients with and without liver disease. Ultrasound Med. Biol.1999; 25: 1341-1352.; Klibanov A.L. Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2005; 16: 9-17; Dalecki D., Raeman C.H., Child S.Z. et al. Hemolysis in vivo from exposure to pulse ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1997; 23 (2): 307-313.; Волков В.Н. Основы ультразвуковой диагностики. Учебно-методическое пособие. Минск: ГрГМУ, 2005. 13-15.; Claudon M., Cosgrove D., Albrecht T. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med. 2008; 29: 28-44.; Morel D.R., Schwieger I., Hohn L. et al. Human pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging. Invest. Radiol. 2000; 35 (1): 80-85.; SonoVue Periodic Safety Update Report, September 2011: 29-32.; Демин И.Ю., Прончатов-Рубцов Н.В. Современные акустические методы исследований в биологии и медицине. Учебно-методические материалы по программе повышения квалификации “Хранение и обработка информации в биологических системах”. Нижний Новгород, 2007. 20-22.; Talu E., Powell R.L., Longo M.L. et al. Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2008; 34: 1182-1185.; Barrack T., Stride E. Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2009; 35: 515-522.; Browning R.M.H., Wells D.J., Eckersley R.J. Effect of needle gauge on microbubble mediated cell transfection in vivo. British Medical Ultrasound General Scientific Meeting (Conference presentation). 2010: 28-30.; Lavisse S. Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE 8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Invest. Radiol. 2008; 43: 100-111.; Lassau N., Koscielny S., Chami L. et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to therapy at dynamic contrast enhanced US with quantification-preliminary results. Radiology. 2011; 258: 291-300.; Garcia A., Etxebarria L., Atilano M. et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasound for assessing focal liver lesions. ECR. 2014; C-1455: 1-30.; Xu H.X. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: The evolving applications. Wld J. Radiol. 2009; 1: 15-24.; Leen E., Ceccotti P., Kalogeropoulou C. et al. Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluation of Novel Method of Characterizing Focal Liver Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006; 186 (6): 1551-1559.; Tranquart F., Le Gouge A., Correas J.M. et al. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the blinded assessment of focal liver lesions in comparison with MDCT and CEMRI: Results from a multi-centre clinical trial. EJC Supplements. 2008; 6: 9-15.; Tranquart F., Correas J.M., Ladam M. et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of focal liver lesions: diagnostic efficacy and economical issues from a French multicentric study. J. Radiol. 2009; 90 (1, Pt 2): 109-122.; Trillaud M., Bruel J.M., Valette P.J. et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRI. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 15 (30): 3748-3756.; Wang W.P., Wu Y., Luo Y. et al. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of focal liver lesions: a prospective multicenter trial. Mepatobiliary Pancreat Dis. Int 2009; 8 (4): 370-376.; Rong-Qin Zheng, Ren Mao, Jie Renеt al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Hepatic Artery Stenosis After Liver Transplantation: Potential Role in Changing the Clinical Algorithm. LiverTransplantation. 2010; 16 (6): 729-735.; van Esser S., Veldhuis W.B., van Hillegersberg R. et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound for preoperative tumor size assessment in patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Imaging. 2007;7: 63-68.; Jiang Y.X., Liu H., Liu J.B. et al. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007; 33: 1873-1881.; Kettenbach J., Helbich T.H., Huber S. et al. Computerassisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors. Eur. J. Radiol. 2005; 53: 238-244.; Xiao X., Ou B., Yang H. et al. Breast Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Is a Scoring System Feasible? A Preliminary Study in China. 2014; 9 (8): e105517.; Saracco A., Aspelin P., Leifland K. et al. Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50: 854-859.; Balleyguier C., Opolon P., Mathieu M.C. et al. New potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literature. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009; 69: 14-23.; Szabo B.K., Aspelin P., Wiberg M.K. et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol. 2003; 44: 379-386.; Ricci P., Cantisani V., Ballesio L. et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultraschall Med. 2007; 28: 57-62.; Caproni N., Marchisio F., Pecchi A. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI. Eur. Radiol. 2010; 20: 1384-1395.; Liu H., Jiang Y.X., Liu J.B. et al. Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: Initial observations. Breast. 2008; 17: 532-539.; Zhao H., Xu R., Ouyang Q., Chen L. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010; 73: 288-293.; Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver Update 2012. Ultraschall Med. 2013; 34: 11-29.; The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhance Ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: 33-59.; Glockner J.F., Forauer A.R., Solomon H. et al. Three dimensional gadolinium enhanced MR angiography of vascular complications after liver transplantation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1447-1453.; Зубарев А.В., Федорова Н.А. Является ли ультразвук конкурентом КТ/МРТ? Вестник МЕДСИ. 2011; 10: 22-27.; Real-time Virtual Sonography Unit. Instruction Manual. Hitachi Medical Corporation. 2004-2006; 1-3.; Sandulescu L., Saftoiu A., Dumitrescu D. et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced and real-time virtual sonography in the assessment of benign liver lesions. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2008; 17: 475-478.; Minami Y., Kudo M., Chung H. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of sonographically unidentifiable liver tumors. Feasibility and usefulness of a novel guiding technique with an integrated system of computed tomography and sonographic images. Oncology. 2007; 72 (1): 111-116.; Kitada T., Murakami T., Kuzushita N. et al. Effectiveness of real-time virtual sonography-guided radiofrequency ablation treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatol. Res. 2008; 38: 565-571.; Minami Y, Chung H., Kudo M. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008; 190: 335-341.; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/187
- Rights: Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). ; Авторы, публикующиеся в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договоренности, касающиеся неэксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например, в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (см. The Effect of Open Access).
|
