Background: Regular prophylactic therapy has become an increasingly common treatment for severe hemophilia. Therefore, hypercoagulability—a potential risk factor of thrombosis—is a cause for concern in hemophilic patients treated with a high dose of FVIII concentrate. In clot waveform analysis (CWA)-thrombin time (TT), a small amount of thrombin activates clotting factor VIII (FVIII) instead of fibrinogen, resulting in FVIII measurements using CWA-TT with a small amount of thrombin. Methods: The coagulation ability of patients treated with FVIII concentrate or emicizumab was evaluated using activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), TT and a small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation assay (sTF/FIXa) using CWA. Results: The FVIII activity based on CWA-TT was significantly greater than that based on the CWA-APTT or chromogenic assay. FVIII or FVIII-like activities based on the three assays in plasma without emicizumab were closely correlated; those in plasma with emicizumab based on CWA-TT and chromogenic assays were also closely correlated. CWA-APTT and CWA-TT showed different patterns in patients treated with FVIII concentrates compared to those treated with emicizumab. In particular, CWA-TT in patients treated with FVIII concentrate showed markedly higher peaks in platelet-rich plasma than in platelet-poor plasma. CWA-APTT showed lower coagulability in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate than in healthy volunteers, whereas CWA-sTF/FIXa did not. In contrast, CWA-TT showed hypercoagulability in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate. Conclusions: CWA-TT can be used to evaluate the thrombin bursts that cause hypercoagulability in patients treated with emicizumab. Although routine APTT evaluations demonstrated low coagulation ability in patients treated with FVIII concentrate, CWA-TT showed hypercoagulability in these patients, suggesting that the evaluation of coagulation ability may be useful when using multiple assays.
Keywords: FVIII; emicizumab; CWA; APTT; thrombin time; thrombin burst
Hemophilia is a congenital bleeding disorder characterized by decreased or defective clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX levels [[
Emicizumab (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) [[
FVIII activity and coagulation ability have been analyzed in several reports using a routine APTT assay based on the peak times of clot waveform analysis (CWA)-APTT and chromogenic substrate assay [[
In this study, we evaluated the coagulation ability and FVIII activity in 23 patients with hemophilia, 1 patient who was a carrier of hemophilia A, and 1 patient with acquired hemophilia A using CWA-APTT, CWA-TT, and chromogenic assays.
Twenty-eight plasma samples were obtained from twenty-three patients with hemophilia, one patient who was a carrier of hemophilia A, and one patient with acquired hemophilia A. The patients were managed at Mie University Hospital between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022 (Table 1). Twenty-four samples were obtained from patients treated with FVIII concentrate, emicizumab, or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC). The interval between sample correction and treatment varied for each patient. Control plasma samples were obtained from 20 healthy volunteers (6 males and 14 females, aged 21–58 years). The study protocol (2249) was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Mie University Hospital and signed informed consent was obtained from each participant. Twenty plasma samples from healthy volunteers were used as the normal reference plasma samples. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
The CWA-TT (Figure 1a) using 0.5 IU thrombin (Thrombin 500 units; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was measured using an ACL-TOP
CWA-APTT (Figure 1b) of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was measured using a HemosIL APTT-SP (Instrumentation Laboratory), as previously reported [[
The sTF/FIX assay (Figure 1c) was performed using PRP and 2000-fold diluted HemosIL RecombiPlasTin 2G (Instrumentation Laboratory) via the ACL-TOP
FVIII or FVIII-like activity was measured using the one-stage clotting assay of APTT peak time (normal reference range: median, 100% [25–75th percentile, 88.2–137%]) with APTT-SP, FVIII-deficient plasma (Instrumentation Laboratory), and the ACL-TOP system, with the chromogenic substrate method using a Revohem
Data are expressed as the median (25–75th percentiles). The significance of the differences between the groups was examined using the Mann–Whitney U-test. p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the Stat-Flex software (version 6; Artec Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan).
Of the 23 patients with hemophilia, 15 were treated with regular replacement therapy, 7 with EHL-FVIII, and 5 with emicizumab (Table 1). The two standard curves (Y = 0.284X − 94.3 vs. Y = 0.291X − 96.7) for FVIII activity in normal reference plasma from 20 healthy volunteers using the CWA-TT in plasma with and without emicizumab (final concentration, 0.15 mg/mL) were similar (difference ≤ 1%) (Figure 2), suggesting that a standard curve in plasma without emici, significantly zumab, could be used to determine FVIII activity in plasma with emicizumab. In contrast, the two standard curves (Y = 225 − 1.78X vs. Y = 171 − 3.91X) for FVIII activity using the APTT one-stage clotting assay in plasma with and without emicizumab differed. FVIII activities in PPP from patients treated without emicizumab based on the one-stage clotting assay using the CWA-TT were significantly higher than those based on the one-stage clotting assay using a CWA-APTT and a chromogenic assay (Figure 3). Although the FVIII activity using the APTT one-stage clotting assay was scaled over in plasm with emicizumab, the activities based on CWA-APTT and CWA-TT in plasma without emicizumab were closely correlated, and those based on CWA-TT and a chromogenic assay in plasma with and without emicizumab were also closely correlated (Figure 4a–c).
CWA-APTT in HA-2 treated with FVIII concentrate (efraloctocog alfa; Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan) showed that the peak time was prolonged, and the peak height was similar to that of the normal control (Figure 5a), whereas CWA-APTT in HA-22 treated with emicizumab showed shorter peak time and relatively lower peak height compared with the normal control (Figure 5b). HA-3 treated with FVIII concentrate (rurioctocog alfa pegol; Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan) showed that FVIII activities reached 7.4–12.4%, with a prolonged peak time and relatively low peak height on CWA-APTT and shortened peak time and normal peak height of 1st DP on CWA-TT (Figure 6a). HA-2 treated with FVIII concentrate (efraloctocog alfa) showed FVIII activity of 16.3–21.0%, with a slightly prolonged peak time and normal peak height on CWA-APTT and a shortened peak time and elevated peak height of 1st DP on CWA-sTF/FIXa (Figure 6b). HA-10 treated with FVIII concentrate (Lonoctocog alfa; CSL Behring K.K., Tokyo, Japan) showed that the 1st DPH and 2nd DPH were similar to the values in healthy volunteers in the CWA-APTT, and the 1st DPT and 2nd DPT were shortened, while the 1st DPH was similar to that in healthy volunteers in the CWA-sTF/FIXa, indicating that the correlation of FVIII activity with the CWA differed.
Regarding CWA-TT, HA-6 treated with emicizumab showed a low peak height of the 1st DP and no marked difference between PPP and PRP (Figure 7a,b), whereas HA-2 treated with FVIII concentrate showed a low peak height and second peak of the 1st DP in PPP, and a markedly high peak height and combined first and second peaks of the 1st DP in PRP (Figure 7c,d).
The peak times (2nd DP [hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate vs. healthy volunteers: 42.4 s; 38.4–51.2 s vs. 31.7 s; 31.1–32.9 s; p < 0.001], 1st DP [58.8 s; 43.7–59.1 s vs. 34.3 s; 33.8–35.9 s; p < 0.001] and FFC [53.2 s; 44.8–60.1 s vs. 36.0; 35.6–38.2 s; p < 0.001]) of CWA-APTT were significantly longer in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate than in healthy volunteers; however, peak times of CWA-sTF/FIXa (2nd DP [45.9 s; 38.4–51.2 s vs. 76.9 s; 70.6–84.0 s; p < 0.001], 1st DP [69.9 s; 62.8–75.8 s vs. 95.3 s; 89.8–106 s; p < 0.001] and FFC [71.9 s; 65.4–77.8 s vs. 94.6; 89.4–109 s; p < 0.001]) and CWA-TT (2nd DP [29.3 s; 28.0–38.1 s vs. 43.0 s; 40.8–46.5 s; p < 0.001], 1st DP [32.9 s; 31.7–43.0 s vs. 50.1 s; 48.2–54.3 s; p < 0.001] and FFC [51.8 s; 47.7–70.6 s vs. 136; 138–147 s; p < 0.001]) were significantly shorter in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate than in healthy volunteers (Figure 8). The peak heights of 2nd DP and 1st DP on the CWA-APTT were significantly lower in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate in comparison to healthy volunteers; however, those of FFC in the CWA-APTT (hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate vs. healthy volunteers: 266 mm absorbance; 216–326 mm absorbance vs. 187 mm absorbance; 170–206 mm absorbance; p < 0.001), 2nd DP in the CWA-sTF/FIXa (78.1 mm absorbance; 59.9–93.9 mm absorbance vs. 37.4 mm absorbance; 31.0–48.1 mm absorbance; p < 0.001), 2nd DP (451 mm absorbance; 329–545 mm absorbance vs. 103 mm absorbance; 86.0–113 mm absorbance; p < 0.001), 1st DP (222 mm absorbance; 161–257 mm absorbance vs. 82.6 mm absorbance; 75.3–94.9 mm absorbance, p < 0.001), and FFC (791 mm absorbance; 687–991 mm absorbance vs. 696 mm absorbance; 622–727 mm absorbance; p < 0.001) in the CWA-TT were significantly higher in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate in comparison to healthy volunteers. There were no significant differences in the peak heights of 1st DP and FFC on CWA-sTF/FIXa between hemophilic patients and healthy volunteers (Figure 9).
Regular prophylactic therapy including EHL-FVIII and emicizumab is common [[
FVIII activity was assessed via the APTT one-stage clotting assay [[
Regarding hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate, the number of patients included in this study was relatively small; however, these CWA analyses showed significant findings regarding coagulability in these patients. CWA-APTT showed hypocoagulability in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate; however, CWA-sTF/FIXa did not. In contrast, CWA-TT exhibited hypercoagulability in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrates. These differences are the result of preincubation with APTT regent, which activates FXII and, subsequently, FIX (FIXa), disturbing the evaluation of the activation ability of FXII to FIXa and reflection of thrombin burst (Figure 10). In CWA-sTF/FIX, a small amount of the TF and FVIIa complex activates FIX to FIXa, which reflects the thrombin burst. In CWA-TT, a small amount of thrombin activates FXI, FVIII, and FV instead of fibrinogen, which is also reflected by the thrombin burst. These findings suggest that some hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate, who are evaluated for hypocoagulability using the routine APTT assay, may be at increased risk of thrombosis, as evaluated based on CWA-TT. In addition, the peak height of CWA-TT was significantly higher in PRP than in PPP, suggesting that hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate, especially EHL-FVIII concentrate, were affected by thrombin burst-dependent platelets. These findings suggest that hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate may temporarily be at the same or a higher risk of thrombosis than healthy individuals. This raises the question of whether the temporal effect of high-dose FVIII concentrate is problematic for thrombotic risk in hemophilic patients.
Limitation and importance: The present study was retrospective and small. In addition, FVIII concentrates and the intervals between the administration and blood sampling times varied. However, despite the small size and heterogenous nature of our study, the results showed statistical significance, suggesting that the findings are significant. Hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate showed hypocoagulability, according to the prolonged peak time of CWA-APTT, but might also show hypercoagulability according to the shortened peak time and an elevated peak height of CWA-TT.
The FVIII activity in the present study was evaluated using several methods, including APTT, CWA-TT, and chromogenic assays, and the APTT one-stage method is not the gold standard. All parameters of CWA-TT and several parameters of CWA-sTF/FIXa showed that hypercoagulability was affected by thrombin bursts in hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrate. This raises the question of whether a transient increase in FVIII activity leads to a thrombotic risk.
Graph: Figure 1 CWA-TT (a), CWA-APTT (b), and CWA-sTF/FIXa, (c) in a healthy volunteer. CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; navy line—fibrin formation curve; FFC—fibrin formation curve; pink line—1stDP—1st derivative peak (velocity); light blue—2nd DP 2nd derivative peak (acceleration); FFPH—peak height of FFC; 1st DPH—peak height of 1st DP; 2nd DPH—peak height of 2nd DP.
Graph: Figure 2 Standard curve for the FVIII and FVIII-like activity in normal reference plasma from healthy volunteers with and without emicizumab. Emi—emicizumab; FVIII—coagulation factor FVIII; closed box—FVIII activity with emicizumab (final concentration—0.15 mg/mL); open box—FVIII activity without emicizumab. Standard curves (Emi(+), Y = 0.284X − 94.3; Emi (−), Y = 0.291X − 96.7).
Graph: Figure 3 The FVIII activity based on a one-stage clotting assay using the clot waveform analysis (CWA)-APTT or CWA-thrombin time or a chromogenic assay. FVIII—coagulation factor FVIII; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; TT—thrombin time; FVIII activity without emicizumab; NS—not significant. Plasma with emicizumab was excluded for measurement of FVIII activity.
Graph: Figure 4 Correlation between the FVIII and FVIII-like activity based on APTT one―stage clotting assay using the APTT and CWA―thrombin time (a), without emicizumab and (b), with emicizuma (b) and between the FVIII activity based on a one―stage clotting assay using the CWA―thrombin time and a chromogenic assay (c). FVIII—coagulation factor FVIII; CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; TT—thrombin time; Emi—emicizumab; red symbol—plasma with emicizumab.
Graph: Figure 5 CWA―APTT in a hemophilia patient treated with FVIII concentrate (a) and a hemophilia patient treated with emicizumab (b). CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; navy line—fibrin formation curve; FFH—fibrin formation height; pink line—1st derivative curve (velocity); 1st DPH—first derivative peak height; light blue—2nd derivative curve (acceleration); 2nd DPH—second derivative peak height; solid line—patient; dotted line—healthy volunteer. Difference between the FVIII concentrate (a) and emicizumab (b); the peak times were prolonged, but the peak heights were within normal limits in (a), whereas the peak times were shortened but peak heights were low in (b).
Graph: Figure 6 CWA―APTT and CWA―sTF/FIXa in a hemophilia patient treated with FVIII concentrate. CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; sTF/FIXa—small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation assay; navy line—fibrin formation curve; FFH—fibrin formation height; pink line—1st DP, 1st derivative (velocity); 1st DPH, 1st DP height; 1st DPT time, light blue—2nd derivative peak—2nd DP (acceleration); 2nd DPH—2nd DP height; 2nd DPT—2nd DP time; solid line—patient; dotted line—healthy volunteer. (a) The FVIII activity was low, but the 1st DPT and 2nd DPT were shortened, and 1st DPH was similar to that in healthy volunteers in the CWA-sTF/FIXa. (b) The FVIII activity was low, but the 1st DPH and 2nd DPH were similar to those in healthy volunteers in the CWA-APTT, and the 1st DPT and 2nd DPT were shortened, while the 1st DPH was similar to that in healthy volunteers in the CWA-sTF/FIXa. The correlation between FVIII activity and CWA-APTT and CWA-sTF/FIX differed.
Graph: Figure 7 CWA—TT in a hemophilia patient treated with emicizumab (a,b) or FVIII concentrate (c,d). CWA—clot waveform analysis; TT—thrombin time; navy line—fibrin formation curve; FFH—fibrin formation height; pink line—1st derivative curve (velocity); 1st DPH—first derivative peak height; light blue—2nd derivative curve (acceleration); 2nd DPH—second derivative peak height; PPP—platelet poor plasma (a,c); PRP—platelet-rich plasma (b,d); EMI. Emicizumab; FVIII—coagulation factor FVIII reagent.
Graph: Figure 8 Peak times of CWA-APTT, CWA-sTF/FIXa, and CWA-TT in hemophilia patients treated with FVIII concentrate. CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; sTF/FIXa—small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation assay; TT—thrombin time; FFC—fibrin formation curve; 1st DP—1st derivative peak; 2nd DP—second derivative peak; ***—p < 0.001; closed box—hemophilia patients treated with FVIII concentrate; open box—healthy volunteers.
Graph: Figure 9 Peak heights of CWA-APTT, CWA-sTF/FIXa, and CWA-TT in hemophilia patients treated with FVIII concentrate. CWA—clot waveform analysis; APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; sTF/FIXa—small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation assay; TT—thrombin time; FFC—fibrin formation curve; 1st DP—1st derivative peak; 2nd DP—second derivative peak; ***—p < 0.001; **—p < 0.01; NS—not significant; closed box—hemophilia patients treated with FVIII concentrate; open box—healthy volunteers.
Graph: Figure 10 Differences among APTT, sTF/FIXa, and sTT assays. APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; sTF/FIXa—small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation assay; sTT—small amount of thrombin time; red arrow—coagulation process; open red arrow—thrombin burst.
Table 1 Subjects.
No Disease Severity Basal FVIII Activity Inhibitor RRT Drug HA-1 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-2 HA Moderate 1.8% Negative Yes Efraloctocog alfa HA-3 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-4 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-5 HA Mild 23.3% Negative No Octocog beta HA-6 HA Severe ≤1.0% Positive Yes Emicizumab HA-7 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Octocog beta HA-8 HA Moderate ≤1.0% Negative No Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-9 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Emicizumab HA-10 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Lonoctocog alfa HA-11 HA Severe 1.0% Negative Yes Octocog beta HA-12 HA Mild 14.1% Negative No FDCHB-FVIII HA-13 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-14 HA Moderate 1.6% Negative No ― HA-15 HA Moderate 3.9% Negative No Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-16 HA Mild 6.7% Negative No Rurioctocog alfa HA-17 HA Mild 5.4% Negative No Rurioctocog alfa HA-18 HA Moderate 2.2% Negative No ― HA-19 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Rurioctocog alfa pegol HA-20 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Emicizumab HA-21 HA Moderate 1.0% Negative Yes Emicizumab HA-22 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Emicizumab HA-23 HA Severe ≤1.0% Negative Yes Efraloctocog alfa 24 HA * Mild 20.4% Negative No ― 25-1 AHA Severe ≤1.0% Positive No APCC 25-2 AHA Severe ≤1.0% Positive No APCC 25-3 AHA Severe ≤1.0% Positive No APCC 25-4 AHA Severe ≤1.0% Positive No ―
Conceptualization, H.W.; methodology, T.M.; validation, K.S. (Kei Suzuki); formal analysis, Y.Y.; investigation, I.T.; data curation, T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, M.S.; visualization, H.W.; supervision, H.S.; project administration, K.S. (Katsuya Shiraki); funding acquisition, H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study protocol (2249) was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Mie University Hospital and signed informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.
The measurements of CWA were partially supported by the Instrumentation Laboratory Japan. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors thank Nisii H and Sakano Y for their kind support during the CWA assay.
By Takeshi Matsumoto; Hideo Wada; Katsuya Shiraki; Kei Suzuki; Yoshiki Yamashita; Isao Tawara; Hideto Shimpo and Motomu Shimaoka
Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author