Value of different CTO scoring systems in predicting procedural success in coronary chronic total occlusion intervention in Egyptian patients

Abstract Background Chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions in coronary arteries pose a significant challenge for coronary interventionists, often leading to referrals for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTOs requires accurate assessment of procedural potential. This study, comprising 100 Egyptian patients aged 37–81, compares the predictive efficacy of various CTO scoring systems in PCI success determination. Patients with CTO in at least one coronary artery, planned for elective PCI based on objective evidence of ischemia, were included. Experienced operators performed PCI, recording procedural variables, and assessing complications. Logistic regression analysis revealed an inverse linear relationship between success rates and score values across all systems. Results Although, the predictive capacity of the scores was similar, with slight differences. The Euro CTO (CASTLE) score10 exhibited superior predictive efficacy, followed by the CL score9, while PROGRESS8 and J-CTO7 scores showed lower significance. ORA CTO11 score demonstrated intermediate predictive ability, and PROGRESS score8 had the least predictive value. Conclusion The CASTLE score10 proved most effective in predicting PCI success for CTO cases in Egyptian patients, with operators advised to choose scoring systems based on experience and case characteristics. Proper planning remains crucial for optimizing success rates in CTO PCI procedures, irrespective of the scoring system employed.