Φυσικές, τεχνικές ικανότητες και ασκησιακή λειτουργική απόκριση καλαθοσφαιριστών με αμαξίδιο
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens ; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ), 2005
Online
Hochschulschrift
Zugriff:
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES AND TECHNICAL ABILITIES OF WHEELCHAIR BASKETBALL ATHLETES BEFORE AND AFTER EIGHT WEEKS OF REGULAR TRAINING. The aim of this study was to: a) evaluate the physical and technical abilities of elite wheelchair basketball players (WBP) and compare their results with values provided by other studies, b) to compare fitness level between athletes with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and those with amputations and other disabilities (AOD), c) to examine possible differences between players with low (1- 2.5) classification (LC) and those withhigh (3-4.5) classification (HC) and d) to assess the effect of training (pre-post) duration 8 weeks on the aerobic capacity and anaerobic power. To test all these purposes, 17 wheelchair basketballplayers (aged 30.9 ±7.2 yrs; Χ SD), all current players of the National Team volunteered to participate and underwent two different tests on a wheelchair roller ergometer. Maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max) and maximal anaerobic power (Pmax) were evaluated. Furthermore, subjects underwent 6 field tests to evaluate the technical skills. There tests took place at a basketball court. The tests were as follows: a) speed 20m, b) obstacle dribble, c) lay up, d) free throw, e) accuracy pass and long pass. The results showed that VO2max of (WBP) was2.18±0.44 l·min-1 ή 27.2±5.4 ml·kg- 1 ·min-1 . The maximal minute ventilation ( VEmax) was 93.2±14.9 l·min-1 , maximalheart rate (HRmax) reached 179.9 b·min-1 , whereas the vendilatory threshold ( VT) was determined at 71.8±6.4 % of VO2max. Respectively, the maximal anaerobic power was 228±37.5 W, the mean power was 163±27.6 W, the min power was 130±25.7 W, and the fatigue index reached 42.7±7.8%. The VO2max of Greek Wheelchair basketball players as compared to those of different countries, where wheelchair basketball is more developed, is lower when expressed as a percentage of their body weight. On the other hand, Pmax was higher and is possibly influenced by the sample size selection as 7 athletes had no spinal cord injuries, as well ...
Titel: |
Φυσικές, τεχνικές ικανότητες και ασκησιακή λειτουργική απόκριση καλαθοσφαιριστών με αμαξίδιο
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Zacharakis, Emmanuil ; Ζαχαράκης, Εμμανουήλ |
Link: | |
Veröffentlichung: | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens ; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ), 2005 |
Medientyp: | Hochschulschrift |
DOI: | 10.12681/eadd/33467 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|