NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION BEST PETITIONERS' BRIEF
In: Media Law & Policy, Jg. 9 (2001-04-01), S. 44
Online
academicJournal
<_><_><_>_ A Note to the Reader The following brief was submitted by the New York Law School Moot Court Association and awarded Best Petitioners' Brief at the Third Annual National Entertainment Law Moot Court Competition hosted by Pepperdine Law School. New York Law School competed against teams from fifteen different schools around the country. A fact pattern is given to New York Law School one month prior to the competition where students research and write a brief to argue at the competition. The brief is printed in its entirety although minor formatting changes have been made for the purpose of publication. <_><_><_><_> Docket No. 00-0079 <_><_><_><_> In the Supreme Court of the United States SEPTEMBER TERM, 2000 <_><_><_><_> Layer Three Music Liberation Front, Inc., A California Corporation, and The University of Oz, and The University of Atlantis, Petitioners, -against- Douglas "Jammy D." Drizzi, an individual, and Blitzkrieg Music Partnership, a New York Partnership, Respondents. <_><_><_><_> ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. UNDER THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISION OF THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT, SECTION 1008 OF THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT OF 1992, AND SONY CORP. V. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), ARE MLF AND THE UNIVERSITIES PROTECTED FROM VICARIOUS AND CONTRIBUTORY LIABILITY, GIVEN THAT MLF IS A SERVICE PROVIDER, THAT THE USE OF LTL SOFTWARE IS NONCOMMERCIAL, AND THAT LTL SOFTWARE IS CAPABLE OF SUBSTANTIAL NON-INFRINGING USES. II. UNDER ...
Titel: |
NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION BEST PETITIONERS' BRIEF
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Feiner, Andra H. |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | Media Law & Policy, Jg. 9 (2001-04-01), S. 44 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2001 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|