Background: Approximately 21 900 women and 35 300 men developed lung cancer in Germany in 2018, and 16 514 women and 28 365 men died of it. The outcome mainly depends on the tumor stage. In early stages (stage I or II), treatment can be curative; unfortunately, because early-stage lung cancers are generally asymptomatic, 74% of women and 77% of men already have advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) at the time of diagnosis. Screening with low-dose computed tomography is an option enabling early diagnosis and curative treatment.
Methods: This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search of the literature on screening for lung cancer.
Results: In the studies of lung cancer screening that have been published to date, sensitivity ranged from 68.5% to 93.8%, and specificity from 73.4% to 99.2%. A meta-analysis by the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection revealed a 15% reduction in lung cancer mortality when low-dose computed tomography was used in persons who were judged to be at high risk for lung cancer (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [0.77; 0.95]). 1.9% of subjects died in the screening arm of the metaanalysis, and 2.2% in the control group. The observation periods ranged from 6.6 to 10 years; false-positive rates ranged from 84.9% to 96.4%. Malignant findings were confirmed in 45% to 70% of the biopsies or resective procedures that were performed.
Conclusion: Systematic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT lowers mortality from lung cancer in (current or former) heavy smokers. This benefit must be weighed against the high rate of false-positive findings and overdiagnoses.
Reck M, Dettmer S, Kauczor HU, Kaaks R, Reinmuth N, Vogel-Claussen J:
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: current status in Germany.
Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120: 387-92. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0099
In 2018, 21 930 women and 35 290 men developed lung cancer in Germany, and 16 514 women and 28 365 men died of it. Lung cancer is therefore the most common cancer-related cause of death in men and the second leading cause in women (
About 85% of all lung cancer incidences in Germany are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), while the remaining 15% are small-cell cancers (SCLC). The three main subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer are squamous cell carcinoma (about 30% of all lung cancer cases), adenocarcinoma (about 40%), and large-cell carcinoma (about 10 to 15% of all lung cancer cases). In Germany, the majority of lung cancer patients, i.e., 74% women and 77% of men, already have an advanced, prognostically unfavorable tumor stage at the time of diagnosis, with involvement of the mediastinal lymph nodes (stage 3) or metastatic spread to other organs (stage 4). By contrast, a diagnosis at an early tumor stage with the possibility of surgical resection and potential follow- up treatment has a much more favorable prognosis. This applies especially for NSCLC, with a 5-year survival rate of up to 80 to 93% for small, localized (stage 1A) tumors in comparison with a one-year survival rate of less than 20% in patients with advanced and metastatic (stage 4) cancer. However, only 17% of cancers in women and 15% of cancers in men are diagnosed at stage 1 (
Given the large prognostic, tumor stage-dependent differences and the often very late diagnosis, lung cancer is particularly suitable for a screening program with low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT).
The aim of this review article is to present the current status of CT screening with LD-CT and its implementation in Germany.
Because of the large cancer stage-related differences in survival time, effective early detection screening is the most efficient measure to significantly improve healing prospects and survival time. Both the Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in Health Care (IQWIG) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have now confirmed in two expert reports, based on a systematic evaluation of available evidence, a positive impact for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) (
The meta-analysis by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer mortality of 15% (risk ratio [RR] = 0.85; 95% confidence interval: [0.77; 0.95]) after screening with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk patients. Thus, 1.9 of participants died in the screening arm and 2.2% in the control group. The observation period was 6.6 to 10 years (
A meta-analysis by Hunger et al. concludes that LD-CT screening can reduce lung cancer mortality of (former) smokers provided the same stringent quality assurance and quality control measures are in place as in randomized controlled trials (RCT) (
So far, over 46 000 high-risk participants in ten RCTs have been screened with LD-CT and compared with control groups who were either examined only clinically (seven studies) or using standard chest radiographs (three studies). The number of examined participants in the individual studies varied widely between 53 452 (NLST) and 765 (DEPISCAN). Apart from total mortality, the primary endpoint was primarily lung cancer-specific mortality (
The majority of studies used age (between 50 and 60 years to 70 or 75 years) and smoking consumption
(20 to 30 pack-years) to define the risk cohort. This risk stratification certainly requires improvement and should be adapted to predict individual high-risk persons. This could improve both the efficiency and cost- effectiveness of screening (
With the exception of one study, subjects were screened multiple times, with between two and seven rounds of screening scheduled with an interval of usually one year, although this varied in some studies. So far, eight randomized studies (ITALUNG, LUSI, MILD, NELSON, NLST, DANTE, DLCST, LSS) (
Very heterogeneous sensitivities and specificities were observed in the individual studies, partly due to the different definitions of positive LD-CT results. Range of sensitivity varied between 68.5% in the MILD trial and 93.8 % (NLST) (
The proportion of positive LD-CT results requiring invasive clarification within the studies DANTE, ITALUNG, LSS, LUSI, MILD, NELSON, NLST, and
Number of participants Criterion Result Design Screening effect ■ Trial Randomized Screened Tobacco consumption Cessation of smoking Age (yrs) (median) Proportion of males Screening rounds Interval Lung cancer mortality DANTE (
HR, hazard ratio; yrs, years, CI, confidence interval; LLP, Liverpool Lung Project; py, pack years (average); RR, risk ratio; d, day; cigs, cigarettes
UKLS ranged from 5.1% in the ITALUNG trial to 19.4% in the NELSON trial, and the proportion of complications during invasive diagnostic clarification (at least one) was reported to range from 0.2% (LSS) to 1.7% (DANTE) (
The positive predictive value for positive screening results which were clarified by biopsy or surgical resection varied in the NLST, NELSON, and LUSI trials and in other large-scale screening studies between about 45 and 70%. That means that 45 to 70% of the biopsies or surgical procedures were performed for malignant results (
Given the short follow-up times, only few valid data are available at present on overdiagnosis of lung cancer after LD-CT screening. In a meta-analysis of five studies, (DLCST, ITALUNG, LUSI, MILD, NELSON), in which a risk calculation was performed, an average surplus of cancer diagnoses of 38% was identified in comparison with the total number of lung cancers detected by LD-CT. With a very long follow-up time after the end of screening, this excess bias can be interpreted as a measure of overdiagnosis (
Calculation of radiation cancer risk is performed using various risk models, and the Federal Office for Radiation Protection has chosen modified risk models based on the data of the American BEIR (Biological Effect of Ionizing Radiation) VII Committee (
Standardized requirements, based on the already analyzed RCTs, need to be created to ensure that the advantages of the screening examination outweigh radiation risks.
Participants must be given detailed information on the advantages of screening and its associated risks (
When the effects of LD-CT for Germany were extrapolated based on the NLST study (
In the USA, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends annual lung cancer screening with LD-CT for smokers aged 50 through 80 years who have at least a 20 pack-year smoking history (one pack-year is equal to smoking 20 cigarettes/one pack per day for one year) and those who have quit within the past 15 years (
In Europe, Poland, Croatia, and Italy are currently implementing national screening programs for high- risk individuals (
Despite the confirmed efficacy of lung cancer screening, only in two to eight percent of subjects included in the controlled studies analyzed by the BfS were diagnosed with lung cancer. Supplementary biomarker analyses, for example, using blood or respiratory air, could possibly increase the efficacy of radiological screening. This could reduce the number of false positive results and correct any false negatives. Tumor cells, proteins, auto-antibodies, nucleic acids, and other molecules are very promising in this respect. They can either be taken directly from the tumor or its surrounding tissue or obtained during liquid biopsy as circulating markers from blood, urine, or other bodily fluids. While the spectrum of potential biomarkers is developing very dynamically, the obligatory controlled validation in the form of defined clinical cohorts, especially the potential effect on sensitivity by a sequential approach, is a challenging and lengthy process (
No national screening program for lung cancer has so far been implemented in Germany. Based on the scientific evidence on the reduction of lung cancer mortality using LD-CT screening, the Federal Office for
Radiation Protection (BfS) and the Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) have published positive assessments (
Apart from a clear definition of the high-risk population, decisive points in its implementation will be the organization and content of patient information, integration of an offer for smoking cessation treatment, as well as the quality assurance of the screening and all subsequent diagnostic or therapeutic steps.
The professional societies involved are to be responsible for developing the specific recommendations for implementation. Of particular importance in this regard is the feasibility of adequate and widespread recruitment by pulmonologists and retention of the target population in a future national program with adequate infrastructure and budget to deal with the approximately six million people at risk (
Two studies are currently being conducted to gain new insights into the specific implementation and future development of screening for lung cancer. The holistic implementation of quality-assured lung cancer screening in conjunction with a better definition of the target population and other issues is currently being assessed in the multifocal, North German Hanse trial (Box). Initial results are expected by the end of 2023 (
Given the scientific evidence of the reduction of lung cancer mortality by LD-CT screening, it is to be expected that screening for lung cancer will also be introduced for the high-risk group in Germany.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Manuscript received on 15 March 2022, revised version accepted on 5 April 2023.
Translated from the original German by Dr Grahame Larkin MD.
- Holistic implementation of an interdisciplinary networked screening program involving three North German lung cancer centers
- Comparison of two definitions of risk populations (NELSON versus PLC0M2012)
- Measurement of the effectiveness and quality of the screening program
- Impact of reporting the result of cardiac calcium score screening, severe cardiac complication, and total mortality
- Impact on smoking habits of reporting the emphysema score result
- Meaningfulness of blood biomarkers
- 5000 high-risk and 7100 low risk- participants
- Hanover Medical School
- Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf
- University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lubeck Campus
- 13. Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V, et al.: Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev 2012; 21: 308-15.
- 14. Pastorino U, Silva M, Sestini S, et al.: Prolonged lung cancer screening reduced 10-year mortality in the MILD trial: new confirmation of lung cancer screening efficacy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 1162-9.
- 15. Saghir Z, Dirksen A, Ashraf H, et al.: CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax 2012; 67: 296-301.
- 16. Wille MM, Dirksen A, Ashraf H, et al.: Results of the randomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with focus on high-risk profiling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 542-51.
- 17. Blanchon T, Brechot JM, Grenier PA, et al.: Baseline results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR). Lung Cancer 2007; 58: 50-8.
- 18. Doroudi M, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM: Lung cancer mortality in the lung screening study feasibility trial. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2018; 2: pky042.
- 19. Field JK, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR, et al.: The UK lung cancer screening trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20: 1-146.
- 20. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS: The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer 2013; 119: 3976-83.
- 21. Team NLSTR: Lung cancer incidence and mortality with extended follow-up in the national lung screening trial. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14: 1732-42.
- 22. Toumazis I, Bastani M, Han SS, Plevritis SK: Risk-based lung cancer screening: a systematic review. Lung Cancer 2020; 147: 154-86.
- 23. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team: Lung cancer incidence and mortality with extended follow-up in the national lung screening trial. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14: 1732-42.
- 24. Hunger T, Wanka-Pail E, Brix G, Griebel J: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 1040.
- 25. Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, et al.: Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1980-91.
- 26. Sverzellati N, Silva M, Calareso G, et al.: Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: comparison of performance between annual and biennial screen. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3821-9.
- 27. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al.: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395-409.
- 28. Van't Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, De Leyn P, et al.: Complications following lung surgery in the Dutch-Belgian randomized lung cancer screening trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 420-9.
- 29. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al.: Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. Jama 2012; 307: 2418-29.
- 30. Brodersen J, Voss T, Martiny F, Siersma V, Barratt A, Heleno B: Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trials. Breathe (Sheff) 2020; 16: 200013.
- 31. Patz EF Jr., Pinsky P, Gatsonis C, et al.: Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 269-74.
- 32. Council NR: Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2: The National Academies Press; 2006. 1-406 p.
- 33. Ozasa K, Grant EJ, Kodama K: Japanese Legacy Cohorts: The life span study atomic bomb survivor cohort and survivors' offspring. J Epidemiol 2018; 28: 162-9.
- 34. Nekolla EA, Brix G, Griebel J: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: Radiation risk and benefit-risk assessment for different screening scenarios. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 364.
- 35. Stang A, Schuler M, Kowall B, Darwiche K, Kuhl H, Jockel KH: Lung cancer screening using low dose CT scanning in Germany -- extrapolation of results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 637-44.
- 36. Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, et al.: Screening for Lung Cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Jama 2021; 325: 962-70.
- 37. Meza R, Jeon J, Toumazis I, et al.: Evaluation of the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: modeling study for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 2021; 325: 988-97.
- 38. Wait S, Alvarez-Rosete A, Osama T, et al.: Implementing lung cancer screening in Europe: taking a systems approach. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3: 100329.
- 39. Seijo LM, Peled N, Ajona D, et al.: Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: achievements, promises, and challenges. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14: 343-57.
- 40. Field JK, Vulkan D, Davies MPA, et al.: Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and i nternational meta-analysis. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 10: 100179.
By Martin Reck, Lung Clinic Gross - hansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_. m.reck@lungenclinic.de; Sabine Dettmer, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hanover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hanover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_; Rudolf Kaaks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_; Niels Reinmuth, Department for Thoracic Oncology, Asklepios Specialist Clinics Munich-Gauting, German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_ and Jens Vogel-Claussen, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hanover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hanover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL)_