CONSERVATORSHIP AND THE TAKINGS CLAUSE
In: NYU Journal of Law & Business, Jg. 10 (2014-04-01), S. 301
Online
academicJournal
Mr. Steven Menashi: Welcome to Panel 3 on "Conservatorship and the Takings Clause." We heard earlier that there are a series of lawsuits brought by the Fannie and Freddie shareholders against the conservatorship and the conduct of the FHFA as Conservator. The lawsuits allege that the FHFA not only exceeded its statutory authority and violated its fiduciary duties, but also effectively took property from the shareholders without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and the lawsuits challenge both the 2008 decision to go into conservatorship and the 2012 net income sweep. So to sort through the implications of the conservatorship, we have four distinguished panelists with us. I should say that Judge Gonzalez, who is teaching, is going to join us a little bit into the panel, so he is going to come and speak last, but I will follow the practice of the last panel, and introduce our speakers as they get up to talk. Our first speaker is Randall Guynn. He is a partner and head of the Financial Institutions Group at Davis Polk & Wardwell, where his practice focuses on providing strategic bank regulatory advice, and advising on M&A and capital markets transactions involving financial institutions. Among the institutions he had advised are the securities industry and Financial Markets Association, and all of the 6th largest American banks. He's a graduate of UVA law school, and served as a law clerk to Justice Rehnquist. So with that, Randy? Mr. Randall Guynn: ...
Titel: |
CONSERVATORSHIP AND THE TAKINGS CLAUSE
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Adler, Barry |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | NYU Journal of Law & Business, Jg. 10 (2014-04-01), S. 301 |
Veröffentlichung: | 2014 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|