The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of cryogenic treatment on the enhancement of the wear resistance of 100Cr6 bearing steel. The study also aims to reveal the underlying mechanisms responsible for the enhancement of wear resistance by deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) at −185°C. The wear behavior was assessed by a reciprocatory friction and wear monitor under varying normal loads (ASTM International, Annual Book of Standards, 1996). It was found that the wear resistance was increased by 37% due to DCT when compared with that of conventional heat treatment (CHT). A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study was also conducted to identify the possible mechanism that augments the improvement in the wear resistance of cryogenically treated 100Cr6 bearing steels. The microstructural study suggests that the improvement in the wear resistance is attributed to the conversion of the retained austenite into martensite, along with the precipitation and distribution of the carbides brought in by the cryogenic treatment. The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis conducted on the bearing steel samples showed that the DCT mainly enhances the destabilization of martensite by activating carbon clustering and transition carbide precipitation. Deep cryogenic treatment demonstrated more improvement in the wear resistance and hardness compared with conventional heat treatment.
Keywords: Cryogenic; 100Cr6; Microstructure; Carbides; Wear
The fuel injection pump plunger is one of the elements limiting the life of diesel engine fuel systems. The plunger is precisely fitted with a very small clearance to facilitate a perfect motion. The failure that occurs in the fuel injection pump is mainly due to the failure of the plunger (Sergeev, et al. ([
Table 1 Chemical Composition of the 100Cr6 Bearing Steel.
Carbon (%) Chromium (%) Manganese (%) Silicon (%) Sulfur (%) Phosphorus (%) Iron 0.97 1.43 0.27 0.28 0.002 0.006 Remaining
Cryogenic treatment is a process attempted by researchers to supplement the conventional heat treatment (CHT) to improve a material's mechanical properties. Molinari, et al. ([
Collins ([
100Cr6 Bearing steel rod samples of 6 mm diameter and 6 mm length were prepared for the wear study. Initially, the composition of the samples was confirmed by the optical emission spectroscope analysis, as shown in Table 1. The samples were heat-treated as per the procedure prescribed in the ASM standards ([
Graph: Fig. 1 Thermal treatment processes for Group A and B samples.
The test samples for the Vickers hardness test were machined as per the ASTM standard designation E 92–82 (ASTM International ([
The enhanced wear resistance of the cryo-treated bearing steel samples was experimentally measured using a reciprocatory friction and wear monitor (DUCOM TR-281M-M4, Ducom Instruments Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore, India) by the weight loss method, as per ASTM standard G-133 (ASTM International ([
Graph: Fig. 2 Reciprocatory friction and wear monitor.
The Scotch yoke mechanism was attached with a reciprocating arm, which carried the bearing steel samples to be tested, with a specially designed holder. The reciprocatory sliding motion was made to occur against a stationary plate (counterpart) held in a special fixture. The fixture for the counterpart was supported on a plunger and lever arrangement, in order to apply a normal load, ranging from 5 to 150 N, through a counterweight at the other end of the lever. The frequency of the reciprocating arm, which was achieved by a variable-frequency drive, can be varied from 1 to 30 Hz. The plunger and the counterpart assembly were heated in a suitable chamber so that the sliding surfaces could be heated to the required level (max. 300°C) during the test, which was monitored and regulated through a feedback controller. A data acquisition software was used for logging the test data and setting the test parameters.
The material samples were cleaned with acetone to remove any contamination and further cleaned using an ultrasonic cleaner for 10 min. After drying with an electric dryer, the sample was weighed using a semi-micro-balance (10
The samples were first polished using emery paper of grits 80, 120, 200, 600, 800, 1,000, and up to 1 μm, followed by polishing using diamond paste on a rotating linen disc, and finished with polishing on a velvet cloth using white kerosene as a coolant. These samples were etched with 2% nital and dried in air. The etched samples were studied using SEM (Hitachi [
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out using a Q10 DSC apparatus (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) in an argon atmosphere to prevent oxidation. Basically, the DSC technique measures the net heat evolved as a result of exothermic and endothermic reactions occurring in the sample as it is heated under controlled environmental conditions. The DSC curves indicate the phase changes as any transformation is accompanied by endothermic or exothermic reactions reflecting in peaks. Sixty milligrams of the bearing steel samples was heated from room temperature to 900°C. The ASTM E1269 standard test method for determining the specific heat capacity by differential scanning calorimetry was followed to determine the specific heat capacity of the bearing steel materials (ASTM International ([
A dilatometer is a thermoanalytical instrument used to measure the thermal expansion or contraction of a given specimen for a specific controlled temperature–time program. The thermal expansion and contraction are measured digitally with a high-resolution (1 μm) linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) measuring system. This instrument can also be connected to a computer system, and the samecan be obtained graphically by using the inbuilt software. The dimensional stability of the 100Cr6 bearing steels after CHT and DCT was studied as per ASTM standard E831 (ASTM International ([
The results obtained from the Vickers hardness test of the bearing steel showed an equivalent hardness of 700 HV for the CHT samples and 850 HV for the DCT samples. The cryogenically treated samples had an increase in the hardness level compared to conventional heat-treated samples. The hardness of the DCT samples showed an improvement of 18% over the CHT samples. This observation is unlike that of Bensely, et al. ([
Cryogenic treatment is more effective in reducing the amount of austenite and can make a larger number of fine secondary carbides precipitate, which can increase the dispersion strengthening effect; both are beneficial for increased hardness. Additionally, as is well known, the decrease in grain size can improve the hardness. The grain size of martensite is smaller than that of austenite; cryogenic treatment can produce more martensite, which implies a fine grain strengthening effect. So, this can also be ascribed to the fact that the hardness of the alloy in cryogenic treatment is higher than that in the non-cryo-treated samples.
Graph: Fig. 3 Wear loss of 100Cr6 at 5 Hz frequency for the two different treatments.
A reciprocatory wear test was conducted on the CHT and DCT samples to study the enhancement in the wear resistance by the weight loss method. The improvement in the wear resistance of cryogenically treated samples compared to conventionally treated samples was evaluated. The improvements in the cryogenically treated samples were studied with respect to varying loads. It was observed from the wear test data that for a maximum load of 50 N and 5 Hz frequency the wear resistance of the 100Cr6 improved by 37% due to DCT compared to CHT. The test results revealed that the DCT samples had a high wear resistance (low wear loss) in all test conditions. In addition, while assessing the wear behavior under the most severe test conditions (i.e., maximum load 50 N and frequency 5 Hz), it was revealed that the CHT and DCT samples experienced wear rates of 2.751 × 10
Figure 3 presents the wear loss for various loads (
Graph: Fig. 4 Wear rate of 100Cr6 bearing steel at 5 Hz frequency for the two different treatments.
Graph: Fig. 5 Microstructure of 100Cr6 bearing steel for the CHT sample.
Graph: Fig. 6 Microstructure of 100Cr6 bearing steel for the DCT sample.
The wear resistance of the cryogenically treated samples was always better than that of the non-cryogenically treated samples in the whole range of test conditions. To account for the observed improvement of the wear resistance in the cryogenic treatment, three important factors should be considered. First is the transformation of abundant retained austenite into martensite during cryogenic treatment, which can offer stronger support for carbides to inhibit their spalling and prevent large grooves from forming during abrasion. Secondly, the precipitation of finer carbides and their more homogeneous distribution as a result of the cryogenic treatment is responsible for the improved wear resistance. The distribution of the carbides in the cryogenically treated samples is more homogeneous than that in the non-cryogenically treated samples, and the carbide volume fraction in the cryogenically treated samples is also more than that in the non-cryogenically treated samples. Thirdly, cryogenic treatment can result in greater martensite transformation and make the alloy present a refiner matrix,
Graph: Fig. 7 DSC graph for 100Cr6 bearing steel.
and a refiner matrix implies a fine grain strengthening effect, which would contribute to the wear resistance improvement. The presence of numerous ultrafine carbides in cryo-treated steels assists in attaining the micro-stress distribution of the material, in a way that results in favorable crack growth resistance of the material. This, in turn, leads to higher wear resistance.
The microstructural examination was carried out to study the changes that influence the wear resistance; Figs. 5 and 6 depict the representative SEM micrographs of CHT and DCT. The microstructure of the 100Cr6 DCT samples shown in Fig. 6 reveals that most of the austenite retained in the CHT sample was converted into martensite, thereby increasing the hardness, which resulted in an improvement in its wear resistance compared to the CHT sample. In addition to the conversion of the retained austenite into martensite, the microstructure of the DCT samples showed a marked increase in carbide precipitation. These were also responsible for the improvement in the wear resistance and hardness. Finer carbides were precipitated in the martensitic matrix of the cryo-treated specimens. This was also responsible for the improvement in the properties of the cryo-treated 100Cr6 bearing steel.
Furthermore, after cryogenic treatment, there was less retained austenite in the CHT samples because the retained austenite is more unstable at lower temperatures and likely to transform into martensite. It can be seen from the micrograph of the DCT sample in Figure 6 that a large amount of fine carbides of micrometer size ware precipitated throughout the structure. The fine carbides precipitated through the cryogenic treatment tie up with certain elements and restrict the promotion of instabilityduring service. It is noted that holding martensite at a lower temperature increases its lattice distortion and thermodynamic instability, both of which drive carbon and alloying atoms to segregate at the nearby crystal defects. These segregated regions act as sites for nucleation of fine carbides, which explains the increase in the population density of fine carbides in DCT specimens compared to CHT specimens.
Graph: Fig. 8 Linear expansion coefficient of the 100Cr6 bearing steels for the CHT and DCT specimens.
Graph: Fig. 9 SEM image of the worn surface: (a) CHT and (b) DCT specimens.
Figure 7 shows the DSC graph of 100Cr6 bearing steel for the temperature range 30–900°C. It displays three partially overlapped peaks. Two of them (I and II) are quite small, whereas the third one (III) is well pronounced. The peak at the highest temperature can be attributed to the alloy carbide precipitation from martensite, which is responsible for secondary hardening.
The coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) estimated for the 100Cr6 bearing steel subjected to the CHT and DCT are shown in Fig. 8. The CTE was low for the 100Cr6 DCT bearing steel specimens, which indicates that the dimensional stability was high. The CTE increased for the CHT and DCT samples until 450°C and then remained fairly constant for the CHT samples, whereas it decreased for the DCT samples due to precipitation of the transition carbides. Again, a reduction in the CTE was noted at around 750°C for the DCT sample, which was attributed to precipitation of the alloy carbides and grain coarsening.
The 100Cr6 bearing steel samples of CHT and DCT specimens subjected to identical wear tests were examined under SEM. The wear characteristics of CHT and DCT specimens were carried out along with an examination of worn surfaces. The estimated values of wear loss for the specimens tested under varying normal loads with a frequency of 5 Hz at room temperature were discussed earlier. The improvement in wear loss was significant by DCT but less significant by CHT. Figures 9a and 9b show representative SEM micrographs of worn surfaces of CHT and DCT specimens tested at 30 N and 5 Hz at room temperature. The worn surface of CHT specimens was rough but metallic in nature and also exhibited fracture ridges and deformation lips stretched parallel to the sliding direction along with occasional subsurface cracking (Fig. 9a). The presence of a deformation lip implies that the CHT specimen underwent heavy plastic deformation during the wear test. In contrast, the worn surface of the DCT (Fig. 9b) specimen was smoother and exhibited less presenceof a deformation lip. The microscope of CHT depleted region of worn surfaces shows cracking and pull-out of carbides in addition to the presence of surface grooves, as illustrated in Fig. 9a. These observations revealed that the wear mechanism of the CHT specimen was plastic deformation, which causes a deformation lip and subsurface cracking, whereas that for the cryogenic-treated specimen was predominantly low deformation lip and subsurface cracking. The wear losses of the DCT specimen at all applied loads were lower than those of the CHT specimen.
The reciprocatory wear test showed that the wear resistance of bearing steel was improved by cryogenic treatment compared to conventional heat treatment.
- • The hardness of the DCT samples showed an improvement of 18% compared to the CHT samples.
- • The wear resistance of the 100Cr6 was improved by 37% due to DCT compared to CHT.
- • Cryogenic treatment produce more martensite transformation and facilitated carbide formation, which made the alloy present a refiner matrix and produced a fine grain strengthening effect, thereby increasing the wear resistance.
- • The CTE was low for the 100Cr6 DCT bearing steel specimens, which indicates that the dimensional stability is high.
This study confirmed that cryogenic treatment can be used to improve the wear resistance of bearing steel.
Review led by Richard Neu
By R.Sri Siva; M.Arockia Jaswin and D.Mohan Lal
Reported by Author; Author; Author