Conformal blocks attached to twisted groups
The aim of this paper is to generalize the notion of conformal blocks to the situation in which the Lie algebra they are attached to is replaced with a sheaf of Lie algebras depending on covering data of curves. The result is a vector bundle of finite rank on the stack H ur ¯ (Γ , ξ) g , n parametrizing Γ -coverings of curves. Many features of the classical sheaves of conformal blocks are proved to hold in this more general setting, in particular the factorization rules, the propagation of vacua and the WZW connection.
Keywords: Sheaves of conformal blocks; Galois coverings of curves; Parahoric Bruhat–Tits groups; Affine Lie algebras; 14D20; 14H10; 17B67
Introduction
In conformal field theory [[25]] there is a way to associate to a natural number and to a simple and simply connected group G over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero, a vector bundle , called the sheaf of covacua, on , the stack parametrizing smooth curves of genus g. The goal of this paper is to generalize the construction and properties of these bundles to the case in which the group G they are attached to is replaces by a parahoric Bruhat–Tits group which depends on cyclic coverings of curves. For this reason, this new sheaf of covacua will not be defined on , but on the Hurwitz stack parametrizing coverings of curves.
One of the reasons that lead algebraic geometers to study the sheaves of covacua, and generalization thereof, is their relation to the stack parametrizing principal bundles on curves. In the classical setting, the fibres of the dual of over the curve X, called space of conformal blocks, have been identified as global sections of well determined line bundles on , obtaining insights on the geometry of this moduli space [[4], [12], [19], [24]]. The key point to prove this isomorphism is the uniformization theorem which describes as a quotient of the affine Grassmannian , whose Picard group and the space of global sections of line bundles have been described in terms of representations of by Kumar [[18]] and Mathieu [[21]]. The uniformization theorem, which was proved initially by Beauville and Laszlo in [[4]] for , has been shown to hold for any simple group G by Drinfeld and Simpson [[9]]. The identification between global sections of line bundles and conformal blocks was then extended to the case of parabolic bundles by Pauly in [[23]] and by Laszlo and Sorger in [[19]]. Finally Heinloth, answering questions posed by Pappas and Rapoport in [[22]], proved the uniformization theorem for , for connected parahoric Bruhat–Tits groups in [[14]], where he also gave a description of the Picard group of .
This motivates our interest in developing the theory of conformal blocks attached to twisted groups . Inspired by [[2]] we restrict ourselves to consider only those groups arising from cyclic Galois coverings, so that will be replaced by the Hurwitz stack .
As in the classical case, also in this new setting the sheaf of conformal blocks arises as dual of the sheaf of covacua. Classically, for every , given n dominant weights of level at most of , it is possible to construct vector bundles on , called sheaves of covacua [[25]]. Similarly, in Sect. 3 we show how to associate to admissible representations of fibres of outside the branch locus of the covering, a sheaf on which generalizes the definition and the properties of the classical covacua.
Besides the relation with , the classical sheaves of conformal blocks have been used to investigate the geometry of and provide examples of divisors satisfying interesting combinatorial relations. In particular, in the case , the sheaves of covacua are globally generated, hence their first Chern classes, called conformal blocks divisors, lie in the nef cone, where they generate a full dimensional sub-cone [[11]]. The combinatorial nature of these divisors, inherited from the structure of the sheaf of covacua, made possible to establish vanishing and non-vanishing criteria for conformal blocks divisors which gave insights in the geometry of [[5]]. In similar way, the twisted sheaves of covacua and conformal blocks provide vector bundles with a rich combinatorial structure on which can be used to study itself and, and forgetting about the covering data, the geometry of moduli of curves.
The main results of this paper (Theorem 3.21 and Corollary 4.23) can be resumed in the following statement.
Theorem
The sheaf is a vector bundle of finite rank on which admits a projectively flat connection on .
In Sect. 5 we describe the properties of these sheaves. In particular Proposition 5.1 generalizes the so called propagation of vacua, which essentially says that trivial representations do not modify the sheaf of conformal block. As a consequence we have the following result (Corollary 5.2).
Proposition
The bundle is independent of the choice of the marked points, hence it descends to a vector bundle on .
As in the classical case, in Proposition 5.6 we formulate factorization rules controlling the rank of the vector bundle under degeneration of the covering. This is the key input to use induction on the genus of the curves to achieve a formula computing the rank of the bundles.
Proposition
Let such that X is irreducible and has only one nodal point x. Let be its normalization so that is a -covering with three marked points. Then for any we have a canonical isomorphism
Graph
In the untwisted case this factorization property, shown in [[25]], allowed to reduce the computation of the rank of the sheaves of conformal blocks to the case of with three marked points and obtaining in this was the Verlinde formula to compute dimension of line bundles on [[12], [24]].
It is important to remark that after the first draft of this paper was completed, several authors worked towards a definition and properties of conformal blocks attached to twisted groups arising from coverings. In particular Zelaci in [[26]] constructs special cases of twisted conformal blocks and relates them to global sections of line bundles on appropriate . In the more recent pre-print [[15]], Hong and Kumar construct conformal blocks attached to groups arising from Galois coverings which are not necessarily cyclic, generalizing the factorization rules and projective connection, and establishing their relation to global sections of line bundles. It is worth to mention that their construction is compatible with the one presented in [[26]] and in this paper.
We now give an overview of how the twisted conformal blocks are defined, generalizing the methods used in [[16], [25]] and [[20]]. To start with, let us briefly explain how a Galois covering determines a twisted group. We fix the cyclic group of prime order p and a group homomorphism . To every -covering of curves, we associate the sheaf of groups defined as the group of -invariants of the Weil restriction of along q, i.e. . The Lie algebra of is denoted . The preliminaries on coverings, on the stack parametrizing them and on the construction of are collected in Sect. 2.
To construct the sheaf of covacua, we explain how to associate to each covering and representation of a finite dimensional vector space. We want to remark that in our construction, we assume the point marking X is disjoint from the branch locus of q: this implies that is isomorphic, although non canonically, to . It follows that once we choose such an isomorphism, we can use the classical construction [[16], Chapter 7] to associate to each representation the integrable highest weight representation of , a central extension of defined in terms of Killing form and residue pairing. The key point is to see that this construction is actually independent of the isomorphism chosen between and . Thanks to the residue theorem, the Lie algebra is a Lie subalgebra of and we set to be the quotient . The construction of the sheaf of covacua runs similarly for any family of coverings , being careful that isomorphisms between and exist only locally on S. The construction of the sheaf is the content of Sect. 3.
Although it is easy to show that is coherent (Proposition 3.22), it is not immediate from its construction that it is also locally free. Following the approach of Looijenga in [[20]], the first step to achieve this result is to generalize to this twisted setting the Wess–Zumino–Witten connection defined in terms of conformal field theory. After recalling how the connection arises using the Virasoro algebra of , in Sect. 4 we show:
Corollary
(Corollary 4.23) The sheaf on is equipped with a projectively flat connection with logarithmic singularities along the boundary .
This shows in particular that is a locally free module over . Combining this with a refined version of the factorization rules (Proposition 6.9), we are able to prove the local freeness of the sheaf on the whole stack . Also in this twisted setting then, the factorization rules play a double role in the theory of conformal blocks. On one side they contribute to show that is locally free on the whole , and on the other side they are a useful tool to reduce the computation to lower genera curves.
Setting and notation
Throughout the paper we fix the following objects.
- An algebraically closed field k of characteristic zero.
- A simple and simply connected algebraic group G over .
- A prime p and for simplicity of notation we denote the group by .
- A group homomorphism .
Preliminaries on groups arising from coverings and Hurwitz stacks
In this section we introduce the group schemes associated with coverings as indicated in the introduction. Since we need to work with these groups in families, we will formulate the definition for families of coverings of curves. We obtain in this way the family over the universal curve over the Hurwitz stack parametrizing coverings of curves.
Definition 2.1
Let be a possibly nodal curve over a k-scheme S. A Galois covering of X with group , called also -covering, is the data of
- a finite, faithfully flat and generically étale map between curves;
- an isomorphism ;
satisfying the following conditions:
- each fibre of is a generically étale -torsor over X;
- the singular locus of , i.e. the set of nodes of , is contained in the étale locus of q.
We want to attach to any -covering and to the group homomorphism a group scheme over X in the same fashion as in [[2], Section 4].
Remark 2.2
We remark that Balaji and Seshadri consider to map to the inner automorphisms of G only, i.e. arising from a morphism . Without imposing that restriction we allow also groups which are non-split over the generic point of X.
First of all we consider the scheme and let be its Weil restriction along q, i.e. for every T over X. It follows from [[8], Theorem 4 and Proposition 5, Section 7.6] that is representable by a smooth group scheme over X. The actions of on G and on induce the action of on given by
Graph
for all and .
We define to be the subgroup of -invariants of , i.e.
Graph
We denote by the sheaf of Lie algebras of . Since is smooth, as shown in [[10], Proposition 3.4], is a vector bundle on X which is moreover equipped with a structure of Lie algebra.
Example 2.3
Let be given by and a -covering of smooth curves. The group is the quasi split special unitary group associated to the extension . Observe that only in the case this action comes from inner automorphisms.
Remark 2.4
The action of on G via induces an action on . We equivalently could have defined as the Lie algebra of -invariants of .
Properties of Γ-coverings
In this section we recall the definitions and properties of coverings of curves. The main reference is [[7]], but we make the stronger assumption that all the points of which are fixed by a non trivial element of are smooth.
Ramification and branch divisors
Consider a -covering . We define the ramification divisor to be the effective Cartier divisor , where is the subscheme of fixed by . Equivalently, since does not have proper subgroups, is the complement of the étale locus of q, which is either empty or an effective Cartier divisor of . The reduced branch divisor is the effective divisor given by the image of in X. One can moreover observe that is isomorphic to .
Remark 2.5
If the map q is not étale both divisors and are finite and étale over S. This is proved in [[7], Proposition 3.1.1] for the smooth case only and in [[7], Proposition 4.1.8] for the general situation.
The ramification divisors are naturally related to tangent sheaves of X and . Let be the tangent sheaf of relative to S, so that its sections are -linear derivations of . Consider its pushforward to X along q and notice that the action of on induces an action on by sending a derivation D to . The following statement, which describes the -invariants of , follows from [[7], Proposition 4.1.11].
Proposition 2.6
The sheaf over X is isomorphic to .
Hurwitz data. The Hurwitz data provide a description of the action of at the ramification points. Before working with families we consider , a -covering of curves over k. Let be a ramification point and up to the choice of a local parameter t the formal disc around is isomorphic to . Since fixes , one of its generators acts on by sending t to for a primitive p-th root unity . It follows that the action of on is uniquely determined by non trivial characters . Let be the set of all non trivial characters of and set . The ramification data or Hurwitz data of a -covering is the element
Graph
The degree of is . Note that .
Definition 2.7
Let be a -covering with S connected. We say that it has Hurwitz data if is the Hurwitz data of one, hence all (see [[7], Lemme 3.1.3]), of its fibres.
We fix for the next two lemmas, a generator of and a primitive p-th root of 1. This identifies the set of characters of with .
Lemma 2.8
Denote by the -submodule of where acts by multiplication by . Then
Graph
Proof
The action of on provides the decomposition with . Observe furthermore that since is -invariant, each eigenspace is naturally an -module. Since the action of is compatible with the product in , the tensor product is a submodule of . Outside the branch divisor this is an isomorphism so we only need to check what is the image along . Let and call the point above x so that , with with . If follows that and , where denotes the product of i with the multiplicative inverse of n in . It follows that which is isomorphic to the completion of at the point x.
Lemma 2.9
Denote by the submodule of where acts by multiplication by . The sheaf decomposes as
Graph
Proof
As the action of on is diagonalizable with eigenvalues belonging to , we can decompose as . As is the Lie algebra of -invariants of , we can combine this with the description of provided by Lemma 2.8 to obtain the wanted decomposition of .
Remark 2.10
In view of the conclusions of Remark 3.1, the above lemmas, which we have proved in the case of coverings of curves over , hold for any family of coverings or curves over an arbitrary scheme S.
Example 2.11
The previous Lemma shows in particular that when the group acts trivially on G, then is isomorphic to . It follows that when we are in this situation we retrieve the classical construction of conformal blocks attached to simple Lie algebras.
Hurwitz stacks
We define in this section the stack parametrizing -coverings with fixed Hurwitz data . Let g be a non negative integer. Let be a -covering of curves and let be a section of with disjoint from the nodes of X and from the branch locus of q. We say that the covering is stably marked by if is a stable marked curve [[7], Définition 4.3.4. and Proposition 5.1.3]. This means that X is a family of curves with at most nodal singularities, the section is disjoint from the nodes and from the branch locus , and the automorphism group of each fibre of preserving the marked locus is finite.
Definition 2.12
We define the Hurwitz stack as
Graph
- the map is a -covering of curves with ramification data ;
-
is an n-marked curve of genus g such that each is disjoint from the nodal locus and from the branch divisor and such that the covering is stably marked by .
When we omit the subscript and use the notation . We denote by the open substack of parametrizing -coverings of smooth curves.
Remark 2.13
Although the notation might suggest that is a compactification of , the stack is not proper because the ramification points avoid both marked and singular points.
In the previous section we explained how to associate to each -covering , a group (resp. a sheaf of Lie algebras ) over X. This defines a group (resp. a sheaf of Lie algebras ) on , where we denote by the universal covering on . The same construction works on , defining then and on the universal curve of .
Remark 2.14
The complement is a normal crossing divisor. First of all observe that is a normal crossing divisor: in fact given a nodal curve with a reduced divisor D of degree d, there exists a versal deformation where the locus consisting of singular curves is a normal crossing divisor of S [[1]]. We now want to compare the deformation theory of a -covering to the one of . Following [[7], Théorème 5.1.5] we see that the natural map fails to be an isomorphism only when the intersection between and is not empty, but since by assumption we impose that , in our contest this map is always an isomorphism. This then allows to obtain, from the versal deformation of , the versal deformation of , and hence deduce from the theory of that is a normal crossing divisor.
The following statement, which is given by [[7], Proposition 2.3.9. and Théorème 6.3.1], describes the properties of the above stacks.
Proposition 2.15
The stacks and are connected smooth Deligne–Mumford stacks of finite type over .
Remark 2.16
We want to remark that the role of the ramification data is to guarantee the connectedness of and [[7], Proposition 2.3.9]. If the group were not cyclic, however, fixing the ramification data would in general not suffice to guarantee the connectedness of or .
Instead of marking the curve X, we can mark the curve , so that we define.
Definition 2.17
For each k-scheme S we set
Graph
- the map is a -covering of curves with ramification data ;
-
is an n-marked curve with pairwise disjoint, disjoint from for all j and such that the covering q is stably marked by .
It follows, from the fact that the image of lies in the étale locus of q, that the map
Graph
is an étale and surjective morphism of stacks. For any we also have the forgetful map
Graph
The advantage of marking the curve instead of X lies in the following proposition.
Proposition 2.18
Let and write . The section induces an isomorphism between and .
Proof
Construct the cartesian diagram
Graph
and since by assumption the image of lies in the étale locus of q the left vertical arrow is étale and it has a section given by . This implies that is isomorphic to . Observe that and that taking -invariants commutes with restriction along . It follows that
Graph
where acts on by sending to . It follows that the invariant elements are of the form for any and , so that the projection on any component of realizes an isomorphism between and . The map selects a preferred component, giving in this way a canonical isomorphism.
The sheaf of covacua and of conformal blocks
In this section we give the definition of the sheaves of covacua and of conformal blocks on . We begin by considering the case and explain how to construct the sheaf on attached to a representation of . The sheaf of conformal blocks will be realized as the dual of . In order to define this sheaf on , we will define it for any family over an affine and smooth base . We can assume moreover that is affine and we will see in Remark 5.4 how to drop this assumption.
For the classical definition of the sheaf of conformal blocks attached to a representation of one can refer to [[25]] or to [[20]]. We will use the latter as main reference, from which we borrow the notation.
Let and denote by the pushforward to S of , i.e.
Graph
where denotes the open immersion . Since the map restricted to is affine we have that and that where is the ideal defining .
We denote by the formal completion of along : by definition gives a short exact sequence
Graph
of -modules. We define
Graph
which is naturally a sheaf of -modules. We denote by the -module
Graph
which is equipped with a natural filtration for and for taking into account the order of the poles or zeros along .
Remark 3.1
Recall that when , the choice of a local parameter t, i.e. of a generator of , gives an isomorphism and hence and so . In the general case, since is locally principal, for every we can find an open covering U of X containing s and such that is principal. Let denote by the open of S given by and by the open . Then is principal and is isomorphic to , where t is a generator of . This moreover implies that the completion of at a point is isomorphic to , where denotes the completion of at s.
Denote by the restriction of to the open curve and by the "restriction of to the punctured formal neighbourhood around ", and consider both sheaves as -modules naturally equipped with a Lie bracket. In other words we set
Graph
The following observations follow from the definitions.
- The injective morphism induces the inclusion .
- The filtration on defines the filtration as
-
Graph
- for all and we denote by .
- We could have equivalently defined as the Lie subalgebra of -invariants of where denotes the open immersion . This follows from the equalities
-
Graph
- Similarly is the Lie subalgebra of -invariants of , where
-
Graph
Remark 3.2
Since has trivial intersection with , we can find an étale cover of S such that or in other terms such that the pull back of to the cover totally splits, i.e. . This implies that
Graph
which leads to where the action is given by
Graph
It follows that the invariant elements are combination of elements of the type for and . For every , the projection on the -th component
Graph
defines a non canonical isomorphism of sheaves of Lie algebras of with . The inverse of is the map that sends the element Xf of to the p-tuple .
The central extension of hL
Once we have defined and , in order to define , we need to extend centrally. Following [[16], Chapter 7], [[20]] and [[25]] we construct this central extension using a normalized Killing form and the residue pairing.
Normalized Killing form. We fix once and for all a maximal torus T of G and a Borel subgroup B of G containing T, or equivalently we fix the root system of G and a basis of positive simple roots, where . Given a root we denote by the associated coroot.
Denote by the unique multiple of the Killing form such that where is the highest root of . As is simple, this form gives an isomorphism between and . Pulling back this form to , then pushing it forward along q we obtain
Graph
where . Since the Killing form is invariant under automorphisms of , the bilinear form is -equivariant. Taking -invariants we obtain the pairing
Graph
which however is not perfect because of ramification. Combining this with the multiplication morphism and taking the limit on n and N we obtain the pairing which is perfect.
Residue pairing. We introduce the sheaf of continuous derivations of which are linear. Denote its -dual by : this is the sheaf of continuous differentials of relative to . Observe that when we have that is isomorphic to and to .
The residue map is computed locally as . Composing this with the canonical morphism we obtain the perfect pairing
Graph
The differential of a section. Let be the universal derivation, which induces the morphism by tensoring it with . Let be an open subscheme of X containing and which is smooth over S, and call . Once we restrict d to and we push it forward along q we obtain the map
Graph
by using the projection formula. Taking -invariants one obtains and since , this induces the map . We can furthermore compose this map with the morphism given by the normalized Killing form , obtaining
Graph
Remark 3.3
We could have equivalently defined by using the local isomorphism between and . Using this approach, we can describe as the map which associates to the element , the element belonging to .
Remark 3.4
Given , we simply write (dX|Y) for . Note that the following equality holds , where is the universal derivation.
The central extension of
. We have introduced all the ingredients we needed to be able to define the central extension of where c is a formal variable.
Definition 3.5
We define the sheaf of Lie algebras to be as -module, with being in the centre of and with Lie bracket defined as
Graph
for all .
The Lie algebra comes equipped with the filtration for all and for .
Remark 3.6
We can locally describe the Lie algebra as follows. Locally on S we know that we can lift to p distinct sections of f so that is isomorphic to . We can define the central extension of as the module with the following Lie bracket:
Graph
where computes the residue at the section . The induced action of , which acts trivially on , respects the Lie bracket, hence the -invariants define a central extension of which coincide with by setting .
As , one might wonder which is the Lie algebra structure induced on .
Proposition 3.7
The inclusion induces a natural inclusion of in .
Proof
The map is given by the inclusion of into as modules, so we are only left to prove that this is a Lie algebra morphism. This can be checked locally on S, so in view of the Remark 3.6 is given by the -invariants of . By definition is given by the -invariants of and thanks to [[20], Lemma 5.1] we know that is a Lie sub algebra of .
We can also prove the previous proposition as a consequence of the following two lemmas, which we present as they are going to be useful in Sect. 4. Let denote by the pushforward to S of , the relative dualizing sheaf of over S. This is a subsheaf of .
Lemma 3.8
The image of via is .
Proof
We can restrict to the case of family of smooth curves, as on the singular points the result follows from [[20], Lemma 5.1] by identifying with . Recall from Lemma 2.9 that , and note that the image of under d is for . To check this fact, it is enough to consider what happens locally at a point . As in the proof of Lemma 2.8, the completion of at x is isomorphic to , and the image of under d is and , we conclude that the image is a scalar multiple of , hence it belongs to the completion of at x. Observe furthermore that gives an isomorphism between and the dual of . Since for and it follows that if we have
Graph
and similarly which together yield .
Lemma 3.9
The annihilator of with respect to the pairing , denoted , is .
Proof
Before starting with the proof, we remark that this lemma holds if we replace with any vector bundle on X as it is essentially a consequence of Serre duality. We start by giving a description of the quotient , as the annihilator of will be the dual of that quotient with respect to the residue pairing. The double quotient computes . It follows that the projective limit equals which is . As the residue pairing gives rise to Serre duality, we know that is isomorphic to the dual of . It follows that
Graph
which equals .
Conformal blocks attached to integrable representations
We have all the ingredients to define the sheaf of conformal blocks. Let denote the universal enveloping algebra of and recall that , i.e. it's the subalgebra of which has no poles along . Observe that this implies that it is also a Lie sub algebra of .
Definition 3.10
For any we define the Verma module of level to be the left -module given by
Graph
For what follows we will need a generalization of this module attached to certain representations of .
Definition 3.11
An irreducible finite dimensional representation of is a locally free -module which is equipped with an action of which locally étale on S, and up to an isomorphism of with , is isomorphic to for an irreducible finite dimensional representation V of .
Let be an irreducible finite dimensional representation of the Lie algebra : we will see how this induces a representation of with the central element acting as multiplication by . As first step, note that the exact sequence
Graph
defining gives rise to the map of Lie algebras induced by the truncation map . The action of on is then extended to the action of by imposing, for every and for every , the relations
Graph
In view of this, once we fix we always view a representation of as a -module with the central part acting by multiplication by .
Definition 3.12
For every we define the Verma module of level attached to to be left -module of level attached to , meaning
Graph
where acts on by multiplication on the right and acts on by left multiplication.
Remark 3.13
Note that when is the trivial representation of , we obtain that coincides with given in Definition 3.10.
In the constant case , the properties of have been studied in [[16], Chapter 7] when and an irreducible representation of of level at most , where it is shown that it has a maximal irreducible quotient . From this, one generalizes the construction to families of curves, but still in the constant case , meaning working on . The new step is to descend from to .
We first of all recall the construction in the constant case in Sect. 3.2.1 and then show how it descends to in Sect. 3.2.2.
Integrable representations of level ℓ on Hur¯(Γ,ξ)g1
The morphism is a finite étale covering, so if we want to define a-module on , we could first define it on and later show that the construction is -equivariant, hence it descends to a module on . As already explained in Proposition 2.18, the advantage of working on , is the identification of with , which allows us to use representation theory of and of the affine Lie algebra [[16], Chapter 7].
We recall here some facts about representation theory of and . Let be the root system of with basis of positive roots . Denote by the set of dominant weights of and the highest coroot of . Then for every we set
Graph
In view of the correspondence between weights and irreducible representations of , the set represents the equivalence classes of representations of level at most , meaning those representations of where acts trivially on for every nilpotent element .
Remark 3.14
We note that the action of on induces an action of on in the following way. Let be a representation of , then we define the representation as for all and . If the representation , then also belongs to since sends nilpotent elements to nilpotent elements.
The properties of , for are well known and described for example in [[16], [25]] and in [[3]]. The main results are collected in the following proposition.
Proposition 3.15
For the following holds.
- The module contains a maximal proper submodule , so that it has a unique maximal irreducible quotient .
- The natural map sending v to identifies V with the submodule of annihilated by .
- The module is integrable, i.e. for any nilpotent element and every , the element Xf(t) acts locally nilpotently on .
It follows that to every and , we can associate the irreducible module realized as the maximal irreducible quotient of .
Let and call the composition . An isomorphism of with is fixed by , as well as an isomorphism of with . Denote by the extension of scalars of V from k to , so that is naturally a representation of . We show how to construct as quotient of .
Let us assume first that , which provides an isomorphism of modules. Observe that this isomorphism does not depend on the choice of the parameter t but only on the isomorphism .
It follows that has a unique maximal proper submodule , where is the maximal proper submodule of . We define as the quotient or equivalently as . This construction uses a choice of the isomorphism , but since and hence satisfy a maximality condition, they do not depend on the isomorphism , concluding that is the maximal irreducible quotient representation of attached to .
We now drop the assumption . Since is locally principal, we can find an open covering of X such that is principal. This implies that is isomorphic to where . Observe that this does not imply that , but only that . Consider then the sheaf of Lie algebras , and construct the -module as explained in the previous section.
Claim
The inclusion induces an isomorphism of -modules .
Proof
We need to prove that is surjective. We use induction on the length of the elements of , where the length of an element is the minimum n such that . Let with and , and take . The class of in is the same as the one of , where , which then belongs to . Let now be an element of , and note that in the element is equivalent to the class of where u has length lower than n. Using the induction hypothesis we conclude the proof.
We define the -module to be . This gives rise to the -module because on the intersection the modules and are isomorphic via the transition morphisms defining . Equivalently we could have defined to be the image of in and so would have been the quotient of by . The modules glue and give rise to a -module on S, so that is given by . This construction is invariant under the action of , hence it defines as a -module.
Integrable representations of level ℓ on Hur¯(Γ,ξ)g,1
We show here how to descend from to , so let consider . The first issue is that, unless we choose an isomorphism between and , we are not able to provide a representation of associated to a . In fact, one obstruction to this, as we noticed in Remark 3.14, is that does not in general act trivially on . Moreover, an isomorphism between and exists only étale locally on S, so we cannot expect to associate to an element a module on . The following set is what replaces .
Definition 3.16
A representation of is said to be of level at most if for every nilpotent element X of , then acts trivially on . Equivalently this means that locally étale we can identify with for a representation . Define or by abuse of notation only or to be the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible and finite dimensional representations of of level at most .
The main step towards the definition of the sheaf of conformal blocks attached to is the following result.
Proposition 3.17
Let . Then there exists a unique maximal proper submodule of .
Proof
We show that the maximal proper submodule of on descends along to the maximal proper submodule of on . Recall that since does not intersect the branch locus of q, we can find an étale covering such that the pullback of lies in the image of . This implies that to give is equivalent to give an irreducible and finite dimensional representation of and an isomorphism satisfying the cocycle conditions on , where is the projection on the i-th component.
This tells us moreover that is obtained by descending from to S. Observe that up to the choice of an isomorphism , the representation belongs to , hence and are well defined.
Since is a module on , we have a canonical isomorphism satisfying the cocycle conditions on . Recall moreover that is the maximal proper submodule of , which is then -invariant. This induces an isomorphism between and which satisfies the cocycle condition on and it is independent of the isomorphism . This implies that descends to a -module on S which is maximal by construction.
For every , the maximal irreducible quotient of by is denoted and, in view of Proposition 3.15, satisfies the following properties:
Corollary 3.18
- The natural map sending v to identifies with the submodule of annihilated by .
- The module is integrable.
Since is a Lie subalgebra of , it acts on by left multiplication.
Definition 3.19
The sheaf of covacua attached to is the sheaf of modules defined as
Graph
By abuse of notation we are going to denote this -module simply by . The sheaf of conformal blocks attached to is the dual of the sheaf of covacua.
When is the trivial representation of , we denote by and by .
Given compatible families defining an element of , the collection defines on which is called the universal sheaf of covacua. Its dual module is the universal sheaf of conformal blocks.
Conformal blocks on Hur¯(Γ,ξ)g,n
We extend the notion of covacua, and hence of conformal blocks, to the case in which more points of X, and by consequence more representations, are fixed. This will allow in a second time to express the factorization rules and, in view of the propagation of vacua, to drop the assumption that in the case we can only work with irreducible curves. This is explained in the classical contest in the last paragraphs of [[20], Section 3].
Let be an point of . For all we denote by the divisor of X defined by and by its ideal of definition. We denote by the open complement of in X and we denote by the pushforward to S of restricted to , in other words . As in the case , we assume that is affine.
In the same way as we defined in the case , we set now to be the formal completion of at , i.e. . We set and
Graph
for all . The direct sum is denoted by and .
We extend centrally in the same way as we did in the case obtaining with central element . We denote by the direct sum of modulo the relation that identifies all the central elements 's so that
Graph
is exact. The Lie algebra is still a sub Lie algebra of .
Let . We denote by the set of irreducible and finite dimensional representations of of level at most . As we have just done in Sect. 3.2.2 we attach to any the irreducible -module . Taking their tensor product we obtain
Graph
which then is a -module with central charge c acting by multiplication by . Since is a Lie subalgebra of , we can take the sheaf of coinvariants with respect to that action.
Definition 3.20
The sheaf of covacua attached to is the -module
Graph
The dual module is the sheaf of conformal blocks attached to .
For every , we consider as a representation of defined by a compatible family of representations of . The collection of defines the module on which we call the universal sheaf of covacua attached to . Its dual module is the universal sheaf of conformal blocks attached to
The main result of this paper is the following:
Theorem 3.21
The sheaf of covacua on is a vector bundle of finite rank.
As a first step in the direction of the proof, and inspired by [[24], Section 2.5] we prove the following statement.
Proposition 3.22
The sheaf is a coherent module on .
Proof
It is enough to show that the -module is coherent and we show it in the case . We furthermore observe that this is essentially a consequence of [[24], Lemma 2.5.2]. As this is a local statement, we can assume that and we can fix an isomorphism . Observe that the quotient is a finitely generated R-module as it computes and is locally free over X. This implies that is finitely generated too over R and so we can choose finitely many generators so that we can write
Graph
which in terms of enveloping algebras becomes
Graph
thing that can be proven using induction on the length of elements of .
We can furthermore assume that the elements acts locally nilpotently on , meaning that there exists such that acts trivially on . In fact we might use the isomorphism with and the Cartan decomposition of . The algebras 's are nilpotent and generate , so that is generated by . This means that also the elements are generated by elements of so that, up to replace with a choice of nilpotent generators, we can ensure that all the 's live in and so using Corollary 3.18 (2) the 's will act locally nilpotently on .
It follows that
Graph
and that
Graph
Using induction on n and the fact that the 's act locally nilpotently, we can conclude that the sum can be taken over finitely many , hence that the quotient is finitely generated.
The projective connection on sheaves of covacua
We want to prove that the sheaf of covacua is a vector bundle on the Hurwitz stack . This will in particular imply that also its dual is a vector bundle, and that its rank is constant on . Since we already know that is coherent, one method to exhibit local freeness is to provide a projectively flat connection on it. In this section we provide a projective action of on , showing its freeness when restricted to . We will explain in detail how to achieve this in the case , and postpone to the end of the section the situation with more marked points.
The tangent to Hur¯(Γ,ξ)g,1
Let and recall that in Remark 2.14 we saw that the tangent space of at is isomorphic to the tangent space of at . The latter, which is the space of infinitesimal deformations of , can be explicitly described as the space [[1], Chapter XI] which sits in the short exact sequence
Graph
where the last term is supported on the singular points of X.
We now use the assumption that is a stable marked curve to ensure that there exists a versal family with a reduced divisor deforming it and such that the subscheme of S whose fibres are singular is a normal crossing divisor . Call the point of S such that is X. The versality condition means that the Kodaira–Spencer map
Graph
is an isomorphism, so that we identify the tangent space of at with the tangent space of S at . The conclusion is that to provide a projective connection on is equivalent to provide a projective action of on for every versal family . As aforementioned, we will however not be able to provide a projective action of the whole , but only of the submodule , which via the Kodaira–Spencer map is identified with .
Tangent sheaves and the action of Γ
In view of the previous observations, we assume that is a versal family, so that the locus of points s of S such that the fibres (or equivalently ) are non smooth is a normal crossing divisor of S. We give in this section a description of and , by realizing it as a quotient of certain sheaves of derivations. We already introduced in Sect. 3.1 the -module of continuous -linear derivations of and we define now as the -module of continuous k-linear derivations of which restrict to derivations of . Observe that and depend only on the marked curve , so the following well known result belongs to the classical setting.
Proposition 4.1
The sequence of -modules
Graph
is exact.
In similar fashion we now describe the subsheaf as quotient of appropriate sheaves of derivations. Following the notation of [[20]], we denote by the sheaf of derivations and in view of Proposition 2.6, we write to denote . In a similar way we consider the action of on the pushforward to S of , the sheaf of k-linear derivations of which restrict to derivations of and we call the sub module of -invariants.
Remark 4.2
Recall that we defined as and define now
Graph
or equivalently is the -module of continuous derivations of which are -linear. Thanks to Proposition 2.6, the -submodule of -invariants of is identified with which equals as and are disjoint. The latter is the -module of continuous and -linear derivations of , which is .
The previous remark implies moreover that is a submodule of .
Remark 4.3
Observe that the action of (resp. of ) on by coefficientwise derivation is -equivariant. This implies that (resp. ) acts on and we will say that the action is by coefficientwise derivation. In particular (resp. ) acts on by coefficientwise derivation and the same holds for and acting on .
Proposition 4.4
The sequence
Graph
is exact.
Proof
As taking -invariants is an exact functor ( ) and acts trivially on , it suffices to prove that the sequence
Graph
is exact. This statement does not depend on the covering, and appears in [[20]] and [[24]].
The Virasoro algebra of L
Now that we can express as , we will define a projective action of on which factors through that quotient.
In order to achieve this result, we will follow the methods of [[20]] and define as first step the Virasoro algebra of as a central extension of . We report in this section the construction of as explained in [[20], Section 2], for which we will use the same notation. As mentioned before, the -module does not depend on the covering, and the same holds for its central extension . The reader who is already familiar with the construction, can therefore skip this section.
The Lie algebras
and its central extension
. We denote by the sheaf of abelian Lie algebras (over S) whose underlying module is . The filtration gives the filtration . Denote by the universal enveloping algebra, which is isomorphic to since is abelian. This algebra is not complete with respect to the filtration , so we complete it on the right obtaining
Graph
Remark 4.5
Note that in this case the completions on the right and on the left coincide because is abelian. The element belongs to , as well as for every . However is not an element of .
We extend centrally via the residue pairing, defining the Lie bracket on as
Graph
for every and . The filtration of extends to a filtration of by setting for and for . The universal enveloping algebra of is denoted by and denotes its completion on the right with respect to the filtration . Note that since is a central element, we have that is an algebra so that we will write instead of and similarly for every .
Remark 4.6
Since is no longer abelian, completion on the right and on the left differ. Take for example the element which belongs to . It does not belong to : an element on the completion on the right morally should have zeros of increasing order on the right side, but in this case, in order to "bring the element on the right side", we should use the equality infinitely many times, which is not allowed.
The Virasoro algebra of
. We want to use the residue morphism to view as an submodule of and induce from this a central extension. Let , and since and are dual we identify D with the map
Graph
Notice that since , we have that is an element of . Moreover, since the latter is canonically isomorphic to the closure of in , we will consider as an element of . We define by setting .
Remark 4.7
Assume for simplicity that and identify with . For every we set and so that and and are linearly independent generators of and . Then we can write explicitly
Graph
In general, let and be linearly independent generators of and with the property that . Then we can write
Graph
which is a well defined object of thanks to the previous remark.
As explained in [[20], Section 2], the central extension and the inclusion induce a central extension of . We recall here how this is achieved. Consider now , and call its image in . This means that modulo the relation . Denote by its closure in and observe the following diagram
Graph
where is the reduction modulo the central element so that the short sequence is exact.
Definition 4.8
We define to be the pullback of along . Equivalently its elements are pairs such that .
Denote by the injection and we write for the pullback of along C so that we have the commutative diagram with exact rows
Graph
Observe, for example using Remark 4.7, that the map C is not a Lie algebra morphism, and so does not arise naturally as a Lie algebra which centrally extends .
We however want to induce a Lie bracket on from the one of by conveniently modifying . To understand how to do this, local computations are carried out.
Definition 4.9
Choose a local parameter t so that locally . Define the normal ordering by setting
Graph
and extend it by linearity to every element of .
The map defines a section of , so that is a section of . Once we make the choice of a local parameter defining the ordering , we will denote by the element . Consider the following relations which hold in and which are proved in [[20], Lemma 2.1].
Lemma 4.10
Let and , Then we have
-
for every ;
-
.
This suggests to rescale the morphism and to define
Graph
which is injective and its image is a Lie subalgebra of the target. Denote by the element which is sent to 1 by T. By construction we obtain the following result.
Proposition 4.11
[[20], Corollary-Definition 2.2] The Lie algebra structure induced on by T is a central extension of the canonical Lie algebra structure on by . This is called the Virasoro algebra of .
Sugawara construction
In this section we generalize to our case, i.e. using in place of , the construction of
Graph
described by Looijenga in [[20], Corollary 3.2], which essentially represents the local picture of our situation. In the classical case the idea is to use the Casimir element of to induce, from , the map which, in turn, will give the map of Lie algebras . When in place of we have , we can run the same argument using the element Casimir of .
As in Sect. 3.1, we consider the normalized Killing form defined on . Recall that it provides an isomorphism between and , hence it gives an identification of with . Moreover, as is disjoint from the ramification locus, we also have that provides an isomorphism of with , giving in this way an identification of with . The Casimir element of with respect to the form is the element in corresponding to the identity via the identification provided by . We denote it by .
Remark 4.12
We could have defined the Casimir element of via the local isomorphism of with . Let be the Casimir element of , and observe that via the inclusion , we can see it as an element of . Since is invariant under automorphisms, it is invariant under , hence it gives an element which equals .
Since is a symmetric form, we have that also is a symmetric element of and moreover lies in the centre of . As is simple over , this implies that there exists such that for all , where denotes the adjoint representation of .
Remark 4.13
Locally, for every bases and of such that we have the explicit description of as . It follows that is given by the equality for every .
Let denote by the completion on the right of with respect to the filtration given by for . We now construct which composed with will give .
Let consider the map given by tensoring with . This map uniquely extends to a map of Lie algebras as follows. Using local bases as in Remark 4.13 and the symmetry of we deduce the following equality
Graph
and recalling that Remark 3.4 implies that , we conclude that
Graph
We then define by sending to and acting as on . Such a map can be extended to the closure of in once we extend the target to , obtaining . We define as the composition
Graph
As for , also in this case the morphism does not preserve the Lie bracket, and thanks to local computation we understand how to solve this issue. Following [[25]] we first of all extend the normal ordering defined in Definition 4.9 as follows.
Definition 4.14
Let fix an isomorphism between and for a local parameter . Let and be elements of . Then we set
Graph
This definition is -equivariant, hence defines a normal ordering on .
This defines a section from the image of to the image of which makes the diagram to commute:
Graph
For any , we write to denote the element .
Remark 4.15
As we have done in Remark 4.7 we can write locally the element in a more explicit way. Consider the morphism and, after tensoring it with , compose it with to obtain the pairing . Let and be orthonormal bases of and with respect to . Then for every we have
Graph
where we see D as a linear map , so that .
As in [[20], Lemma 3.1] we have the following result.
Lemma 4.16
The following equalities hold true in :
-
for all and ;
-
where .
As Lemma 4.10 also Lemma 4.16 suggests to rescale and consider instead the map
Graph
which is compatible with the Lie brackets of and , proving the following statement.
Proposition 4.17
The map is a homomorphism of Lie algebras which sends the central element to . We call the Sugawara representation of .
Fock representation
We induce the representation to the quotient of defined as
Graph
By abuse of notation call the composition of with the projection of to , so that is a representation of . We can depict the result as follows
Graph
where the first vertical arrow maps to and by abuse of notation we wrote instead of .
Remark 4.18
We give a local description of how the action looks like. Choose for this purpose a local parameter t of so that we can associate to the element . Let be representatives of an element of with . Then the action of is described as follows
Graph
where denotes the image of under coefficientwise derivation by D (Remark 4.3).
Projective representation of θL,S
We define in this section a map of Lie algebras which is induced by and which will lead, in a second time, to a projective connection on the sheaves of covacua. By duality, this will induce a projective connection on conformal blocks. The construction of in the classical case is the content of [[20], Corollary 3.3].
Let be the subsheaf of given by those derivations D such that , and similarly we set to be the subsheaf of whose elements D satisfy .
Remark 4.19
Assume that so that every element of is written as . The element acts on as the operator where is the Casimir element of , hence the action is by scalar multiplication. Combining this with Remark 4.18, we obtain that acts on by coefficientwise derivation up to scalars.
As in the classical case, also in our context this observation is the key input to define . In fact we let act on by coefficientwise derivation so that we obtain a map
Graph
which uniquely defines the Lie algebra homomorphism
Graph
and hence the central extension and the map .
Proof
We only have to prove that the Lie algebra generated by and is . This can be checked locally, where the choice of a local parameter t allows us to split the exact sequence
Graph
hence to write as . We can in fact decompose every element as which are uniquely determined by the conditions
Graph
This implies that , concluding the argument.
Remark 4.20
Assume that so that we can write every element as satisfying . Then Remark 4.18 tells us that the action of D on is given by componentwise derivation by D plus right multiplication by .
Remark 4.21
We want to remark that in the case in which is the trivial representation, then the central extension is isomorphic to , viewed as a Lie subalgebra of , where the action of is by coefficientwise derivation. In fact in the previous proof we saw that locally on S, and up to the choice of a local parameter this is the case. By looking at Remark 4.19 and the previous proof, we note that the obstruction to deduce this statement globally lies in the action of the Casimir element on . When is the trivial representation acts as multiplication by zero, hence there is no obstruction. In particular, the central charge acts by multiplication by .
The projective connection on Vℓ(V)
The aim of this section is to induce, from , the projectively flat connection . In Proposition 4.4 we realised as the quotient , so that the content of this section can be summarized in the following statement.
Lemma 4.22
The actions of and of on induce a projective action of on . In particular is locally free if restricted to .
As a consequence of it, we obtain that is locally free on . This is the first step to the proof of Theorem 3.21.
Corollary 4.23
The sheaf on is equipped with a projectively flat connection with logarithmic singularities along the boundary . In particular is locally free on .
Proof
As pointed out in Sect. 4.1 the tangent space of at a versal covering is identified via the Kodaira–Spencer map with the tangent bundle . The previous theorem gives the projective action of the latter on , concluding in this way the argument.
Proof of Lemma 4.22. We first of all prove that the action of on descends to .
Proposition 4.24
The projective action of on preserves the space , hence induces a projective action on .
Proof
By the local description of the action of explained in Remark 4.20, it suffices to show that the action of on by coefficientwise derivation is well defined. This follows from Remark 4.3.
We denote by the morphism induced by . To conclude the proof of Lemma 4.22 we are left to show the following proposition.
Proposition 4.25
The morphism factorizes through
Graph
Proof
We need to prove that acts on by scalar multiplication. As this can be checked locally, we can assume to have a local parameter, so that we can associate to the element . We need to prove that, up to scalars, lies in the closure of in .
For this purpose we use the description of provided in Remark 4.15. Let consider the orthonormal bases with respect to given by elements and of and and with . From Remark 4.15 we can write
Graph
Observe that up to an element in we have the equality , so that to conclude it is enough to show that . To do this, we first need to identify where 's live. Since the basis is -orthonormal we know from Lemma 3.9 that .
Recall that in Lemma 2.9, we decomposed as . Using this decomposition, and the fact that provides an isomorphism between and for , we deduce that
Graph
It follows that
Graph
and hence is contained in .
Projective connection on Vℓ(V1,⋯,Vn)
As we did in Sect. 3.2.3, whose notation we are going to use here, we extend also the projective connection to the case in which more points on X are fixed. Observe first of all that the identification of the tangent space of at a versal covering with still holds. Since Proposition 4.4 still holds, this implies that we are allowed to provide the projective connection on in terms of a projective action of on .
We denote by the direct sum of , and we obtain a central extension thereof as the quotient of the direct sum of which identifies with . The Sugawara representation is induced from the Sugawara representations of and gives the projective action of on .
Combining all these elements with the case we obtain the following generalization of Corollary 4.23.
Corollary 4.26
For every let . The coherent module is equipped with a projective action of . In particular it is locally free over .
Factorization rules and propagation of vacua
We show in this section that the sheaf descends to by means of the propagation of vacua, and we provide the factorization rules which compare the fibre of over a nodal curve X with the fibres of the sheaves on its normalization . We will proceed following the approach of [[20], Section 4].
Independence of number of sections
In this section we want to show that the sheaf actually descends to a vector bundle on as a consequence of Proposition 5.1. Following [[3], Proposition 2.3] we state and prove the aforementioned proposition, called also propagation of vacua, because it shows that we can modify the sheaf of covacua by adding as many sections as we want to which we attach the trivial representation to obtain a sheaf isomorphic to the one we started with.
Setting and notation
In this section we fix the following objects.
- Let be an element of .
- Denote by and by and set which is contained in .
- For every fix and for every we fix .
Under these conditions we notice that acts on each since maps naturally to and the latter acts on by definition.
Proposition 5.1
The inclusions induce an isomorphism
Graph
of -modules.
Proof
We sketch here the main ideas of the proof, using the same techniques used by Beauville in [[3], Proof of Proposition 2.3]. By induction it is enough to prove the assertion for , so that we need to prove that the inclusion induces an isomorphism
Graph
The morphism is well defined on the quotients as the inclusion of in factors through . Since the inclusion factors through , we prove the proposition in two steps.
Claim 1
The inclusion induces an isomorphism
Graph
Claim 2
The projection map
Graph
is an isomorphism.
We give the proof of Claim 1, as for Claim 2 one can refer to [[3], (3.4)]. We just remark that in the proof of Claim 2 it is used that the level of is bounded by and the local description of the maximal submodule of .
Since checking that is an isomorphism can be done locally on S, there is no loss in generality in assuming that the 's are principal so that and that there are isomorphisms . Observe that the exact sequence of R-modules
Graph
splits because the quotient is isomorphic to which can be identified with . Moreover we observe that since the residue pairing is trivial on , this is a Lie sub algebra of , hence we are left to prove that
Graph
is an isomorphism. Observe that this statement no longer depends on the covering , so once we choose isomorphisms , this follows from the classical case.
As previously announced, this proposition has important consequences.
Corollary 5.2
For all n and there is a natural isomorphism
Graph
of vector bundles on .
Which leads to the following result.
Corollary 5.3
The vector bundle defined on descends to a vector bundle on .
Proof
We can construct the sequence
Graph
where the horizontal morphisms, which are faithfully flat, are given by forgetting one of the sections. The vector bundle on then descends from to because Corollary 5.2 provides a canonical isomorphism between and . The compatibility of the isomorphisms on holds by construction.
Remark 5.4
When we defined on , we assumed that the complement of the section was affine. Corollary 5.2 allows us to remove this assumption: in fact if this is not the case, we can add finitely many sections to which we attach the trivial representation and set to be . The same holds for on .
Nodal degeneration and factorization rules
In this section we want to compare the sheaf of covacua attached to a covering of nodal curves , to the sheaves of the form , attached to the normalization of the covering we started with.
Setting and notation
We will consider the following objects.
- Let and assume that X has one double point .
- Let be the partial normalization of X separating the branches at and set . The points of mapping to are denoted and .
Remark 5.5
Observe that is a -covering with the action of induced by the one on , so that it is ramified only over . The Lie algebra is then isomorphic to the Lie algebra of -invariants of . Furthermore, the normalization provides an isomorphism between the k-Lie algebra and .
Let be the structural morphism and consider the Lie algebras
Graph
and
Graph
which are the analogues of and for the marked covering . Observe that since X and are isomorphic outside of , the Lie algebras and are isomorphic.
As observed in the previous remark, since and are isomorphic, every representation of , is also a representation of . Let denote by the dual of and view as a representation of , with acting on and on . This induces an action of on as
Graph
where denotes the reduction modulo the ideal defining . Let denote the trace morphism which is compatible with the action of . We can formulate the factorization rules controlling the nodal degeneration as follows.
Proposition 5.6
The morphisms induce an isomorphism
Graph
The proof of this result is a mild generalization of the proof of [[20], Proposition 6.1], which in turn is a consequence of Schur's Lemma. We give an overview of it.
Proof
Fix an isomorphism between and so that is identified with . Denote by and and let be the ideal defining , so that the normalization gives the diagram
Graph
whose rows are exact. As in the classical case, we consider a similar diagram of Lie algebras, which, in contrast to the classical case, is not obtained by tensoring by . Define as the tensor product , and observe that the quotient is , which is then isomorphic to . Repeating the construction on , we obtain the commutative diagram of Lie algebras
Graph
Consider the -module and observe that its quotient is a finite dimensional representation of , because the quotient is finite dimensional and the quotient is one dimensional. It is moreover a representation of of level less or equal to relative to each factors. Since acts trivially on , the maps induce the morphism
Graph
Observe, using the above diagram, that if we consider M as a -module via the diagonal action, and we denote this -representation by , then is exactly . After these considerations, the proof of the proposition boils down to showing that if M is a finite dimensional representation of of level at most , then the morphisms induce the isomorphism
Graph
Schur's Lemma ensures that the set of morphisms between irreducible Lie algebra representations is a skew field, and since without loss of generality we might assume M to be an irreducible representation of the form for , we conclude.
Denote by the Lie algebra . Then Proposition 5.1 allows us to rewrite the previous proposition as an isomorphism
Graph
and in particular implies the isomorphism
Graph
where we see naturally marked by and .
Remark 5.7
Observe that in the case in which is a non separating node, i.e. when has the same number of irreducible components of X, then the genus of is one less the genus of X. By repeatedly applying the factorization rules, it is possible then to reduce the computation of the rank of sheaves of covacua on to the case of covacua over .
Remark 5.8
Let and assume that it is possible to normalize the family (for example assuming that the nodes of X are given by a section ). Then Proposition 5.6 still holds by replacing the index set with .
Locally freeness of the sheaf of conformal blocks
In this section we show how to use a refined version of the factorization rules to prove that the sheaves of covacua , and hence the conformal blocks , are locally free also on the boundary of , concluding in this way the proof of Theorem 3.21. For simplicity only we will assume .
Canonical smoothing
As previously stated, we want to prove that is a locally free sheaf on . For this purpose we describe here a procedure to realise a covering of nodal curves as the special fibre of a family of coverings which is generically smooth. The idea is to induce a deformation of the covering from the canonical smoothing of the base curve X provided in [[20]]. As already noted in Remark 2.14, it is essential that the branch locus of the covering is contained in the smooth locus of X.
Let with the unique nodal point of X. The goal of this section is to construct a family belonging to which deforms and whose generic fibre is smooth, i.e. it lies in .
The intuitive idea
The idea which is explained in [[20]], is to find a deformation of X which replaces the formal neighbourhood of the nodal point with the -algebra . This can be achieved with the following geometric construction. We first normalize the curve X obtaining the curve with two points and above . We blow up the trivial deformation of at the points and and note that the formal coordinate rings at in the strict transform are of the form . We then obtain the neighbourhood by identifying with . The deformation of is induced from the one of X because the singular point does not lie in .
Construction of X~→X
We will realise the canonical smoothing of it by constructing compatible families
Graph
where for . As these are infinitesimal deformations, we only need to change the structure sheaf. As we have previously done, we normalize and X obtaining . We fix furthermore local coordinates and at the points and .
Let U be an open subset of X and . If U does not contain we set . Otherwise, if , we set
Graph
where
Graph
is the -linear morphism given by and , and
Graph
sends to where is the expansion of at the point using the identifications .
Remark 6.1
Observe that the completion of at the point is isomorphic to . In fact note that once we take the completion of at the point we obtain exactly , the map becoming the identity. The kernel of is then identified with as claimed.
Observe furthermore that once we take the limit for , then the formal neighbourhood of will be as asserted in Sect. 6.1.1. The map describes the process of glueing the formal charts around and .
Note moreover that for all there are natural maps induced by the identity on topological spaces and by the projection on the structure sheaves.
Lemma 6.2
For every the family is a curve over deforming X.
Proof
We need to prove that is flat and proper over . Once we show that the is of finite type, we can use the valuative criterion to deduce that is proper over . Observe that the kernel of the map is . Outside , as the deformation is trivial, this is true. On an open U containing , the snake lemma tells us that this is the kernel of
Graph
where and are the gluing functions defining . We can conclude that is of finite type by using induction on n and observing that . This moreover shows the flatness of the family.
This deformation of X induces a deformation of which, in rough terms, is obtained as the trivial deformation outside the points of lying above , and for every , the formal neighbourhood of around will be isomorphic to the formal neighbourhood of around .
To do this, let denote by and the two points of mapping to . We fix local coordinates at so that
Graph
and let consider U an open subset of . If U is disjoint from , we set . Let and if U contains but not for all we set
Graph
where the maps and are defined as in the case of .
Remark 6.3
As was shown for , also is a curve over deforming .
Let denote by the trivial deformation of the branch locus inside . The natural map which extends realizes as a -covering which is étale exactly outside since the map is étale on by construction. Furthermore, as is disjoint from the singular locus, it follows that for every we can set to be the trivial deformation of .
By taking the direct limit of this family of deformations we obtain the -covering of formal schemes over . To prove that is algebraizable, i.e. that is comes from an algebraic object , we can invoke Grothendieck's existence theorem [[13], Théorème 5.4.5] so that we are left to prove that the family is equipped with a compatible family of very ample line bundles. This is true because given a smooth point P of X which is not in and m sufficiently big, we know that is a very ample line bundle on X whose pullback to is also very ample. Since P lies in the smooth locus of X these line bundles extend naturally to very ample line bundles on and on , providing the wanted family of very ample line bundles.
We refer to the covering that we have just constructed as the canonical smoothing of . Observe that the generic fibre of is a covering of smooth curves over because, as one can deduce from Remark 6.1, the formal neighbourhood of is given by .
Local freeness
The aim of this section is to show that, in the setting of the previous section, is a locally free -module. We can depict the situation that we described in the previous section in the following diagram
Graph
where the covering is a -covering of smooth curves and we denote by the nodal point of X. Let so that is a -module. We use the subscript 0 to denote the pullback along 0, i.e. the restriction to the special fibre, so that denotes the induced representation of .
Remark 6.4
Observe that there is a canonical injection of -modules which is an isomorphism modulo for every . Moreover we have by construction that is isomorphic to and so is isomorphic to .
The main result is that is the trivial deformation of as stated in the following theorem.
Theorem 6.5
There is an isomorphism
Graph
of -modules. In particular is a free -module.
Proof of Theorem 6.5
Notation
In what follows we denote by the k-algebra which is the coordinate ring of the disjoint union of the formal neighbourhoods at the points in . Similarly represents the disjoint union of the punctured formal neighbourhoods at the points in . Moreover we will write in place of . Recall that this is the completion of at the point .
Lemma 6.6
The canonical smoothing identifies with the subalgebra of consisting of elements
Graph
via the map sending to and to .
Proof
Taking the limit of the definition of we identify the formal neighbourhood of at with
Graph
where and .
In view of Proposition 5.6 we identify with
Graph
or equivalently with
Graph
Recall that is a filtered Lie algebra, hence this induces a filtration on and by consequence on . Since for every the k-vector space is a quotient of , also the latter is equipped with a filtration inducing the associated decomposition where .
Remark 6.7
Once we choose local coordinates and an isomorphism between and we observe that the elements of are -linear combinations of elements with and , where stands for . We can explicitly write the graded pieces of as
Graph
so that it is not zero only for and in particular which shows that .
The key ingredient to provide a morphism between and lies in the construction of the element given by the following Proposition which we can see as a consequence of [[20], Lemma 6.5].
Proposition 6.8
Let and be the trace morphism. Then there exists an element
Graph
satisfying the following conditions:
- the constant term is the dual of and for every we have ;
-
is annihilated by the image of in .
Proof
We choose an isomorphism between and , as well as an isomorphism between and . The construction of essentially lies in showing that the pairing extends to a unique pairing
Graph
such that for all we have
6.1
Graph
for all and and that is identically zero when restricted to if . This is essentially [[25], Claim 1 of the proof of Proposition 6.2.1] to which we refer.
We saw how to attach to any representation W the element : we now use these elements to obtain the isomorphism map between and . The following statement, combined with Proposition 5.6 implies Theorem 6.5.
Proposition 6.9
The linear map
Graph
induces the isomorphism
Graph
of -modules.
Proof
In order to prove that is an isomorphism we first quotient out by and using the identifications observed in Remark 6.4 we get the map
Graph
which sends the class of u to . Property (a) of tells us that is, up to some invertible factors, the inverse of the morphism induced by the , which we showed to be an isomorphism in Proposition 5.6. Since is finitely generated, Nakayama's lemma and the fact that the right hand side is a free -module guarantee that is an isomorphism.
Remark 6.10
The argument we used run similarly if instead of starting with a covering of curves over , we had considered a family of coverings where the singular locus of X is given by one (or more) sections of and whose normalization is a covering of versal pointed smooth curves. Using these assumptions we are able to construct the canonical smoothing of over which is moreover a versal deformation of . Once we have this construction, the analogue of Theorem 6.5 follows.
We have now all the ingredients to prove Theorem 3.21 which, we recall, stated that is locally free on the whole .
Proof of Theorem 3.21
Let consider only the case . From Corollary 4.23 we already know that is locally free on , so we have to check that this property extends to the boundary. Let be a k-point of . As already mentioned we are left to show that is locally free on a neighbourhood of , i.e. that for one (hence any) versal deformation of , the -module is locally free. Assume, for simplicity only, that is the only nodal point of X. Consider the normalization of and denote by its universal deformation. Since we can see as a fibre of the covering obtained from by identifying and , the previous remark allows us to conclude.
Acknowledgements
The main results of this paper are part of my Ph.D. thesis, which was written in 2017 at the Universität Duisburg-Essen under the supervision of Jochen Heinloth. I am indebted to him for the constant support, for the useful discussions and comments on a preliminary version of this manuscript. Many thanks to Christian Pauly and Angela Gibney. I am grateful to the anonymous referee for their comments and suggestions.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
[
References
1
Arbarello, E, Cornalba, M, Griffiths, P.A: Geometry of Algebraic Curves, vol. II, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 268. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). With a contribution by Joseph Daniel Harris
2
Balaji V, Seshadri CS. Moduli of parahoric -torsors on a compact Riemann surface. J. Algebr. Geom. 2015; 24: 1-493275653. 10.1090/S1056-3911-2014-00626-3
3
Beauville, A: Conformal blocks, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula. In: Proceedings of the Hirzebruch 65 Conference on Algebraic Geometry (Ramat Gan, 1993), Israel Math. Conf. Proc, vol. 9, Bar-Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, pp. 75–96 (1996)
4
Beauville A, Laszlo Y. Conformal blocks and generalized theta functions. Commun. Math. Phys. 1994; 164: 385-4191289330. 10.1007/BF02101707
5
Belkale P, Gibney A, Mukhopadhyay S. Vanishing and identities of conformal blocks divisors. Algebr. Geom. 2015; 2: 62-903322198. 10.14231/AG-2015-004
6
Belkale P, Gibney A, Mukhopadhyay S. Nonvanishing of conformal blocks divisors on. Transform. Groups. 2016; 21: 329-3533492039. 10.1007/s00031-015-9357-2
7
Bertin, J, Romagny, M: Champs de Hurwitz, Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.), p. 219 (2011)
8
Bosch, S, Lütkebohmert, W, Raynaud, M: Néronmodels, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), vol. 21 [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer, Berlin (1990)
9
Drinfel'd VG, Simpson C. B-structures on -bundles and local triviality. Math. Res. Lett. 1995; 2: 823-8291362973. 10.4310/MRL.1995.v2.n6.a13
Edixhoven B. Néron models and tame ramification. Compos. Math. 1992; 81: 291-30611491710759.14033
Fakhruddin, N: Chern classes of conformal blocks. In: Compact Moduli Spaces and Vector Bundles, Contemp. Math, vol. 564. Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, pp. 145–176 (2012)
Faltings G. A proof for the Verlinde formula. J. Algebr. Geom. 1994; 3: 347-37412573260809.14009
Grothendieck, A: Éléments de géométrie algébrique. III. Étude cohomologique des faisceaux cohérents. II, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math, p. 91 (1963)
Heinloth J. Uniformization of -bundles. Math. Ann. 2010; 347: 499-5282640041. 10.1007/s00208-009-0443-4
Hong, J, Kumar, S: Conformal blocks for Galois covers of algebraic curves, arXiv preprint. arXiv:1807.00118 (2018)
Kac VG. Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras. 19903: Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
Kac, V.G, Raina, A.K: Bombay lectures on highest weight representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, vol. 2. World Scientific, Teaneck (1987)
Kumar S. Demazure character formula in arbitrary Kac–Moody setting. Invent. Math. 1987; 89: 395-423894387. 10.1007/BF01389086
Laszlo Y, Sorger C. The line bundles on the moduli of parabolic -bundles over curves and their sections. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4). 1997; 30: 499-5251456243. 10.1016/S0012-9593(97)89929-6
Looijenga, E: From WZW models to modular functors. In: Handbook of Moduli, vol. II, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 25. Int. Press, Somerville, pp. 427–466 (2013)
Mathieu, O: Formules de caractères pour les algèbres de Kac–Moody générales, Astérisque, p. 267 (1988)
Pappas, G, Rapoport, M: Some questions about-bundles on curves, in Algebraic and arithmetic structures of moduli spaces (Sapporo 2007), Adv. Stud. Pure Math, vol. 58. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, pp. 159–171 (2010)
Pauly C. Espaces de modules de fibrés paraboliques et blocs conformes. Duke Math. J. 1996; 84: 217-2351394754. 10.1215/S0012-7094-96-08408-2
Sorger, C: La formule de Verlinde, Astérisque, Exp. No. 794, 3, pp. 87–114. Séminaire Bourbaki, vol. 1994/95 (1996)
Tsuchiya, A, Ueno, K, Yamada, Y: Conformal field theory on universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries. In: Integrable Systems in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics, Adv. Stud. Pure Math, vol. 19. Academic Press, Boston, pp. 459–566 (1989)
Zelaci, H: Moduli spaces of anti-invariant vector bundles and twisted conformal blocks, arXiv preprint. arXiv:1711.08296 (2017)
]
By Chiara Damiolini
Reported by Author