Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University;
Liat Haze-Filderman
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University
Morton Leibowitz
Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center
Orna Reges
Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center
Abid Khaskia
Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center
Morris Mosseri
Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center
Acknowledgement: This study was supported by a grant from the Israel Heart Fund and the Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society. This study is partially based upon the second author's thesis and is a part of a large-scale research project of the Psych-Cardiology laboratory, Department of Cardiology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
According to the Person–Environment Fit Model (
Applying the Person–Environment Fit Model, the current study examined the contribution of the interaction between spouses' ways of providing support (social environment) and cardiac patients' attachment orientations (individual traits) to the level of distress (anxiety and depression) experienced by the patients 6 months after their first Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).
Social cognition approaches hold that the ability to benefit from support demonstrates a sense of being accepted by others. This sense is rooted, in part, in the history of parent–child attachment (
Applying Bowlby's attachment theory, we hypothesized that patients high in attachment anxiety might benefit from active engagement in terms of fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms at follow-up. An alternative hypothesis was that patients high in attachment anxiety would profit even from overprotection, because of their excessive need for reassurance and their emotional dependency. We also predicted that none of the ways of providing support would moderate the association between avoidance and depression and anxiety.
The target population was defined as married Jewish men with the diagnosis of their first ACS, whose wives also agreed to participate in the study. Israel comprises a majority (75.4%) of Jewish citizens; the remainder consists of Muslims and other minorities (
Of the 306 patients (15%) who were potentially eligible for the study, 80 (26%) were discharged or transferred to other departments; 110 (36%) did not participate as a result of either their or their spouses' refusal to take part in the study; and 5 (2%) were excluded because of their spouses' life-threatening illnesses. Overall, 111 (36%) patients and spouses completed the study questionnaires at baseline, during hospitalization, and 101 completed the questionnaires at follow-up, 6 months after hospitalization. Spouses were also interviewed 1 month post patient hospitalization. Reasons for the 9% attrition rate included loss of contact with the patients and refusal to continue to participate because of lack of time or interest. No significant differences were found between the ten patients who dropped out of the study and the rest of the sample with regard to age, illness severity, and socioeconomic status.
Patients ranged in age from 39 to 74 years (M = 55.84, SD = 7.54). Half (50.9%) had more than 12 years of formal education (M = 13.85 years, SD = 3.30) and the majority of patients (63%) described themselves as having a good to very good economic status. The wives ranged in age from 39 to 74 years (M = 54.89, SD = 7.57). More than half (59.8%) had more than 12 years of formal education (M = 14.36 years, SD = 3.08) and the same percentage of spouses as patients described themselves as having a good to very good economic status (62.5%). Most of the wives (80%) declared being in good to very good health. The couples had been married or living together for an average of 27.6 years (SD = 11.28) and had on average 2.92 children (SD = 1.10). The majority of patients (85.6%) had experienced an acute myocardial infarction (MI) without severe damage to the heart and without significant obstruction of the arteries. Six months after their first ACS, they had experienced very few repeat acute coronary events (2.7%) or coronary angioplasty (12.6%), and only one patient had died.
Attachment orientation
Patients' attachment orientations were measured at baseline using the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR;
Twelve items measured attachment-related anxiety and 12 measured attachment-related avoidance. The ECR has been used extensively with Israeli populations (
Spouses' ways of providing support
Spouses' ways of providing support were measured 1 month after hospitalization using the Ways of Giving Support Questionnaire (WOGS;
Depression and anxiety
Patients' depressive and anxiety symptoms were measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI;
At the time of the initial examination, the severity of the patient's illness was estimated by a senior cardiologist using two sets of criteria: an echocardiography score, which assesses cardiac damage, and an angiography score (status of obstructed arteries), which assesses the risk of future damage. No associations were found between the two measures of illness severity with regard to the study variables.
To examine the interactive effects of attachment anxiety, avoidance, and the ways of providing support in predicting depressive and anxiety symptoms at the 6-month follow-up, two 4-step hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. Step 1 of each regression consisted of the baseline data of the dependent variable (either depressive or anxiety symptoms) predicted in the regression to control for it. Step 2 consisted of the centered scores of the two attachment orientations. Step 3 consisted of the centered scores of the three ways of providing support. The 2-way interactions were entered in Step 4, which consisted of the product of the centered scores among each of the three ways of providing support and the two attachment orientations (see
Means and SDs of the study's main measures are presented in
Consistent with the Person–Environment Fit Model, we found that whereas increasing scores on active engagement were associated with a decrease in anxiety symptoms for patients high in attachment anxiety, they were also associated with an increase in anxiety symptoms for patients low in attachment anxiety. As could be expected regarding patients high in anxiety, support from the spouse was probably beneficial because it fulfilled their dependency needs. However, the latter finding presents an apparent enigma, given that patients low in attachment anxiety are thought to enjoy and make use of social support to a greater extent than patients high on this orientation (
A possible explanation for this unexpected finding may be derived from
The current study did not support our hypothesis that overprotection would benefit patients high in attachment anxiety. Our findings in this regard add to the vast body of evidence that regards overprotection as a nonhelpful manner of providing support (e.g.,
This study has a number of limitations. First, the 36% participation rate may have resulted in a nonrepresentative sample of couples and may therefore limit the possibility of generalizing from these findings. Second, as we lacked any objective way of confirming accuracy, we have relied on the spouses' subjective accounts of the support provided. Third, all patients in this study were male and their partners female; thus, it is difficult to determine which findings may be attributable to gender differences and which to patient versus partner role differences. Fourth, the internal consistency of the active engagement way of providing support was relatively low, thus limiting the validity and reliability of this scale. Fifth, the majority of patients were found to be within the normal range for both depression and anxiety, therefore limiting the clinical value of the current results. Finally, given that the studied patients were Israeli Jews, any generalization to other cultures must be made cautiously.
Despite these limitations, the results of this study have some important clinical implications. Clinicians working with patients who have experienced a recent MI may wish to assess both patients' attachment orientations as well as their partners' ways of providing support. Equipped with this information, they may be better prepared to help patients accept the support provided by their spouses. In addition, they may be better able to facilitate the spouses' awareness of patients' difficulties in accepting their support, therefore contributing to a better patient-spouse fit in which to cope with major stressors, such as a sudden ACS.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A.Simpson & S. W.Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford.
Brown, B. B. (1978). Social and psychological correlates of help-seeking behavior among urban adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 425–439.
Buunk, B. P., Berkhuysen, M. A., Sanderman, R., Nieuwland, W., & Ranchor, A. V. (1996). Actieve betrokkenheid, beschermend bufferen en overbescherming: Meetinstrument voor de rol van de partner bij hartrevalidatie. Gedrag en Gezondheid, 24, 304–313. [The role of the partner in heart disease: Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection].
Cimarolli, V. R. (2006). Perceived overprotection and distress in adults with visual impairment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 338–345.
Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. (1994). Couples coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 43–54.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.
French, J. R. P., Jr., Rodgers, W., & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person–environment fit. In G. V.Coelho, D. A.Hamburg, & J. E.Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York: Basic Books.
Gilbar, O., & Ben-Zur, H. (2002). Adult Israeli community norms for the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). International Journal of Stress Management, 9, 1–10.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Selected data from the New Israel Statistical Abstract No. 60–2009. Retrieved from
Lemos, K., Suls, J., Jenson, M., Lounsbury, P., & Gordon, E. E. I. (2003). How do female and male cardiac patients and their spouses share responsibilities after discharge from the hospital?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 8–15.
Martire, L. M., Druley, J. A., Stephens, M. A. P., & Wojno, W. C. (2002). Negative reactions to received spousal care: Predictors and consequences of miscarried support. Health Psychology, 21, 167–176.
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (2000). Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 260–273.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Piersma, H. L., Reaume, W. M., & Boes, J. L. (1994). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) as an outcome measure for adult psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 555–563.
Reinhardt, J. P., Boerner, K., & Horowitz, A. (2006). Good to have but not to use: Differential impact of perceived and received support on well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 117–129.
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 78–89.
Submitted: August 9, 2009 Revised: April 9, 2010 Accepted: April 10, 2010