SUCI POROTNICI U HRVATSKOM KAZNENOM POSTUPKU TE KOMPARACIJA ANGLOAMERIČKOG POROTNIČKOG SUSTAVA I SUSTAVA PRISJEDNIČKOG SUDA ; LAY JUDGES IN CROATIAN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AND COMPARISON OF THE ANGLO-AMERICAN JURY SYSTEM AND THE LAY JUDGE SYSTEM ; LAY JUDGES IN CROATIAN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AND KOMPARACI ANGLOAMERIČKI POROTNIČK OF THE SYSTEM OF THE ASSIZE COURT; LAY JUDGES IN CROATIAN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AND COMPARISON OF THE ANGLO-AMERICAN JURY SYSTEM AND THE LAY JUDGE SYSTEM

Rad sadrži analizu instituta sudskog porotništva, odnosno sudskih prisjednika poznatih još kao sudaca laika, u pravnom sustavu Republike Hrvatske (u daljnjem tekstu: RH). U prvom dijelu rada naglasak je stavljen na kratki uvod u temu rada te analizu nastanka i razvoja prethodno spomenutog instituta kroz povijest Europe i RH, s posebnim naglaskom na razvoj instituta u novijoj povijesti RH. Drugi dio rada govori o reguliranosti dotičnog instituta preko Ustava Republike Hrvatske (u daljnjem tekstu URH)1 te s pomoću relevantnih domaćih i stranih propisa. Treći dio rada bavi se detaljnom analizom angloameričke (engleske, “odvojene”) porote2 i komparacijom iste sa sustavom prisjedničkog suda (kontinentalnoeuropska porota koja je prihvaćena i u RH). Četvrti dio rada namijenjen je preispitivanju pozitivnih i negativnih aspekata, odnosno dojmova prisjedničkog suda na pravosuđe RH, a peti, te ujedno i posljednji, dio namijenjen je autorovu zaključnom razmišljanju. ; The paper analyses the institution of jury, i.e. lay judges also known as lay assessors, in the legal system of the Republic of Croatia. The first part of the paper places emphasis on a brief introduction to the subject matter and analysis of the origin and development of the above-mentioned institute through the history of Europe and the Republic of Croatia, with special stress on the development of the institute in the recent history of the Republic of Croatia. The second part of the paper deals with the regulation of the said institute by means of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia and relevant national and international regulations. The third part of the paper gives a detailed analysis of the Anglo-American (English, “separate”) jury system and its comparison with the lay judge system (the European continental jury that was also accepted in the Republic of Croatia). The aim of the fourth part of the paper is to review the positive and negative aspects, i.e. the impacts of the lay judge system on the judiciary of the Republic of Croatia, whereas ...