Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Bacitracin resistance and enhanced virulence of Streptococcus suis via a novel efflux pump

Ma, Jiale ; Liu, Jin ; et al.
In: BMC Veterinary Research, Jg. 15 (2019), Heft 1, S. 1-11
Online academicJournal

Bacitracin resistance and enhanced virulence of Streptococcus suis via a novel efflux pump 

Background: Streptococcus suis is a prominent pathogen causing septicemia and meningitis in swine and humans. Bacitracin is used widely as a growth promoter in animal feed and to control the spread of necrotic enteritis in most developing countries. This study aimed to characterize a novel membrane transporter module Sst comprising SstE, SstF, and SstG for bacitracin resistance. Results: Comparative genomics and protein homology analysis found a potential efflux pump SstFEG encoded upstream of well-known bacitracin-resistance genes bceAB and bceRS. A four-fold decrease in bacitracin susceptibility was observed in sstFEG deletion mutant comparing with S. suis wildtype strain CZ130302. Further studies indicated that the bacitracin tolerance mediated by SstFEG is not only independent of the BceAB transporter, but also regulated by the two-component system BceSR. Given that SstFEG are harbored by almost all virulent strains, but not in the avirulent strains, we managed to explore its potential role in bacterial pathogencity. Indeed, our results showed that SstFEG is involved in S. suis colonization and virulence in animal infection model by its potential competitive survival advantage against host bactericidal effect. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to functionally characterize the bacitracin efflux pump in S. suis to provide evidence regarding the important roles of the novel ABC transporter system SstFEG with respect to drug resistance and virulence.

Keywords: Bacitracin; Virulence; Serotype Chz; Streptococcus suis; SstFEG; Efflux pump

Jiale Ma and Jin Liu are co-first authors of the article.

Background

Streptococcus suis is an emerging zoonotic pathogen imposing a serious burden on the porcine industry as well as a severe public health concern [[1]]. It is found extensively in porcine breeding environments, which are considered as a potential natural reservoir of resistance genes among several bacteria [[3]–[5]]. Bacitracin produced by Bacillus licheniformis is a type of narrow-spectrum peptide acting on Gram-positive bacteria [[6]]. Bacitracin was previously used as a growth-promoting supplement in animal feed [[7]]. Furthermore, bacitracin can effectively control necrotic enteritis [[8]], which is used as a preparation in numerous countries. Prolonged use of bacitracin in animals increases resistance genes in microorganisms. Some molecular mechanisms underlying bacitracin resistance in bacteria have been reported [[9]–[11]].

In one such pathway, the Bce system comprising a two-component system (TCS) BceSR and the membrane transporter BceAB to export bacitracin [[12]]. Similar pathways have been identified in Bacillus subtilis [[6]], Streptococcus mutants [[13]], Enterococcus faecalis [[9]], and Clostridium perfringens [[14]]. Furthermore, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus highly express undecaprenol kinase to convert undecaprenol pyrophosphate to undecaprenol phosphate. Some organisms produce exopolysaccharides, such as Streptococcus mutans, or membrane-bound cell-surface phospholipids, such as Xanthomonas campestris [[15]], which could bind bacitracin to remain extracellular. Bce systems are widely distributed in bacteria as a bacitracin efflux pump. The Bce system functions as an importer, as revealed through structural studies. In Bce systems, the RS regulon functions as the key bacitracin-resistance locus; the other module AB pumps out bacitracin via a transmembrane channel. The present study aimed to characterize a novel membrane ABC transporter module Sst comprising three components SstF, SstE, and SstG, and their role in the regulation of bacitracin resistance. We generated a series of mutant strains to compare their differences in bacitracin resistance with the wild-type strain through a drug sensitivity test and qRT-PCR analysis for bceRS, bceAB, and sstFEG genes. Mice challenge experiments testing bacterial colonization and survival rate were further performed to assess the pathogenicity of the Sst FEG modules in strain CZ130302.

Results

A potential efflux pump for drug-resistance encoded by sstFEG

Recently, we reported a highly virulent S. suis strain CZ130302 designated as the new serotype Chz causing acute meningitis in piglets. Unexpectedly, CZ130302 also displayed a more extensive drug resistance pattern than S. suis serotype 2 (SS2) reference strains P1/7 and HA9801 in the MIC test, including bacitracin (Table 1). Whole genome retrieval of CZ130302 (CP024974.1) identified a gene cluster encoding the well-known bacitracin transporter BceAB and the related TCS BceSR (Fig. 1a). Further genetic annotation and prediction revealed a novel ABC transporter located at the upstream of bceAB, which was predicted as a potential efflux pump for drug-resistance. Thus, three genes, CVO91_06470, CVO91_06465, and CVO91_06460, were designated as sstFEG for further studies.

The MICs of CZ130302 to different kinds of antibiotics

Antibiotics

MIC(ng/μL)a

Antibiotics

MIC(ng/μL) a

Penicillin G

16

Tetracycline

128

Ampicillin

64

Doxycycline

32

Streptomycin

256

Erythromycin

512

Gentamicin

256

Lincomycin

512

Kanamycin

> 512

Bacitracin

64

Spectinomycin

32

Vancomycin

0.25

Amikacin

128

Nisin

256

Neomycin

> 512

Ciprofloxacin

64

Chloramphenicol

4

Norfloxacin

128

aThe Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as control strain here

Graph: Fig. 1 The genetic neighborhood analysis and the mutant construction strategy. a A schematic representation of the genetic locus containing seven genes (CVO91_06470 to CVO91_06430), along with the adjacent genes, comparing gene organization characteristics in Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus mutans, and S. suis. The genes bceABSR are ubiquitous, while sstFEG are exclusively present in S. suis. Sequence analysis of this genetic locus indicates three potential transcriptional terminators in the region between sstG and bceA and downstream of bceB and bceS.b A schematic representation of mutant construction strategy. Three fragments AB, Spc, and CD were fused to form an intermediate vector with pUC19 plasmid. The mutant strains were obtained via natural genetic transformation, screening, and identification

SstFEG mediates bacitracin tolerance in S. suis

Subsequently, a series of deletion mutants were constructed via homologous replacement with a spectinomycin (Spc) resistance expression cassette [[16]]. Construction of the mutant strains was confirmed via PCR (Additional file 1). The bacterial growth of CZ13-△sstFEG showed 1 h delay in log-phase compared with that of wild-type strain (Additional file 2), but no significant difference in the last stage. It should be noted that the bacitracin sensitivity of different mutant strains was increased at varying degrees in comparison with the wild-type strain (Fig. 2a). The mutant strain CZ13-△sstFEG (MIC, 16 μg/mL) was approximately 4-fold more sensitive to bacitracin than the wild-type CZ130302 strain was (MIC, 64 μg/mL), concurrent with the colony growth of CZ13-△sstFEG on the culture media supplemented with bacitracin at different concentrations (Fig. 2b). Otherwise, CZ13-△bceAB and CZ13-△bceRS (MIC, 4 μg/mL) were more sensitive to bacitracin than CZ13-△sstFEG was (MIC, 16 μg/mL). Based on the MIC, bacterial growth inhibition at 8 h was compared upon bacitracin supplementation at high concentrations in the log-phase. Obviously, the mutant strain CZ13-△bceAB displayed the greatest reduction in bacterial survival at each time point (Fig. 2c). In summary, both BceAB and SstFEG transporters co-regulate bacitracin resistance in strain CZ130302, but their functional correlation in this process is unclear.

Graph: Fig. 2 Bacitracin sensitivity of the mutant strains. a Comparison of MICs to bacitracin between wild-type and mutant strains. b The bacterial colony growth in THB plate with bacitracin resistance. Bacterial cells in the logarithmic phase were subjected to serial dilution and 10 μL of bacterial cultures were in THB plates supplemented with bacitracin at different concentrations (0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 μg/mL). c The bacterial survival of wild-type and mutant strains incubated with high bacitracin concentration. The bacterial cells were eliminated with 128 μg/mL bacitracin. We monitored and recorded the bacterial loads incubated after 8 h with 128 μg/mL bacitracin in the logarithmic phase. The CFU values of all mutants was reduced to a greater extent in comparison with the wild-type strain at each hour

Bacitracin tolerance mediated by SstFEG is independent of the BceAB transporter

To further understand the functional characteristics of SstFEG, BceAB, and BceRS when bacterial cells responded to bacitracin stress, total RNAs of wild-type and mutant strains were extracted under the same culture conditions with or without bacitracin treatment, and the expression of relevant seven genes (sstFEG/bceAB/bceRS) were comparatively analyzed via qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3a, the bacitracin supplementation in culture medium significantly activated the expression of sstFEG and bceAB at least 30-fold higher than that in the normal culture. However, the transcriptional level of bceRS was not significantly upregulated under this condition. These results indicated that the bceRS and sstFEG/bceAB were controlled by different operons, suggesting that the following study need to be performed under the bacitracin treatment to confirm the function of SstFEG in bacitracin resistance directly or indirectly.

Graph: Fig. 3 Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of the sstFEG, bceAB, and bceRS. The data were normalized to the housekeeping gene parC transcript [[18]]. The relative expression levels represent the mean ± SD for three independently isolated RNA samples. (a) The comparison of gene expression in the presence (Bac [2 μg/mL]) or absence of bacitracin. The concentration of bacitracin at 2 μg/mL was tested that could not kill S. suis cells rapidly. (b, c, d) The expression changes of sstFEG, bceAB and bceRS in different deletion mutant under the bacitracin stress. Several-fold changes represent the relative gene expression in the wild-type and mutant strains cultured in the presence (Bac [2 μg/mL]) of bacitracin

Indeed, our previous genetic analysis showed that sstFEG, bceAB, and bceRS are controlled by different operons (Fig. 1a), respectively. Here, we need to confirm whether the deletion of sstFEG caused the expression change of bceAB and bceRS, which have been reported for bacitracin resistance in several bacterial species [[12]]. As shown in Fig. 3b, the deletion of sstFEG did not downregulate the expression of bceABRS and even caused the significant activation of bceA by more than 4-fold. These results suggested that the deficiency of bacitracin resistance caused by sstFEG deletion does not relate with well-known BceAB and BceSR systems. Unexpectedly, the deletion of bceAB significantly inhibited the expression of sstFEG (Fig. 3c), suggesting that the deficiency of bacitracin resistance caused by bceAB deletion may be related with BceAB inactivation and sstFEG downregulation together. These observations, together with the results shown in Fig. 2, further implied that SstFEG is an efflux pump for bacitracin and can transport bacitracin independently.

BceSR regulates SstFEG in response to bacitracin resistance

Here, we explored why the deletion of bceAB inhibited the expression of sstFEG (Fig. 3c), and found that bceRS is downregulated by approximately 50% in the △bceAB mutant. As revealed from the KEGG Pathway Database (Additional file 3) and previous studies [[11]], BceAB transporter serves as an efflux pump along with the BceSR TCS to regulate bacitracin perception. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that BceSR also is the important regulator of sstFEG operon. Indeed, the deletion of bceRS caused significant downregulation of sstFEG and bceAB more than 50-fold (Fig. 3d), which almost lost the transcriptional activation of these genes in response to bacitracin stress under the 2 ng/μL concentration, indicating that BceSR is the major regulator for bacitracin resistance in this case. These results suggested that the downregulation of bceRS caused by the deletion of bceAB may be the primary reason of sstFEG transcriptional inhibition, and sstFEG regulation by BceSR.

S. suis colonization and virulence requires bacitracin tolerance

The prevalence of sstFEG, bceAB, and bceSR genes in 35 whole genomes of S. suis from NCBI database were investigated, which showed that all strains encode bceAB and bceRS genes, but only 19 strains (18 highly virulent or virulent strains except for T15) encode sstFEG genes, and almost all avirulent strains are sstFEG negative (Table 2). In particular, serotype 3 strain ST3, isolated from a pig with pneumonia in Hubei province in 2009 [[43]], only harbors sstF, but not sstE and sstG. These results suggested that SstFEG may be involved in the pathogenicity of S. suis.

The distribution of seven bacitracin resistance genes in Streptococcus suis

Strains

Serotypea

Virulence

host

Symptoms

BceB/A

BceS/R

sstFEG

Reference

CZ130302

Chz

Highly virulent

piglet

Meningitis

+

+

+

[18]

BM407

2

Highly virulent

human

STSS

+

+

+

[19]

05ZYH33

2

Highly virulent

human

STSS

+

+

+

[20]

98HAH33

2

Highly virulent

human

STSS

+

+

+

[20]

GZ1

2

Highly virulent

human

STSS

+

+

+

[21]

SC84

2

Highly virulent

human

STSS

+

+

+

[19]

SC19

2

Highly virulent

piglet

Meningitis

+

+

+

[22]

05ZY719

2

Highly virulent

piglet

Septicemia

+

+

+

[23]

SC070731

2

Highly virulent

piglet

Meningitis

+

+

+

[24]

P1/7

2

Highly virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[25]

S735

2

Highly virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[26]

A7

2

Highly virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[27]

CS100322

2

Virulent

pig

lung

+

+

+

[28]

SS2–1

2

Virulent

pig

diseased

+

+

+

[29]

T15

2

Avirulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[30]

SS12

1/2

Virulent

pig

lung

+

+

+

[27]

JS14

14

Highly virulent

pig

lung

+

+

+

[31]

GZ0565

9

Highly virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[31]

LSM102

Highly virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+

[32]

ST3

3

Virulent

pig

Septicemia

+

+

+/−

[21]

AH681

Chz

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[18]

HN136

Chz

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[18]

ST1

1

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[27]

HA0609

2

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[28]

NSUI002

2

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[33]

05HAS68

2

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[34]

NSUI060

2

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[35]

YB51

3

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[36]

6407

4

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[37]

D9

7

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[27]

D12

9

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[38]

TL13

16

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[39]

LS9N

Avirulent

+

Healthy

+

+

[40]

90–1330

Avirulent

+

Healthy

+

+

[41]

DN13

9

Avirulent

pig

Healthy

+

+

[42]

The colonization of S. suis requires to antagonize mucosal microflora and host immune clearance. Many bacterial species from mucosal microflora can secrete bacitracin to achieve competitive advantage for optimal survival. Furthermore, bacitracin was previously used as a growth-promoting supplement in animal feed. Here, we managed to test whether SstFEG efflux pump is required for S. suis original colonization. Indeed, the inactivation of SstFEG resulted in a 2- to 3-fold reduction in the bacterial loads compared to the wild-type strain in blood after intraperitoneal injection for 10 h (Fig. 4a), indicating that SstFEG mediating bacitracin tolerance are essential for S. suis to rapidly infect the host. As shown in Fig. 4b, mice infected with the wild-type strain CZ130302 had severe clinical symptoms and displayed 100% mortality on the fifth day after challenge. In contrast, the group infected with the mutant CZ13-△sstFEG strain displayed a 50% greater survival rate (5/11).

Graph: Fig. 4 Bacterial competitive colonization and virulence analysis in vivo. a The competitive test was carried out to compare the colonization between wild-type and mutant strains in mouse infection model. The bacterial loads of mutant strains were decreased by approximately two- or three-fold in comparison with the wild-type strain in blood after intraperitoneal challenge for 10 h, ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001. b Survival curves of BALB/c mice infected with wild-type or mutant strains. Six-week-old female BALB/c mice were segregated into three groups and inoculated i.p. with 2.6 × 107 cells/mouse. Mice infected with the vehicle solution (PBS) were used as controls and survival was monitored over a 7-d period. Data are expressed as the mean percentage of live animals in each group (n = 11), * P < 0.05

Discussion

Thus far, the underlying mechanism of bacitracin resistance has been reported in B. subtilis, S. mutans, and S. pneumoniae, but not in S. suis. The present study shows that the network of bacitracin resistance in Streptococcus partially comprises TCS and ABC transporters, as revealed from the KEGG Pathway Database (Additional file 3). BceSR (TCS) and BceAB (ABC transporter) are ubiquitous and significantly influence the bacitracin resistance of Streptococcus spp. In this study, we identified a novel ABC transport module (CVO91_06470, 06465, and 06460) mediating bacitracin resistance and virulence in S. suis. The CVO91_06470 gene encodes an ABC transporter ATP-binding protein that shares approximately 42% protein homology with the BcrA system, contributing to bacitracin resistance in B. subtilis.

Interestingly, these three genes (designated as sstFEG) are coincidentally located upstream of the four genes encoding well-known BceAB and BceSR homologs (Fig. 1a). Bacitracin sensing depends on the BceRS signal transduction system and the BceAB transporter as a co-sensor. Jing Ouyang et al [[12]] reported that phosphorylated BceR upregulates the positively regulated expression of the bceABRS operon. In this study, we proposed that BceAB, BceRS, and SstFEG may constitute a seven-component system to regulate the bacitracin efflux optimally. Our results indicated that the bacitracin tolerance mediated by SstFEG is not only independent of the BceAB transporter, but also regulated by the TCS BceSR. Furthermore, sstFEG and bceAB are controlled by different operons, but the deletion of bceAB caused significant downregulation of bceRS, which decreased the bacitracin resistance mediated by SstFEG by inhibiting the transcriptional activation. In contrast, the deletion of sstFEG could not regulate the BceAB and BceSR systems for sensing bacitracin. A model for this regulatory pathway of bacitracin resistance in S. suis is proposed (Fig. 5).

Graph: Fig. 5 The underlying network regulating bacitracin sensing and resistance in S. suis. We supposed that when BceS senses extracellular bacitracin, it activates BceR via phosphorylation. Phosphorylated BceR can not only directly regulate BceAB to transport bacitracin, but also regulate SstFEG efflux pump to further export bacitracin

Except for the bacitracin resistance, antibiotic susceptibility testing indicated that strain CZ130302 exhibits a more extensive drug resistance pattern than that of other S. suis strains. Comparative genomics studies have reported that the genomes of newly isolated CZ130302 harbor at least 45 ISs, including the novel 82-kb integrative conjugative element ICESsuCZ130302 [[17]], which may increase the potential horizontal gene transfer from different bacterial species or genera. Further studies need to explore how and why strain CZ130302 acquired numerous exogenous antibiotic resistance genes and integrated into a chromosome, especially for newly identified SstFEG efflux pump.

Given that the SstFEG never been reported in any other opportunistic or commensal bacteria species, we speculated that its encoding genes may be transferred from pathogenic bacterial strains. To further examine the correlation between the virulence of S. suis strains and SstFEG, genomic data of 34 S. suis strains from GenBank were investigated. Consequently, SstFEG are harbored by almost all virulent strains isolated from the patients and diseased pigs, but not in the avirulent strains isolated from healthy pigs. To further explore the potential roles of SstFEG in S. suis virulence, BALB/c mouse infection model was employed for challenge tests [[44]]. Indeed, the pathogenicity of the mutant strain deleted sstFEG was significantly decreased.

Conclusions

This study reports a novel membrane transporter module SstFEG, which functions as not only an efflux pump for bacitracin resistance, but also a virulence-related protein involved in S. suis pathogenicity.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions

S. suis strain CZ130302 from the novel serotype Chz was isolated from a diseased piglet in Changzhou, China [[18], [45]]. Plasmid pSET-4S with Spc resistance gene was generously provided by Professor Daisuke Takamatsu. Plasmid pUC19 was maintained in the OIE Reference Laboratory for Swine Streptococcosis. S. suis were cultured in Todd Hewitt Broth (THB, BD) or agar comprising 6% (v/v) sheep blood at 37 °C and 5% CO2. E. coli strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB, BD) medium at 37 °C supplemented with 100 μg/mL Spc (Sigma) per requirement for S. suis and 50 μg/mL Spc or 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp, Sigma) for E. coli. Different types of antibiotics, especially bacitracin (Bac, Sigma), were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration. In total, 100 μg/mL lysozyme (Lzm, Sigma) and 1 μg/mL vancomycin (Van, Sigma) were used for phagocytosis assays.

Antimicrobial susceptibility assays

In accordance with the standardized methods per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2015), the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different types of antibiotics, including beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, amide alcohols, macrolides, lincosamides, polypeptides, and fluoroquinolone against S. suis CZ130302 were determined. In brief, the strains were diluted 1000-fold into Cation Adjusted Muller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) with lysed horse serum (2.5% v/v) and cultured to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 0.5; thereafter, 180 μL of the culture was inoculated into the first vertical well, while 100 μL was inoculated in the other wells. Different initial antibiotic concentrations in 20 μL were placed in the first well and mixed, and 100 μL of the mixture from the first well was transferred to the subsequent well. This was repeated and as an analogy until the last well. Subsequently, cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 20 h. CZ130302 was tested through a serial dilution from 10− 1 CFU to 10− 7 CFU, and the THB plates with a 2-fold dilution of bacitracin, initiating at 64 μg/mL. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The Streptococcus pneumoniae strain ATCC 49619 was used as a control to ensure the reliability of tested data.

Prediction and distribution of bacitracin-resistant genes in Streptococcus suis

The complete genome sequence of S. suis strain CZ130302 was obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, GenBank: CP024974.1). Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database (ARDB, http://ardb.cbcb.umd.edu/) was used to predict resistance genes in the genome of S. suis. KEGG PATHWAY Database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) was used to extract previously reports pathways underlying bacterial bacitracin resistance and the distribution of resistance genes in S. suis exhibited in the NCBI database. In addition, Rockhopper software was used to predict the operon, transcription start site (TSS), and transcription termination sites (TTS) of CZ130302 in accordance with the distribution of reads in the genome.

Construction of gene deletion mutants

To investigate the contribution of predictable genes, a series of deletion mutants was constructed via natural DNA transformation instead of the traditional method with pSET-4 s because this method was not suitable for S. suis CZ130302. Primers used to construct and confirm the mutants are enlisted in Additional file 4. The construction strategy for sstFEG deletion mutant strain is shown in Fig. 1. In brief, fragment AB (574 bp) and CD (867 bp) were amplified from S. suis CZ130302, using primers sst-A (BamHI site at its 5′ end) and sst-B, sst-C, and sst-D (Sal I site at its 3′ end) as upstream and downstream of sstFEG, respectively. The spc sequence (1133 bp) with the promoter was amplified from plasmid pSET-4 s by primers Spc-F and Spc-R. These three fragments were fused via PCR and ligated with pUC19 to form the recombinant plasmid pUC19-AB-Spc-CD. The CZ13-△sstFEG mutant was obtained via homologous recombination and resistance screening. Other mutant strains including CZ13-△bceAB and CZ13-△bceRS were constructed as previously described.

Anti-pressure analysis of bacitracin

sstFEG mutant strains were cultured up to an optical density of approximately 0.7 at 600 nm (OD600). Thereafter, bacitracin was added at a high concentration. All bacteria were cultured for 8 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 continuously, followed by plating of serial ten-fold dilutions on THB agar to enumerate bacteria at each hour. The trial was performed in triplicate, and the results were determined using the following formula: CFUs of viable bacteria at each hour − CFUs of original bacteria.

qRT-PCR analysis

To analyze the expression levels of related genes and their interactions, total RNA was isolated from CZ130302 and mutant strains upon culturing to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6 in THB broth, with or without 2 μg/mL bacitracin, using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. When bacterial strains were cultured with bacitracin, the Streptococcus pneumoniae strain ATCC 49619 was used as control. The resulting RNA was then treated with gDNA Eraser to remove genomic DNA and further converted to cDNA via reverse transcription (RT), using PrimeScript™RT reagent Kit (Takara). cDNA samples were synthesized using RNA species harvested from three independent cultures of each strain. Real-time quantitative PCR assays were performed in triplicate with the method of SYBR Green detection. Primers for qRT-PCR analysis are enlisted in Additional file 4. The relative amount of target gene mRNA was normalized to the housekeeping gene parC [[46]]. The relative fold change was calculated by the threshold cycle (2-△△CT) method [[47]]. Each assay was performed in duplicate in three independent experiments.

Animal experiments

A competitive test was performed to compare the colonization ability between wild-type and mutant strains in mice. Prior to this experiment, all mice were fed with bacitracin in water to activate bacterial genes. Eighteen female 6-week-old BALB/c mice were equally segregated into three groups. The wild-type and mutant strains were cultured until the OD600 was approximately 0.8, and the density of each strain was adjusted to 1.3 × 108 CFU in PBS. Thereafter, the wild-type and different mutant strains were respectively mixed in a 1:1 ratio and challenged intraperitoneally with 200 μL/mouse. After 10 h, blood was sampled from each mouse, followed by plating serial five-fold dilutions on THB agar, containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin with or without 100 μg/mL Spc to distinguish and enumerate bacteria. In addition, the virulence of mutant CZ13-△Sst FEG strain was assessed in the BALB/c mouse model of infection. Thirty-three female 6-week-old BALB/c mice were equally segregated into three groups and challenged intraperitoneally with 200 μL/mouse at approximately 2.6 × 107 CFU (10 × LD50) in PBS. Mice infected with the vehicle (PBS) were used as controls. Mortality was monitored every 8 h for 7 d. All experiments were performed in triplicate. All animals used in this study were humanely euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation in an airtight box.

Statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism version 5 is used to analyze and plot the data. Student's t-test (unpaired) was performed to determine differences between the means of the two samples. Differences with a P value of < 0.05 were considered significant, and a P-value of < 0.01 was considered greatly significant.

Ethics statement

Six-week-old female germfree BALB/c mice were purchased from the Comparative Medicine Center of Yangzhou University. Animal experiments were carried out in the Laboratory Animal Center of Nanjing Agricultural University and approved by Laboratory Animal Monitoring Committee of Jiangsu Province, China [Permit number: SYXK (SU) 2017–0007].

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20191309) and Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program (grant number G2016060201) and the project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD). The funders had no use in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participating workers of the OIE Reference Laboratory for Swine Streptococcosis in Nanjing Agricultural University.

Authors' contributions

ZP conceived and designed the experiments. JM, JL, YZ and DW performed the experiments. GL contributed materials and analysis tools. JM, HY and ZP analyzed the data. JM and JL drafted the manuscript. RL, GL and ZP revised the manuscript. ZP coordinated the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript version

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments in this study were carried out in the Laboratory Animal Center of Nanjing Agricultural University and approved by Laboratory Animal Monitoring Committee of Jiangsu Province, China [Permitted number: SYXK (SU) 2017–0007]. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Graph: Additional file 1. Identification of mutant strains via PCR.

Graph: Additional file 2. Comparison of growth curves between wild-type CZ130302 and mutant strain CZ13-△ sstEFG.

Graph: Additional file 3. Genes involved in bacitracin transport.

Graph: Additional file 4. Primers used in this study.

• CLSI

  • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

• LB

  • Luria-Bertani

• MICs

  • The minimum inhibitory concentrations

• SS

  • Streptococcus suis

• TCS

  • Two-component system

• THB

  • Todd Hewitt Broth

• TSS

  • Transcription start site
Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12917-019-2115-2.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References 1 Palmieri C, Varaldo PE, Facinelli B. Streptococcus suis, an emerging drug-resistant animal and human pathogen. Front Microbiol. 2011; 2: 2353223616. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00235 2 Wertheim HF, Nghia HD, Taylor W, Schultsz C. Streptococcus suis: an emerging human pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48; 5: 617-625. 10.1086/59676319191650 3 Huang J, Shang K, Kashif J, Wang L. Genetic diversity of Streptococcus suis isolated from three pig farms of China obtained by acquiring antibiotic resistance genes. J Sci Food Agric. 2015; 95; 7: 1454-1460. 10.1002/jsfa.684125060787 4 Huang J, Ma J, Shang K, Hu X, Liang Y, Li D, Wu Z, Dai L, Chen L, Wang L. Evolution and diversity of the antimicrobial resistance associated Mobilome in Streptococcus suis: a probable Mobile genetic elements reservoir for other streptococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016; 6: 1185053989 5 Bernard R, El Ghachi M, Mengin-Lecreulx D, Chippaux M, Denizot F. BcrC from Bacillus subtilis acts as an undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase in bacitracin resistance. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280; 32: 28852-28857. 10.1074/jbc.M41375020015946938 6 Eppelmann K, Doekel S, Marahiel MA. Engineered biosynthesis of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin in the surrogate host Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276; 37: 34824-34831. 10.1074/jbc.M10445620011448966 7 Wei S, Gutek A, Lilburn M, Yu Z. Abundance of pathogens in the gut and litter of broiler chickens as affected by bacitracin and litter management. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 166; 3–4: 595-601. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.00623870707 8 Collinder E, Cardona ME, Berge GN, Norin E, Stern S, Midtvedt T. Influence of zinc bacitracin and Bacillus licheniformis on microbial intestinal functions in weaned piglets. Vet Res Commun. 2003; 27; 7: 513-526. 10.1023/A:102604362319414609263 9 Manson JM, Keis S, Smith JM, Cook GM. Acquired bacitracin resistance in enterococcus faecalis is mediated by an ABC transporter and a novel regulatory protein, BcrR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48; 10: 3743-3748521867. 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3743-3748.2004 Ohki R, Giyanto TK, Masuyama W, Moriya S, Kobayashi K, Ogasawara N. The BceRS two-component regulatory system induces expression of the bacitracin transporter, BceAB, in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003; 49; 4: 1135-1144. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03653.x12890034 Radeck J, Gebhard S, Orchard PS, Kirchner M, Bauer S, Mascher T, Fritz G. Anatomy of the bacitracin resistance network in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2016; 100; 4: 607-620. 10.1111/mmi.1333626815905 Ouyang J, Tian XL, Versey J, Wishart A, Li YH. The BceABRS four-component system regulates the bacitracin-induced cell envelope stress response in Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54; 9: 3895-39062935011. 10.1128/AAC.01802-09 Tsuda H, Yamashita Y, Shibata Y, Nakano Y, Koga T. Genes involved in bacitracin resistance in Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46; 12: 3756-3764132740. 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3756-3764.2002 Charlebois A, Jalbert LA, Harel J, Masson L, Archambault M. Characterization of genes encoding for acquired bacitracin resistance in Clostridium perfringens. PLoS One. 2012; 7; 9: e444493435297. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044449 Rodrigues JC, Caseli L. Incorporation of bacitracin in Langmuir films of phospholipids at the air-water interface. Thin Solid Films. 2017; 622: 95-103. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.12.019 Zhu Y, Dong W, Ma J, Zhang Y, Pan Z, Yao H. Utilization of the ComRS system for the rapid markerless deletion of chromosomal genes in Streptococcus suis. Future Microbiol. 2019; 14: 207-222. 10.2217/fmb-2018-027930663887 Pan Z, Liu J, Zhang Y, Chen S, Ma J, Dong W, Wu Z, Yao H. A novel integrative conjugative element mediates transfer of multi-drug resistance between Streptococcus suis strains of different serotypes. Vet Microbiol. 2019; 229: 110-116. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.11.02830642585 Pan Z, Ma J, Dong W, Song W, Wang K, Lu C, Yao H. Novel variant serotype of streptococcus suis isolated from piglets with meningitis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81; 3: 976-9854292476. 10.1128/AEM.02962-14 Holden MT, Hauser H, Sanders M, Ngo TH, Cherevach I, Cronin A, Goodhead I, Mungall K, Quail MA, Price C. Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. PLoS One. 2009; 4; 7: e60722705793. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006072 Chen C, Tang J, Dong W, Wang C, Feng Y, Wang J, Zheng F, Pan X, Liu D, Li M. A glimpse of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome from comparative genomics of S. suis 2 Chinese isolates. PloS One. 2007; 2; 3: e3151820848. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000315 Ye CY, Zheng H, Zhang J, Jing HQ, Wang L, Xiong YW, Wang W, Zhou ZM, Sun QZ, Luo X. Clinical, experimental, and genomic differences between intermediately pathogenic, highly pathogenic, and epidemic Streptococcus suis. J Infect Dis. 2009; 199; 1: 97-107. 10.1086/59437019016627 Teng L, Dong X, Zhou Y, Li Z, Deng L, Chen H, Wang X, Li J. Draft Genome Sequence of Hypervirulent and Vaccine Candidate Streptococcus suis Strain SC19. Genome Announc. 2017;5(3):e01484-16. Wang X, Zhao J, Cai C, Tang X, Fu L, Zhang A, Han L. A label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of mouse neutrophil extracellular trap formation induced by Streptococcus suis or Phorbol Myristate acetate (PMA). Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 26156282035. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02615 Wu ZF, Wang WX, Tang M, Shao J, Dai C, Zhang W, Fan HJ, Yao HC, Zong J, Chen D. Comparative genomic analysis shows that Streptococcus suis meningitis isolate SC070731 contains a unique 105 K genomic island. Gene. 2014; 535; 2: 156-164. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.11.04424316490 Clifton-Hadley FA. Studies of Streptococcus suis type 2 infection in pigs. Vet Res Commun. 1984; 8; 3: 217-227. 10.1007/BF022147156495639 Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Smith HE. Characterization of virulence of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 reference strain Henrichsen S 735 in newborn gnotobiotic pigs. Vet Microbiol. 1996; 51; 1–2: 125-136. 10.1016/0378-1135(96)00028-48828129 Zhang A, Yang M, Hu P, Wu J, Chen B, Hua Y, Yu J, Chen H, Xiao J, Jin M. Comparative genomic analysis of Streptococcus suis reveals significant genomic diversity among different serotypes. BMC Genomics. 2011; 12: 5233227697. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-523 Wei WANG, Kong-wang HE, Yan-xiu NI, Li-xin L, Jun-ming ZHOU, ZHANG X-h, Bin LI. mRNA level of inflammation-associated cytokines of porcine alveolar macrophages cell lines 3D4/21 stimulated by Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Jiangsu J Agric Sci. 2013; 3: 017 Ma YL, Lu CP. Isolation and identification of a bacteriophage capable of infecting Streptococcus suis type 2 strains. Vet Microbiol. 2008; 132; 3–4: 340-347. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.01318676101 Vecht U, Arends JP. Differences in virulence between two strains of Streptococcus suis type II after experimentally induced infection of newborn germ-free pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1989; 50; 7: 1037-10432774320 Hu P, Yang M, Zhang A, Wu J, Chen B, Hua Y, Yu J, Xiao J, Jin M. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus suis serotype 14 strain JS14. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193; 9: 2375-23763133069. 10.1128/JB.00083-11 Zhou Y, Dong X, Li Z, Zou G, Lin L, Wang X, Chen H, Gasser RB, Li J. Predominance of Streptococcus suis ST1 and ST7 in human cases in China, and detection of a novel sequence type, ST658. Virulence. 2017; 8; 6: 1031-1035. 10.1080/21505594.2016.124319327689249 Athey TB, Auger JP, Teatero S, Dumesnil A, Takamatsu D, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, Gottschalk M, Fittipaldi N. Complex population structure and virulence differences among serotype 2 Streptococcus suis strains belonging to sequence type 28. PLoS One. 2015; 10; 9: e01377604574206. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137760 Tang JQ. Analyses reveal a novel avirulent Streptococcus suis serotype 2 strain that induces protective immunity against challenge with the highly virulent strains. Retrovirology. 2010; 7: 66. 10.1186/1742-4690-7-S1-P170 Athey TB, Vaillancourt K, Frenette M, Fittipaldi N, Gottschalk M, Grenier D. Distribution of Suicin gene clusters in Streptococcus suis serotype 2 belonging to sequence types 25 and 28. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 68158945203872. 10.1155/2016/6815894 Wang K, Chen J, Yao H, Lu C. Whole-Genome Sequence of Streptococcus suis Serotype 3 Strain YB51. Genome Announc. 2013;1(6):e00884-13. Wang K, Chen J, Yao H, Lu C. Whole-Genome Sequence of Streptococcus suis Serotype 4 Reference Strain 6407. Genome Announc. 2014;2(4):e00770-14. Yu WL, Li CL, Wang GP, Lu CP. Pathogenic characteristics of Streptococcus suis type 2 and type 9 isolated from Guangdong province. Vet Sci China. 2007; 37; 8: 650-654 Wang K, Yao H, Lu C, Chen J. Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus suis Serotype 16 Strain TL13. Genome Announc. 2013; 1; 3: e00394-e003133695429 Lai L, Dai J, Tang H, Zhang S, Wu C, Qiu W, Lu C, Yao H, Fan H, Wu Z. Streptococcus suis serotype 9 strain GZ0565 contains a type VII secretion system putative substrate EsxA that contributes to bacterial virulence and a vanZ-like gene that confers resistance to teicoplanin and dalbavancin in Streptococcus agalactiae. Vet Microbiol. 2017; 205: 26-33. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.03028622857 Jobin MC, Grenier D. Identification and characterization of four proteases produced by Streptococcus suis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003; 220; 1: 113-119. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00088-012644236 Zheng H, Du P, Qiu X, Kerdsin A, Roy D, Bai X, Xu J, Vela AI, Gottschalk M. Genomic comparisons of Streptococcus suis serotype 9 strains recovered from diseased pigs in Spain and Canada. Vet Res. 2018; 49; 1: 15759227. 10.1186/s13567-017-0498-2 Hu P, Yang M, Zhang A, Wu J, Chen B, Hua Y, Yu J, Chen H, Xiao J, Jin M. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus suis serotype 3 strain ST3. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193; 13: 3428-34293133292. 10.1128/JB.05018-11 Zhang Y, Lu P, Pan Z, Zhu Y, Ma J, Zhong X, Dong W, Lu C, Yao H. SssP1, a Streptococcus suis Fimbria-Like Protein Transported by the SecY2/A2 System, Contributes to Bacterial Virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(18):e01385-18. Pan Z, Ma Y, Ma J, Dong W, Yao H. Acute meningitis of piglets and mice caused by co-infected with Streptococcus suis and Aerococcus viridans. Microb Pathog. 2017; 106: 60-64. 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.10.02427816682 Wu Z, Wu C, Shao J, Zhu Z, Wang W, Zhang W, Tang M, Pei N, Fan H, Li J. The Streptococcus suis transcriptional landscape reveals adaptation mechanisms in pig blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Rna. 2014; 20; 6: 882-8984024642. 10.1261/rna.041822.113 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25; 4: 402-40811846609. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

By Jiale Ma; Jin Liu; Yue Zhang; Dan Wang; Runxia Liu; Guangjin Liu; Huochun Yao and Zihao Pan

Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author; Author

Titel:
Bacitracin resistance and enhanced virulence of Streptococcus suis via a novel efflux pump
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Ma, Jiale ; Liu, Jin ; Zhang, Yue ; Wang, Dan ; Liu, Runxia ; Liu, Guangjin ; Yao, Huochun ; Pan, Zihao
Link:
Zeitschrift: BMC Veterinary Research, Jg. 15 (2019), Heft 1, S. 1-11
Veröffentlichung: BMC, 2019
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 1746-6148 (print)
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2115-2
Schlagwort:
  • Bacitracin
  • Virulence
  • Serotype Chz
  • Streptococcus suis
  • SstFEG
  • Efflux pump
  • Veterinary medicine
  • SF600-1100
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sprachen: English
  • Collection: LCC:Veterinary medicine
  • Document Type: article
  • File Description: electronic resource
  • Language: English

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -