Some electrostatic structures of the mKP equation for a nonthermal plasma system by a unified solver technique

The reductive perturbation technique is used to obtain the Modified KP equation at critical densities distinguished by the MKPE in plasma ion pair with fast electron positron. The new structures reveal that super-solitary and period waveforms are derived via the mathematical analysis of Jacobi-elliptic function expansions (MJEFE) for MKPE. The electrostatic new structures such as super-soliton, cnoidals, shock-like, super-dispersive and superperiodic plasma waves which existed at critical densities have been introduced. The positrons (electron) nonthermality supports on nonlinear dispersive new structures have been discussed. Also, many of the obtained electrostatic solutions are important and may be applicable in ionosphere plasma observations.

Keywords: MKPE; super-solutions; Jacobian elliptic function; applications in fluids; 35C08; 35A08; 35Q51; 35Q53

1. Introduction

The dynamical nonlinear studies for new nonlinear waves such as super nonlinear and shock waves play effective roles in applied physics of fluids and plasmas [[1], [3], [5]]. Supersolitons are distorted solitary waves that may be identified by the electric field's three local minima and three local maxima. Also, there have been very few reports of real satellite findings of supersoliton structures [[6], [8]]. It was reported that the mKdV equation that accounted for the effects of a cubic nonlinearity has the periodical solutions of a super-nonlinear kind [[6]]. The NLS equation is used to examine electron-acoustic supernonlinear forms in plasmas via phase plane analysis. Also, the NLS equation waves are demonstrated by including an external periodical force in the dynamical behaviour [[9]]. The effects of generalized

Graph

$(r,q)$ distributions on supernonlinear DA periodic waves have been investigated in dusty plasma using bifurcation of waves [[10]].

The physical importance of plasma containing pair-ions (PI) and their thermodynamically characteristics has a serious implementations in astronomy, terrestrial laboratories, solar wind studies [[11], [13]], active galactic-nuclei [[15]], pulsar environments [[17]], nanotechnology [[19]] and plasma laboratories [[20]]. Non-thermal particle distributions have not been described by the thermality equilibrium states of particles [[21]]. These distributions observed by satellites and spacecrafts explain the non-Maxwellian states in Mars, Saturn, Earth bow-shock, Moon vicinity [[22], [24], [26], [28]].

In fluid dynamics and plasma studies, accurate physical search shows the propagation of distinct nonlinear forms represents new profiles as bright soliton, dark shocklike, rational, supernonlinear periodic, explosive and huge structures [[29], [31]]. The dark cylindrical soliton characteristics in nonthermality mesospheric fluid model have been inspected [[29]]. The time damped superthermal cylindrical structure has been discussed in space plasma [[31]]. Saha et al. studied the superperiodic progression in auroral zone [[32]]. Also, the localized, rational and huge propagations have been taken into in consideration for pairs plasma [[24], [33]]. Finally, periodic chaotic and supernonlinearity profiles were investigated using dynamics stability of positrons acoustics mode in e-p-i plasmas [[31]].

On the other hand, in positron electron plasmas, new wave classes that do not present in the typical electron ion plasma were discovered. It was demonstrated that so-called periodical supernonlinear waveforms of the acoustic waves type, whose phase trajectories enclose the separatrix on the phase plane, can occur in the epid plasma [[34], [36]]. Furthermore, the supernonlinear acoustic propagation in quantum electron positron plasma for the KdV and mKdV equations has been studied. The superperiodic waves are examined by some various system parameters [[38]]. The acoustic wave's properties and their fractal structures have been examined in auroral Earth's plasma. Also, the dynamics and existence of chaotic properties were studied by Lyapunov exponents [[39]]. Also, it was reported that the chaotic Alfven structures behaviour have been propagated in ionosphere plasma [[40]].

Abdelrahman and AlKhidhr in [[41]] introduced the math-solver to resolve the so famous duffing equation, which emerges from so many models of the NPDEs describing physical cases in applied science, using appropriate wave transformation. The duffing equation takes place in so many vital applications, see for example [[42], [44], [46], [48], [50], [52], [54]]. Our main aim is to apply the solver method to resolve the MKP equation in space of ionosphere fluid.

2. Unified solver

In view of unified solver technique [[41]], some family solutions of the following duffing model:

Graph

${\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1{\mathrm{\Theta }}^{\mathrm{\prime }\mathrm{\prime }}+{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2{\mathrm{\Theta }}^3+{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_3\mathrm{\Theta }=0,$ (1)

are

Family I:

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_1(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}msn\left(\zeta \right).$ (2)

When

Graph

$m\to 1$ , Equation (2) becomes

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_1(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\tanh \left(\zeta \right).$ (3)

Family II:

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_2(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}msn\left(\zeta \right)-\sqrt{\frac{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}mcn\left(\zeta \right).$ (4)

When

Graph

$m\to 1$ , Equation (4) becomes

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_2(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\tanh \left(\zeta \right)-\sqrt{\frac{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(\zeta \right).$ (5)

Family III:

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_3(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}msn\left(\zeta \right)+\sqrt{\frac{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}mcn\left(\zeta \right).$ (6)

When

Graph

$m\to 1$ , Equation (6) becomes

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_3(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\tanh \left(\zeta \right)+\sqrt{\frac{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(\zeta \right).$ (7)

Family IV:

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_4(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}mcn\left(\zeta \right).$ (8)

As long as

Graph

$m\to 1$ , Equation (8) becomes

Graph

${\mathrm{\Theta }}_4(x,t)=\pm \sqrt{\frac{2{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1}{{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(\zeta \right).$ (9)

3. Mathematical model

In plasma model containing pairs ion, the nonthermal electrons effect on the soliton shape has been examined [[25]]. In this study, a two-dimensional fluid system in [[25]] with extra fast positrons is considered. The model equation for this fluid reads

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{n}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\left(n_{+}{u}_{+}\right)}{\mathrm{\partial }x}+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\left(n_{+}{V}_{+}\right)}{\mathrm{\partial }y}=0,\end{array}$ (10)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{n}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }}{\mathrm{\partial }x}\left(n_{-}{u}_{-}\right)+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }}{\mathrm{\partial }y}\left(n_{-}{V}_{-}\right)=0,\end{array}$ (11)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+u_{+}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }x}+V_{+}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }y}+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }x}=0,\end{array}$ (12)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+u_{-}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }x}+V_{-}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{u}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }y}-\alpha Q\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }x}=0,\end{array}$ (13)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+u_{+}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }x}+V_{+}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{+}}{\mathrm{\partial }y}+\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }y}=0,\end{array}$ (14)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}+u_{-}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }x}+V_{-}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{V}_{-}}{\mathrm{\partial }y}-\alpha Q\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }y}=0.\end{array}$ (15)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}& \frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }{x}^2}+\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }{y}^2}={\delta }_n{n}_{-}-n_{+}+{\delta }_e(1-\text{β}\varphi +\text{β}{\varphi }^2){\mathrm{e}}^{\varphi }\\ & -{\delta }_p(1+\sigma \text{β}\varphi +{\sigma }^2\text{β}{\varphi }^2){\mathrm{e}}^{(-\sigma \varphi )}.\end{array}$ (16)

The equilibrium condition implies

Graph

${\delta }_n+{\delta }_e=1+{\delta }_p,$ (17)

Graph

$n_{-,+}$ is density of ions.

Graph

$\sigma =T_e/T_p$ (electrons to positrons temperatures ratio),

Graph

$\alpha =\left(\frac{Z_{-}}{Z_{+}}\right)$ , where

Graph

$Z_{\pm }$ are charges,

Graph

${\delta }_n=\frac{n_{-0}{Z}_{-}}{n_{+0}{Z}_{+}}$ ,

Graph

${\delta }_e=n_{e0}/n_{+0}{Z}_{+},$ and

Graph

${\delta }_p=n_{p0}/n_{+0}{Z}_{+}$ ,

Graph

$\text{β}=\frac{4\rho }{1+3\rho }$ , where

Graph

$\rho$ is the fast electrons (positrons) parameter. To obtain KP for electrostatic IA waves, the stretched time (space) coordinates given in the form:

Graph

$T={ϵ}^{\frac{3}{2}}t,X={ϵ}^{\frac{1}{2}}(x-\lambda t),\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}Y=ϵy,$ (18)

where ϵ is a dimensionless small expansion parameter and λ is the velocity of IAWs. All dependent variables in the system are expanded in power series of ϵ as

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{n}_{+,-}& =1+{ϵ}^2{n}_{+,-}^{\left(1\right)}+{ϵ}^4{n}_{+,-}^{\left(2\right)}+{ϵ}^6{n}_{+,-}^{\left(3\right)}+..,\\ u_{+,-}& ={ϵ}^2(u_{+,-}^{\left(1\right)}+{ϵ}^2{u}_{+,-}^{\left(2\right)}+{ϵ}^4{u}_{+,-}^{\left(3\right)}+..),\\ V_{+,-}& ={ϵ}^3(V_{+,-}^{\left(1\right)}+{ϵ}^2{V}_{+,-}^{\left(2\right)}+{ϵ}^4{V}_{+,-}^{\left(3\right)}+..),\\ \varphi & ={ϵ}^2({\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}+{ϵ}^2{\varphi }^{\left(2\right)}+{ϵ}^4{\varphi }^{\left(3\right)}+..).\end{array}$ (19)

The boundary conditions are

Graph

$\left|\xi \right|\to \mathrm{\infty },n_{+,-}=1,u_{+,-}=V_{+,-}=0,\varphi =0.$ By using the lowest order and next higher order in ϵ, one can obtain the MKPE in the form:

Graph

$\frac{\mathrm{\partial }}{\mathrm{\partial }X}(\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}}{\mathrm{\partial }T}+A{\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }{\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}}{\mathrm{\partial }X}+R\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^3{\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}}{\mathrm{\partial }{X}^3})+P\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2{\varphi }^{\left(1\right)}}{\mathrm{\partial }{Y}^2}=0.$ (20)

where

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}A& =\frac{3}{{\lambda }^4}(1-{\delta }_n{\alpha }^2{Q}^2-\frac{{\lambda }^4}{3}({\delta }_e-{\sigma }^2{\delta }_p))\\ & \times \frac{\lambda }{2(1-\text{β})({\delta }_e+\sigma {\delta }_p)},\\ R& =-\frac{(3\rho +1)\lambda }{2(\rho -1)({\delta }_e+\sigma {\delta }_p)},P=\frac{\lambda }{2},\\ \lambda & =\sqrt{\frac{1+\alpha Q{\mu }_{-}}{(1-\text{β})({\delta }_e+{\delta }_p\sigma )}}.\end{array}$

For small amplitude limits, a critical density point is foreseeable to reproduction at the nonlinearity vanishing point. So, the transformations

Graph

$\tau ={ϵ}^{3}t$ for times and

Graph

$\xi =ϵ(x-\lambda t),\eta ={ϵ}^{2}y$ for space, ϵ (

Graph

$\lambda )$ is small number (IAs speed). Modified KP equation at

Graph

$Q=Q_c$ is given by

Graph

$\frac{\mathrm{\partial }}{\mathrm{\partial }\xi }(\frac{\mathrm{\partial }}{\mathrm{\partial }\tau }\varphi +G{\varphi }^2\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }\xi }+R\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^3\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }{\xi }^3})+P\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2\varphi }{\mathrm{\partial }{\eta }^2}=0,$ (21)

with

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{Q}_c& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{3+({\sigma }^2{\delta }_p-{\delta }_e){\lambda }^4}{3{\alpha }^2{\delta }_n}},\end{array}$ (22)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}G& =\frac{\begin{array}{c}(15\rho +1)({\delta }_e+{\sigma }^3{\delta }_p){\lambda }^6\\ -15(3\rho +1)({\alpha }^3{Q}^3{\delta }_n+1)\end{array}}{4(\rho -1)({\delta }_e+\sigma {\delta }_p){\lambda }^5},\\ R& =-\frac{(3\rho +1)\lambda }{2(\rho -1)({\delta }_e+\sigma {\delta }_p)},P=\frac{\lambda }{2}.\end{array}$ (23)

By using transformations:

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}\chi & =L\xi +M\eta -\tau ({\upsilon }_1+{\upsilon }_2),\end{array}$ (24)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}t& =\tau ,\end{array}$ (25)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}\varphi \left(\chi \right)& =\varphi (x,y,t),\end{array}$ (26)

where L is the x cosine direction and M is the y cosine direction.

The MKP equation is reduced to

Graph

$3\theta \frac{{\mathrm{d}}^2\varphi }{\mathrm{d}{\chi }^2}+h{\varphi }^3-3(v-S)\varphi =0.$ (27)

4. Application

Here, we applied the unified solver method to solve Equation (27). Comparing this equation with Equation (1) gives

Graph

${\mathrm{\Lambda }}_1=3\theta$ ,

Graph

${\mathrm{\Lambda }}_2=h$ and

Graph

${\mathrm{\Lambda }}_3=-3(v-S)$ . Thus the solutions of Equation (21) and its related electrostatic field and the related electrostatic field

Graph

$E_f(x,t)$ are:

Family I:

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_1(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-6\theta }{h}}msn(x-(S-\theta (1+m^2)\left)t\right),\end{array}$ (28)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f1}(x,t)& =-\sqrt{6}m\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}cn(St-(m^2+1)\theta t-x)dn\\ & \times (St-(m^2+1)\theta t-x)\end{array}$ (29)

At

Graph

$m\to 1$ , the solution of Equation (28) goes to

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_1(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-6\theta }{h}}\tanh (x-(S-2\theta \left)t\right),\end{array}$ (30)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f1}(x,t)& =-\sqrt{6}\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}}^2\left(t\right(S-2\theta )-x).\end{array}$ (31)

Family II:

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_2(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-3\theta }{2h}}msn(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta (2-m^2\left)\right)t)\\ & -\sqrt{\frac{3\theta }{2h}}mcn(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta (2-m^2\left)\right)t),\end{array}$ (32)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f2}(x,t)& =\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}mdn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x)\\ & \times (\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}sn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x)\\ & -\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}cn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x).\end{array}$ (33)

At

Graph

$m\to 1$ , the solution of Equation (32) goes to

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_2(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-3\theta }{2h}}\tanh (x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta )t)\\ & -\sqrt{\frac{3\theta }{2h}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta )t).\end{array}$ (34)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f2}(x,t)& =1.22474\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}\tanh \left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x)\\ & \times \mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x)\\ & -1.22474\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}}^2\left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x)\end{array}$ (35)

Family III:

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_3(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-3\theta }{2h}}msn(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta (2-m^2\left)\right)t)\\ & +\sqrt{\frac{3\theta }{2h}}mcn(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta (2-m^2\left)\right)t).\end{array}$ (36)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f3}(x,t)& =-\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}mdn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x)\\ & (\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}cn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x)\\ & +\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}sn(St+(0.5m^2-1.)\theta t-x)).\end{array}$ (37)

At

Graph

$m\to 1$ , the solution of Equation (36) goes to

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_3(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{-3\theta }{2h}}\tanh (x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta )t)\\ & +\sqrt{\frac{3\theta }{2h}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}(x-(S-\frac{1}{2}\theta )t),\end{array}$ (38)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f3}(x,t)& =-1.22474\sqrt{-\frac{\theta }{h}}{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}}^2\left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x)\\ & -1.22474\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}\tanh \left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x)\\ & \times \mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(t\right(S-0.5\theta )-x).\end{array}$ (39)

Family IV:

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_4(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{6\theta }{h}}mcn(x-(S-\theta (1-2m^2)\left)t\right),\end{array}$ (40)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f4}(x,t)& =-\sqrt{6}m\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}dn(St+(1.m^2-0.5)\theta t-x)\\ & \times sn(St+(1.m^2-0.5)\theta t-x).\end{array}$ (41)

At

Graph

$m\to 1$ , the solution of Equation (40)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{u}_4(x,t)& =\pm \sqrt{\frac{6\theta }{h}}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}(x-(S+\theta \left)t\right),\end{array}$ (42)

Graph

$\begin{array}{rl}{E}_{f4}(x,t)& =-2.44949\sqrt{\frac{\theta }{h}}\tanh \left(t\right(0.5\theta +S)-x)\\ & \times \mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{h}\left(t\right(0.5\theta +S)-x).\end{array}$ (43)

5. Results and discussion

Nonthermal plasma system contains electron-positron-ions (e-p-i), and it should be emphasized that the KP equation cannot represent the solitary propagations in the system at a particular value known as the critical point. As a result, the MKP equation was developed to describe the system at this important point. A computational technique used to find different solutions to the MKP problem. The propagation of nonlinear solitonic like and other excitations of two direction IAs and its related electrostatic fields

Graph

$E_{\mathrm{f}}$ are depicted by MKP equation (27). The new solitons and electric excitations obtained in this study have been examined using plasma parameters linked space plasma data (

Graph

${\delta }_p=0.7,{\delta }_e=0.8,u=0.5,\sigma =1.0,\alpha =1.0,L=0.7,\upsilon =0.01)$ [[31], [55]]. At critical value

Graph

$Q=Q_c$ , the KP dynamical behaviour cannot describe the wave mode. So, new derived MKP solutions can characterize this investigation at those critical nonlinear points by EMJEF. The EMJEF accords a lot of different solution profiles. Equations (28) and (29) are introduced solutions

Graph

${\varphi }_c=u_1(x;t)$ and

Graph

$E_{f1}(x,t)$ that give solutions in three forms which respect on model densities and temperatures as plotted in Figures 1–6. The cnoidal form and its super electrostatic form are the first announced forms as drawn in Figures 1 and 2. Another forms insert a new super periodic potential propagation and related super field soliton as in Figures 3 and 4. The third shock potential and related solitonic structures are given in Figures 5 and 6. From the aforementioned relationships, it appears that the nonthermal fast parameters reduced all profile amplitudes in three type waves in addition to phase change that appears clearly in electrostatic field's structures. Equations (32) and (36) defined both forms

Graph

${\varphi }_c=u_2(x;t)$ ,

Graph

${\varphi }_c=u_3(x;t)$ that identify some solitonic types as in Figures 7–11. It was plotted for variable values of

Graph

$\chi$ and

Graph

$\rho$ . Figures 7 and 8 perform a periodical and super-nonlinear pictures. Figure 9 denotes influential supersolitary shape. In another result, the shock (soliton) form is set in Figures 10 and 11. Also, for Equations (32), (36), it was reported that

Graph

$\rho$ rebates amplitudes without no variation in phases as described in Figures 7–11.

On the other hand, the related field equations (33), (37) describing some new electrostatic structures as super, periodic and train soliton fields are shown in Figures 12, 13 and 14. It was noted that fast positron changes the electrostatic wave phase shift. Furthermore, Equations (40) and (41) are different solution forms

Graph

${\varphi }_c=u_4(x;t)$ and

Graph

$E_{f4}(x,t)$ which have four solutions in which its differences with

Graph

$\chi$ and

Graph

$\rho$ are represented in Figures 15–18. Interestingly, Figures 15 and 16 expound the wave periodic and soliton trains. Moreover, super-nonlinearity and solitonic waves are plotted in Figures 17 and 18. Finally, for any solution described by (40), as established in Figures 15–18, it was reported that the fast factor

Graph

$\rho$ shows a noticeable modification in solitary phases and decreases its amplitudes.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 1. Graph of cnoidal wave ϕc for χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 2. Graph of Ef1(x,t) with χ and ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 3. Graph of periodic wave ϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 4. Graph of Ef1(x,t) with χ and ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 5. Graph of shock wave ϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 6. Graph of Ef1(x,t) with χ and ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 7. Graph of cnoidal wave Reϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 8. Graph of periodic wave Reϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 9. Graph of super-periodic wave Imϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 10. Graph of shock wave Reϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 11. Graph of soliton wave Imϕc with χ v ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 12. Graph of ReEf3(x,t) with χ and ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 13. Graph of ImEf3(x,t) with χ and ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 14. Graph of |Ef3(x,t)| with χ and ρ

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 15. Graph of periodic wave |ϕc| with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 16. Graph of soliton-train wave |ϕc| with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 17. Graph of super periodic soliton Imϕc with χ & ρ.

PHOTO (COLOR): Figure 18. Graph of soliton wave |ϕc| with χ & ρ.

6. Conclusion

It is noted that at certain value called critical point, the KP equation cannot depict the solitonic propagations in the system. So, the MKP equation acquired for describing the system at this critical point. A symbolic computational method employed for obtaining various MKP equation solutions. Most potential and field excitations obtained here as shocks, solitonlike, cnoidals, supershocks, trains and super-nonlinearity are presented from the study of MKPE which characterized wave solutions in nonthermal fluid plasmas via EMJEF. This investigation announced that the parameters

Graph

$\rho$ can control the solitary characteristics in plasma. Accordingly, these fast electron (positron) parameters may reduce the profiles amplitude and sometimes modify its wave phases. Finally, the results of new structures obtained from MKPE might be reused to establish the acoustic electrostatical plasma wave in Earth' s ionosphere.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

1 Saha A, Banerjee S. Dynamical systems and nonlinear waves in plasmas. 1st. Boca Raton : CRC Press; 2021. DOI: 10.1201/9781003042549. 2 Kolotkov DY, Nakariakov VM, Rowlands G. Nonlinear oscillations of coalescing magnetic flux ropes. Phys Rev E. 2016; 93 (5):Article ID 053205. 3 El-Taibany WF, EL-Labany SK, El-Helbawy AS, et al. Dust-acoustic solitary and periodic waves in magnetized self-gravito-electrostatic opposite polarity dusty plasmas. Eur Phys J Plus. 2022; 137 (2): 261. 4 Khalil TH, El-Depsy A, El-Taibany WF, et al. Nonlinear Langmuir oscillations in an ultrarelativistic degenerate quantum electron-ion plasma. Phys Scr. 2022; 97 :Article ID 125607. 5 El-Shafeay NA, Moslem WM, El-Taibany WF, et al. Role of solar wind on the ionic escaping from Venus upper ionosphere via plasma wakefield. Phys Scr. 2023; 98 (3):Article ID 035603. 6 Ryskin NM, Trubetskov DI. Nonlinear waves. Moscow : Fizmatlit (in Russian); 2000. 7 Dubinov AE, Kolotkov DY, Sazonkin MA. Supernonlinear waves in plasma. Plasma Phys Rep. 2012; 38 (10): 833 – 844. 8 Dubinov AE, Yu. Kolotkov D. Ion-acoustic supersolitons in plasma. Plasma Phys Rep. 2012; 38 (11): 909 – 912. 9 Sarkar S, Prasad PK, Saha A, et al. Coexisting wave features and various nonlinear waves for Schrödinger equation in superthermal dusty plasma. Phys Scr. 2022; 97 (4):Article ID 045602. Taha RM, El-Taibany WF. Bifurcation analysis of nonlinear and supernonlinear dust–acoustic waves in a dusty plasma using the generalized (r, q) distribution function for ions and electrons. Contrib Plasma Phys. 2020; 60 (8):Article ID e202000022. Pramanik S, Maity C, Chakrabarti N. Phase-mixing of ion plasma modes in pair-ion plasmas. Phys Plasmas. 2015; 22 :Article ID 052303. Jilani K, Mirza AM, Khan TA. Ion-acoustic solitons in pair-ion plasma with non-thermal electrons. Astrophys Space Sci. 2013; 344 (1): 135 – 143. Oohara W, Date D, Hatakeyama R. Electrostatic waves in a paired fullerene-ion plasma. Phys Rev Lett. 2005; 95 (17):Article ID 175003. Song B, D´Angelo N, Merlino RL. Ion acoustic waves in a plasma with negative ions. Phys Fluids B. 1991; 3 (2): 284 – 287. Oohara W, Hatakeyama R. Pair-ion plasma generation using fullerenes. Phys Rev Lett. 2003; 91 (20):Article ID 205005. Begelman MC, Blandford RD, Rees MD. Theory of extragalactic radio sources. Rev Mod Phys. 1984; 56 (2): 255 – 351. Sturrock PA. A model of pulsars. Astrophys J. 1971; 164 : 529. Michel FC. Theory of pulsar magnetospheres. Rev Mod Phys. 1982; 54 (1): 1 – 66. Chen H, Wilks SC, Bonile JD, et al. Relativistic positron creation using ultraintense short pulse lasers. Phys Rev Lett. 2009; 102 :Article ID 105001. Iwamoto N. Collective modes in nonrelativistic electron-positron plasmas. Phys Rev E. 1993; 47 (1): 604 – 611. Cairns RA, Mamun AA, Bingham R, et al. Electrostatic solitary structures in non-thermal plasmas. Geophys Res Lett. 1995; 22 (20): 2709 – 2712. Dovner PO, Erikson AI, Bostrom R, et al. Freja multiprobe observations of electrostatic solitary structures. Geophys Res Lett. 1994; 21 (17): 1827 – 1830. Bostrom R. Observations of weak double layers on auroral field lines. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 1992; 20 (6): 756 – 763. Elwakil SA, El-Shewy EK, Abdelwahed HG. Envelope ion-acoustic solitary waves in a plasma with positive-negative ions and nonthermal electrons. Phys Plasmas. 2010; 17 (5):Article ID 052301. Abdelwahed HG, El-Shewy EK. Effect of nonthermality of electrons on the speed and shape of ion-acoustic solitary waves in a warm plasma. Phys Plasmas. 2012; 19 (7):Article ID 072301. Selim MM. Spherical ion acoustic waves in pair ion plasmas with nonthermal electrons. Eur Phys J Plus. 2016; 131 (4): 93. Paul A, Bandyopadhyay A. Ion acoustic solitons, double layers and supersolitons in a collisionless unmagnetized plasma consisting of nonthermal electrons and isothermal positrons. Indian J Phys. 2018; 92 (9): 1187 – 1198. Bouzit O, Tribeche M, Bains AS. Modulational instability of ion-acoustic waves in plasma with a q-nonextensive nonthermal electron velocity distribution. Phys Plasmas. 2015; 22 :Article ID 084506. El-Shewy EK, El-Rahman AA. Cylindrical dissipative soliton propagation in nonthermal mesospheric plasmas. Phys Scr. 2018; 93 (11):Article ID 115202. Das A, Saha A. Dynamical survey of the dual power Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation with external periodic perturbation. Comput Math Appl. 2018; 76 (5): 1174 – 1183. El-Shewy EK, El-Rahman AA, Zaghbeer SK. Cylindrical damped solitary propagation in superthermal plasmas. J Exp Theor Phys. 2018; 127 (4): 761 – 766. Saha A, Prasad PK, Banerjee S. Bifurcation of ion-acoustic superperiodic waves in auroral zone of earth's magnetosphere. Astrophys Space Sci. 2019; 364 (10): 180. Abdelwahed HG, El-Shewy EK, Mahmoud AA. Time fractional effect on ion acoustic shock waves in ion-pair plasma. J Exp Theor Phys. 2016; 122 (6): 1111 – 1116. Dubinov AE, Kolotkov DY. Ion-acoustic supersolitons in plasma. Plasma Phys Rep. 2012; 38 (11): 909 – 912. Verheest F, Hellberg MA, Hereman WA. Head-on collisions of electrostatic solitons in nonthermal plasmas. Phys Rev E. 2012; 86 (3):Article ID 036402. Singh SV, Lakhina GS. Ion-acoustic supersolitons in the presence of non-thermal electrons. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2015; 23 (1-3): 274 – 281. Prasad PK, Gowrisankar A, Banerjee S, et al. Fractal representation of electron-acoustic waves in the Earth's auroral zone; 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.02.009 Abdikian A, Tamang J, Saha A. Electron-acoustic supernonlinear waves and their multistability in the framework of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Commun Theor Phys. 2020; 72 (7):Article ID 075502. Pradhan B, Abdikian A, Saha A. Nonlinear and supernonlinear ion-acoustic wave phenomena in an electron-positron-pair-ion quantum plasma. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/17455030.2022.2070796 El-Labany SK, El-Taibany WF, El-Tantawy AA, et al. Quasi-periodic and chaotic structure of Alfven waves in a plasma containing double spectral distributed electrons. Phys Plasmas. 2022; 29 (12):Article ID 122103. Abdelrahman MAE, AlKhidhr H. Fundamental solutions for the new coupled Konno–Oono equation in magnetic field. Results Phys. 2020; 19 :Article ID 103445. Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA. Solitary waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger problem with the probability distribution function in stochastic input case. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017; 132 (8): 339. Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA. The development of the deterministic nonlinear PDEs in particle physics to stochastic case. Results Phys. 2018; 9 : 344 – 350. Abdelrahman MAE. A note on Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method combined with complex transform method applied to fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Eng. 2018; 7 (4): 279 – 285. Abdelwahed HG, El-Shewy EK, Abdelrahman MAE, et al. New super waveforms for modified Korteweg–de-Veries-equation. Results Phys. 2020; 19 :Article ID 103420. Abdelwahed HG, El-Shewy EK, Abdelrahman MAE, et al. On the physical nonlinear (n+1)-dimensional Schrödinger equation applications. Results Phys. 2021; 21 :Article ID 103798. Abdelrahman MAE, Alshreef G. Closed-form solutions to the new coupled Konno–Oono equation and the Kaup–Newell model equation in magnetic field with novel statistic application. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021; 136 (4): 1 – 10. Abdelrahman MAE, Abdo NF. On the nonlinear new wave solutions in unstable dispersive environments. Phys Scr. 2020; 95 (4):Article ID 045220. Abdelrahman MAE, AlKhidhr H. A robust and accurate solver for some nonlinear partial differential equations and tow applications. Phys Scr. 2020; 95 :Article ID 065212. Alharbi YF, Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA, et al. Stochastic treatment of the solutions for the resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with spatio-temporal dispersions and inter-modal using beta distribution. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020; 135 (4): 368. Baskonus HM, Bulut H. New wave behaviors of the system of equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves. Waves Random Complex Media. 2016; 26 (4): 613 – 625. Liu C. Exact solutions for the higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation in nonlinear optical fibres. Chaos Solit Fractals. 2005; 23 (3): 949 – 955. Hosseini K, Kumar D, Kaplan M, et al. New exact traveling wave solutions of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Commun Theor Phys. 2017; 68 (6): 761 – 767. Bulut H, Sulaiman TA, Baskonus HM. Optical solitons to the resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with both spatio-temporal and inter-modal dispersions under Kerr law nonlinearity. Optik. 2018; 163 : 49 – 55. Nakamura Y, Tsukabayashi I. Observation of modified Korteweg–de Vries solitons in a multicomponent plasma with negative ions. Phys Rev Lett. 1984; 52 (26): 2356 – 2359.

By H. G. Abdelwahed

Reported by Author